cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Buletin Peternakan
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 01264400     EISSN : 2407876X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak
Core Subject : Health, Education,
Veterinary Other
Bulletin of Animal Science is published every four months. The Annual subscription rate is Rp. 150.000,-/year. Bulletin receives original papers in animal science and technology which are not published at any other journals.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 1,046 Documents
 21   22   23   24   25 
THE EVALUATION OF SILICA+ SUPPLEMENTATION IN DIFFERENT TYPE OF DIET ON PERFORMANCE, NUTRIENT RETENTION AND THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF BROILERS DIET Irfan Anshory; Sumiati Sumiati; Indah Wijayanti
Buletin Peternakan Vol 41, No 4 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (4) NOVEMBER 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v41i4.24976

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of silica+ supplementation (Si) in different types of diet on performance, nutrient retention (energy, protein, fat), and the economic value of broiler diet. The treatment diets are 1. HN (high nutrient), 2. HN+Si, 3. LN (low nutrient), 4. LN+Si, 5. HNRB (high nutrient contained rice bran) and 6. HNRB+Si. A number of 1440 unsexed day old chicks (CP707 strains) were arranged in a com­pletely randomized design consisted of 6 treatments and each treatment was replicated six times.  The results showed that silica+ supplementation in HNRB and LN diets did not affect the performance and nutrient retention. The HNRB diet produced low fat retention, high FCR during starter period, and lower body weight during starter and grower period (P<0.05). The LN diet resulted high FCR during starter period (P<0.05), however it had no effects on the body weight. Silica+ supplementation on HN diet decreased the FCR by 8.09% during the grower period (P<0.05). Besides, it increased the fat retention and true metabolizable energy corrected by nitrogen (TMEn) by 1.30% and 4.41%, respectively. In general, silica+ supplementation was applied on the high nutrient diet during the grower period (22 to 35 days of ages) was effective. HN+Si produced the highest economic value diet in terms of income over feed and chick cost (IOFCC) increasing by 11.07% and relative feed cost (RFC) decreasing by 4.16%.
THE EFFECT OF COCOA LEAVES FEEDING ONT HE WEIGHT GAIN OF GOATS (STUDY ON FARMERS IN THE BANJARHARJO VILLAGE, KULON PROGO) Gunawan Gunawan; Wiendarti Indri Werdhany1; I Gede Suparta Budisatria
Buletin Peternakan Vol 41, No 4 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (4) NOVEMBER 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v41i4.25002

Abstract

Cocoa leave is potential as goat’s feed, but has not been widely used by farmers. The aim of this study was to observe the use of cocoa leaves as goat feed and their effect on the daily gain of goats. This study was conducted on 2 phases. Phase 1, study of the use of cocoa leaves as feed goat has been done on 10 farmers with innovation and 10 farmers without innovation. The observations were done by weighing of fresh cocoa leaves as goat feed for eight months (March to October, 2013). Independent t-test was done to analyze the cocoa leaves treatments on farmers with and without innovation . Phase 2, feeding trial has been done for 8 weeks to compare 3 level of feed treatments namely A (grass ad lib, cocoa leaves 2 kg/head/day, rice bran 0.6 kg/head/day), B (grass ad lib, cocoa leaves 2 kg/head/day) and C (grass ad lib). Each level of feed treatment consisted of 7 male Bligon goats, aged 11-12 months. Data was analyzed using analysis of covariance with initial body weight as covariate. The results showed that the use of cocoa leaves as goat feed on farmers  with innovations was 130 ± 18 g/head/day higher than on farmers without innovation namely 33 ± 19 g/head/day. Body weight gain of goat increased from 30,6 ± 13,5 g/head/day (feeding grass) to 61,2 ± 9,5  g/head/day if added cocoa leaves 2 kg/head/day and to 68,9 ± 24,0g/head/day if added cocoa leaves 2 kg/head/day and rice bran 0.6 kg/head/day. The study implied that cocoa-goats integration system should be developed to optimize the utilization of cocoa leaves as goat’s feed.
REGROWTH ABILITY OF ARBILA (Phaseolus lunatus L.) AFTER GRASSED AT DIFFERENT DOSAGE OF RHIZOBIUM INOCULANT AND AGE OF PLANT WHEN START GRAZED AT DRY LAND Bernadete Barek Koten; Redempta Wea; Bambang Hadisutanto; Maria Klara Salli; Agustinus Semang
Buletin Peternakan Vol 41, No 4 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (4) NOVEMBER 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v41i4.25302

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate regrowth ability of arbila (Phaseolus lunatus L.) after grazed at different rhizobium inoculants dosage and age of plant to be grassed, have conducted during 6 month at Noelbaki village and Politani Kupang General Laboratory. Factorial design with 3 dose levels of rhizobium inoculants ei: I0 = without inoculant, I10 = 10 g/kg seed dan I20 = 20 g/kg seed) and 3 dose of initial grazing time ei: G20 = 20 days, G30 = 30 days, dan G40 = 40 days, and 3 replications. The variables were number of shoots (shoot, plants vitality (%), covered area (cm), space between crops (crops/ m2), and chlorophyll (mg/ml). Obtained data were tested using analysis of variance followed by Duncan test (Duncan’s new multiple range test / DMRT). Result shows that interaction between inoculant dose with crops’ age when grazed greatly influence the size of covered area (P<0.01), eventhough other variable not influence Duncan test showed, the most extensive covered area are shown by I10G30 (262 cm), I0G40 (126 cm), and I2G40 (123 cm). As single factor, inoculant dose only affect to the size covered area, which the most extensive is shown by I10, and crops’ age when grazed affect the number of shoots, vitality, size of covered area (cm) and space between crops (crops/ m2. It can be concluded, the interaction between inoculum dose  and age of plant to be grassed was affecting the ability of regrowth of arbila, rhizobium inoculum caused arbila to withstand grazing stress, and arbila which is added inoculant 20 g/kg seed and were grazed at age  40 days can regrowth post grazed. It was concluded that the interaction between inoculum dose and age of plant to be grassed was affecting the ability of regrowth of arbila, rizobium inoculum caused arbila to withstand grazing stress, and rhizobium inoculum with dose of 20 g /kg of seed and started grazing at age 40 days which was most able to guarantee the regrowth of plant arbila post-shepherd.
AMMONIATION OF RICE STRAW AND SUPPLEMENTATION OF Paraserianthes falcataria AND Sapindus rarak ON IN VITRO RUMEN FERMENTATION AND METHANE PRODUCTION Anuraga Jayanegara; Nanang Krisnawan; Yeni Widyawati; Asep Sudarman
Buletin Peternakan Vol 41, No 4 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (4) NOVEMBER 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v41i4.25549

Abstract

This study aimed to observe the effects of rice straw ammoniation and supplementation of Paraserianthes falcataria and Sapindus rarak on rumen fermentation and methane production in vitro. Rice straw was ammoniated by adding 2% urea. Rice straw, ammoniated rice straw, P. falcataria leaves and S. rarak fruits were oven-dried and finely ground. Experimental treatments were arranged as follow: rice straw (T1), ammoniated rice straw (T2), T2 80% + P. falcataria 20% (T3), T2 60% + P. falcataria 40% (T4), T2 80% + P. falcataria 10% + S. rarak 10% (T5), and T2 60% + P. falcataria 20% + S. rarak 20% (T6). An amount of 1 g sample from each treatment was added with 100 ml rumen fluid and buffer mixture (1:2 v/v), and incubated in a water bath at 39 ºC for 48 h. The incubation was performed in four replicates and each replicate was represented by four incubation bottles. Results showed that urea treatment increased gas production of rice straw at 24 and 48 h, higher ammonia production, higher IVDMD, and lower methane production as compared to the untreated rice straw (P<0.05). Addition of P. falcataria or S. rarak at lower level produced similar ammonia concentration as ammoniated rice straw whereas their addition at higher level decreased ammonia concentration (P<0.05). Paraserianthes falcataria addition to ammoniated rice straw decreased protozoa population (P<0.05) and S. rarak further decreased the fauna population (P<0.05) as well. Inclusion of S. rarak at 20% DM (T6) produced the lowest methane production both at 24 and 48 h after incubation and lowest methane production per unit of DM degraded. It was concluded that ammoniation of rice straw improved its nutritional quality with lower methane production, and its mixture with P. falcataria and S. rarak further increased the quality and lower the production of methane, respectively.        
The Effect of 12 and 24-Hour Blue Lighting on Performance and Feeding Behaviour of Broiler Chickens Diah Reni Asih; Sri Harimurti; Wihandoyo Wihandoyo
Buletin Peternakan Vol 42, No 1 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (1) FEBRUARY 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i1.25696

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the effects of the 12 and 24 hours blue lighting on the performance of broiler chickens. This study used 2,700 broiler chickens that were divided into three treatments which are: control lighting (K) with conventional light used by farmers, 12-hours blue lighting (B12), and 24-hours  blue lighting (B24). Each treatment was repeated three times and consisted of 300 broiler chickens each. The parameters observed were feeding behaviour including the feeding duration, feeding frequency, and broiler chickens performance. The results showed that broilers treated with the B24 and B12 lighting have longer feeding duration (P<0.05), lower feeding frequency (P<0.05), higher body weight gained (P<0.05), and lower feed conversion (P<0.05) when compared to those of chickens with K lighting. The conclusion of this study showed that continuous 24-hours blue lighting (B24) caused longer feeding duration  and lower feeding frequency and the treatment of B24 and B12 lighting gave better benefits than control lighting. 
The Effect of Various Decomposers on Quality of Cattle Dung Compost Nur Shoodiq Alfadlli; Safuan Noor; Bayu Setya Hertanto; Muhammad Cahyadi
Buletin Peternakan Vol 42, No 3 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (3) AUGUST 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i3.25865

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the utilization of decomposer from bioethanol waste (DLB) with various commercial decomposers on quality of compost made from cattle dung. This study used completely randomized design (one-way ANOVA) with four treatments and five replications. Materials used in this study were cattle dung, water, molasses, DLB and various commercial decomposers (A, B, and C). The treatments in this study were cattle dung + BLB 0.5% (P0), cattle dung + decomposer A 0.5% (P1), cattle dung + decomposer B 0.5% (P2) and cattle dung + decomposer C 0.5% (P3). Then, the mixtures were aerobically ripened until four weeks. During composting, compost was stirred weekly. Furthermore, mature compost was analyzed to evaluate the amount of C Organic, total N, total P, total K, total Ca, total Mg, C/N ratio and pH value. The analysis of variance showed that there was no difference of the quality and pH value of compost made from cattle dung with utilization of DLB and commercial decomposers. It could be concluded that utilization of DLB in composting of cattle dung had identically quality and pH value of compost with utilization of commercial decomposers, therefore, this technology could be an alternative to process waste from home industry of bioethanol.
Analysis of Business Efficiency Level of Beef Cattle in Banggai District of Central Sulawesi Supardi Rusdiana; Soeharsono Soeharsono
Buletin Peternakan Vol 42, No 1 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (1) FEBRUARY 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i1.25917

Abstract

This study aims to determine the level of efficiency analysis of beef cattle business in breeders. The research was conducted in Batui Sub-district, Banggai Regency, Central Sulawesi in 2015, using completely randomized design (CRD), with control I, treatment II = 1 + supplemented feed 1.00% of body weight, treatment III = 1 + supplement feed 1,50% of body weight and treatment IV = 1 + supplemented feed 2.00% of body weight, according to the weight of the livestock. Primary data obtained from interviews on business units of beef cattle farmers, while secondary data obtained from the relevant agencies. The collected data were analyzed descriptively, qualitatively and economic analysis. The results showed that income on the implementation of supplemented feed of the highest concentrate feed was achieved at 2.00% supplementation level. The gain in control I is IDR13,680,-/head, R/C ratio 1.50 and B/C ratio 0.56, treatment II IDR19,380,-/head, R/C 2.15 and B/C 1.15, treatment III of IDR25,080,-/head, R/C ratio 2.26 and B/C ratio 1.26 and treatment IV of IDR28,500,-/head, R/C 2.44 and B/C 1.44. Financially, beef cattle business is profitable and shows the feasibility of cattle business deserve to be developed.
INVESTMENT ANALYSIS FOR SMALL SCALE LAYER CHICKEN BUSINESS (Case Study in Triwidadi Village Pajangan Sub District Bantul Yogyakarta) Rini Widiati; Sudi Nurtini; Suci Paramitasari Syahlani; Bambang Ariyadi
Buletin Peternakan Vol 41, No 4 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (4) NOVEMBER 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v41i4.25965

Abstract

Chicken eggs are the most popular and nutritious food in human dietary.The production activities require investments that should create benefit for the business holder, especially for small-scale entrepreneurs with capital constraint and risks. The purpose of this study was to determine investment feasibility and to set alternatives in dealing with the risks on the small scale layer business. Survey method was implemented using 73 respondents selected purposively of small scale layer chicken business in Triwidadi village of Bantul district, Yogyakarta as the sample. Data were collected by direct interview to respondents using questionnaires that related to the research problem. Analysis of investment financial feasibility criteria’s using Net Present Value, Benefit Cost Ratio and Internal Rate of Return, followed by sensitivity analysis in facing business risk.  The result revealed that the average number of birds raised was 1572 birds. The NPV was IDR 37,377,383 per 5 years of investment, B / C ratio more than 1 and IRR was 20.58%. Based on the existing production management, layer chicken investment by small-scale farmers was profitable, but farmers faced on the risk of losses due to increasing feed prices, decreasing egg prices, and increased mortality. In anticipating the risks, farmers should improve productivity so that the Hen Day Average of egg production at least was 77%, on the increase in feed prices and decrease in egg prices of 5%. Small scale layer businesses could provide employment and welfare for society of lower classes.
Study of Animal-Based Food Product Labeling use Candra Pungki Wibowo; Suci Paramitasari Syahlani; Sudi Nurtini
Buletin Peternakan Vol 43, No 2 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (2) MAY 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v43i2.26102

Abstract

This study was conducted to identify the food labeling profile in animal-based food products based on consumers’ age and gender, consumers’ preference of the information provided in the label, consumers’ behavior in reading the label, and consumers’ knowledge about food labeling. A total of 100 respondents participated in the study. The sampling was done by using judgmental sampling method with the following criteria: (1) respondent has bought animal-based food products within the last month of the study; (2) respondent’s age was over 18 years old. The data were analyzed descriptively and by using regression analysis. The results showed that female respondents and a group of 50 years or older respondents were used to read the food label frequently compared to other respondent groups. The type of information which considered as the most important was the expiration date, followed by product’s name, ingredients, halal status, nutritional value, product’s instruction for usage and its irregularities, net weight, and the producer’s name and address. This study also identified that the majority of the respondents, as many as 67%, already had good knowledge about food labels, while the other 32% had adequate knowledge, and only 1% of the respondents had a little knowledge about food labels. It can be concluded that consumers’ perception of the potential risks on animal-based food products affect their behaviour in reading the label (p<0.05) while consumers’ health condition and time availability to buy the products did not affect their behaviour in reading the label in animal based food products.
Application of Multiplex PCR Assay for Campylobacter fetus Sub sp. Detection and Differentiation in Bovine Preputial Wash Seruni Agistiana; Surachmi Setiyaningsih; Agustin Indrawati
Buletin Peternakan Vol 42, No 1 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (1) FEBRUARY 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i1.26114

Abstract

The aim of this research was to evaluate the detection and differentiation of C. fetus subspecies through multiplex PCR (mPCR) method from the bovine preputial wash. The evaluation was done by comparing 2 extraction methods, which was by commercial kit extraction and boiling method, and also by measuring the effect of Transport Enrichment Media (TEM) addition as bacterial enrichment. Spiked bovine preputial washes with 2 extraction methods (commercial kit and boiling), with and without TEM addition were used as a sample. The results showed that the highest sensitivity/specificity was by boiling extraction without TEM addition, which reached 83.3%/100% for all or grouped sample. The results also supported by Poisson regression analysis which showed the comparison between sample with and without TEM addition which had 1.3 Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR). The obtained IRR score indicated that sample without TEM addition had 30% better result compared to the sample with TEM addition. Furthermore, a comparison between commercial kit and boiling extraction showed no significant difference (1.029 IRR). The research concluded that boiling extraction without TEM addition is the most accurate, fast and economical extraction method regarding its high sensitivity and specificity value, with less than 24 hours testing time and without any commercial kit requirements. However, a validation and verification with field sample were still needed before applied in the laboratory.

Page 23 of 105 | Total Record : 1046

 21   22   23   24   25 

Filter by Year

1987 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 49, No 4 (2025): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 49 (4) November 2025 Vol 49, No 3 (2025): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 49 (3) August 2025 Vol 49, No 2 (2025): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 49 (2) MAY 2025 Vol 49, No 1 (2025): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 49 (1) FEBRUARY 2025 Vol 48, No 4 (2024): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 48 (4) NOVEMBER 2024 Vol 48, No 3 (2024): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 48 (3) AUGUST 2024 Vol 48, No 2 (2024): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 48 (2) MAY 2024 Vol 48, No 1 (2024): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 48 (1) FEBRUARY 2024 Vol 47, No 4 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (4) NOVEMBER 2023 Vol 47, No 3 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (3) AUGUST 2023 Vol 47, No 2 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (2) MAY 2023 Vol 47, No 1 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (1) FEBRUARY 2023 Vol 46, No 4 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (4) NOVEMBER 2022 Vol 46, No 3 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (3) AUGUST 2022 Vol 46, No 2 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (2) MAY 2022 Vol 46, No 1 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (1) FEBRUARY 2022 Vol 45, No 4 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (4) NOVEMBER 2021 Vol 45, No 3 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (3) AUGUST 2021 Vol 45, No 2 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (2) MAY 2021 Vol 45, No 1 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (1) FEBRUARY 2021 Vol 44, No 4 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (4) NOVEMBER 2020 Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020 Vol 44, No 2 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (2) MAY 2020 Vol 44, No 1 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (1) FEBRUARY 2020 Vol 43, No 4 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (4) NOVEMBER 2019 Vol 43, No 3 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (3) AUGUST 2019 Vol 43, No 2 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (2) MAY 2019 Vol 43, No 1 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (1) FEBRUARY 2019 Vol 42, No 4 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (4) NOVEMBER 2018 Vol 42, No 3 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (3) AUGUST 2018 Vol 42, No 2 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (2) MAY 2018 Vol 42, No 1 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (1) FEBRUARY 2018 Vol 41, No 4 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (4) NOVEMBER 2017 Vol 41, No 3 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (3) AGUSTUS 2017 Vol 41, No 2 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (2) MEI 2017 Vol 41, No 1 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (1) FEBRUARI 2017 Vol 40, No 3 (2016): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 40 (3) OKTOBER 2016 Vol 40, No 2 (2016): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 40 (2) JUNI 2016 Vol 40, No 1 (2016): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 40 (1) FEBRUARI 2016 Vol 39, No 3 (2015): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 39 (3) OKTOBER 2015 Vol 39, No 2 (2015): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 39 (2) JUNI 2015 Vol 39, No 1 (2015): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 39 (1) FEBRUARI 2015 Vol 38, No 3 (2014): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 38 (3) OKTOBER 2014 Vol 38, No 2 (2014): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 38 (2) JUNI 2014 Vol 38, No 1 (2014): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 38 (1) FEBRUARI 2014 Vol 37, No 3 (2013): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 37 (3) OKTOBER 2013 Vol 37, No 2 (2013): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 37 (2) JUNI 2013 Vol 37, No 1 (2013): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 37 (1) Februari 2013 Vol 36, No 3 (2012): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 36 (3) Oktober 2012 Vol 36, No 2 (2012): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 36 (2) Juni 2012 Vol 36, No 1 (2012): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 36 (1) Februari 2012 Vol 35, No 3 (2011): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 35 (3) Oktober 2011 Vol 35, No 2 (2011): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 35 (2) Juni 2011 Vol 35, No 1 (2011): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 35 (1) Februari 2011 Vol 34, No 3 (2010): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 34 (3) Oktober 2010 Vol 34, No 2 (2010): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 34 (2) Juni 2010 Vol 34, No 1 (2010): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 34 (1) Februari 2010 Vol 33, No 3 (2009): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 33 (3) Oktober 2009 Vol 33, No 2 (2009): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 33 (2) Juni 2009 Vol 33, No 1 (2009): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 33 (1) Februari 2009 Vol 32, No 3 (2008): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 32 (3) Oktober 2008 Vol 32, No 2 (2008): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 32 (2) Juni 2008 Vol 32, No 1 (2008): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 32 (1) Februari 2008 Vol 31, No 4 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (4) November 2007 Vol 31, No 3 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (3) Agustus 2007 Vol 31, No 2 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (2) Mei 2007 Vol 31, No 1 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (1) Februari 2007 Vol 30, No 4 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (4) November 2006 Vol 30, No 3 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (3) Agustus 2006 Vol 30, No 2 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (2) Mei 2006 Vol 30, No 1 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (1) Februari 2006 Vol 29, No 4 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (4) November 2005 Vol 29, No 3 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (3) Agustus 2005 Vol 29, No 2 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (2) Mei 2005 Vol 29, No 1 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (1) Februari 2005 Vol 28, No 4 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (4) November 2004 Vol 28, No 3 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (3) Agustus 2004 Vol 28, No 2 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (2) Mei 2004 Vol 28, No 1 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (1) Februari 2004 Vol 27, No 4 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (4) November 2003 Vol 27, No 3 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (3) Agustus 2003 Vol 27, No 2 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (2) Mei 2003 Vol 27, No 1 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (1) Februari 2003 Vol 26, No 4 (2002): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 26 (4) November 2002 Vol 26, No 1 (2002): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 26 (1) Februari 2002 Vol 25, No 4 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (4) November 2001 Vol 25, No 3 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (3) Agustus 2001 Vol 25, No 2 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (2) Mei 2001 Vol 25, No 1 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (1) Februari 2001 Vol 24, No 4 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (4) November 2000 Vol 24, No 3 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (3) Agustus 2000 Vol 24, No 2 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (2) Mei 2000 Vol 24, No 1 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (1) Februari 2000 Vol 23, No 4 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (4) November 1999 Vol 23, No 3 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (3) Agustus 1999 Vol 23, No 2 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (2) Mei 1999 Vol 23, No 1 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (1) Februari 1999 Vol 22, No 4 (1998): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 22 (4) November 1998 Vol 21, No 3 (1997): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 21 (3) November 1997 Vol 21, No 1 (1997): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 21 (1) April 1997 Vol 20, No 2 (1996): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 20 (2) Desember 1996 Vol 20, No 1 (1996): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 20 (1) Juni 1996 Vol 19, No 2 (1995): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 19 (2) Desember 1995 Vol 19, No 1 (1995): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 19 (1) Juni 1995 1995: BULETIN PETERNAKAN SPECIAL EDITION 1995 Vol 18, No 4 (1994): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 18 (4) Desember 1994 Vol 17, No 1 (1993): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 17 (1) Juni 1993 Vol 16, No 1 (1992): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 16 (1) Desember 1992 Vol 15, No 2 (1991): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 15 (2) Desember 1991 Vol 15, No 1 (1991): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 15 (1) Juni 1991 Vol 14, No 2 (1990): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 14 (2) Desember 1990 Vol 14, No 1 (1990): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 14 (1) Juni 1990 Vol 13, No 1 (1989): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 13 (1) September 1989 Vol 11, No 2 (1987): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 11 (2) September 1987 Vol 11, No 1 (1987): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 11 (1) Maret 1987 More Issue