cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Arif Rahman
Contact Email
shautunapmh@gmail.com
Phone
+6282343321118
Journal Mail Official
shautunapmh@gmail.com
Editorial Address
https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/shautuna/editorialteam
Location
Kab. gowa,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27750477     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i3
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Social,
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Shautuna: Jurnal Imiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab adalah jurnal akademik yang telah menerbitkan karya ilmiah sejak tahun 2013. Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Perbandingan Madzhab dan Hukum, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Alauddin Makassar. Jurnal ini disediakan untuk mahasiswa-mahasiswa yang berkecimpung dalam hukum Islam lebih khusus perbandingan mazhab dan hukum. Jurnal ini secara rutin terbit tiga kali setahun yakni pada Januari, Mei dan September.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 365 Documents
 33   34   35   36   37 
Ketidakadilan Distribusi Manfaat dalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam di Kalimantan Timur: Telaah Kritis atas Implementasi Pasal 33 UUD 1945 Arundaya, Maheswari; Syifa, Triyara Annisa Nur; Arifin, Sheila Aurelia; Suryaningsih, Suryaningsih
Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/shautuna.v7i1.63463

Abstract

The unfair distribution of benefits in natural resource management is a persistent legal and institutional problem in Indonesia, particularly in East Kalimantan, even though Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia explicitly places state control over natural resources as a constitutional instrument for realizing the welfare of the people. This study focuses on the gap between the constitutional norms of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution and the practice of natural resource management, which is still rife with abuse of authority and unequal distribution of benefits. This study aims to critically analyze the implementation of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution in the policies and practices of natural resource management in East Kalimantan and to identify the institutional factors that influence distributive injustice. The main problems of this research lie in the weak design of natural resource management institutions, the fragmentation of authority among state actors, and the strong intervention of political and economic interests that open up opportunities for corruption. This study uses a qualitative research method with a normative juridical approach combined with institutional analysis. Data was obtained through a literature study of laws and regulations, relevant court decisions, official reports from the Corruption Eradication Commission related to the evaluation of the National Movement for the Preservation of Natural Resources (GNP SDA), and academic literature, which was analyzed using the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. The results of the study show that the inconsistency between constitutional rules and policy implementation is reflected in weak oversight mechanisms, overlapping sectoral regulations, and low community participation in decision-making on natural resource management. These conditions lead to the concentration of economic benefits in certain groups, while local communities bear the social, economic, and ecological burdens. The novelty of this study lies in the use of the IAD framework to explain the unfair distribution of natural resource benefits from a constitutional law perspective. This study implies the need for institutional reform, strengthening legal accountability, and restructuring natural resource management policies to be in line with the principles of distributive justice and the constitutional mandate of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution.
Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap Barang Rusak dengan Biaya Perlindungan dalam Platform E-commerce: Analisis Hukum Perdata Islam Asti, Mulham Jaki; Farhan, Muh
Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/shautuna.v7i1.66383

Abstract

This study examines the issue of legal protection for consumers against damaged goods that are still subject to protection fees on e-commerce platforms from the perspectives of positive law and Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh muamalah). The problem arises from the practice in which consumers, despite paying additional product protection fees, often face difficulties in obtaining compensation when the goods received are defective or not in accordance with the agreement. This research aims to analyze the forms of legal protection provided under Indonesian legislation, particularly Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and regulations governing electronic commerce, while also assessing the practice based on the principles of fiqh muamalah such as justice (al-‘adl), the prohibition of gharar (uncertainty), the prohibition of tadlis (fraud), and the concept of khiyar (option rights). The study employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches and adopts a comparative analysis between positive law and Islamic law. Data were collected through library research involving primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that under positive law, consumers are entitled to accurate information, compensation, and legal remedies; however, the regulation concerning product protection fees is not specifically governed, resulting in gaps in its implementation. From the perspective of fiqh muamalah, the imposition of protection fees is permissible as long as it upholds transparency, contractual clarity, and fairness, and does not contain elements of uncertainty or injustice. Therefore, regulatory strengthening and harmonization between positive law and Islamic principles are necessary to ensure fairer, more certain, and more effective consumer protection in e-commerce transactions.
Prinsip Proporsionalitas dan Kebebasan Berekspresi dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Revisi Indonesia: Sebuah Analisis Demokrasi Deliberatif Tahir, Muh. Taqwin; Yanlua, Muh. Akbar; Lawung, Mario Aprio Almit
Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 7 ISSUE 2, MAY 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/shautuna.v7i2.66961

Abstract

This article examines the regulation of freedom of expression in Indonesia's new Criminal Code with a focus on insults to the President/Vice President, insults to state institutions, and provisions on unrest and fake news that have the potential to limit the space for criticism and public discourse. The main issue raised is whether the configuration of the restrictions is in line with the principle of proportionality and how its implications are for the quality of deliberative democracy in Indonesia. In particular, the article links the constitutional guarantee of freedom of expression in the 1945 Constitution and international law with the design and potential application of new articles of the Criminal Code that touch on the realm of political expression and expression in the digital space. This research uses normative legal methods with legislative, conceptual, and case approaches, based on an analysis of the 1945 Constitution, international law, laws, Constitutional Court decisions, and the latest literature on freedom of expression, the principle of proportionality, and deliberative democracy. The principle of proportionality is applied to assess the extent to which restrictions in the new Criminal Code are justifiable in a democratic society. The results of the study show that, although formally meeting the requirements for restrictions through the law, a number of new articles of the Criminal Code have the potential to close discursive spaces that are oriented towards excessive protection of state officials and institutions, as well as ignore the availability of non-criminal instruments that are less intrusive, thus failing to meet the test of necessity and nonexcessiveness. This configuration has implications for the strengthening of the chilling effect and self-censorship in the public space, which in turn reduces the quality of democracy in Indonesia. The article recommends normative correction through testing in the constitutional court and revision of the law to be in harmony with the ideals of a democratic state of law.
Wacana Pluralitas Agama dalam Islam: Kajian Hadis Ahkam terhadap Makna dan Cakupan Ahl al-Kitab dalam Tafsir M. Ghalib Rif’ah, Andi Muh. Afwaz Fafaza; Abubakar, Achmad; Irham, Muhammad
Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 7 ISSUE 2, MAY 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/shautuna.v7i2.68172

Abstract

This study examines the concept of Ahl al-Kitab through the exegetical framework of M. Ghalib, focusing on the meaning, scope, and jurisprudential implications derived from legal hadiths (hadith ahkam) in his Qur'anic interpretation. Employing a qualitative approach through library research, this study analyzes M. Ghalib's exegetical methodology and situates his views within the broader discourse of classical and contemporary Islamic scholarship. The findings reveal that M. Ghalib's exegesis acknowledges Ahl al-Kitab as adherents of divinely revealed religions while distinguishing between those who maintain peaceful coexistence and those who adopt a hostile stance toward Muslims. On jurisprudential matters, his interpretive framework addresses three principal issues: first, the permissibility of consuming food slaughtered by Ahl al-Kitab, which M. Ghalib allows under specific conditions consistent with the majority scholarly position; second, the marriage of Muslim men with Ahl al-Kitab women, which he permits with certain qualifications, contrasting with the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) fatwa prohibiting such unions on grounds of maslahah; and third, the issues of greeting (salam) and social guardianship (walayah), which he treats as contextual rather than absolute prohibitions. Overall, M. Ghalib's exegesis reflects a hermeneutical orientation that balances theological integrity with openness toward religious plurality, grounded in the Qur'anic principles of tolerance and social justice. This study contributes to the contemporary discourse on Islamic legal pluralism and offers practical insights for religious scholars, educators, and policymakers engaged in fostering interfaith harmony within the pluralistic context of Indonesia.
Pluralisme Hukum dalam Sistem Kewarisan Anak Bungko: Dialektika Hukum Adat dan Hukum Islam di Masyarakat Pangkep Maulidah, Tahani Asri; Kurniati; Ilyas, Musyfikah; Tahir, Juraeri; Idrus, Achmad Musyahid
Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 7 ISSUE 2, MAY 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/shautuna.v7i2.68614

Abstract

This study examines the inheritance distribution practice of the youngest child (anak bungko) in the Pangkep community from the perspective of legal pluralism between customary law and Islamic law. The main issue is the practice of granting a larger inheritance share to the youngest child, which does not fully conform to Islamic inheritance law. The research questions address the practice itself, societal and Islamic legal perspectives, and its implications for family justice. This study uses a qualitative method with a socio-legal approach based on literature review. The findings show that the larger share given to the youngest child is based on their social role in caring for parents and maintaining family continuity. While considered fair socially, it requires adjustment in Islamic law through grants and wills. This reflects a dynamic interaction between customary and Islamic law within legal pluralism.

Page 37 of 37 | Total Record : 365

 33   34   35   36   37 

Filter by Year

2020 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue VOLUME 7 ISSUE 2, MAY 2026 VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2026 VOLUME 6 ISSUE 3, SEPTEMBER 2025 VOLUME 6 ISSUE 2, MAY 2025 VOLUME 6 ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2025 VOLUME 5 ISSUE 3, SEPTEMBER 2024 VOLUME 5 ISSUE 2, MAY 2024 VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2024 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 3, SEPTEMBER 2023 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2, MAY 2023 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2023 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 3, SEPTEMBER 2022 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2, MAY 2022 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2022 SEPTEMBER Januari MEI Vol. 1, No. 3, September 2020 Vol. 1, No. 2, Mei 2020 Vol. 1, No. 1, Januari 2020 More Issue