cover
Contact Name
April Gunawan Malau
Contact Email
p3mstip@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
fahrudinuin@gmail.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta utara,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Meteor STIP Marunda
ISSN : 19794746     EISSN : 26854775     DOI : -
Meteor STIP Marunda merupakan jurnal ilmiah nasional berkala sebagai media untuk mempublikasikan hasil penelitian bagi para akademisi, peneliti maupun praktisi di bidang pelayaran pada umumnya. Berdasarkan fokus dan ruang lingkup jurnal maka artikel yang dapat di muat dalam Jurnal ini meliputi 5 hal (termasuk bidang lain yang masih ada kaitannya dalam pelayaran) yaitu : 1) Nautika; 2) Permesinan Kapal; 3) Ketatalaksanaan dan Kepelabuhanan; 4) Pendidikan Kepelautan; 5) Diklat Kepelautan.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 278 Documents
Bridging Practice and Policy: A Meta-Synthesis of Nine Qualitative Studies on Indonesian Sea Transportation Management Iksan Saifudin; Jaya Alamsyah; Aliong Silalahi
Meteor STIP Marunda Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Vol 19 No 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Meteor STIP Marunda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesian sea transportation management research has grown rapidly, yet each study typically stands alone, leaving unclear whether recurring practical concerns — gaps between policy and practice, or between different professional ranks — reflect a genuine structural condition or a coincidence of overlapping topics. This study conducts a meta-synthesis of nine qualitative studies completed in 2026 under a single coordinated Indonesian maritime research programme, spanning seafarer route knowledge, domestic-international safety culture, sustainability competency, autonomous navigation governance, shipboard leadership, occupational conflict, service quality, blue economy awareness, and workforce social sustainability. Following a meta-ethnographic translation-and-synthesis procedure, reported themes from all nine studies were extracted, compared, and integrated into cross-cutting categories, cross-checked across three distinct methodological sub-designs represented in the corpus. Two robust cross-cutting themes emerged, each supported by five of the nine studies: a persistent divergence between formally documented management structures and lived operational practice, and a separate asymmetry in how different professional ranks and roles experience that practice. Two additional, more narrowly evidenced themes concern practitioner agency and an aspiration-implementation gap in sustainability commitments. The synthesis offers Indonesian maritime institutions a prioritised, corpus-triangulated evidence base for reform beyond what any single constituent study could provide.
Document Analysis of Tridarma Governance Practice at a Maritime Institution: A Replicable Case Study Muhammad Naim; Tazkiyah; Amalil Aziz; Teresa Sitompul
Meteor STIP Marunda Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Vol 19 No 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Meteor STIP Marunda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesian higher-education law obliges every institution to operationalise a national Tridarma mandate into concrete lecturer-level practice, yet institutions vary considerably in how comprehensively they translate that legal obligation into actionable internal guidance, and this variation is rarely documented through direct analysis of the guidance documents institutions actually produce. This study conducts a qualitative document analysis of one Indonesian maritime higher-education institution's internal Tridarma guidance presentation, coding its fifteen slides against a four-criterion policy-document evaluation framework — completeness, clarity, actionability, and alignment with national legal and regulatory standards — and comparing the resulting profile against general Indonesian commentary on Tridarma implementation. The analysis finds the guidance document unusually comprehensive in translating the three Tridarma domains into concrete per-semester lecturer actions, with a particularly detailed seven-part research and publication roadmap, but identifies specific gaps in explicit integrity/compliance safeguards and in formalising its own roadmap into a standing, versioned institutional policy document rather than a single internal presentation. The study offers a transferable, replicable evaluation template that other institutions can apply to their own internal Tridarma guidance materials at negligible cost.
Ten Years of Tol Laut: A Policy Evaluation of Indonesia's Subsidized Inter-Island Shipping Program Agung Kwartama
Meteor STIP Marunda Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Vol 19 No 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Meteor STIP Marunda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia's Tol Laut (Sea Toll) program has subsidised regular container shipping to remote and underserved ports for a decade, yet no published evaluation has assembled the scattered evidence on its performance into a single structured account using a recognised evaluation framework. This study conducts a desk-based policy evaluation of Tol Laut using the OECD Development Assistance Committee's five evaluation criteria — relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability — applied to government route-performance reporting and the published academic literature on the program and comparable archipelagic connectivity schemes. Document analysis of eleven substantive sources indicates strong evidence for the program's relevance and measurable effectiveness in improving scheduled connectivity to Indonesia's outermost regions, but persistent efficiency limitations centred on chronic return-cargo underutilisation, and impact and sustainability evidence that is positive in aggregate but obscured by locally variable conditions that route-level statistics do not capture. The evaluation concludes that Tol Laut's central unresolved weakness is not connectivity provision but the empty-backhaul problem, and that closing this gap requires demand-side, community-integrated interventions rather than further route or subsidy expansion alone.
Behind the Numbers: A Trend Synthesis of Publicly Reported Indonesian Marine Casualty Investigation Data Achmad Ali Mashartanto; Muhammad Fachruddin Raihan; Rizal Rochmansyah
Meteor STIP Marunda Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Vol 19 No 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Meteor STIP Marunda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia's National Transportation Safety Committee (KNKT) has investigated marine casualties for nearly two decades, yet the statistics its reports and secondary analyses have produced remain scattered across studies with different time windows and units of analysis, preventing a coherent view of what has actually changed. This study synthesises publicly reported KNKT-derived marine casualty statistics spanning 2007 to 2025 from four independent sources, coding each for time period, accident category, and contributing factor to construct a trend account without requiring new access to raw KNKT case files. The synthesis indicates a declining investigation caseload from 2019 to 2023 followed by a sharp resurgence in 2024, a persistent and disproportionate concentration of fatalities in small fishing vessels that fall partly outside KNKT's formal investigation threshold, and a consistent, multi-decade dominance of human error as the leading contributing factor across every reporting period examined. The study's principal contribution is identifying a structural data-visibility gap — Indonesia's marine casualty statistics substantially undercount vessels below the 100-gross-tonnage investigation threshold — as a more consequential limitation than any single year-on-year fluctuation in the reported trend.
One Region, Different Speeds: A Comparative Policy Review of Blue Economy Frameworks in Indonesia, the Philippines, and ASEAN Ahmad Wahid; Amrin
Meteor STIP Marunda Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Vol 19 No 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Meteor STIP Marunda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The blue economy has become the dominant regional framing for reconciling ocean-based economic growth with marine sustainability across Southeast Asia, yet ASEAN member states have adopted this framing at markedly different institutional speeds, and no comparative account has yet examined what these differences mean for how individual maritime higher-education institutions should translate blue economy policy into curriculum and community engagement. This study conducts a comparative desk-based policy review of blue economy frameworks at the regional (ASEAN), and two national (Indonesia, Philippines) levels, applying a four-dimension comparative matrix covering governance structure, legal-institutional formalisation, education-policy linkage, and community-empowerment provision. Document analysis of the ASEAN Blue Economy Framework, its associated 2026–2030 Implementation Plan, Indonesia's blue economy policy landscape, and the Philippines' 2024 Blue Economy Act indicates that the Philippines has achieved the region's most advanced legal-institutional formalisation through statute and a dedicated coordinating council, while Indonesia possesses the region's largest blue economy value base but a comparatively less formalised national legal instrument, and ASEAN's own regional framework functions as a coordinating rather than binding mechanism across both. All three levels share a common and largely unaddressed weakness: none specifies a direct, operational linkage between blue economy policy and maritime higher-education curriculum design. The review offers Indonesian maritime institutions a specific, comparatively informed basis for advocating clearer national education-policy linkage mechanisms.
Formal Compliance and Enacted Practice: A Systematic Review of Domestic-International Safety Culture Asymmetry in Shipping Damoyanto Purba; Renta Novaliana Siahaan
Meteor STIP Marunda Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Vol 19 No 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Meteor STIP Marunda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

International maritime safety regulation applies formally uniform standards to vessels regardless of trade, yet safety outcomes diverge sharply between internationally certified and domestically operated vessels within the same national fleet, a pattern documented but not yet systematically synthesised. This review assembles theoretical, legal-governance, and empirical literature addressing safety culture and safety climate divergence in shipping, following a PRISMA-informed two-pass screening and extraction protocol applied to thirteen substantive sources spanning global regulatory analysis and Indonesia-specific empirical research. Thematic and cross-group synthesis indicates that safety climate theory and STCW/ISM governance architecture jointly explain why such divergence is structurally expected, that documentation-focused mechanisms such as the ISM Code have limited independent power to resolve it, and that Indonesia-specific evidence consistently, though indirectly, confirms the divergence empirically. The review identifies professional socialisation as the most theoretically implicated yet empirically uninvestigated mechanism sustaining this divergence, since no existing source directly examines how practitioners' understanding of acceptable safety practice differs across operating contexts within their own careers. The review offers regulators and training institutions an evidence base favouring socialisation-aware interventions over documentation-focused remedies alone, and specifies the comparative qualitative study needed to close the field's most consequential remaining gap.
A Curriculum Content Analysis of a Maritime Management Program Against IMO/STCW Standards Tazkiyah; Yogaswara Dwi Rachmat; Dewi Indah Pertiwi
Meteor STIP Marunda Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Vol 19 No 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Meteor STIP Marunda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Maritime vocational and higher-education institutions routinely advertise graduate career pathways into regulated maritime and logistics roles, yet whether their published curricula explicitly cultivate the regulatory, communication, and safety competencies those roles presuppose is rarely verified through direct document analysis rather than assumed from accreditation status alone. This study conducts a qualitative curriculum content analysis of a Bachelor's-level Maritime Transportation Management program's seven core courses and practicum structure, coding each against competency domains derived from the IMO STCW Convention and associated Model Course specifications, using a constructive-alignment curriculum-mapping approach applicable to any comparable maritime management program. The analysis finds strong alignment on regulatory and operational management competencies, direct alignment between the program's mandatory practicum and STCW's practical-training philosophy, but no dedicated course addressing Maritime English/communication competency or basic safety training, despite both appearing as explicit STCW-associated expectations for maritime-sector graduates generally. These gaps are consistent with, and offer a curriculum-level explanation for, independently reported cross-major curriculum-practice misalignment findings from the same institutional context. The study offers a replicable, low-cost curriculum audit method and a specific, actionable basis for curriculum revision ahead of upcoming accreditation review.
Toward a Unified Maritime Human Resource Management Model: Synthesizing Published Framework Proposals Jaya Alamsyah; Iksan Saifudin
Meteor STIP Marunda Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Vol 19 No 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Meteor STIP Marunda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Maritime human resource research increasingly concludes each individual empirical study by proposing a bespoke management framework addressing that study's specific problem, yet these frameworks are rarely read against one another, leaving practitioners with a growing collection of overlapping, uncoordinated models rather than one coherent human-resource strategy. This study conducts a conceptual synthesis of six published framework proposals emerging from a single 2026 Indonesian maritime research programme — covering autonomous navigation technology governance, shipboard leadership, crew well-being and conflict management, service quality, blue economy literacy, and social sustainability reform — comparing each framework's target level, core mechanism, theoretical anchor, and primary outcome domain. The synthesis finds that the six frameworks, despite addressing ostensibly distinct problems, converge on three shared pillars: competency development, leadership and accountability, and workforce well-being, with leadership and accountability appearing as a structural component in five of the six frameworks examined. The study proposes an integrated three-pillar model consolidating the six frameworks' shared structure, offering shipping companies and maritime training institutions a single, coordinated point of reference in place of six independently developed and potentially competing models.