cover
Contact Name
Rengga Kusuma Putra
Contact Email
garuda@apji.org
Phone
+6285726173515
Journal Mail Official
adminojs@apji.org
Editorial Address
Perum Cluster G11 Nomor 17 Jl. Plamongan Indah, Pedurungan, Kota Semarang 50195, Semarang, Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 50195
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
ISSN : 30633990     EISSN : 30634024     DOI : 10.62383
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal ini menyajikan artikel-artikel yang membahas berbagai aspek hukum, mulai dari hukum pidana, hukum perdata, hukum administrasi negara, hingga hukum internasional
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 107 Documents
Kedudukan Mahkamah Syariah Aceh untuk Menggantikan Peran Peradilan Agama dalam menjalankan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Muhammad Rayhan Putera; M. Junaidi
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v3i1.1414

Abstract

The Aceh Sharia Court is a special judicial institution formed based on the specifics of Aceh as regulated in the Aceh Government Law. The existence of the Aceh Sharia Court has juridical consequences for the exercise of judicial power which was previously exercised by the Religious Courts. This research aims to analyze the position of the Aceh Sharia Court in the national justice system and examine its power in replacing the authority of the Religious Courts in handling cases related to Islamic law. The research method used is normative legal research. The research results show that the Aceh Sharia Court has an equal position to the Religious Court in the judicial power structure, but has broader authority because it covers Islamic civil cases, sharia criminal (jinayat), and sharia procedural law. This transfer of authority does not eliminate the existence of the Religious Courts nationally, but creates a special justice system that only applies in the Aceh region. The position of the Aceh Sharia Court strengthens the implementation of Islamic law within the framework of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia and remains under the guidance of the Supreme Court.
Kontroversi Pernikahan Beda Agama di Indonesia Riu Zaldi Siregar; Uswatun Hasanah
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v3i1.1441

Abstract

This study examines the legal provisions regarding interfaith marriage in Indonesia from the perspective of Islamic law and national law. The focus lies on the differences and points of convergence between the two legal systems in assessing the validity of marriages conducted between couples of different religions. This research employs a library research method with a normative-comparative approach, analyzing primary sources such as the Qur’an, Hadith, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, as well as relevant court decisions. The results show that Islamic law explicitly prohibits interfaith marriage, particularly between a Muslim woman and a non-Muslim man, as it contradicts the principles of faith and the objectives of marriage in Islam. Meanwhile, national law through Law Number 1 of 1974 stipulates that a marriage is valid only if conducted according to the laws of each religion and belief, which implicitly rejects the legality of interfaith marriage. In practice, however, some individuals seek legal loopholes through human rights interpretations or by registering their marriages abroad. Therefore, both Islamic and national law share the same goal: to preserve the sanctity of marriage and maintain social harmony based on the divine values upheld by the Indonesian nation.
Implementasi Perlindungan Hukum Petani Tembakau dalam Hukum Indonesia Aviessita Mar'ah Nuruttamami; Rumawi Rumawi; Udiyo Basuki; ST. Sariroh; Sukron Mazid; Mohammad Ali; Supianto Supianto; Freddy Hidayat; Sholikul Hadi
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v3i1.1447

Abstract

This study discusses the legal problems faced by tobacco farmers in Sukorejo Village, Kotaanyar District, Probolinggo Regency due to the closure of large tobacco warehouses that force them to depend on middlemen. This condition causes legal uncertainty, an imbalance in the bargaining position, and alleged violations of the principle of healthy business competition, thus having a direct impact on the economic sustainability of farmers. The focus of this research is to describe the practice of business competition and its impact on tobacco farmers and explain the form of legal protection from the perspective of business competition law and sharia economic law. The research method used is empirical law with a sociology approach to law and legislation, through observations, interviews, and documentation from farmers, middlemen, and factories. The results of the study show that there is dominance of middlemen in cooperation with large factories so that farmers lose freedom in determining prices. This condition does not reflect the principles of fairness and transparency in business competition. Legal protection is still weak because there is no regulation of the basic price or a definite buying and selling mechanism. In the perspective of sharia economic law, the practice violates the principles of al-adl (justice) and al-amanah (honesty). In conclusion, preventive legal protection is needed in the form of price regulation and the establishment of marketing cooperatives, as well as repressive protection through law enforcement against unfair business competition practices.
Perlindungan Kehormatan dalam Aturan Pandangan dan Sentuhan antar Mahram Menurut Mazhab Syafi‘i Husnul Furqon; Muhammad Amar Adly
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v3i1.1450

Abstract

This article examines in depth the concept of protecting human dignity through the regulation of gaze and physical contact among mahram according to the Shafi‘i School of Islamic law. From an Islamic perspective, the preservation of dignity (ḥifẓ al-‘irḍ) occupies a highly fundamental position as part of the objectives of Islamic law, particularly in regulating social relations and family interactions. Although mahram relationships legally allow closer interaction, Islam continues to establish ethical boundaries to safeguard purity and moral values. This study is a normative legal research employing conceptual and normative-fiqh approaches, relying on primary sources such as the Qur’an, the Prophetic traditions (hadith), and classical as well as contemporary Shafi‘i jurisprudential literature. The findings indicate that the Shafi‘i School does not regard mahram relations as a sphere of absolute and unrestricted freedom, but instead provides clear regulations concerning gaze and physical contact. Visual interaction is permitted in a limited manner, restricted to certain parts of the body and subject to the condition that it does not provoke desire or potential moral temptation (fitnah). Meanwhile, physical contact is regulated more strictly and, in principle, is only permitted in situations of legitimate shar‘i necessity, such as medical treatment or emergency circumstances. Therefore, the regulation of gaze and physical contact among mahram in the Shafi‘i School functions as an instrument for protecting human dignity, preserving the sanctity of family relationships, and preventing behavioral deviations from an early stage.
Konflik Bersenjata Modern dan Domain Hukum Farras Zakia Rahman; Rangga Andi Yoga; Dwi Imroatus Sholikah
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v3i1.1464

Abstract

Contemporary defense and security challenges now come from both non-military threats (such as cyber attacks, disinformation campaigns, and economic pressure) and military threats (traditional armed force). These often operate in the gray zone, meaning actions are taken below the threshold of armed conflict as defined under international law. This situation signals the rise of modern armed conflict, which is growing more intense and causing a crisis in International Humanitarian Law (IHL) enforcement. This study aims to describe modern armed conflict and its challenges to IHL. The research used a normative juridical approach and analyzed statutes. Legal materials reviewed included various international legal instruments, which were examined qualitatively and normatively. The results show that modern armed conflict challenges International Humanitarian Law with non-linear conflicts (conflicts with unclear frontlines or participants), proxy actors (groups acting on behalf of states), and cyber threats or propaganda. Therefore, IHL should be updated to include more comprehensive regulations
Perlindungan Hukum Hak Cipta terhadap Pembajakan Karya Digital di Indonesia Risma Fernanda Syafi’iyah; Siti Nur Afifah; Zahwa Sabila Nurul Lailiyah; Selly Salsabila; Mohammad Iqbal; Firza Agung Prakoso
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v3i1.1467

Abstract

Digital copyright piracy remains a growing legal issue in Indonesia alongside the rapid development of information technology. This practice not only causes economic losses to creators and copyright holders but also reflects a gap between legal norms and social realities. This study aims to analyze legal protection for digital copyrights and to assess the effectiveness of Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright. This research employs a normative legal method using a library research approach by examining statutory regulations and relevant academic literature. The findings indicate that although Indonesia has established an adequate legal framework for copyright protection, its implementation remains ineffective due to low public legal awareness, weak law enforcement, and challenges in monitoring digital platforms. These findings emphasize that effective copyright protection requires not only comprehensive regulations but also synergy between the government, law enforcement authorities, and the development of a strong legal culture within society.
Perlindungan Hukum dan Kepastian Hukum terhadap Perdagangan Data Pribadi dalam UU PDP Muhammad Rizky; Rini Apriyani; Nur Aripkah
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Januari : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v3i1.1488

Abstract

Article 20 of the Personal Data Protection Law (PDP Law) normatively regulates the protection of data subjects and constitutes a pivotal provision that underscores the principle of consent as the legal basis for the processing of personal data for commercial purposes. This normative framework safeguards individuals’ right to privacy, encompassing the validity of explicit consent, the right to withdraw such consent, and the accountability of data controllers. In parallel, Articles 65 to 70 of the PDP Law substantively establish various categories of criminal offenses within the context of personal data protection. These include the unlawful acquisition, disclosure, processing, falsification, and utilization of personal data. Collectively, these provisions reflect the State’s commitment to ensuring criminal legal protection against violations of personal data.This research adopts a doctrinal legal methodology with a descriptive-normative approach to address two primary issues: First, to examine and identify the scope of legal protection concerning the trade of personal data under the PDP Law; and Second, to assess and determine the degree of legal certainty afforded to the trade of personal data within the framework of the PDP Law.Notwithstanding the protective intent embodied in Article 20—particularly concerning the commercial use of personal data—this provision gives rise to legal uncertainty due to the absence of comprehensive regulatory clarity on several critical aspects. Similarly, Articles 65 to 70 continue to exhibit significant legal ambiguities, particularly with respect to the constituent elements of offenses, the definition of harm, corporate liability, regulatory overlap with other legislative instruments, and the lack of clear enforcement mechanisms and implementing institutions.

Page 11 of 11 | Total Record : 107