cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rengga Kusuma Putra
Contact Email
garuda@apji.org
Phone
+6288215137076
Journal Mail Official
rafaelardian39@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Perum Cluster G11 Nomor 17 Jl. Plamongan Indah, Pedurungan, Kota Semarang 50195, Semarang, Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 50195
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Published by Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia
ISSN : 30319684     EISSN : 30319706     DOI : 10.62383
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Social,
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Topics of interest in the Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora in particular include the study of Communication, Politics, Government, International Relations, and Social Affairs.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 326 Documents
 29   30   31   32   33 
Paradoks Sentralisasi dalam Desentralisasi: Analisis Konflik Norma Vertikal-Horizontal pada Evolusi UU Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia Desi Ayuherma Anugrah; I Dewa Gede Herman Yudiawan
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Mei: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i3.1672

Abstract

This study analyzes normative conflicts in the evolution of local government regulations from Law No. 22 of 1999 to Law No. 23 of 2014, along with the changes following the Job Creation Law. The research background is grounded in the phenomenon of policy pendulum swings, which indicate a shift from radical decentralization toward structured centralization, as well as the disruptions caused by the omnibus law approach. The research aims to identify and classify vertical and horizontal normative conflicts and formulate recommendations for regulatory harmonization. The method used is normative legal research with a legislative and conceptual approach, employing Hans Kelsen’s theory of antinomy as an analytical tool. The research findings identified two main forms of normative conflict: first, a vertical conflict between Law No. 22/1999, which advocates for the broadest possible autonomy, and Law No. 23/2014, which strengthens central control through the concepts of absolute affairs and NSPK, creating a paradox of centralization within decentralization. Second, a horizontal conflict following the Job Creation Law, which centralizes regional licensing authority through the OSS system and revives Article 251 regarding the annulment of regional regulations that have been declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court. The implications of this research recommend revising problematic articles and strengthening the role of regions within a just decentralization system.
Pancasila as Grundnorm and Islamic Religious Education as Moral Foundation: Strengthening Constitutional Order through Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence Theory Nazila Riskiya Putri; Nayla Damayanti; Meifta Dian Safitri; Ahmad Muhamad Mustin Nasoha
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Mei: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i3.1676

Abstract

This study aims to examine the position of Pancasila as a grundnorm within the Indonesian constitutional system and the role of Islamic Religious Education as an ethical foundation in strengthening constitutional principles from the perspective of Islamic sociological legal theory. The methodology employed is a qualitative approach using library research, involving the analysis of various relevant literature sources. The findings indicate that Pancasila plays a fundamental role in the Indonesian legal system, serving as the highest norm in the hierarchy of laws, while also functioning as an ethical guideline in the life of the nation and the state. Islamic Religious Education plays a significant role in shaping the moral constitution through the understanding of values such as honesty, justice, responsibility, and trustworthiness, in line with the principles of Pancasila. The integration of Pancasila values and Islamic teachings, viewed through the lens of sociological law, demonstrates that effective law is not merely normative but also responsive to social realities. Therefore, Islamic sociological legal theory can strengthen the Indonesian constitutional system through the integration of normative, moral, and sociological values, resulting in a more responsive, just, and contextually relevant legal system.
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pembatalan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara oleh PTUN: Menelaah Alasan Hukum yang Digunakan Hakim Dalam Membatalkan KTUN Tansya Hadiansyah Ramdi; Intan Sukmawati; Euis Maesaroh; Aji Nugraha; Taufiq Alamsyah
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Mei: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i3.1678

Abstract

This study aims to gain an in-depth understanding of the legal reasoning used by judges in the Administrative Court (PTUN) in annulling State Administrative Decisions (KTUN), as well as to examine the legal implications for the parties involved and the overall system of government administration. This research employs a normative juridical method with three approaches: statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The analysis was conducted qualitatively by studying reference books and reviewing court decisions. The study shows that the annulment of KTUN by PTUN judges is based on three important factors, namely lack of authority (ultra vires), procedural defects, and substantive defects in the decision. In addition, violations of the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB), such as the principles of legal certainty, prudence, and proportionality, also constitute important considerations for judges. In the judicial process, judges not only consider the formal aspects of the law, but also take into account substantive justice in order to protect citizens’ rights from improper governmental actions. The implications of the annulment of KTUN include the restoration of the plaintiff’s rights through the process of restitutio in integrum, the obligation of administrative officials to revoke or correct the issued decision, as well as the potential impact on third parties involved in the decision. In general, the annulment of KTUN serves as a legal control mechanism over government administration while also encouraging the realization of good and transparent governance within a state governed by the rule of law.
Eksistensi Nilai Siri’ dan Pesse dalam Praktik Hukum Adat Masyarakat Bugis-Makassar: Suatu Kajian Sosio-Legal Dyah Auliah Rachma Ruslan
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Mei: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i3.1681

Abstract

Siri’ and Pesse are the foundational ethical and legal values of the Bugis-Makassar community, shaping social behavior, interpersonal relations, and traditional dispute resolution mechanisms. This study aims to examine how these values persist and remain functional within contemporary customary legal practices, despite the pressures of modernization, state law, and rapid socio-cultural change. Employing a socio-legal approach, the research explores the interaction between customary norms and formal legal structures through in-depth interviews, field observations, and analyses of adat documents. The findings reveal that Siri’ operates as a principle of honor that legitimizes social and legal actions, while Pesse embodies collective empathy that reinforces solidarity and social equilibrium. These values not only influence the resolution of familial and communal disputes but also shape adat-based mediation models that are perceived by local communities as more just and effective than formal legal mechanisms. Although state law provides a more standardized regulatory framework, Siri’ and Pesse continue to function as strong moral guidelines and remain central references in the pursuit of substantive justice. The study concludes that the existence of Siri’ and Pesse has not diminished; instead, these values have transformed to adapt to evolving legal contexts and societal dynamics. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the interaction between customary law and state law within Indonesia’s multicultural society.  
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Data Pribadi dalam Penggunaan Aplikasi Belanja Online (Shopee) Komang Vena Apriana Dewi
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Mei: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i3.1684

Abstract

Legal protection of personal data when using online shopping applications, especially Shopee, is becoming increasingly important along with the increasing risk of data misuse. The purpose of this study is to find out the regulations and implementation of personal data protection for Shopee users, especially related to the Paylater function. The study refers to Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection and focuses on the challenges faced by consumers related to violations of personal data rights, such as data theft and phishing crimes. The research method used is a normative research method. Consumers' legal awareness of the right to protect personal data is still relatively low, so many consumers d do not take legal action in the event of a violation. This study provides a deeper insight into consumer legal protection in the digital era and serves as a reference for developing more effective policies in protecting the personal data of online shopping application users.
Perbandingan Kebijakan Formulasi Ganja di Kanada dan Uruguay Dikaitkan dengan Hukum Pidana Indonesia Shinta Chintya Fella; Syaifulah Yophi Ardiyanto; Tengku Arif Hidayat
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Mei: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i3.1691

Abstract

The legal arrangement of cannabis in Indonesia is based on Article 28H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which guarantees the right to health services, elaborated through Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health. Cannabis is classified as a Group I narcotic prohibited for health services under Article 8 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009, while Article 139 of Law Number 17 of 2023 requires that the use of medicines containing narcotics may only be carried out based on a prescription from medical personnel. At the same time, Canada through the Cannabis Act (S.C. 2018, c. 16) and Uruguay through Ley No. 19.172 (2013) apply fundamentally different legal arrangements for cannabis. This research uses normative legal research methods with a comparative law approach, applying the criminal policy framework of Marc Ancel and the law enforcement theory of Joseph Goldstein. The results show: (1) cannabis arrangement in Indonesia is prohibitive through Article 8 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009, while Article 6 paragraph (3) opens a mechanism for reclassification through Ministerial Regulation; (2) Canada through the Cannabis Act applies a regulated market model with a CAD 11.4 billion legal industry and a 70% reduction in arrests, while Uruguay through Ley No. 19.172 applies a state monopoly with an 85% reduction in arrests without an increase in problematic use; (3) fundamental differences in legal systems, political systems, socio-cultural backgrounds, religion, and narcotics policy philosophy mean that the Canadian and Uruguayan models are not relevant to be directly applied in the Indonesian criminal law system.

Page 33 of 33 | Total Record : 326

 29   30   31   32   33 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Mei: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Maret: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): September : Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): November: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024): September: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): July : Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): May : Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): March: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): January : Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora More Issue