cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M.Ya’kub Aiyub Kadir
Contact Email
kanun.jih@usk.ac.id
Phone
+62651-7552295
Journal Mail Official
kanun.jih@usk.ac.id
Editorial Address
Redaksi Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala Jl. Putroe Phang No. 1, Darussalam, Banda Aceh 23111
Location
Kab. aceh besar,
Aceh
INDONESIA
Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published by Universitas Syiah Kuala
ISSN : 08545499     EISSN : 25278428     DOI : 10.24815/kanun.v20i3.11380
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
anun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (KJIH), the Indonesian Journal of Autonomy Law, is an international journal dedicated to the study of autonomy law within the framework of national and international legal systems. Published thrice annually (April, August, December), KJIH provides valuable insights for scholars, policy analysts, policymakers, and practitioners. Managed by the Faculty of Law at Syiah Kuala University in Banda Aceh, Indonesia, KJIH has been fostering legal scholarship since its establishment in June 1991, with the ISSN: 0854 – 5499 and e-ISSN (Online): 2527 – 8428. In 2020, it received national accreditation (SINTA 2) from the Ministry of Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia and the National Research and Innovation Agency. KJIH is actively pursuing indexing in prestigious databases like Scopus, Web of Science and other global indexes. We publish in English for accessibility, not as a political statement. The Editorial Board shall not be responsible for views expressed in every article.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 483 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
The Problems in Mineral and Coal Mining Regulations Perspectives Political Law and Responsive Law Putra Astomo
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 23, No 1 (2021): Vol. 23, No. 1, April 2021
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v23i1.19949

Abstract

Minerals and coal are two elements of natural wealth owned by the Indonesian people and managed according to the country's economic system as regulated in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This paper examines the criticism of the birth of mineral and coal mining legal products amid the Corona Virus Pandemic Disease (Covid-19) that is deadly and afflicts most countries in the world including Indonesia, namely Law Number 3 of 2020 on Amendments to Law Number 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining thus the regulations of mineral and coal mining creates problems. The approach method was used a socio legal approach. The results of the study show that problems that arise in the regulations of mineral and coal mining in terms from the political law and responsive law perspectives due to two factors between: (1) Contrary with establishment of legislation principles related discussion the draft Law on Amendments to Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining. (2) Contrary with responsive law because participations of community low in establishment the draft Law on Amendments to Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining.
Kepastian Hukum Qanun Aceh Nomor 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh Arabiyani Arabiyani
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 20, No 2 (2018): Vol. 20, No. 2, (Agustus 2018)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v20i2.11165

Abstract

Pasal 18B ayat (1) UUD Tahun 1945 memberikan legitimasi terhadap Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh yang merupakan hasil kesepakatan Pemerintah Indonesia dengan GAM. Hal ini kemudian dituangkan ke dalam Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh. Permasalahannya adalah materi qanun tersebut dianggap bertentangan dengan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 77 Tahun 2007. Pemerintah Pusat menghendaki perbaiki terhadap beberapa materi qanun, namun pihak Pemerintah Aceh dianggap menyalahi MoU Helsinki. Rumusan masalah kajian ini sebagai berikut: Pertama, apakah landasan pemikiran lahirnya Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh? Kedua, apakah akibat hukum dari adanya Pasal 246 ayat (2), dan ayat (4) serta Pasal 247 Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh? Ketiga, apakah akibat hukum adanya Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh? Hasil penelitian sebagai berikut: Pertama, menemukan landasan pemikiran lahirnya Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh terdiri dari Pasal 18B UUD Tahun 1945 serta perumusan Pasal 246 dan Pasal 247 Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2006. Kedua, bahwa akibat hukum dari adanya Pasal 246 dan Pasal 247 berlaku dan sah untuk diterapkan melalui pembentukannya Qanun Aceh. Ketiga, konsekuensi yuridis adanya Qanun Aceh No. 3 Tahun 2013 berlaku secara yuridis dan dapat ditindaklanjuti oleh Pemerintah Aceh karena sudah diundangkan dalam lembaran daerah. Tentu sudah berlaku secara otomatis karena pada saat disahkan oleh Gubernur Aceh selaku Kepala Pemerintah Aceh dan DPRA secara serta merta diundangkan dalam lembaran daerah Pemerintah Provinsi Aceh. Legal Certainty of Qanun Aceh Number 3 Year 2013 On Flag and Symbol of Aceh  The 1945 Constitution Article 18B paragraph (1) gives legitimacy to the Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on the Flag and the Symbol of Aceh which is the result of the Government of Indonesia's agreement with GAM. This is then poured into Law Number 11 Year 2006 regarding Aceh Government. The problem is that the Qanun material is considered to be contradictory to Government Regulation Number 77 of 2007. The central government wants to improve on some of the Qanun material, but the Government of Aceh is considered to have violated the Helsinki MoU. The formulation of the problem as follows: First, what is the basis of thinking the formulation of Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on the flag and the symbol of Aceh? Second, what are the legal consequences of the existence of Article 246 paragraph (2), and paragraph (4) and Article 247, Law Number 11 Year 2006 regarding Aceh Government? Thirdly, what are the legal consequences of Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on the Flag and the Symbol of Aceh? The results of the research are as follows: First, find the foundation of the thought of the birth of Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on the Flag and the Symbol of Aceh consists of Article 18B of the 1945 Constitution and the formulation of Article 246 and Article 247 of Law Number 11 Year 2006. Second, the existence of Article 246 and Article 247 is valid and valid to be implemented through the establishment of Aceh Qanun. Thirdly, the juridical consequences of the Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 are valid in juridical manner and can be acted upon by the Government of Aceh as already enacted in the regional slabs. Of course already valid automatically because at the time passed by the Governor of Aceh as Head of the Government of Aceh and DPRA is immediately promulgated in the sheet area of Aceh Provincial Government.
Kewenangan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Terkait Aspek Pidana Dibidang Kenotariatan Dahlan Dahlan
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2016): Vol. 18, No. 1, (April, 2016)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRAK. Majelis pengawas tetap eksis dalam melakukan pengawasan terhadap notaris karena masih banyak kewenangan lain dibidang pengawasan yang diberikan oleh UUJN. Kewenangan majelis pengawas yang dilimpahkan kepada majelis kehormatan hanya terkait dengan memberi persetujuan atau tidak terhadap notaris dalam proses pidana. Kehadiran lembaga majelis kehormatan notaris adalah sebagai wujud dari perlindungan hukum terhadap jabatan notaris dan perlindungan hukum terhadap masyarakat. kehadiran lembaga majelis kehormatan notaris dapat membantu penyidik dalam menemukan ada tidaknya unsur pidana terkait dengan minuta akta dan protokol notaris. The Authority of Honour Board of Notary in Regard with Criminal in the Field of Notary  ABSTRACT. Honor supervisory avails in terms of controlling notary as there are many other authorities in the field of supervision given by Notary Act. The authority delegated to the supervisory council chamber is associated with the honor only to give consent or not to the notary in criminal proceedings. The presence of a notary public assemblies honor is as a form of legal protection of the office of notary and legal protection of public. The presence of a notary honor assemblies can assist investigators in determining whether there is a criminal element associated with minuta notary deed and its protocol.
Penerapan Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Islam dalam Istinbath Hukum (Analisis Kajian Dewan Hisbah/Persis) Syamsul Bahri
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 13, No 3 (2011): Vol. 13, No. 3, (Desember, 2011)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The principles of Islamic law are fundamentals that can be an operational reference in finding Islamic law which is a study to ease Islamic thinkers in researching and finding a law that has not ever been ruled. It is required in terms of overcoming the worries of Muslems in deciding wrether a matter can be done or not on daily life. Generally it covers the case and problem recently, such as the use of urine as medicine, cheque etd responding such matter. Persis as one of community associations of muslems in Indonesia, through its assembly board of hisbah does the draft and research in order to find the law from a daily problem. The process of law finding is done by looking at the especial pinciples. In addition, it should refer to al-Quran and as-Sunnah first. The Implementation of Islamic Principles in Finding Law  (Analysis Hisbah/Persis Board)
Inkonsistensi Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Budiman NPD Sinaga
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15, No 1 (2013): Vol. 15, No. 1, (April, 2013)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT: During the preparation of Indonesian independence, the founding fathers designed a Constitution. Constitution was later known as the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The Constitution embraces of sovereignty of the people. To overcome the shortcomings of the Constitution, it has been madeseveral changes. However, changes were turned out inconsistent with existing regulations, such as the regulation of representative democracy and direct democracy. To address the inconsistencies, it then needs to be revised more as there are various provisions of the Constitution that are inconsistent with aforementioned matters. Inconsistency of People Sovereignity in the Constitution 1945 of the Republic of Indonesia
FORMULATING YOUTUBE ACCOUNTS AS A COLLATERAL OBJECT: A PROGRESSIVE LEGAL PERSPECTIVE Ni Made Indah Corry Andani; Anak Agung Ayu Ngurah Sri Rahayu Gorda; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 25, No. 2, August 2023: Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Legal Reform
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v25i2.32298

Abstract

Using a YouTube account as a collateral object is one of the progressive  legal policies as   YouTube  nowadays tends to have economic orientation. This study  discusses the legal certainty of setting up a YouTube account as a collateral object  from a progressive legal perspective. This is a normative legal research with a conceptual and statutory approach. This research shows that   in order to guarantee legal certainty, it is necessary to establish   the Financial Service Authority (OJK) Regulation which substantively regulates standards and guidelines  for assessing a YouTube account whether or not it can be used as collateral for debt.  Using a YouTube account that can be used as collateral for debt must be seen from its positive and negative impacts.  It is necessary to diagnose potential problems that might arise in the future; hence there will be no  Youtube accounts can be used as debt collateral, as it would need   the parameters to be taken  as a standard for assessing a sustainable economic value. 
Capaian Program Legislasi Aceh Basri Effendi; Sufyan Sufyan
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 22, No 2 (2020): Vol. 22, No. 2, Agustus 2020
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v22i2.16347

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis capaian program legislasi daerah dari aspek politik hukum. Program tersebut dilaksanakan setiap tahun lembaga eksekutif dan legislatif sebagai bentuk legal policy dalam menyusun suatu program, yang mana setiap program tersebut membutuhkan landasan hukum yang konstitusional. Hal ini juga menjadi salah satu indikator tercapainya good governance dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis empiris dan análisis data kualitatif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa tingkat keberhasilan pembahasan Program legislasi daerah di Aceh hanya 24,66% per/tahun. Ada pelbagai kendala yang menghambat pelaksanaan program legislasi daerah di Aceh, diantaranya adalah anggaran yang minim, political will yang tidak kuat, terbatasnya sumber daya manusia dengan waktu yang tersedia, serta tidak realistisnya antara jumlah qanun usulan Prolegda dengan kemampuan penyelesaian. Pemerintah dan DPR harus lebih realistis dalam menetapkan jumlah target legislasi daerah tiap tahun.  Achievement of Aceh Legislation Programs This study aims to analyze the achievements of the regional legislative program from the political law aspects. The program is carried out annually by the executive and legislative bodies as a form of legal policy in developing a program where each of which requires a constitutional legal basis. This is also one indicator of the achievement of good governance in the administration of regional government. Using empirical juridical research methods and qualitative data analysis, this study found that the success rate of discussion of the regional legislative program in Aceh was only 24.66% per year. There are various obstacles that hamper the implementation of the regional legislation program in Aceh, including a minimal budget, insufficient political will, limited human resources and time, and an unrealistic number of Prolegda's proposed qanuns and the ability to resolve the proposal. The government and Parliament should be more realistic in setting the target number of regional legislation each year.
Dukungan Infrastruktur Hukum dalam Pengembangan Green Investment di Provinsi Aceh Muhammad Insa Ansari; Adi Hermansyah
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 17, No 1 (2015): Vol. 17, No. 1, (April, 2015)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRAK: Pengembangan green investment harus didukung oleh infrastruktur hukum pada semua level pemerintahan. Pengembangan green investment yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah pusat telah dituang dalam sejumlah peraturan perundang-undangan, diantaranya adalah Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal dan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2012 tentang Rencana Umum Penanaman Modal. Berdasarkan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pemerintah Provinsi Aceh telah memiliki kebijakan green investment baik dalam Qanun Aceh maupun Peraturan Gubernur Aceh, Pemerintah Kabupaten Aceh Besar telah memiliki kebijakan green investment secara parsial yang dituangkan dalam Peraturan Bupati Kabupaten Aceh Besar, sementara itu Pemerintah Kabupaten Aceh Barat belum memiliki kebijakan green investment secara khusus. Dukungan infrastruktur hukum dalam pengembangan green investment yang dimiliki Pemerintah Aceh berupa Qanun Aceh  Nomor 4 Tahun  2013 tentang Perubahan Atas Qanun Aceh Nomor 5 Tahun 2009 tentang Penanaman Modal dan Peraturan Gubernur Aceh Nomor 71 Tahun 2012 tentang Rencana Umum Penanaman Modal Aceh, kemudian dukungan infrastruktur hukum yang dimiliki Pemerintah Kabupaten Aceh Besar dalam pengembangan green investment berupa Peraturan Bupati Aceh Besar Nomor 11 Tahun 2011 tentang Investasi Hijau di Bidang Perikanan dan Kelautan dan Peraturan Bupati Aceh Besar Nomor 3 Tahun 2014 tentang Kebijakan Subsidi Hijau Bidang Perikanan, sementara Kabupaten Aceh Barat belum memiliki infrastruktur hukum secara khusus dalam kaitannya dengan green investment. Untuk itu maka dipandang perlu Pemerintah Provinsi Aceh dan Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota membuat dukungan infrastruktur hukum dalam pengembangan green investmen sesuai dengan kewenangan masing-masing.  Support of Legal Infrastructure in Developing Green Investment in Aceh Province ABSTRACT: The research shows that the Aceh Provincial government has had a policy of green investment both in Qanun Aceh and Regulation governor of Aceh, the Government of Aceh Besar district has had a policy of green investment is partially outlined in the decree Aceh Besar District, while the Goverment of West Aceh District has not had a policy green investment in particular. Support the legal infrastructure for the development of green investment owned by the Government of Aceh in the form of Aceh Qanun No. 4 of 2013 on the Amendment of Aceh Qanun No. 5, 2009 on Investment and Regulation of the Governor of Aceh No. 71, 2012 on the General Plan Investment Aceh, then the support of legal infrastructure owned by the Government of Aceh Besar in the development of green investment in the form of decree Aceh Besar No. 11, 2011 on the Green Investment in the Field of Fisheries and Marine Resources and the decree of Aceh Besar No 3, 2014 on Subsidy Policy Green Field of Fisheries, while the West Aceh District is not the legal infrastructure specifically in relation to green investment. For that it is necessary Aceh Provincial government and district/city government create legal infrastructure support in the development of green investment in accordance with each authority.
Pembayaran Pidana Uang Pengganti dalam Perkara Korupsi Intan Munirah; Mohd. Din; Efendi Efendi
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 19, No 2 (2017): Vol. 19, No. 2, (Agustus, 2017)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRAK: Pidana tambahan uang pengganti merupakan salah satu konsekuensi hukum yang dibebankan kepada pelaku tindak pidana korupsi. Perbuatan pelaku telah mengakibat-kan kerugian negara. Pembebanan tersebut merupakan pidana tambahan dari pidana pokoknya. Uang pengganti dibayar dalam waktu paling lama satu bulan sesudah putusan pengadilan yang telah memperoleh hukum yang tetap. Penelitian ini ingin mengetahui efektivitas ketentuan ambang waktu satu bulan dalam pelaksanaan pembayaran uang pengganti dan penghitungan besaran jumlahnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis-empiris. Penelitian menemukan bahwa mekanisme pembayaran pidana uang pengganti tidak sesuai dengan amanat Undang-Undang  Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Undang-Undang Perbendaharaan Negara dalam kaitannya dengan pemidanaan dan pembayaran kerugian negara. Temuan ini menyebabkan ketidakpastian hukum dan ketidakefektifan proses pengembalian kerugian negara. Criminal Sanction Compensation Payment As Liability For States Financial Lost In The Case Of Corruption ABSTRACT: Additional penalty of compensation money is one of the legal consequences imposed on the perpetrators of corruption. The perpetration has caused a state’s losses. The money replacing the loss is an additional penalty of the principal penalty. It is paid within a month after a court decision enforceable. This paper is going to discuss the effective-ness of the provisions of the threshold of one month in the application of the payment and the calculation of the amount paid. This is juridical-empirical research. It shows that the mechanism of paying the state’s loss in against the mandate of the Corruption Act and the State Treasury Law in relation to the prosecution and payment of state losses. It causes law uncertainty and ineffectiveness of the compensation process.
Dinamika Formalisasi Syariat Islam di Indonesia Kurniawan Kurniawan
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 14, No 3 (2012): Vol. 14, No. 3, (Desember, 2012)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to describe a long struggle to incorporate Islamic law into the constitution and various legislations in Indonesia pre and post Indonesia’s Independence. In addition, this study also illustrates the challenges faced by Moslems who brought the idea of formalization and implementation of Islamic law into state institutions as well as regional institutions such as the Aceh region. The study also tried to give an idea how far the opportunities provided by democracy in Indonesia at this time to be used by the Muslims to offer what they consider as the Islamic law. The research was done by using library research (normative research) through collecting and studying literatures, legislations, law journals, encyclopedias, as well as citing the opinions of scholars and activists (human defender) Islamic law and other relevant opinion. Therefore this type of study called normative legal research or study by using a conceptual analysis of social history and law issue (legal-historical social approaches). The study result shows that the efforts made by Moslem people to get guarantee constitutionally in implementing Islamic, essentially has got a great opportunity in line with the basic legitimating granted by Article 29 of the 1945 Constitution. In the current era of democracy, there are some opportunity to synchronize elements of Islamic law into policies and legislations products is a major challenge, especially for areas that are socially and culturally not or not yet ready to apply them in daily life people. The Dynamics of Formalization of Islamic Law in Indonesia

Page 3 of 49 | Total Record : 483

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2010 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 27, No 2: August 2025: Islam and Justice development in Indonesia Vol 27, No 1: April 2025: Customary Law and development in Indonesia Vol 26, No 3: December 2024: Law and Justice in Digital Age Vol 26, No 2: August 2024: The Global and National Challenges for Justice Vol 26, No 1: April 2024: Islam and Human Rights: National and Global Perspective Vol. 25, No. 3, December 2023: Law and Justice in Various Context in Indonesia Vol. 25, No. 2, August 2023: Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Legal Reform Vol. 25, No. 1, April 2023: Legal Developments in National and Global Context Vol 24, No 3 (2022): Vol. 24, No. 3, December 2022 Vol 24, No 2 (2022): Vol. 24, No. 2, August 2022 Vol 24, No 1 (2022): Vol. 24, No. 1, April 2022 Vol 23, No 3 (2021): Vol. 23, No. 3, December 2021 Vol 23, No 2 (2021): Vol. 23, No. 2, August 2021 Vol 23, No 1 (2021): Vol. 23, No. 1, April 2021 Vol 22, No 3 (2020): Vol. 22, No. 3, Desember 2020 Vol 22, No 2 (2020): Vol. 22, No. 2, Agustus 2020 Vol 22, No 1 (2020): Vol. 22 No. 1, April 2020 Vol 21, No 3 (2019): Vol. 21, No. 3 (Desember 2019) Vol 21, No 2 (2019): Vol. 21, No. 2 (Agustus 2019) Vol 21, No 1 (2019): Vol. 21, No. 1 (April 2019) Vol 20, No 3 (2018): Vol. 20, No. 3 (Desember 2018) Vol 20, No 2 (2018): Vol. 20, No. 2, (Agustus 2018) Vol 20, No 1 (2018): Vol. 20, No. 1, (April 2018) Vol 19, No 3 (2017): Vol. 19, No. 3, (Desember, 2017) Vol 19, No 2 (2017): Vol. 19, No. 2, (Agustus, 2017) Vol 19, No 1 (2017): Vol. 19, No. 1, (April, 2017) Vol 18, No 3 (2016): Vol. 18, No. 3, (Desember, 2016) Vol 18, No 2 (2016): Vol. 18, No. 2, (Agustus, 2016) Vol 18, No 1 (2016): Vol. 18, No. 1, (April, 2016) Vol 17, No 3 (2015): Vol. 17, No. 3, (Desember, 2015) Vol 17, No 2 (2015): Vol. 17, No. 2, (Agustus, 2015) Vol 17, No 1 (2015): Vol. 17, No. 1, (April, 2015) Vol 16, No 3 (2014): Vol. 16, No. 3, (Desember, 2014) Vol 16, No 2 (2014): Vol. 16, No. 2, (Agustus, 2014) Vol 16, No 1 (2014): Vol. 16, No. 1, (April, 2014) Vol 15, No 3 (2013): Vol. 15, No. 3, (Desember, 2013) Vol 15, No 2 (2013): Vol. 15, No. 2, (Agustus, 2013) Vol 15, No 1 (2013): Vol. 15, No. 1, (April, 2013) Vol 14, No 3 (2012): Vol. 14, No. 3, (Desember, 2012) Vol 14, No 2 (2012): Vol. 14, No. 2, (Agustus, 2012) Vol 14, No 1 (2012): Vol. 14, No. 1, (April, 2012) Vol 13, No 3 (2011): Vol. 13, No. 3, (Desember, 2011) Vol 13, No 2 (2011): Vol. 13, No. 2, (Agustus, 2011) Vol 13, No 1 (2011): Vol. 13, No. 1, (April, 2011) Vol 12, No 3 (2010): Vol. 12, No. 3, (Desember, 2010) Vol 12, No 2 (2010): Vol. 12, No. 2, (Agustus, 2010) Vol 12, No 1 (2010): Vol. 12, No. 1, (April, 2010) More Issue