cover
Contact Name
Mustafid
Contact Email
fidmusta22@gmail.com
Phone
+6285211335664
Journal Mail Official
Elthawalib@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JALAN T RIZAL NURDIN KM 4,5 SIHITANG PADANGSIDIMPUAN, Padangsidimpuan, Provinsi Sumatera Utara
Location
Kota padangsidimpuan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Jurnal El-Thawalib
ISSN : -     EISSN : 28287231     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24952/el-thawalib.v3i3
Core Subject : Religion, Social,
Hukum Keluarga Islam, Hukum Tata Negara,Hukum Pidana Islam, Hukum Ekonomi Islam, Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 2 Documents
Search results for , issue "vol 7, no 5 (2026)" : 2 Documents clear
Reconstructing al-Dakhīl fī al-Tafsīr as Epistemic Quality Control: Integrating the Epistemic Filter and Interpretive Horizon Malinda Meinapuri; Nur'aisyah Nur'aisyah; Muhammad Irfan
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 5 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i5.21223

Abstract

Contemporary Qur’anic interpretation faces two interrelated methodological challenges: maintaining the epistemic validity of interpretive claims and ensuring their relevance to continuously changing contexts. This article aims to reconstruct al-Dakhīl fī al-Tafsīr from a critical concept primarily concerned with identifying infiltrative elements into an epistemic quality control framework and to functionally integrate it with hermeneutics and Qur’anic contextualism. This study employs qualitative library research using a critical-comparative approach and conceptual synthesis. Primary sources comprise seminal works representing al-Dakhīl fī al-Tafsīr, hermeneutics, and Qur’anic contextualism, while secondary sources include scholarly journal articles, academic books, and relevant studies, with priority given to publications from 2022–2026. Data were collected through documentation and bibliographic searches based on the criteria of relevance, bibliographic traceability, academic authority, and evidentiary contribution. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis within a critical-comparative framework, followed by conceptual synthesis through six stages: concept identification, genealogical mapping, reconstruction of epistemological assumptions, comparison of methodological functions, evaluation of strengths and limitations, and conceptual synthesis. The findings demonstrate that al-Dakhīl fī al-Tafsīr can be reconstructed as an epistemic quality-control mechanism through source authentication, linguistic validation, and methodological validation, while hermeneutics and Qur’anic contextualism contribute to historical reconstruction, the extraction of significance, and contemporary recontextualization. Their functional integration generates the Filter–Horizon Model, a sequential but recursive framework that positions epistemic admissibility as a prerequisite for contextual productivity. The model offers a conceptual contribution by establishing a functional division between the epistemic filter and the interpretive horizon, thereby enabling Qur’anic interpretation to remain epistemically accountable and contextually responsive without collapsing the epistemological distinctions among the intellectual traditions brought into dialogue.
Reconstructing Children’s Maintenance In Islamic Family Law: Rethinking The Free Nutritious Meal Program As A Shared Welfare Responsibility Durga Ramdhani; Rudi Santoso; Khairuddin Khairuddin
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 5 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i5.21202

Abstract

This article reconstructs the legal relationship between parental maintenance and state responsibility for children's nutritional rights through Indonesia's Free Nutritious Meal Program (Makan Bergizi Gratis/MBG). Recent studies already recognize complementarity between MBG and parental support; this study develops that proposition into differentiated rules on obligations, service standards, and accountability. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and Islamic legal approaches. The analysis distinguishes the juridical-personal obligation of maintenance from the material-functional provision of nutrition. Parents retain their respective family-law duties, including the father's financial responsibility under the applicable provisions, while MBG provides a public nutritional service. Public provision does not automatically discharge maintenance or authorize unilateral deductions from an existing award. The proposed Complementary-Guarantee Responsibility Model connects family responsibility, program-specific standards, and wider protective intervention when children's needs remain unmet. Its evaluative criteria translate ḥifẓ al-nafs, ḥifẓ al-ʿaql, ḥifẓ al-nasl, ḥifẓ al-māl, maṣlaḥah, and substantive justice into identifiable duties, indicators, and corrective responses. The guarantee is a normative reconstruction grounded in existing law, not a claim that MBG already creates an unlimited, judicially enforceable entitlement to complete daily nutrition. The study contributes operational boundaries for shared welfare responsibility while acknowledging that household responses and program outcomes require empirical investigation.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2