cover
Contact Name
Rengga Kusuma Putra
Contact Email
garuda@apji.org
Phone
+6281269402117
Journal Mail Official
info@appihi.or.id
Editorial Address
Perum Cluster G11 Nomor 17 Jl. Plamongan Indah, Pedurungan, Kota Semarang 50195, Semarang, Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 50195
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Referendum
ISSN : 30630517     EISSN : 30631203     DOI : 10.62383
Core Subject : Social,
jurnal interdisipliner yang menggabungkan kontribusi dari bidang hukum, administrasi publik, dan ilmu komunikasi. Jurnal ini menyajikan artikel-artikel yang menyoroti berbagai aspek hukum, termasuk tetapi tidak terbatas pada isu-isu konstitusi, perundang-undangan, yudisial, administrasi publik, serta teori-teori komunikasi yang terkait dengan sistem hukum dan administrasi publik.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 82 Documents
Tanggung Jawab Perdata Influencer terhadap Klaim Produk dalam Endorsement: Tinjauan Hukum Atas Perlindungan Konsumen Berdasarkan UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 dan Perkembangan Praktik Digital di Indonesia Gunawan Widjaja; Songga Aurora Abadi; Yuri Anggi
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i2.913

Abstract

The advancement of digital technology has introduced a novel trend in marketing via social media platforms, specifically through influencers promoting products or services. Nonetheless, numerous endorsements by influencers contain misleading, inaccurate, or harmful claims to consumers. This research aims to analyze the civil liability of influencers for product claims that cause consumer harm in digital media endorsements, referencing Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. Utilizing a normative juridical method based on literature review of laws, legal doctrines, and pertinent cases, the findings reveal that influencers can be held civilly liable under the tort principle (onrechtmatige daad) as stipulated in Article 1365 of the Civil Code, if proven to provide false or unsupported claims resulting in consumer harm (Setiawan, 2019). Therefore, there is a pressing need to enhance regulations governing the role of influencers in consumer protection frameworks alongside effective liability mechanisms as a form of accountability in the evolving digital marketing landscape.
Analisis Implikasi Perceraian Asing terhadap Hak atas Tanah berdasarkan Putusan No. 19/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Sgr. dan Perjanjian Pra-Perkawinan sebagai Solusi Penyelesaian Diva Raniza; M. Indra Pratama; Roger Alfiano; Rizha Claudilla Putri
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i4.1301

Abstract

This paper explores the involvement of International Civil Law in the implications of foreign divorce on land rights by paying attention to the principles contained in International Civil Law. In terms of writing, the author will analyze Decision No. 19/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Sgr. as a review of facts that will be analyzed in accordance with the scope of International Civil Law using relevant research methods. The author reviews that the research method used to compile this writing is juridical-normative based on the applicable laws and regulations and in accordance with what is the subject of discussion. In addition, this paper also pays attention to the theory of legal protection by Philipus M. Hadjon and the principles contained in International Civil Law as supporting aspects in the preparation of this analysis. To strengthen the argument, the author also compares several provisions related to the status of land ownership by foreign parties and the application of pre-marriage agreements as an alternative settlement. The final result of this writing will highlight the correctness of the judge's decision based on the author's analysis and provide suggestions that are considered relevant as solutions that can be offered.