Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Terhadap Produk UMKM Yang Tidak Bersertifikat SNI dan BPOM Yuliana Indah Sari; M. Rizki Azmi
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i2.11064

The purpose of this study is to analyze consumer protection for Pineapple Chips UMKM that do not register SNI and BPOM, and to find out the process of determining SNI and BPOM certification for Pineapple Chips UMKM products that can provide legal certainty for business actors. Consumers have the right to comfort, security, and safety in consuming goods and/or services, products that must register SNI and BPOM to ensure consumer safety and security. The urgency of this research for consumers is the importance of choosing certified products. As well as for business actors to realize legal awareness in registering their products, in order to create legal protection, and as an evaluation of the government to provide counseling and guidance to MSMEs in registering their product certification. The research method used is sociological research with a statutory regulatory approach. The novelty of this research lies in the importance of legal protection for consumers by registering SNI and BPOM, as well as the determination or process of SNI and BPOM that should be carried out by the pineapple chips UMKM to create legal certainty. The results of the study showed that there are two forms of legal protection for consumers, namely preventive protection by conducting supervision once a year at the factory where the product is made, before it is distributed. BPOM carries out licensing by testing product content, product specifications, and processed materials used before being distributed. As well as repressive legal protection through litigation and non-litigation, if there is an unlawful act or a criminal act. Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk menganalisis perlindungan konsumen terhadap UMKM Keripik Nenas yang tidak mendaftarkan SNI dan BPOM, dan proses penetapan sertifikasi SNI dan BPOM pada produk UMKM Keripik Nenas yang dapat memberikan kepastian hukum bagi pelaku usaha. Konsumen berhak mendapatkan hak atas kenyamanan, keamanan, dan keselamatan dalam mengkonsumsi barang dan/atau jasa, hal ini dibuktikkan dengan produk harus mendaftarkan SNI dan BPOM untuk menjamin keamanan, keselamatan konsumen. Urgensi penelitian ini bagi konsumen pentingnya dalam memilih produk yang telah tersertivikasi. Serta bagi pelaku usaha untuk mewujudkan kesadaran hukum dalam mendaftarkan produknya, demi terciptanya perlindungan hukum, serta sebagai evaluasi kepada pemerintah untuk memberikan penyuluhan, dan pembinaan kepada UMKM dalam mendaftarkan sertifikasi produknya. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian sosiologis dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Kebaharuan penelitian ini terletak pada pentingnya perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen dengan mendaftarkan SNI dan BPOM, serta penetapan atau proses SNI dan BPOM yang seharusnya dilakukan UMKM Keripik Nenas untuk menciptakan kepastian hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ada dua bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen, yakni perlindungan preventif dengan melakukan pengawasan satu kali setahun di pabrik tempat pembuatan produk, sebelum diedarkan. BPOM melakukan perizinan dengan menguji kandungan produk, spesifikasi produk, bahan olahan yang digunakan sebelum diedarkan. Serta perlindungan hukum represif melalui litigasi dan non litigasi jika terjadi perbuatan melawan hukum, ataupun tindak pidana.

Kebijakan Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Tentang Pidana Kerja Sosial Dalam KUHP Nasional : Perspektif Tujuan Pemidanaan Wicaksana, Villar Wibawa; Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i2.11092

The research aims to analyze the concept of social work punishment based on the National Criminal Code (KUHP) and formulate an ideal model for its implementation from the perspective of criminal law reform policy. The research background originates from the conditions of correctional institutions experiencing overcrowding and over-capacity, coupled with negative societal stigmatization towards convicts, which demonstrates the continued dominance of an absolute and retributive punishment paradigm. The research urgency lies in the necessity of an in-depth study of social work punishment as one of the new legal instruments in the National Criminal Code that prioritizes restorative and rehabilitative values. The research methodology employs a normative juridical approach with descriptive specifications, conducted through a literature study and qualitative analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research novelty focuses on a comprehensive examination of social work punishment within the context of Indonesian criminal law reform. The research findings indicate that social work punishment in the National Criminal Code represents a penalization aimed at restorative and rehabilitative objectives, signifying a paradigm shift in punishment goals, with its ideal implementation model being a product of criminal legal politics that utilizes a rational approach to achieve social order and community welfare in accordance with the procedural mechanism outlined in Article 85 of the National Criminal Code. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis konsep pidana kerja sosial berdasarkan KUHP Nasional dan merumuskan model ideal penerapannya dalam perspektif kebijakan pembaruan hukum pidana. Latar belakang penelitian bermula dari kondisi lembaga pemasyarakatan yang mengalami overcrowding dan overcapacity, serta stigmatisasi negatif masyarakat terhadap terpidana, yang menunjukkan masih dominannya paradigma pemidanaan bersifat absolut dan sekadar pembalasan. Urgensi penelitian terletak pada perlunya kajian mendalam tentang pidana kerja sosial sebagai salah satu instrumen hukum baru dalam KUHP Nasional yang mengedepankan nilai restoratif dan rehabilitatif. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi deskriptif, melalui studi kepustakaan dan analisis kualitatif terhadap bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Kebaharuan penelitian fokus pada kajian komprehensif pidana kerja sosial dalam konteks pembaruan hukum pidana Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pidana kerja sosial dalam KUHP Nasional merupakan pemidanaan bertujuan restoratif dan rehabilitatif, yang menandakan pergeseran paradigma tujuan pemidanaan, dengan model ideal penerapannya merupakan produk politik hukum pidana yang menggunakan pendekatan rasional untuk mencapai ketertiban dan kesejahteraan masyarakat sesuai mekanisme prosedural Pasal 85 KUHP Nasional.

Analysis of Legal Protection of Intellectual Property Rights from a Criminal Law Perspective Rosita, Dian; Novitasari, Arina; Azizah, Naili; Cahyaningrum, Nila Maulida; Zuniarti, Zuniarti
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i2.11191

This research intention is to find out how the legal protection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) on TikTok video content is from a penal law perspective and to find out the penalties given to increase the effectiveness of law enforcement. The background of this research is based on the large number of uses of most of the songs on the Tiktok application without permission from the copyright holder who should have economic rights to their creations. This action can be categorized as a criminal act of piracy. A crime is an unlawful act that is detrimental to society and the perpetrators can be subject to criminal penalties. The development of communication technology has given birth to a new media called social media, and TikTok is one of the popular social media among the public. The problem is that most of the songs used in the Tiktok application are used without permission from the copyright holder who should have economic rights to their creation. The research method used in this study is the normative legal method with a statutory approach. The specifications of this study are descriptive analytical. The results of the study show that the criminal approach in the protection of Intellectual Property Rights is very important to ensure that the intellectual property rights of the results of creation are respected in society, the imposition of criminal sanctions in cases of violations, such as the use of songs without permission is important to provide a deterrent effect on the perpetrators while protecting the interests of the rights owners and creating legal certainty. The novelty of this research lies in the multidisciplinary approach that connects aspects of penal law with social and economic problems in the protection of Intellectual Property Rights.

Kedudukan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang di Indonesia Liana Nasir; Syamsul Rijal; Aksan Akbar, Muhamad
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i2.11333

This study aims to analyze the position of the Constitutional Court's decision in the formation of laws and to examine the legal implications if the laws formed are in conflict with the Constitutional Court's decision. This study is important to conduct considering the polemic of alleged non-compliance of state administrators with the Constitutional Court's decision, especially in the formation of laws. This study is different from several previous studies because it examines the position of the Constitutional Court's decision and the legal implications of laws formed in conflict with the Constitutional Court's decision. Using a normative legal research method. The results obtained from this study are that the Constitutional Court's decision is a source of law in the formation of laws as stipulated in Article 10 paragraph (1) letter d of Law No. 12 of 2011, that one of the materials that must be included in the law is the follow-up to the Constitutional Court's decision. The legal implications of the formation of laws that are in conflict with the Constitutional Court's decision are that it will cause legal uncertainty, can harm human rights, and the law can be submitted for judicial review to the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court's decision is the official interpretation of the 1945 Constitution. Therefore, the DPR and the President are obliged to follow up on it in the formation of laws, so that the resulting laws can provide justice, benefits, and legal certainty as well as protection of human rights. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam pembentukan undang-undang serta mengkaji implikasi hukum apabila undang-undang yang dibentuk bertentangan dengan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Penelitian ini penting dilakukan mengingat adanya polemik dugaan ketidakpatuhan penyelenggara negara terhadap putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi khususnya dalam pembentukan undang-undang. Penelitian ini memiliki perbedaan dengan beberapa penelitian sebelumnya karena mengakaji kedudukan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan implikasi hukum undang-undang yang dibentuk bertentangan dengan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini yaitu putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi berkedudukan sebagai sumber hukum dalam pembentukan undang-undang sebagaimana ditentukan pada Pasal 10 ayat (1) huruf d UU No. 12 Tahun 2011, bahwa salah satu materi yang wajib dimuat dalam undang-undang adalah tindak lanjut atas putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Implikasi hukum pembentukan undang-undang yang bertentangan dengan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yakni akan menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum; dapat merugikan hak asasi manusia; dan undang-undang tersebut dapat diajukan judicial review di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan Mahkamah Kontitusi merupakan penafsiran resmi UUD 1945. Oleh karena itu, DPR dan Presiden wajib menindaklanjutinya dalam pembentukan undang-undang, agar undang-undang yang dihasilkan dapat memberikan keadilan, kemanfaatan dan kepastian hukum serta perlindungan terhadap hak asasi manusia.

The Impact of Granting Building Use Rights to Foreign Citizens Living in Indonesia Hanura Wijayanti, Mayday; Sudiro, Amad
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i2.11776

This study aims to analyze the legal implications of granting building use rights to foreign nationals under the Job Creation Law. The main problem that currently occurs is the limited availability of land in Indonesia, while development is progressing rapidly, especially in urban areas. To meet the needs of the community, including foreign citizens, for housing, the government then took the path of building flats as part of housing development, considering the limited land in urban areas. In its development, the government then enacted the Job Creation Law, which turned out to be inconsistent with previous regulations. This is interesting to study regarding the impact that will occur if Building Use Rights are granted to Foreign Citizens living in Indonesia, so that the problems that arise can be in the form of legal certainty of the Job Creation Law regarding ownership of Building Use Rights by Foreign Citizens and ownership of flat units by Foreign Citizens according to the Job Creation Law linked to the principle of nationality. This study uses a normative legal approach method by reviewing library materials or secondary data, and the nature of this research is descriptive and analytical. The results of the study concluded that the legal certainty of ownership of Apartment Ownership Rights on land with building use rights by foreigners based on the Job Creation Law is still not guaranteed, because in the UURS and UUPA, foreigners can only have usage rights, while in the UUCK, they can have HGB. The novelty of this study lies in its normative analysis of conflicting regulations and the identification of legal gaps in the implementation of foreign ownership of apartment units.

Keabsahan Akta Jual Beli Letter C Yang Diterbitkan Oleh Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Daniel, Glenn; Hadiati, Mia
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i2.11820

This study seeks to investigate and acquire insights regarding the legal validity of the sale and purchase deed associated with Letter C and the impact of land erosion on land rights owners. The foundation of this research stems from the transaction involving the deed of sale and purchase of Letter C, carried out by the Land Deed Official, who overlooked the measurement of the Letter C land when transferring rights from one person to another. The significance of this research lies in addressing the issues that arise in various places in the archipelago are increasingly complex and increasingly varied, especially regarding the ownership of land rights with Letter C status, which do not have legal certainty over their ownership rights. This research employs the Normative Juridical approach, which analyzes literature documents and related regulations while emphasizing the duties and permits of PPAT, so that it will provide the right answers regarding land rights problems and literacy to the community regarding land rights ownership. The results of this study explain that Letter C land sale and purchase transactions that are not accompanied by measurements and are not immediately certified have the potential to cause disputes and difficulties in proving land rights because there are legal loopholes, so owners must confirm the validity of ownership of land rights. The novelty of this research lies in the analysis of cases that occurred in Bogor Regency, illustrating the consequences of the incident, so that it can provide a solution so that the Letter C land that is still circulating in the community can immediately change its land rights status to provide security in land ownership. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggali serta mendapatkan pengetahuan tentang keabsahan akta jual beli Letter C serta dampak dari terkikisnya tanah bagi pemilik hak atas tanah. Dasar penelitian ini berasal dari transaksi akta jual Beli Letter C yang disusun oleh Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) tanpa memperhatikan pengukuran tanah Letter C yang dialihkan haknya dari satu individu ke individu lainnya. Urgensi dari penelitian ini adalah permasalahan yang terjadi diberbagai tempat di Nusantara semakin kompleks dan semakin variatif khususnya tentang kepemilikan hak atas tanah yang berstatus Letter C yang tidak mendapatkan kepastian hukum atas hak kepemilikannya. Penelitian ini menerapkan metode Yuridis Normatif dengan menganalisis dokumen literatur dan peraturan yang relevan serta memperjelas tugas dan kewenangan PPAT, sehingga penelitian ini akan memberikan jawaban yang tepat mengenai permasalahan hak atas tanah serta meningkatkan literasi terkait kepemilikan hak atas tanah kepada masyarakat. Temuan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kegiatan jual beli tanah Letter C yang tidak disertai pengukuran dan tidak segera disertifikatkan berpotensi menyebabkan sengketa serta kesulitan pembuktian hak atas tanah karena terdapat celah hukum, sehingga pemilik harus mempertegas validitas kepemilikan hak atas tanah. Kebaruan dalam penelitian ini dijelaskan dalam analisis dari kasus yang terjadi di Kabupaten Bogor yang menjabarkan dampak dari peristiwa tersebut, sehingga dapat memberikan solusi agar tanah Letter C yang masih beredar dalam masyarakat segera diubah status hak atas tanahnya untuk memberikan keamanan dalam kepemilikan tanah.

Ganti Rugi Karena Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Sengketa Penguasaan Tanah Adat Aleska, Ivanna Isya Putri; Naomi Emmavenza Daat; Sri Harini Dwiyatmi
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i2.11838

This research examines District Court Decision Number 113/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jap with the aim of assessing that the decision was incorrect by not granting compensation and that the request for compensation submitted was legally valid. The urgency of this research is the injustice of the judge's decision against the Plaintiff by not providing the compensation requested by the Plaintiff even though the application is valid according to the law and assessing that the first level decision was incorrect because the Defendants committed an unlawful act by claiming, releasing, transferring and selling customary land without permission and causing losses. This reflects the lack of legal protection of landowners' rights to customary land inheritance. This research is important to provide a perspective for customary landowners in order to obtain justice from a legal perspective. The research method used is the normative juridical research method or doctrinal research. The statute approach and case approach were used. This research encourages judges to refer to Article 1365 of the Civil Code in deciding PMH cases by paying attention to proving losses so that the decisions have legal certainty and have implications for improving the quality of decisions. Therefore, this research assesses that the judge's decision in this case was incorrect because it did not provide compensation in accordance with the losses suffered by the landowner despite the fact that the losses were experienced for 35 years and the Plaintiff's request for compensation was valid according to Article 1365 of the Civil Code. Penelitian ini mengkaji Putusan PN Nomor 113/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jap dengan tujuan melakukan penilaian bahwa putusan tersebut tidak tepat dengan tidak memberikan ganti kerugian dan permohonan ganti rugi yang diajukan sah secara hukum. Urgensi penelitian ini yaitu ketidakadilan putusan Hakim terhadap Penggugat dengan tidak memberikan ganti rugi yang dimohonkan Penggugat meskipun permohonan sah menurut hukum serta menilai putusan tingkat pertama tidak tepat karena para Tergugat melakukan perbuatan melanggar hukum dengan mengeklaim, melepas, mengalihkan dan menjual tanah adat tanpa izin dan menimbulkan kerugian. Hal ini, mencerminkan kurangnya perlindungan hukum terhadap hak-hak pemilik tanah atas warisan tanah adat. Penelitian ini penting untuk memberikan perspektif bagi Pemilik tanah adat agar mendapatkan keadilan dari segi hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif atau doctrinal research. Digunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Penelitian ini mendorong Hakim mengacu pada Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata dalam memutuskan perkara PMH dengan memperhatikan pembuktian kerugian sehingga putusan yang diputus memiliki kepastian hukum dan berimplikasi terhadap peningkatan kualitas putusan. Karenanya, penelitian ini menilai bahwa putusan Hakim dalam perkara ini tidak tepat karena tidak memberikan ganti rugi sesuai kerugian yang dialami pemilik tanah padahal secara faktanya kerugian dialami selama 35 tahun serta permohonan ganti rugi Penggugat sah menurut Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata.

Peran Hukum dalam Pengelolaan dan Perlindungan Lahan Gambut Nuriyatman, Eko; Budhiartie, Arrie; Amir, Latifah
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i2.11857

This article aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of legislation in the management and protection of peatlands in Tanjung Jabung Timur Regency, as well as to identify the main obstacles and legal strategies that can be applied to overcome them. The background of the issue highlights that peatlands have significant ecological functions, particularly in maintaining environmental balance and mitigating climate change. Their existence faces serious threats due to land conversion, fires, and uncontrolled exploitation. The urgency of this research lies in the need to review the effectiveness of the regulations that have been implemented to ensure the sustainability of the peatland ecosystem functions, as well as the balance between utilization and environmental conservation. This research adopts a normative juridical approach with a descriptive-analytical method. The data used consists of secondary data obtained through a literature study of legislation, court decisions, scientific journals, and relevant policy documents. The novelty of this study lies in its specific focus on examining the implementation of legal regulations in peatland management in Tanjung Jabung Timur Regency, differing from previous studies that have been more general at the national level. The research findings indicate that the main obstacles in the implementation of peatland management laws include weak law enforcement, regulatory overlaps, conflicts of interest, and low public legal awareness. To address these challenges, optimal strategies are required, including strengthening coordination among state institutions, harmonizing regulations, enforcing strict sanctions, and utilizing technology for monitoring and law enforcement. With these strategies, it is expected that a balance between the utilization and protection of peatlands can be achieved in accordance with the principles of sustainable development. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas implementasi peraturan perundang-undangan dalam pengelolaan dan perlindungan lahan gambut di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur serta mengidentifikasi hambatan utama dan strategi hukum yang dapat diterapkan guna mengatasinya. Latar belakang permasalahan menunjukkan bahwa lahan gambut memiliki fungsi ekologis yang signifikan, terutama dalam menjaga keseimbangan lingkungan dan mitigasi perubahan iklim. Keberadaannya menghadapi ancaman serius akibat konversi lahan, kebakaran, serta eksploitasi yang tidak terkendali. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada perlunya peninjauan efektivitas regulasi yang telah diterapkan untuk memastikan keberlanjutan fungsi ekosistem gambut serta keseimbangan antara pemanfaatan dan konservasi lingkungan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan metode deskriptif-analitis. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada fokusnya yang secara spesifik menelaah implementasi hukum dalam pengelolaan lahan gambut di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur, berbeda dari kajian sebelumnya yang lebih bersifat umum pada tingkat nasional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kendala utama dalam implementasi hukum pengelolaan lahan gambut meliputi lemahnya penegakan hukum, tumpang tindih regulasi, konflik kepentingan, serta minimnya kesadaran hukum masyarakat. Untuk mengatasi hambatan tersebut, diperlukan strategi optimal berupa penguatan koordinasi antar lembaga negara, harmonisasi regulasi, penerapan sanksi tegas, serta pemanfaatan teknologi dalam pengawasan dan penegakan hukum. Dengan strategi ini, diharapkan keseimbangan antara pemanfaatan dan perlindungan lahan gambut dapat terwujud sesuai dengan prinsip pembangunan berkelanjutan.

Peran Intelijen Keamanan Dalam Pencegahan Dan Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Sirait, Suman; Abdillah, Junaidi
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i2.11952

This study aims to analyze the role and strategy of the Security Intelligence Division (Intelkam) of the Bangka Belitung Islands Police in preventing and countering terrorism in an archipelagic region vulnerable to the transit of extremist networks. The research background stems from the high terrorism threat level in Indonesia and the strategic geographic position of Bangka Belitung, which increases the risk of radical infiltration. The urgency lies in the critical need to strengthen the role of regional intelligence as the front line in early detection and counter-radicalization efforts. The research method employs a normative juridical approach, utilizing legal and conceptual frameworks, and is analyzed through a descriptive-qualitative lens. Findings indicate that Intelkam Babel has implemented both preventive and repressive strategies, such as digital surveillance, monitoring of ex-terror convicts, and collaboration with community leaders, although challenges remain regarding human resources, budget constraints, and inter-agency coordination. The novelty of this study lies in its focus on island-based regions and localized approaches to deradicalization strategies. The study concludes that Intelkam's strategies must be enhanced through technological modernization, capacity building, integrated intelligence systems, and expanded locally-rooted deradicalization programs. It is recommended that the implementation be supported by a continuous monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system to ensure sustained and effective terrorism prevention at the regional level. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran dan strategi Intelijen Keamanan (Intelkam) Polda Kepulauan Bangka Belitung dalam mencegah dan menanggulangi tindak pidana terorisme di wilayah kepulauan yang rawan perlintasan jaringan ekstremis lintas pulau. Latar belakang penelitian ini berangkat dari tingginya ancaman terorisme di Indonesia serta posisi geografis strategis Bangka Belitung yang membuka peluang infiltrasi radikalisme. Urgensi penelitian terletak pada pentingnya penguatan peran intelijen daerah sebagai garda terdepan dalam deteksi dini dan kontra-radikalisasi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan, serta dianalisis secara kualitatif-deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Intelkam Polda Babel telah menjalankan strategi preventif dan represif, seperti patroli digital, pengawasan eks-napiter, serta pelibatan tokoh masyarakat, namun masih menghadapi tantangan seperti keterbatasan SDM, anggaran, dan sinergi antar-lembaga. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada fokus wilayah kepulauan dan pendekatan lokal terhadap strategi deradikalisasi. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa strategi Intelkam perlu diperkuat melalui modernisasi pemantauan, peningkatan kapasitas SDM, integrasi sistem intelijen, dan perluasan program deradikalisasi berbasis kearifan lokal. Direkomendasikan agar strategi yang dijalankan didukung oleh evaluasi berkelanjutan berbasis monitoring and evaluation (M&E) untuk memastikan efektivitas dan keberlanjutan pencegahan terorisme di tingkat daerah.

Legal Study of Unlawful Acts by The Opponents In Land Dispute Decision Number 6/Pdt.Bth/2024/Pn Bpp Aldo Yanuarto; Aris Sunandar; Abdul Khair
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i2.11971

This study aims to conduct a juridical analysis of the elements and legal reasoning used by the panel of judges in establishing the existence of an unlawful act (onrechtmatige daad) committed by the Defendants in a land dispute case, as stipulated in the Decision of the Balikpapan District Court Number 6/PDT.BTH/2024/PN BPP. Employing normative legal research with a conceptual and case approach, this study focuses on the interpretation of Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata) and the judicial construction applied by the court in assessing the Defendants’ actions. The urgency of this study lies in the increasing complexity of land disputes in Indonesia, which demand clearer doctrinal and judicial guidance in determining the threshold of unlawful acts in civil litigation. The novelty of this research is its integrative use of abuse of rights theory and good faith principles as analytical tools to assess the boundaries of civil liability, which have not been thoroughly explored in previous studies. The findings reveal that the Defendants' act of filing for execution over a parcel of land that had been lawfully transferred to the Plaintiff, without a legitimate legal basis, constitutes a clear instance of an unlawful act. Such conduct satisfies the juridical elements of tort as outlined in both doctrine and jurisprudence: the existence of an act, its unlawfulness, fault, actual damages, and a causal relationship between the act and the harm incurred. The court’s decision reflects a balanced consideration of good faith principles, legal protection doctrines, and the abuse of right theory in determining the Defendants’ civil liability. This study recommends a more consistent application of these doctrines to ensure legal certainty and justice in future land dispute adjudications.

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Zaenal Arifin

Contact Email
zaenal@usm.ac.id

Phone
+6282242226898

Journal Mail Official
usmlawreview@usm.ac.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Soekarno - Hatta

Location
Kota semarang,

Jawa tengah

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Zaenal Arifin

Contact Email zaenal@usm.ac.id

Phone +6282242226898

Journal Mail Official usmlawreview@usm.ac.id

Editorial Address Jl. Soekarno - Hatta

Location Kota semarang, Jawa tengah INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Zaenal Arifin

Contact Email
zaenal@usm.ac.id

Phone
+6282242226898

Journal Mail Official
usmlawreview@usm.ac.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Soekarno - Hatta

Location
Kota semarang,

Jawa tengah

INDONESIA