cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi
Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Phone
+6281215312967
Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Konstitusi
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
ISSN : 18297706     EISSN : 25481657     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1841
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 9 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "vol. 22 no. 2 (2025)" : 9 Documents clear
Tafsir Konstitusional: Kriteria Pembentukan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (2003-2023): Constitutional Interpretation: Criteria for the Issuance of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law in Constitutional Court Decisions (2003-2023) Mohammad Agus Maulidi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2224

Abstract

Over-reliance on Constitutional Court Decision No. 138/PUU-VII/2009 as the primary benchmark for Government Regulations in Lieu of Law has led to overlooking other final and binding decisions from 2003-2023 that also established issuance criteria. This research analyzes the legitimacy and formation criteria for these regulations, examining multiple Constitutional Court decisions from 2003-2023. Using a juridical-normative and case-law approach, this study finds the Constitutional Court has established multiple material and formal criteria for the issuance and substantive content of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law. These criteria mandate such regulations as a last resort for compelling urgencies, adhering to legal certainty and constitutional principles. Presidential subjectivity in issuing Government Regulations in Lieu of Law is thereby limited by these Constitutional Court-established criteria. Differing criteria across Constitutional Court decisions are construed as jurisprudential refinement and adaptation to evolving state governance needs, complementing previous rulings.
Relasi Kelembagaan dan Pertanggungjawaban Lembaga Negara terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Institutional Relations and State Institutions’ Accountability for the Implementation of Constitutional Court Decisions Ahmad Yani
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2225

Abstract

Tindak lanjut atas putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) yang bersifat final dan mengikat terus memunculkan persoalan berkelanjutan, serta berkontribusi pada pelemahan supremasi konstitusi di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: pertama, mengkaji hubungan kelembagaan antara Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR), Presiden, dan Mahkamah Agung (MA) terkait pelaksanaan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi; dan kedua, menggali bentuk dan mekanisme pertanggungjawaban lembaga negara terhadap pelaksanaan putusan-putusan tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hubungan kelembagaan antara Mahkamah Konstitusi di satu sisi, dengan DPR, Presiden, dan Mahkamah Agung di sisi lain, terkait pelaksanaan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, masih berlangsung tegang. Ketegangan ini seringkali termanifestasi dalam bentuk pendekatan konfrontatif dari DPR, Presiden, dan Mahkamah Agung dalam melaksanakan putusan-putusan tersebut. Lebih lanjut, pertanggungjawaban lembaga negara atas pelaksanaan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dapat diwujudkan melalui tanggung jawab kelembagaan maupun tanggung jawab pejabat secara individual yang melekat pada anggota/pejabat DPR, Presiden, dan Mahkamah Agung, terutama dalam hal pengabaian atau sikap konfrontatif terhadap putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Ketidakpastian Praktik Hukum Acara dan Variasi Amar Putusan Pengujian Formil: Uncertainty of Procedural Law Practices and Variation in Decisions of Judicial Review of Legislative Process Ilhamdi Putra; Beni Kharisma Arrasuli
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2228

Abstract

amar putusan uji formil di luar ketentuan Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi memperlihatkan fenomena ketidakpastian hukum. Melalui metode yuridis normatif, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penggabungan perkara yang diatur Pasal 36 Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 diformulasikan secara fakultatif, dan variasi amar putusan uji formil terjadi akibat ketentuan Pasal 72 ayat (2) Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2 Tahun 2021. Fenomena yang tampak sederhana ini pada praktiknya justru membuka celah terjadinya intervensi politik, hal itu dapat dilihat pada Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 dan pembangkangan konstitusional terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan agar MK tidak lagi memperlebar norma hukum acara melalui PMK.
Quo Vadis Hak Partisipasi di Bidang Lingkungan: Tinjauan terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Quo Vadis Environmental Participation Rights: A Review of Indonesian Constitutional Court’s Decision Andika Putra; Deka Oktaviana
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2222

Abstract

Public participation is recognized as a fundamental pillar of procedural environmental rights under both national and international legal frameworks. Nevertheless, the protection of public participation rights in Indonesia has experienced significant shifts following the enactment of regulations potentially diminishing public involvement in environmental governance. This article aims to map and critically analyze the evolving regulatory dynamics and the Constitutional Court’s jurisprudence concerning public participation in environmental matters. Employing normative legal research with statutory and case-law approaches, this study identifies a normative regression in the substantive value of public participation, particularly after the enactment of Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. However, through its constitutional review function, the Constitutional Court has consistently underscored the government’s obligation to ensure meaningful participation, emphasizing that public involvement should not be reduced to merely a procedural formality. Nevertheless, the Court remains substantially constrained by judicial formalities, potentially limiting civil society’s capacity to advocate effectively for sustainable and equitable environmental participation.
Celah Hukum yang Terselubung: Problematika Regulasi Peran Swasta dalam Pelayanan Air Minum: A Hidden Legal Loophole: The Complexity of Regulating Private Sector on Drinking Water Service Mohamad Mova Al’Afghani; Bisariyadi Bisariyadi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2227

Abstract

The constitutional concept of ‘state control’ mandates that drinking water be provided by the State. However, the State’s limited capacity has created a service gap filled by a plurality of non-state actors, including communities and private companies. Due to restrictive laws, these actors are forced to operate through regulatory loopholes—such as ‘own-use’ schemes, partnership models, and community-based systems. This situation results in normative incoherence, weak state oversight, and undermines consumer protection. This paper argues that the effective solution is not to prohibit non-state participation but to establish a legal framework that explicitly recognizes and governs this plurality of providers, thereby ensuring legal certainty and upholding the universal right to water
Politik Hukum Pengawasan dan Penegakan Kode Etik dan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi: The Legal Politics of the Supervision and Enforcement of the Code of Ethics and Conduct for Constitutional Court Justices Yusuf Warsyim; Harmoko Harmoko
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2229

Abstract

The oversight and enforcement of the code of ethics for constitutional judges have evolved throughout history, culminating in the recent establishment of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court (MKMK) as a permanent body. However, significant weaknesses persist. These include structural dependencies, such as its reliance on administrative staff seconded from the Constitutional Court and its institutional positioning within the Court’s framework. This research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing statutory, regulatory, and contextual approaches. The findings indicate that the legal policy governing the supervision and enforcement of ethics for constitutional judges has undergone three distinct phases of change. While the MKMK is now institutionally permanent, it faces several challenges related to its independence, its limited and passive authority, a membership recruitment process that does not adhere to a merit system, and its dependence on seconded human resources. Therefore, to fortify the ethical oversight mechanism for constitutional judges, this research proposes a two-pronged approach. First, it is necessary to reconstruct the MKMK’s position as a truly independent supervisory and enforcement body by separating it institutionally from the Constitutional Court and strengthening its authority. Second, the authority of the Judicial Commission (KY) should be restored, allowing it to function as the primary ethical oversight institution for all state officials exercising judicial power, including constitutional judges.
Penguatan Landasan Konstitusional Kejaksaan dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia: Strengthening the Legal Foundation of the Prosecutor’s Office in the Constitutional System of the Republic of Indonesia Janpatar Simamora; Bintang ME Naibaho
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2226

Abstract

Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia tidak diatur secara eksplisit dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945, padahal lembaga tersebut mengemban fungsi pokok kekuasaan negara dalam bidang penegakan hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan menguraikan pengaturan kedudukan Kejaksaan dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945, menjelaskan penafsiran kedudukan konstitusionalitas Kejaksaan dan menawarkan model pengaturannya dalam konstitusi. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mengingat tidak ditemukannya istilah Kejaksaan secara eksplisit dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945, maka dasar konstitusionalnya hanya dapat ditemukan melalui penafsiran luas atas sejumlah pasal diantaranya Pasal 1 ayat (3), Pasal 24 ayat (1) dan ayat (3), Pasal 27 ayat (1), Pasal 28D ayat (1), Pasal 28I ayat (1) dan ayat (5) dan Pasal 30 ayat (4). Model pengaturan Kejaksaan yang ditawarkan melalui kajian ini adalah membuat rumusan baru dengan menambah satu pasal tersendiri, yaitu Pasal 24D UUD NRI Tahun 1945.
Teoretisasi Konstitusionalisme Moneter di Indonesia dalam Bingkai Pluralisme Konstitusi: Theorizing Monetary Constitutionalism in Indonesia through Constitutional Pluralism Mei Susanto; Mario Angkawidjaja; Susi Dwi Harijanti
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2221

Abstract

Konstitusionalisme moneter adalah konsep kontemporer yang berkembang untuk memahami isu moneter melalui konstitusionalisme. Minimnya konsensus ahli mengenai definisi dan ruang lingkupnya mendorong makalah ini mengkaji kritis pandangan yang ada dan mengajukan teorisasi baru untuk penelitian mendatang. Metode yang digunakan adalah doktrinal, yakni menelusuri dan mengkaji kritis pendapat pakar tentang konstitusionalisme moneter. Makalah ini berpendapat, pendekatan konstitusional di bidang moneter mengalami jalan buntu karena adherensi pada konstitusionalisme klasik yang berciri nasionalisme metodologis dan fokus politik berlebihan. Menerapkan pluralisme konstitusional, makalah ini menawarkan teorisasi baru untuk mengatasi isu konstitusional di sektor moneter. Kerangka ini diterapkan pada pengaturan keuangan UUD 1945, khususnya bank sentral. Prinsip konstitusionalisme moneter menjadi rujukan Bank Indonesia, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), dan Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS) dalam menjalankan independensi dan menegakkan konstitusi moneter yang bersifat self-enforcing.
Reformasi Elektoral Melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi: Konstitutionalitas Ambang Batas Pencalonan Presiden di Indonesia: Electoral Reform Through the Indonesian Constitutional Court: Constitutionality of Presidential Candidacy Threshold in Indonesia Djayadi Hanan; Tri Sulistianing Astuti; Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2223

Abstract

Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia muncul sebagai jalur reformasi pemilu yang telah mengubah tata kelola pemilu Indonesia secara substansial. Setelah 20 tahun norma ambang batas presiden berlaku di Indonesia, Mahkamah mengeluarkan Putusan Nomor 62/PUU-XXII/2024, yang menghapus ambang batas presiden untuk memenuhi hak konstitusional warga negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap mengapa Mahkamah mengubah pendiriannya dengan metode yuridis normatif. Penelitian menemukan bahwa putusan Mahkamah mencerminkan keberpihakan Mahkamah terhadap nilai-nilai representasi daripada governability. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa politisi kehilangan kendali atas putusan yudisial dalam ambang batas presiden. Putusan Mahkamah dimungkinkan untuk berubah karena melihat akibat buruk dari aturan tersebut, tidak hanya pada penafsiran tekstual Konstitusi dan maksud aslinya, sehingga Mahkamah Konstitusi menjadi jalan bagi para aktor reformasi pemilu yang memiliki kekuatan politik yang lebih kecil, seperti warga negara biasa, LSM, dan partai politik minoritas yang tidak memiliki kursi di parlemen maupun partai politik minoritas yang tidak terlibat dalam tinjauan parlemen dalam proses pembentukan undang-undang untuk melakukan reformasi elektoral.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 9

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 23 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 23 No. 2 (2026) Vol. 23 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 22 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 22 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 22 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 20 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 18 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 4 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol. 15 No. 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) More Issue