Verstek
Jurnal Verstek is a peer-reviewed journal published by Procedural Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret three times a year in April, August, and December. This Journal aims primarily to facilitate undergraduate students paper over current developments on procedural law issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian procedural laws and legal system. It provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to public support a greater global exchange of knowledge. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Procedural Law, included but not limited to legal construction of procedural law, critical construction of procedural law in practice, trends and changes in procedural law, and the technical challenges faced in proedural law.
Articles
453 Documents
<![CDATA[LEGALITAS KESAKSIAN TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCABULAN ANAK ]]>
<![CDATA[Wardani, Riska Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Kurniawan, Itok Dwi]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 12, No 3 (2024): JULI-SEPTEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i3.83916
<![CDATA[This article analyzes the value and strength of evidence in the use of testimonium de audituwitnesses in proving the crime of child molestation. Basically, in the KUHAP regulates witnesses and witnessstatements, namely that the information given by a witness in a trial must be information that he heard,saw and experienced himself. The purpose of this article is to prove whether the Pelalawan District Courtdecision Number 44/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn Plw is in accordance with the provisions of criminal procedural law.The research method used is doctrinal or normative legal research. This research is descriptive and applied.The method for collecting legal materials is by means of literature study and the legal materials used areprimary legal materials and secondary legal materials.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS DAKWAAN ALTERNATIF SUBSIDAIR DALAM PERKARA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 349/PID.B/2023/PN SMN) ]]>
<![CDATA[Hapsari, Duwi]]>;
<![CDATA[Rustamaji, Muhammad]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 12, No 4 (2024): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i4.85471
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kesesuaian penggunaan bentuk dakwaan alternatif subsidair dalam perkara tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 349/PID.B/2023/PN SMN dengan Pasal 143 KUHAP. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kasus. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang digunakan menggunakan studi kepustakaan kemudian dianalisis menggunakan metode deduktif silogisme. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan, diperoleh bahwa penggunaan bentuk dakwaan alternatif subsidair oleh penuntut umum dalam perkara tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana (Studi Putusan Nomor 349/Pid.B/2023/PN Smn) telah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 143 KUHAP.]]>
<![CDATA[TELAAH PENGHENTIAN PENUNTUTUAN BERDASARKAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI SURAKARTA ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad, Raihan Kamal]]>;
<![CDATA[Soehartono, Soehartono]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 12, No 4 (2024): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i4.84607
<![CDATA[Penulis melakukan Analisa dan pengkajian terkait proses restorative justice pada tindak pidana penganiayaan antar supporter sepak bola yang terjadi di Kota Surakata. Tujuan penelitian ini yakni menganalisa dan mengkaji bagaimana pertimbangan Kejaksaan Negeri Surakata dan bagaimana proses atau tahapan dalam penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan keadilan restoratif yang berdasar pada Peraturan Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empiris yang bersifat deskriptif. Dalam penulisan hukum ini penulis menggunakan jenis bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi lapangan dan studi kepustakaan. Penulisan hukum ini menggunakan teknik analisis secara silogisme deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, implementasi restorative justice yang dilakukan oleh Kejaksaan Negeri Surakarta pada tindak pidana penganiayaan antar supporter di Kota Surakarta telah sesuai dengan tata cara perdamaian dan telah memenuhi syarat-syarat yang tertuang didalam Peaturan Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020.]]>
<![CDATA[DAMPAK PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TERHADAP SANGSI PADA ANAK PELAKU PERUNDUNGAN DALAM INTENSITAS PERILAKU VERBAL ( SUATU TINJAUAN UNDANG- UNDANG NOMER 35 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN ANAK) ]]>
<![CDATA[Ismaya, Heru]]>;
<![CDATA[Kholidah, Rika Jazilatul]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 14, No 2 (2026): APRIL-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v14i2.117824
<![CDATA[Bullying can be interpreted as a form of structured violence carried out with the aim of intimidating and maintaining dominance by a particular individual or group over a stronger entity. The court, as a legal institution, functions as an enforcement agency. Children are part of the younger generation and are a human resource that plays a strategic role in the future of the nation's ongoing struggle. The purpose of this study is to describe the deterrent effect of sanctions imposed on perpetrators of bullying in terms of the intensity of verbal behavior. The punishment for perpetrators of bullying according to Article 76 C of Law Number 35 of 2014 are as follows; "Everyone is prohibited from placing, allowing, committing, ordering, or participating in committing violence against children" (Law Number 35 of 2014). It means that what is meant by everyone is an individual or corporation, while the meaning of a child is someone who is not yet 18 years old. This article states that perpetrators of verbal bullying can be punished with a maximum prison of 3 years and 6 months and/or a maximum fine of IDR 72 million. Indeed, perpetrators of criminal acts of bullying must be punished to prevent repeat acts. However, on the other hand, the long-term effects on the future of children who bully need to be considered.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN PERKARA KEKERASAN BERSAMA-SAMA TERHADAP ORANG ]]>
<![CDATA[Ardinata, Dimey Cantika]]>;
<![CDATA[Santoso, Bambang]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i3.96900
<![CDATA[This article analyzes the judge's consideration in deciding the crime of joint violence against persons. The purpose of this article is to find out whether the judge's consideration in imposing a punishment decision is in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, especially Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is a prescriptive and applied normative legal research with a case approach, namely examining one case of joint violence against persons with the Decision of the Surakarta District Court Number: 202/Pid.B/2023/PN.Skt. The collection of legal materials is carried out by means of literature studies in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The analysis technique is to use the deductive syllogism method. Based on this research, it is found that in the case of joint violence against persons, the judge in handing down the verdict is in accordance with the provisions of Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code so that the defendant can be convicted. Translated with DeepL.com (free version).]]>
<![CDATA[PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA JENIS NEW PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES ]]>
<![CDATA[Wibawa, Aurelia Neyshanda Dascha]]>;
<![CDATA[Rustamaji, Muhammad]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 12, No 2 (2024): APRIL-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i2.83633
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pertimbangan hakim dalam penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana narkotika Baru Psikoaktif pada Putusan Nomor 983/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tng ditinjau dari perspektif teori rasio memutuskan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Sifat penelitian ini adalah perskriptif dan terapan. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kasus. Bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini adalah studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah metode silogisme dengan pola pikir deduktif, yaitu berpangkal dari premis mayor dan premis minor yang kemudian ditarik kesimpulan. Berdasarkan penelitian ini diperoleh hasil bahwa pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pemidanaan bagi pengedar pada Putusan Nomor 983/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Tng sesuai dengan perspektif teori rasio keputusan.]]>
<![CDATA[MEKANISME PENDISTRIBUSIAN KERUGIAN DALAM PERKARA CLASS ACTION DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Alya, Zalfa Hania]]>;
<![CDATA[Hartanto, Heri]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 14, No 1 (2026): JANUARI-MARET ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v14i1.99290
<![CDATA[This article analyzes the mechanism for distributing damages to class members in class action lawsuits in Indonesia, focusing on Court Decisions Number 5/Pdt.G/2023/PN Sbh and Number 26/PDT.G/2009/PN.TPI. The study employs a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and a case approach to both court decisions. The research sources consist of primary and secondary legal materials. Legal materials were collected through the library research method. The analysis was conducted using a descriptive method to provide a detailed overview of the class action mechanism. The findings reveal significant variations in the implementation of damage distribution mechanisms as regulated in Article 9 of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2002. The Sibuhuan District Court applied a simple distribution system through community leaders, while the Tanjung Pinang District Court adopted a more structured mechanism by establishing a special commission. The Tanjung Pinang District Court also implemented membership verification and a clear time limit in the damage distribution process. The findings indicate that the absence of clear and consistent procedural standards in compensation distribution may impede the achievement of substantive justice for class members. The research recommends regulatory improvements to establish more systematic and measurable compensation distribution mechanisms in class action cases in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[TELAAH URGENSI AMICUS CURIAE DALAM KERANGKA SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI NEGARA INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Rizal, Fachri Nur]]>;
<![CDATA[Santoso, Bambang]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 13, No 1 (2025): JANUARI-MARET ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i1.84832
<![CDATA[Artikel ini menelaah urgensi Amicus Curiae dalam kerangka sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui urgensi Amicus Curiae dalam kerangka sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum doktrinal atau normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Penelitian hukum ini dilakukan dengan meneliti data berupa bahan-bahan hukum primer dan bahan-bahan hukum sekunder. Penelitian hukum ini bersifat preskriptif, atau penelitian ini bertujuan untuk dapat diterapkan dan harus koheren dengan gagasan dasar hukum yang berpangkal dari moral. Dalam penelitian ini, digunakan teknik analisis silogisme deduktif yang berpangkal dari pengajuan premis mayor dan premis minor. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keberadaan Amicus Curiae tersebut dapat menjadi aksesibilitas bagi masyarakat yang ingin berkontribusi dalam proses berjalannya suatu perkara peradilan. Terobosan hukum dalam mencari bahan atau informasi tambahan bagi hakim dalam pertimbangan hukumnya. Namun perlu diketahui bahwa konsep Amicus Curiae perlu diberi batasan sejauh mana Amicus Curiae dapat menjadi bahan pertimbangan hakim, karena mengingat ada potensi konsep ini mempengaruhi independensi hakim dalam memutus perkara. Konsep ini harus diakui secara formal untuk memberi pengaturan secara rinci terkait konsep Amicus Curiae.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PEMIDANAAN TERDAKWA ANAK DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Heryadi, Seno Satrio]]>;
<![CDATA[Rustamaji, Muhammad]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i3.96046
<![CDATA[This research in legal writing aims to examine the judge's considerations in giving a criminal decision in a criminal case of theft with aggravating circumstances in decision number: 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2024/PN SKH. who imposed a prison sentence of 4 (four) months based on Article 363 paragraph (1) 4th and 5th of the Criminal Code concerning Aggravated Theft and Based on Article 183 and Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is prescriptive normative legal research. The approach used is the case approach, the case approach is an approach carried out by examining cases that relate to legal issues and have received a decision by a judge that has permanent legal force. Legal materials are obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials in this research is library research. The legal material obtained is then processed using the syllogism method which uses a deductive mindset. Based on this research, research results were obtained which showed that the judge's consideration in deciding the case was in accordance with Article 363 paragraph (1) 4th and 5th of the Criminal Procedure Code and based on Article 183 and Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Criminal Procedure.]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN YURIDIS ATAS RISIKO PENDAFTARAN GANDA JAMINAN FIDUSIA ONLINE AKIBAT KETIDAKEFEKTIFAN DATABASE DITJEN AHU KEMENTERIAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Paramesti, Nabila Shafa]]>;
<![CDATA[Badriyah, Siti Malikhatun]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 14, No 2 (2026): APRIL-JUNI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v14i2.115405
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini menganalisis implikasi yuridis dari risiko pendaftaran ganda jaminan fidusia secara online yang disebabkan oleh ketidakefektifan database Ditjen AHU Kementerian Hukum. Masalah utama terletak pada kegagalan sistem dalam melakukan validasi otomatis dan pemblokiran objek yang sudah terdaftar namun belum diroya, sehingga melanggar prinsip spesialisasi dan publisitas. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengevaluasi dampak hukum dari pendaftaran ganda tersebut serta merumuskan tanggung jawab notaris dan upaya rekonstruksi sistem demi kepastian hukum. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis empiris dengan deskriptif analitis, yang mengkaji norma hukum serta fakta perilaku melalui studi pustaka dan wawancara praktisi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendaftaran ganda mengakibatkan degradasi kekuatan pembuktian akta menjadi akta di bawah tangan dan hilangnya hak preferen kreditur kedua. Notaris memegang tanggung jawab absolut dalam verifikasi data berdasarkan asas parat inhaerendo. Rekonstruksi sistem melalui integrasi real-time blocking dan sinkronisasi data otomatis sangat diperlukan untuk memitigasi risiko hukum di masa depan.]]>
