cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rianda Dirkareshza
Contact Email
riandadirkareshza@upnvj.ac.id
Phone
+6281293604632
Journal Mail Official
flj@upnvj.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung Yos Sudarso Jl. RS Fatmawati No. 1, Pondok Labu Kecamatan Cilandak, Jakarta Selatan DKI Jakarta, 12450
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Forschungsforum Law Journal
Published by Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
ISSN : 30466598     EISSN : 30469899     DOI : https://ejournal.upnvj.ac.id/flj/article/view/7740
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal ini menerima seluruh tulisan dari peneliti, akademisi dan praktisi yang bergerak di bidang hukum. Ruang lingkup dari jurnal ini: Hukum Pidana, Hukum Perdata, Hukum Internasional, Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Hukum Adat, Hukum Bisnis, Hukum Lingkungan, dan lingkup lainnya yang memiliki kaitan dengan hukum.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 52 Documents
 2   3   4   5   6 
Mekanisme Penegakan Hukum dalam Perdagangan Pengaruh Politik serta Tinjauan Kekuasaan dengan Keadilan Distributif Faathir Andar Nurali
Forschungsforum Law Journal Vol 3 No 01 (2026): JANUARI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/flj.v3i01.13530

Abstract

Trading influence as the influence of constitutional politics in the process of obtaining undue benefits. This influence is spread across the national institutional area in promising public office directly or indirectly for the abuse of power that applies. In this problem, a law enforcement mechanism is needed by adjusting the institutional power of the state. This mechanism uses a review of power with a process of distributive justice on institutional power and political relations. The review is carried out to form transparency of power in avoiding abuse of law and institutional power. Transparency of power is formed in accordance with the legal mechanism on distributive justice when the adjustment of trading influence is taking place. In this legal mechanism, the process will create transparency in the use of power according to the review of distributive justice. The research method used is normative empirical research with a process of law enforcement mechanisms in reviewing the power of trading political influence. Law enforcement in every institutional institution must always be carried out, especially in the paradigm of trading political influence. So, the results of this law enforcement create accountability and transparency of Good governance with distributive justice in every state power institution.
Kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Sengketa Pemecatan Kader Partai Politik: Studi Kasus Perkara Misriani Ilyas Josua Satria Collins
Forschungsforum Law Journal Vol 3 No 01 (2026): JANUARI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/flj.v3i01.13552

Abstract

Dismissal of political party members has increasingly emerged as a constitutional issue in Indonesia, particularly when internal party decisions directly affect individual political rights and public office positions. This phenomenon raises a fundamental question on the boundary between party autonomy and the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court (PTUN) in safeguarding citizens’ constitutional rights. This research aims to analyze the scope of PTUN’s authority in adjudicating disputes concerning party member dismissal, specifically when such decisions trigger administrative actions by state bodies, such as interim replacement (PAW) by the General Elections Commission (KPU). This study employs a normative juridical method. The analysis indicates that although political parties are private legal entities, their internal decisions may be subject to public law review once they produce administrative decisions that are concrete, individual, final, and legally binding. The PTUN Makassar decision in the Misriani Ilyas case reflects an expanded interpretation of administrative decisions involving political processes. The novelty of this study lies in clarifying PTUN’s jurisdiction limits and emphasizing the need to strengthen intra-party dispute resolution through the Party Court to prevent judicial politicization and maintain a balance between party autonomy and protection of political rights. In conclusion, PTUN intervention is permissible as long as the object of dispute is a state administrative act, not the party’s internal decision itself.
Keadilan Energi dalam Bayang-Bayang Hukum: Studi atas Ketimpangan Regulatori Transisi Energi di Indonesia Leonyta Nugroho
Forschungsforum Law Journal Vol 3 No 01 (2026): JANUARI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/flj.v3i01.13554

Abstract

This research critically examines Indonesia's energy transition, asserting that the current legal and institutional framework does not maintain neutrality but rather actively perpetuates the dominance of fossil fuels. By analyzing regulatory mechanisms such as the Domestic Market Obligation (DMO) for coal and subsidized pricing strategies, the study employs the perspective of Critical Legal Studies to explore how laws contribute to the perpetuation of energy injustices. It further argues that the government's failure to promote clean energy constitutes a violation of citizens' constitutional right to a healthy environment. A significant structural challenge identified is the conflict of interest within PT PLN (Persero). Drawing on Ecological Modernization Theory, the study advocates for comprehensive reforms of laws and institutions, including the establishment of an independent renewable energy agency and the alignment of climate and energy regulations. The findings underscore that a just and effective energy transition depends on legal reforms that restore the law's role in advancing social justice.
Menyoal Peran Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia Ganung Rindra Kusuma; Aifa Zahda Aulia Ahmad
Forschungsforum Law Journal Vol 3 No 01 (2026): JANUARI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/flj.v3i01.13582

Abstract

Environmental damage in Indonesia has reached an ecological emergency marked by massive deforestation and increased frequency of natural disasters. This situation indicates that the anthropocentric paradigm, which places humans at the center of values in relation to the environment, has fundamental limitations in achieving sustainable environmental protection. The research question in this study is how a shift from the anthropocentric paradigm to a non-anthropocentric paradigm can strengthen environmental protection efforts and how criminal law functions as a tool in the prevention and mitigation of environmental damage in Indonesia. This study applies a normative legal research method through a legislative and conceptual approach. The legal materials used include primary and secondary legal materials that are analyzed qualitatively using a deductive method. The findings show that the non-anthropocentric paradigm offers a stronger ethical and normative basis by recognizing the intrinsic value of the environment and placing humans as a component of the ecological system. In addition, the criminal provisions in Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Management Protection play a crucial role as a means of social control that is preventive, repressive, and restorative in nature. Therefore, improving environmental protection requires synergy between a paradigm shift and the maximization of criminal law instruments.
Etomidate dalam Rokok Elektronik: Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dan Perubahan Rezim Hukum Kesehatan di Indonesia Deva Alfianto Supardi; Yuliana Putri
Forschungsforum Law Journal Vol 3 No 02 (2026): MEI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/flj.v3i02.14097

Abstract

The misuse of etomidate in electronic cigarette liquid (vape) has constituted an unresolved legal issue since mid-2025. Prior to the issuance of Ministerial Regulation No. 15 of 2025, etomidate did not fall within the narcotics or psychotropics schedules, leaving enforcement entirely reliant on Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health and Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024. This study examines the legal status of etomidate as a pharmaceutical preparation under the Health Law, the mechanism of criminal liability for producers and distributors, and the prohibition on additives in electronic cigarettes under Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024. A normative legal method is employed, applying statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The study finds that etomidate qualifies as a pharmaceutical preparation under Article 1(16) of the Health Law, making unauthorised production and distribution subject to Article 435. Article 432(1) of PP 28/2024 explicitly prohibits unverified additives in electronic cigarettes, which includes etomidate. The enactment of Ministerial Regulation No. 15 of 2025 shifts the legal regime from the Health Law to the Narcotics Law, but raises retroactivity concerns for cases already in progress.
Konflik Normatif Pengelolaan Dana Publik: Pelibatan Ormas dalam Retribusi Parkir di Kota Bekasi Muhammad Yazid Al-Faizi; Karel Maruli Situmorang
Forschungsforum Law Journal Vol 3 No 02 (2026): MEI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/flj.v3i02.14123

Abstract

This study conducts a legal analysis of the Bekasi City Government's practice of delegating the function of collecting Public Service Retribution for On-Street Parking to Community Organizations (Ormas). This action generates a structural conflict by involving a non-governmental entity in the management of public funds, leading to the risk of Local Own-Source Revenue (PAD) leakage and consumer rights violations. Examination of this practice against the three pillars of State Administrative Law Competence, Legality, and Accountability reveals significant issues. In terms of Competence, the City Government risks committing an ultra vires action by transferring the collection function to a private subject without an adequate legal basis. Regarding Legality, the Regional Regulation (Perda) suffers from a rechtvacuum (legal void), as it fails to clearly mandate the mechanism for Ormas appointment, thus violating the Principle of Legality. Furthermore, concerning Accountability, the manual system managed by the Ormas is highly vulnerable to under-reporting and illegal levies, while violating the City Government's Principle of No Transfer of Responsibility for public funds. Therefore, this research recommends that the Bekasi City Government revise the Regional Regulation immediately, terminate the collection delegation function to Ormas, and enforce a total transition to an integrated, non-cash Smart Parking (e-parking) system to close PAD leakage loopholes and ensure consumer protection.
Mengurai Regulasi Pengelolaan Sampah Elektronik: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat (AS): A Comparative Study of Indonesia and the United States Dyah Retna Prabaningrum
Forschungsforum Law Journal Vol 3 No 02 (2026): MEI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/flj.v3i02.14127

Abstract

The increasing utilization of electronic devices has substantial implications for the electronic waste management. Meanwhile, amidst the environmental crisis, Indonesia currently lacks specific regulations for e-waste management, in contrast to the United States, which has already established such regulations. In an effort to address the e-waste issue, Indonesia ought to study how the United States managing its extensive e-waste volumes. This research seeks to compare the legal frameworks and institutional structures of Indonesia and the United States in regulating e-waste. This study was compiled using a normative juridical research method, incorporating a legislative approach, a comparative legal approach, and a conceptual approach. The findings of this study indicate that policies regarding e-waste are not explicitly outlined within Indonesian laws and regulations. This is in contrast to the United States, which has regulated it under EPA-HQRCRA-2004-0012.
Rekonstruksi Perlindungan Hukum atas Alat Bukti Hak Ulayat Pasca Berlakunya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 dalam Perspektif Teori Keadilan Prosedural Safrin Salam; Nuragifah Taheriah; Nurul Miqat; Imron Rizki Azis; A.R. Wirawan
Forschungsforum Law Journal Vol 3 No 02 (2026): MEI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/flj.v3i02.14135

Abstract

This study examines the reconstruction of legal protection for evidentiary instruments concerning hak ulayat following the enactment of Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 from the perspective of procedural justice. The primary focus of the study is the delegitimization of customary evidence and the still limited recognition of socio-communal evidence within Indonesia’s land administration system. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and case approaches. Legal materials are analyzed prescriptively to assess normative consistency, identify regulatory weaknesses, and formulate a fairer model of legal protection for the proof of hak ulayat. The findings show that Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 has opened a pathway for the formalization of customary land through the schemes of management rights, ministerial determination, registration, and certification. However, this model still places the validity of hak ulayat within a state-centered regime of recognition and has not expressly recognized the history of collective possession, recognition by customary law communities, natural boundaries, and the legitimacy of customary institutions as autonomous components of the national land law system of evidence. From the perspective of procedural law, customary evidence can in fact be associated with documentary evidence, witness testimony, and presumptions. This study concludes that legal certainty over hak ulayat land must be built through a normative reconstruction integrating customary law, land law, and procedural justice so that the protection of the rights of customary law communities becomes more substantive and operational
Urgensi Rekonstruksi Seleksi Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui Substantive Involvement dan Duty to Give Reasons: Pendekatan Akuntabilitas Substantif dalam Reformasi Sistem Rekrutmen Hakim Konstitusi di Indonesia Kevin Verrel Nurreyhan; Rosfanny Delia Leghitta Ayu; Dhea Putri Anjelita
Forschungsforum Law Journal Vol 3 No 02 (2026): MEI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/flj.v3i02.14163

Abstract

The author's research analyzes the crisis of independence of the Constitutional Court (MK) stemming from the judicial recruitment system through a three-door mechanism that is inconsistent and lacks transparency. The phenomenon of "pseudo-independence" indicates that formal guarantees of independence are not always accompanied by substantive independence in judicial decision-making practice. Although the three-door system is designed to realize checks and balances, its implementation practice shows that selection mechanisms at each proposing institution (Parliament, President, and Supreme Court) tend to be laden with sectoral interests, minimized transparency, and weak public accountability. This research employs a normative juridical approach enriched with a socio-legal analytical framework to analyze relevant legislation, recruitment practices, and court decisions. Through qualitative descriptive-analytical analysis, this research identifies fundamental problems in the recruitment system and formulates prescriptive solutions. The research results propose reconstructing the constitutional judge recruitment system through three main mechanisms: first, establishing a multi-stakeholder pre-selection panel involving representatives of state institutions and civil society as a filter mechanism to ensure clear and uniform accountability standards; second, implementing Substantive Involvement Test (SIT) as an instrument for in-depth candidate assessment, encompassing investigation of political affiliation records, ethical and judgment evaluation, and statesman assessment; third, strengthening the duty to give reasons principle as an obligation for proposing institutions to provide rational justification when selecting candidates outside the panel's recommendation. The Transitional Accountability approach through the Prospective Ethical Scrutiny model is offered to balance institutional stability and ethical accountability. This reform is designed in an evolutionary and integrated manner to continuously improve the quality of the MK's integrity.
Konseptualisasi Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia Generasi Mendatang Atas Lingkungan Hidup Muhammad Khatami; Yuda Mustajab
Forschungsforum Law Journal Vol 3 No 02 (2026): MEI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/flj.v3i02.14186

Abstract

This research aims to conceptualize the human rights of future generations over the environment. This article begins its discussion with the issue of the incomplete availability of laws to guarantee the human rights of future generations over the environment, especially when this is seen in terms of comparison with several other countries. For this reason, this article questions about the legal guarantee of the fulfillment of human rights for future generations and the design of its fulfillment. Using normative legal research methods, this article has formulated the answer. According to its findings, this article views that the human rights of future generations to the environment are an integral part of the human rights regime itself with the status of collective rights in the building of the third generation of human rights. The principle is that the nature of human rights itself is continuously connected to each generation of human life (continuity). Its legal guarantee is based on the principle of intergenerational equity which gives the current generation the responsibility to protect and respect it. At the same time, it is also up to the state to realize its fulfillment by protecting, to respect, and to fulfil through every implementation of state functions carried out by each branch of state power itself, both inside and outside the territory of the country itself (cross-territorial responsibility).

Page 5 of 6 | Total Record : 52

 2   3   4   5   6 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 3 No 02 (2026): MEI Vol 3 No 01 (2026): JANUARI Vol 2 No 03 (2025): SEPTEMBER Vol 2 No 02 (2025): MEI Vol 2 No 01 (2025): JANUARI Vol 1 No 03 (2024): SEPTEMBER Vol 1 No 02 (2024): MEI Vol 1 No 01 (2024): JANUARI