cover
Contact Name
Dr. Muslim Lobubun, S.H., M.H.
Contact Email
azizfahruddin@gmail.com
Phone
+6298127270
Journal Mail Official
azizfahruddin@gmail.com
Editorial Address
https://journal.stihbiak.ac.id/index.php/kyadiren/about/editorialTeam
Location
Kab. biak numfor,
P a p u a
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN
ISSN : 25025058     EISSN : 2715503X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal Hukum Kyadiren menerima manuskrip dengan topik-topik terkait masalah hukum di indonesia dan mancanegara secara umum. Artikel-artikel yang dikirim mencakup permasalahan seputar hukum perdata (Civil Law), hukum pidana(Criminal Law), hukum acara perdata (Civil Procedural Law), Hukum acara pidana (Criminal Procedure Law), hukum dagang (Commercial Law), hukum konstitusi (Constitutional Law), hukum internasional (International Law), hukum administrasi negara (State Administrative Law), hukum adat (Adat Law), hukum agama (Islamic Law), hukum agraria (Agrarian Law), hukum lingkungan (Environmental Law), Hukum Pendidikan (Educational Law), Bahasa Hukum (Legal Linguistics) dan sebagainya.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 297 Documents
Risk and Legal Consequences of Beauslim Slimming Products Sandjaya, Edithya Widy; Kurnia, Ida
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.364

Abstract

The background of this study is the widespread use of slimming products in Indonesia and reports of health risks from hazardous ingredients, highlighting gaps between legal norms and practical enforcement. The research problem focuses on business liability and the legal consequences of distributing Beauslim slimming products. This study employs normative juridical research with statute, case, and analytical approaches. Secondary data include primary legal materials such as Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, Law No. 36 of 2009 on Health, the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), and BPOM regulations, as well as secondary literature and media reports. Data were analyzed qualitatively to examine the alignment and gaps between normative obligations and business practices. The results indicate that while laws mandate accountability, transparency, and accurate labeling, enforcement remains weak. Many hazardous products continue circulating, showing a gap between law and practice. Stronger regulation, corporate compliance, and consumer awareness are essential to minimize risks and ensure accountability.
The Effectiveness of Administrative Sanctions as an Alternative to Criminal Law Enforcement in the Environmental Sector Kurdi, Kurdi; Armansyah, Armansyah; Teuku Ahmad Dadek
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.365

Abstract

The escalating intensity of environmental violations in Indonesia necessitates the strengthening of effective law enforcement mechanisms, particularly following the enactment of the Job Creation Law and Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021, which redefined administrative sanctions as the primum remedium. This study examines the evolution of administrative legal instruments within the environmental law enforcement system and assesses the effectiveness of administrative sanctions—including government coercion and administrative fines—in preventing and addressing environmental violations. The research employs a normative–empirical juridical approach through regulatory analysis, case studies, and interviews with regional environmental inspectors. The findings reveal that administrative sanctions are implemented more swiftly, align more closely with the principles of ecological restoration, and exert a stronger influence on the economic motivations of violators compared to criminal sanctions. Nevertheless, their effectiveness remains constrained by limited human resources, inadequate supervisory budgets, and weak regional political commitment. The study concludes that administrative instruments hold a strategic role as the primary mechanism for environmental law enforcement, yet require institutional strengthening and integrated policy support to operate optimally.
Judicial Overreach in Constitutional Court Decisions: Navigating the Boundary Between Constitutional Interpretation and Judicially Created Legislation Kurdi, Kurdi; Joko Cahyono; Teuku Ahmad Dadek
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.366

Abstract

The imbalance between the Constitutional Court’s prescribed authority and its growing tendency to expand its judicial function has raised significant concerns regarding judicial overreach in Indonesia’s constitutional system. This study seeks to identify the defining characteristics of judicial overreach and to delineate the boundaries between legitimate constitutional interpretation and covert judicial lawmaking. It further evaluates the implications of this phenomenon for democratic legitimacy, public trust, and adherence to the separation-of-powers principle. Employing normative legal research methods, this study utilizes statutory, conceptual, and case-law analyses with a particular focus on Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023. The findings reveal a shift in the Constitutional Court’s role from a negative legislator to a positive legislator, evidenced by expanded interpretations unsupported by constitutional text and inconsistencies with established precedents. These developments have undermined public confidence and contributed to increasing constitutional uncertainty. The study concludes that stricter limitations on the Court’s interpretive discretion and enhanced judicial accountability are essential to preserving the integrity of constitutional review within Indonesia’s democratic framework.
Inconsistency in the Implementation of Corruption Criminalization Guidelines Based on PERMA No. 1 of 2020 in the Harvey Moeis Case Decision Cristofel, Moses; Prasetyo, Boedi
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.367

Abstract

This study analyzes the inconsistency in applying Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 of 2020 on Sentencing Guidelines for Corruption Cases in the Central Jakarta District Court Decision No. 70/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN.Jkt.Pst concerning Harvey Moeis. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, using library research on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials analyzed through a descriptive qualitative framework. The findings reveal that the sentencing failed to align with the principles of proportionality and justice mandated by PERMA No. 1 of 2020. Weak judicial oversight, subjective interpretation by judges, and declining professional ethics have led to sentencing disparities that erode public trust in judicial integrity. Systemic reconstruction is therefore required through stronger compliance mechanisms, an enhanced role of the Judicial Commission, and moral-based judicial training to ensure the consistent realization of substantive justice.
A Critical Examination of the Absence of Intent in Establishing Criminal Liability in the Central Jakarta District Court Decision No. 12/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN.Jkt.Pst Darmawan, Benedictus Ardy
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.368

Abstract

This study conducts a critical analysis of Court Decision No. 12/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN.Jkt.Pst, which is deemed to create confusion regarding the role of mens rea (malicious intent) in criminal liability for corruption. Using a normative juridical method and a case study approach, this research examines the case of Karen Agustiawan, the former CEO of Pertamina, who was convicted in an LNG procurement case. The main findings indicate that the Defendant was proven to have no malicious intent to cause state financial loss and did not gain personal profit. Furthermore, the state losses that occurred were attributed more to external factors, such as force majeure and global market changes. The verdict is criticized for disregarding fundamental principles of criminal law, namely actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea (an act does not make one guilty unless the intent is guilty) and geen straf zonder schuld (no punishment without fault). In conclusion, this research emphasizes that mens rea is a fundamental requirement, and therefore, the absence of malicious intent on the Defendant’s part should have been a central consideration in the judgment.
Judicial Inconsistency and Its Implications for Trademark Protection in Indonesia Purba, Jeremy Exaudi; Silalahi, Wilma
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.369

Abstract

The issue of legal certainty and trademark protection for relevant parties arises from the inconsistency between the decisions of the Judex Facti and Judex Juris in trademark cancellation cases. This study aims to identify the nature of this inconsistency and its implications for trademark legal protection in Indonesia. Drawing on statutory regulations, Medan Commercial Court Decision No. 6/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2022, and Supreme Court Decision No. 989 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2024, this normative legal research employs both case-based and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the Commercial Court adopts a narrow interpretation of “interested parties” and does not recognize first use as a legal basis, resulting in the dismissal of the trademark cancellation claim. In contrast, the Supreme Court applies a broader and more progressive interpretation by acknowledging historical use and identifying indications of bad faith in the trademark registration process. These divergent interpretations generate legal uncertainty, underscoring the need for harmonization between courts to ensure equitable trademark protection.
Validity of Account-Blocking Clauses in Standard Agreements Between Crypto-Asset Platforms and Consumers in Indonesia Winata, Christopher Andrew; Kurnia, Ida
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.370

Abstract

The rapid growth of crypto-asset transactions in Indonesia has led to an increased reliance on electronic agreements containing standard clauses unilaterally drafted by digital platforms. However, the unilateral authority to block user accounts raises concerns regarding legal validity and potential violations of consumer rights. This study examines the legal framework governing standard clauses in electronic agreements on crypto-asset platforms and assesses the validity of account-blocking clauses under the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK) and the Indonesian Civil Code (KUH Perdata). Using a normative juridical method, the research analyzes statutory regulations, court decisions, and relevant literature. The findings indicate that although the standard clause satisfies the elements of a valid agreement under Article 1320 of the Civil Code, a unilateral account-blocking clause violates Article 18 of the UUPK because it grants disproportionate authority to business actors and may undermine consumer rights without a legitimate legal basis. The study concludes that account blocking is legally valid only when conducted pursuant to an order issued by a competent authority and in accordance with consumer protection principles.
The Urgency of Applying the Principles of Accuracy and Public Interest in the Evaluation Process and the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions on Mining Business Permits Natasha, Evelyn; Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.372

Abstract

This article analyzes the urgency of applying the principles of due diligence and public interest in evaluating and imposing administrative sanctions on Mining Business Permits (IUP) in Indonesia. Using normative legal research methods, the study examines statutory regulations, principles of administrative law, and decisions of the Administrative Court (PTUN) to assess the consistency of government actions in mining oversight. The findings indicate that many IUP revocation decisions are overturned because of insufficient data verification, the absence of on-site inspections, and the failure to consider community and environmental impacts. This demonstrates that these two principles are essential prerequisites for ensuring the legality, accountability, and social legitimacy of administrative decision-making. The article recommends strengthening coordination between central and regional governments, enhancing supervisory capacity, and involving local communities as key strategies for improving mining governance and promoting more accountable administrative law enforcement.
Policy Framework for Crime Prevention Based on the Modus Operandi of Human Trafficking in Cibadak District Court Decision No. 92/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.CBD Sherlyn, Sherlyn; Adhari, Ade
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.374

Abstract

This study investigates the increasing prevalence of human trafficking in Indonesia facilitated through social media platforms as a mechanism for recruiting illegal migrant workers, as illustrated by the Cibadak District Court Decision No. 92/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Cbd. In this case, the defendant, Clara Emilia Yulianti, and her network recruited prospective migrant workers without official authorization by offering high-paying jobs abroad, thereby exposing significant gaps in state oversight and digital protection for prospective migrants. The objective of this study is to analyze the modus operandi of the illegal recruitment scheme in this case and to evaluate existing prevention policies to address the legal loopholes exploited by the perpetrators. Employing normative legal methods alongside legislative, conceptual, and case study approaches, the study finds that the perpetrators used social media to lure victims, collect fees, and engage in unlawful sheltering and deployment activities in violation of Article 2(1) of Law No. 21/2007 in conjunction with Law No. 18/2017. Preventive efforts should prioritize strengthening oversight of online recruitment through enhanced cooperation between the government and digital platforms to enable detection, verification, and removal of illegal recruitment content.
A Juridical Analysis of the Validity of General Meeting of Shareholders’ Resolutions in Cases of Procedural and Organizational Deviations Kuistono, Caesar Andre; Adam, Richard C.
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.375

Abstract

The General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS), as the highest governing body of a Limited Liability Company, must be conducted in accordance with the formal and material procedures mandated by Law Number 40 of 2007 to ensure that its resolutions carry binding legal effect. This study employs a normative legal research method using a statutory approach to examine the validity of GMS resolutions in instances of procedural deviation, including improper notice, omission of the meeting agenda, or failure to satisfy attendance and decision-making quorum requirements. The findings show that such procedural violations generally render GMS resolutions invalid and may provide grounds for shareholders to file a claim before the district court under Article 61 of the Company Law, except in situations where all shareholders are present and unanimously approve the resolutions as permitted under Article 82(5). Beyond invalidating resolutions, procedural deviations may also give rise to civil liability for directors or commissioners, underscoring the importance of adherence to GMS procedures in safeguarding shareholder rights and supporting sound corporate governance