cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Masduki
Contact Email
lppi@ums.ac.id
Phone
+62856-4096-0975
Journal Mail Official
lppi@ums.ac.id
Editorial Address
Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Jln. A. Yani, Pabelan, Kartasura, Surakarta - 57162
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Jurisprudence
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
ISSN : 18295045     EISSN : 25495615     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Jurisprudence is an academic journal published twice a year by the Magister Law Program of Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 8 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024" : 8 Documents clear
Comparison Of Protection Laws Private Data In Indonesia, And The Philippines Amiludin, Amiludin; Nurhalisa, Siti; Undang Prasetya Umara; Hidayatullah
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.4266

Abstract

To compare private data protection regulations in Indonesia and the Philippines and understand dispute resolution related to private data cases in the two countries. This research method uses literature review studies derived from books and journals or articles that have been published. The research findings reveal a comparison between the Private Data Protection Act in Indonesia and the Philippines. It is noted that the Philippines already has an independent supervisory body, whereas Indonesia does not, despite the establishment of such an institution being regulated by the Private Data Protection Act number 27 of 2022. Additionally, the study aims to understand the dispute resolution mechanisms in case of private data theft in both Indonesia and the Philippines. This study compares the regulations of the Private Data Protection Act in Indonesia and the Philippines, focusing particularly on the establishment of an essential independent supervisory body that needs to be formed in Indonesia. Subsequently, the case resolution mechanisms through Alternative Dispute Resolution can be considered to eliminate practices that tend to be slow, complex, and expensive, as well as to stop corrupt practices in the courts, ensuring that the Indonesian community feels secure and protected. No specific research has been found that compares the regulations on Private Data Protection in Indonesia and the Philippines. This includes the establishment of an independent supervisory body to aid law enforcement authorities in identifying perpetrators of private data theft, providing education, and addressing public inquiries about private data. Additionally, the resolution of cases involving private data theft through alternative dispute resolution is deemed superior to the judicial route due to the frequent practices of being slow, complex, expensive, and corrupt, which can erode or even eliminate the trust of the Indonesian public in law enforcement authorities.
A Comparison of Supreme Court Justices’ Legal Argumentation in Deciding Disputes on Transfer Pricing Management Fees in Indonesia Suharsono, Agus; Prasetyoningsih, Nanik; Nur Aida Ikrima
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.5874

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the Study: to of the Supreme Court Justice in deciding transfer pricing disputes related to the payment of management fees in Indonesia so that tax authorities and taxpayers understand its implementation to prevent similar cases. Methodology: This doctrinal research using statutory, conceptual, cases, and interpretive approaches; The data is secondary, namely laws, Supreme Court decisions, and concepts in relevant literature. Results:  The Supreme Court Justice's argument in deciding the management fee transfer pricing law and existing law in the international community, evidence, and the judge's knowledge of legal philosophy, legal principles and previous decisions. Taxpayers must document all evidence of transactions and conduct functional analysis by Arm's Length Principle to prove the correctness of payment of management fees. Applications of this study: Taxpayers and tax authorities can understand the argument of the Supreme Court Justice in deciding the dispute over transfer pricing management fees to be considered in making laws and regulations implementing it, and encourage further research by comparing in other countries. Novelty: Substantive truth is the primary basis for the Supreme Court Justice's argument in the transfer pricing management fee dispute. Keywords: Legal Argumentation; Management Fee; Supreme Court; Tax-Payers; Transfer Pricing.   ABSTRAK Tujuan: menganalisis argumentasi Hakim Agung dalam memutus sengketa transfer pricing terkait pembayaran management fee di Indonesia, agar otoritas pajak dan wajib pajak memahami implementasinya untuk mencegah ada kasus serupa. Metodologi: Penelitian doktrinal ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konsep, dan interpretasi, datanya berupa undang-undang, putusan Mahkamah Agung, dan studi pustaka yang relevan. Temuan: Argumentasi Hakim Agung dalam agung dalam memutus sengketa transfer pricing management fee  mengutamakan kebenaran substansif, berdasarkan hukum positif tertulis maupun hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat internasional, alat bukti, serta pengetahuan hakim tentang filsafat hukum, asas hukum, dan putusan sebelumnya. Wajib pajak harus mendokumentasikan semua bukti transaksi dan melakukan analisis fungsional sesuai Arm's Length Principle untuk membuktikan kebenaran pembayaran management fee. Kegunaan: wajib pajak dan otoritas pajak dapat memahami argumentasi Hakim Agung memutus sengketa transfer pricing management fee, untuk dipertimbangan dalam membuat undang-undang dan peraturan pelaksananya, serta mendorong penelitian lanjutan dengan membandingkan di Negara lain. Kebaruan: Kebenaran substantif lebih diutamakan oleh Hakim Agung dalam menyususun argumentasi putusan sengketa transfer pricing management fee. Kata Kunci: Argumentasi Hukum; Management Fee; Mahkamah Agung; Wajib Pajak; Transfer Pricing        
Juridical Analysis of the State Administrative Court of Surabaya’s Decision No. 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY on Land Ownership Certificate Overlapping Sarjiyati, Sarjiyati; Angga Pramodya Pradhana; Anik Tri Haryani; Bambang Sukarjono; Izyana Farhana Zulkarnain; Galuh Ayu Rahmawati
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.6017

Abstract

ABSTRACT  Purpose of the Study: This research aims to analyze the State Administrative Court of Surabaya City judges’ basis of consideration in Decision No. 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY in resolving the dispute of land ownership certificate overlapping through the litigation method and knowing the legal consequences of this decision. Methodology: This research employed the normative legal research method. The data were descriptively analyzed to obtain research results. It used applicable court decisions, legal regulations and the general principle of good governance as its basis of consideration. Results: In its relations with the Plaintiff's lawsuit, Judge Assembly stated that it had fulfilled the lawsuit’s formal aspect on deadlines in issuing the certificate which is the Defendant’s authority. However, in the issue of procedures and substances, there have been deviations that violate the applicable legal regulations and the general principle of good governance. Based on the author’s analysis, these judges have given accurate considerations. The legal consequences of State Administrative Court of Surabaya City's Decision No. 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY are that the two land tenure certificates owned by Defendant II Intervention were revoked by Surabaya City's State Administrative Court. Apart from that, the Defendant and Defendant II Intervention are burdened with paying for the case fees. Applications of this study: This research becomes a reference for National Land Agency Officers to be more careful when issuing certificates to prevent administrative and/or juridical errors. Novelty/Originality of this study: This research analyzed the decision of Surabaya City’s State Administrative Court on the revocation of 2 (two) land ownership certificates issued by the Batu City Land Agency and the legal consequences of State Administrative Court of Surabaya City’s Decision No. 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY. Keywords: Decision, overlapping, land tenure certificates, dispute resolution   ABSTRAK Tujuan Penelitian: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hakim Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Kota Surabaya dalam Putusan Nomor 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY dalam menyelesaikan sengketa tumpang tindih sertifikat hak milik atas tanah melalui metode litigasi dan mengetahui akibat hukum dari putusan tersebut. Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif untuk memperoleh hasil penelitian. Dasar pertimbangan yang digunakan adalah putusan pengadilan yang berlaku, peraturan perundang-undangan, dan asas umum pemerintahan yang baik. Hasil: Terkait gugatan Penggugat, Majelis Hakim menyatakan telah memenuhi aspek formil gugatan mengenai batas waktu penerbitan sertifikat yang merupakan kewenangan Tergugat. Namun, dalam masalah prosedur dan substansi masih terdapat penyimpangan yang melanggar peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan asas umum pemerintahan yang baik. Berdasarkan analisis penulis, para hakim telah memberikan pertimbangan yang tepat. Akibat hukum dari Putusan PTUN Kota Surabaya Nomor 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY adalah dua sertifikat hak milik atas tanah milik Tergugat II Intervensi dicabut oleh PTUN Kota Surabaya. Selain itu, Tergugat dan Tergugat II Intervensi dibebani biaya perkara. Aplikasi penelitian ini: Penelitian ini menjadi acuan bagi Pejabat Badan Pertanahan Nasional agar lebih cermat dalam menerbitkan sertifikat untuk mencegah terjadinya kesalahan administratif dan/atau yuridis. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas penelitian ini: Penelitian ini menganalisis putusan PTUN Kota Surabaya atas pencabutan 2 (dua) sertifikat hak milik atas tanah yang diterbitkan oleh Badan Pertanahan Kota Batu dan akibat hukum dari Putusan PTUN Kota Surabaya Nomor 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY. Kata kunci: Putusan, tumpang tindih, sertifikat hak milik atas tanah, penyelesaian sengketa
Implication of The Constitutional Court’s Decision No. 91/Puu-XVIII/2020 on The Formal Examination of Law No. 11 of 2020 Warjiyati, Sri; Sari, Zeti Nofita; Musyafaah, Nur Lailatul; Supaat, Dina Imam
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.6297

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This paper aims to analyze the impact and implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 on the formal review process of Law No. 11 of 2020. This includes an understanding of changes in the legal framework relating to the formal review process of the law and how the decision affects the formal review of the law. Methodology: This paper employed the normative legal research method through a jurisprudence approach and a statute approach. This research examined primary and secondary legal materials. Results: The Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 reflects the commitment of that highest justice institution to maintaining the enforcement of constitutional principles in the law-making process in Indonesia. It decided that the Law on Job Creation had a conditional unconstitutional status, as it did not follow the procedures of law formation stated in Law No. 12 of 2011. Even though it has a conditional unconstitutional status, the Law on Job Creation still applies until it is improved in two years by the government and the Legislative House. Applications of this study: This research is useful for providing valuable insight for policymakers, lawyers, and constitutional law practitioners regarding the practical implications of Constitutional Court decisions on the process of proposing laws. It can also help people understand how this ruling affects laws and policies in Indonesia. Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this research lies in its special focus on Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 and its impact on the formal review of Law No. 11 of 2020. Apart from that, this research provides an important contribution to the concreteness of the Constitutional Court's formal legislative procedures. Keywords: Implications, Constitutional Court Decisions, Formal Tests.   ABSTRAK Purpose of thestudy (Tujuan): Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dampak dan implikasi dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstistitusi No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 terhadap proses uji formil Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020. Ini mencakup pemahaman tentang perubahan-perubahan dalam kerangka hukum yang berkaitan dengan proses uji formil undang-undang dan bagaimana putusan tersebut mempengaruhi pengujian formal undnag-undang. Methodology (Metodologi): Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan jurisprudensi dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini mengkaji bahan-bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Results (Temuan): Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 merupakan cerminan komitmen lembaga peradilan tertinggi tersebut dalam menjaga tegaknya asas-asas konstitusi dalam proses pembentukan undang-undang di Indonesia. Putusan ini menyatakan bahwa UU Cipta Kerja berstatus inkonstitusional bersyarat, karena tidak mengikuti tata cara pembentukan undang-undang sebagaimana yang tercantum dalam UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2011. Meskipun berstatus inkonstitusional bersyarat, UU Cipta Kerja tetap berlaku sampai ada perbaikan dalam jangka waktu dua tahun oleh pemerintah dan DPR. Applications of this study (Kegunaan): Penelitian ini berguna untuk memberikan wawasan yang berharga bagi para pembuat kebijakan, pengacara, dan praktisi hukum konstitusi mengenai implikasi praktis dari putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap proses pengajuan undang-undang. Penelitian ini juga dapat membantu memahami bagaimana putusan tersebut memengaruhi hukum dan kebijakan di Indonesia. Novelty/Orginalty of this study (Kebaruan/Orisinalitas): Penelitian ini menawarkan kebaruan karena ia memberikan okus khusus pada Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 dan dampaknya terhadap uji formil undang-undang No. 11 Tahun 2020. Selain itu, penelitian ini dapat memberikan kontribusi penting terhadap kekonkretan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap prosedur legislatif formal. Kata Kunci: Implikasi, Putusan MK, Uji Formil.
Examining the Constitutional Court’s Positive Legislature Decisions in Indonesia's Hierarchy of Legal Norms Muttaqin, Labib; Nurhayati, Nunik; M. Junaidi; Mustofa, Rochman Hadi; Amaylia Noor Alaysia
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.6410

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: The objective of this research is to investigate the positive legislature decision of the Constitutional Court, whose hierarchy is ambiguous in the order of Indonesian legal norms. Methodology: This study utilized a doctrinal legal research method with a legal realism approach. The data were sourced from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The authors employed the literature study as the method to collect data that were then qualitatively analysed. Results: The results of this study indicate that from a formal perspective, the positive legislature decision is a court verdict that falls under the jurisdiction of the judicial branch of power. However, from a material perspective, it encompasses elements such as regulations (regeling) that are genuinely located within the executive and legislative branches of power. Considering the presence of norms (regeling) in the Positive Legislature Decision, it is necessary to evaluate its position within the hierarchy of legal norms in Indonesia. Applications of this study: Constitutional judges can use this research as a reference in making positive legislative decisions. It can also be used as a reference in forming laws as a follow-up to the Constitutional Court's decision. Novelty/Originality of this study: This research revealed that the Constitutional Court's positive legislature decision includes elements of legal norms, also known as regeling, such as statutory regulations. Consequently, it is imperative to evaluate the position of courtly decisions within the hierarchical structure of legal norms in Indonesia. It is also crucial to find the legal reasoning for the Constitutional Court's positive legislature decision. Keywords: Constitutional Court Decisions, Positive Legislature, Legal Norms, Legal Hierarchy   ABSTRAK  Tujuan Penelitian: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji putusan perundang-undangan positif Mahkamah Konstitusi yang hierarkinya masih rancu dalam tatanan norma hukum Indonesia. Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum doktrinal dengan pendekatan realisme hukum. Data yang digunakan bersumber dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Metode pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi kepustakaan yang kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil Penelitian: Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dari segi formil, putusan perundang-undangan positif merupakan putusan pengadilan yang berada di bawah yurisdiksi cabang kekuasaan yudikatif. Namun, dari segi materiil, putusan perundang-undangan positif mengandung unsur-unsur seperti peraturan perundang-undangan (regeling) yang secara hakiki berada di bawah cabang kekuasaan eksekutif dan legislatif. Melihat keberadaan norma (regeling) dalam Putusan Perundang-Undangan Positif, maka perlu dikaji kedudukannya dalam hierarki norma hukum di Indonesia. Aplikasi Penelitian: Hasil penelitian ini dapat dijadikan acuan bagi hakim konstitusi dalam mengambil keputusan perundang-undangan positif. Dapat pula dijadikan sebagai acuan dalam pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan sebagai tindak lanjut putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Kebaruan/Keaslian penelitian ini: Penelitian ini mengungkap bahwa putusan MK yang bersifat positif mengandung unsur norma hukum, yang juga dikenal dengan istilah regeling, seperti peraturan perundang-undangan. Oleh karena itu, penting untuk mengevaluasi kedudukan putusan pengadilan dalam struktur hierarki norma hukum di Indonesia. Penting pula untuk menemukan alasan hukum di balik putusan MK yang bersifat positif tersebut. Kata Kunci: Putusan MK, Legislatif Positif, Norma Hukum, Hirarki Hukum
Deactivation of Health Security Participation as a Form of Unlawful Act (Legal Reasoning of the Judicial Decision in the Khalimah vs BPJS Case) Hitaningtyas, Ratih Dheviana Puru; Subhan, M. Hadi; Nurwahjuni
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.6460

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This study examines the legal reasoning behind the judicial decision in the case between Siti Khalimah and the Social Security Administrator of Health (Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Kesehatan/BPJS) in Papua, Indonesia. This case demonstrates the need for a constructive interpretation of the Civil Code to determine if BPJS committed a law-violating action. Methodology: As normative research, this study employed statute, case, and conceptual approaches. The statutory approach used laws and regulations as legal sources for research. The case approach was focused on the judge's ratio decidendi or the legal reasons behind their conclusion. The conceptual approach was used to refer to the fundamental principles of law. To analyze the data, the authors employed grammatical, systematic, and teleological analysis techniques. Results: Results found that that BPJS should not be declared to have violated Article 21 clause (1) of the BPJS Law as an error in fulfilling Article 1365 of the Civil Code. The judges emphasized that the aim of the norm in Article 21 clause (1) is to protect its participants against economic risks, including the loss of income. The panel of judges prioritized justice as a value in its decision. Applications of this study: This study provides a new point of view on law violating actions in the judges’ decision at court, notably in terms of social security administrators’ legal obligations, especially BPJS. Novelty/Originality of this study: Few articles have addressed the subject of legal violations committed by BPJS. Furthermore, in this article, the authors applied Dworkin's theory to the analysis of court decisions. This demonstrates the article's originality. Keywords: health insurance, worker protection, legal reasoning, legal violation, BPJS.   ABSTRAK Tujuan penelitian: Penelitian ini mengkaji alasan hukum yang melatarbelakangi putusan pengadilan dalam perkara antara Siti Khalimah dan Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Kesehatan (BPJS) di Papua, Indonesia. Kasus ini menunjukkan perlunya penafsiran yang konstruktif terhadap Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata untuk menentukan apakah BPJS melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum. Metodologi: Sebagai penelitian normatif, penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual. Pendekatan perundang-undangan menggunakan peraturan perundang-undangan sebagai sumber hukum penelitian. Pendekatan kasus difokuskan pada ratio decidendi hakim atau alasan hukum yang melatarbelakangi putusannya. Pendekatan konseptual digunakan untuk merujuk pada asas-asas hukum yang fundamental. Untuk menganalisis data, penulis menggunakan teknik analisis gramatikal, sistematis, dan teleologis. Hasil: Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa BPJS tidak dapat dinyatakan melanggar Pasal 21 ayat (1) UU BPJS karena dianggap keliru dalam memenuhi Pasal 1365 KUH Perdata. Para hakim menekankan bahwa tujuan norma dalam Pasal 21 ayat (1) adalah untuk melindungi para pesertanya dari risiko ekonomi, termasuk hilangnya pendapatan. Majelis hakim mengutamakan keadilan sebagai nilai dalam putusannya. Aplikasi penelitian ini: Penelitian ini memberikan sudut pandang baru terhadap tindakan pelanggaran hukum dalam putusan hakim di pengadilan, khususnya dalam hal kewajiban hukum penyelenggara jaminan sosial, khususnya BPJS. Kebaruan/Keaslian penelitian ini: Hanya sedikit artikel yang membahas tentang pelanggaran hukum yang dilakukan oleh BPJS. Lebih lanjut, dalam artikel ini, penulis menerapkan teori Dworkin untuk menganalisis putusan pengadilan. Hal ini menunjukkan keaslian artikel tersebut. Kata kunci: asuransi kesehatan, perlindungan pekerja, penalaran hukum, pelanggaran hukum, BPJS.
Judicial Considerations of the Kota Bharu High Court of Malaysia in Acquitting an Indonesian Migrant Worker’s Death Penalty izziyana, Wafda vivid; Sukimin; Endah Puji Astuti; Eva Dwi
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.6506

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This paper aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the judges' considerations in case number HC-42KB-7-04/2014 at the High Court of Kota Bharu, Malaysia. This paper specifically aims to explore the philosophical, historical, psychological, and sociological aspects that influenced the decision to release an Indonesian migrant worker from a death penalty charge. The considerations of Malaysian judges were guided by the applicable law, facts of the case, principles of justice, legal precedents; social considerations and due process of law. Methodology: This was socio-legal research with a comparative legal approach that examined how the law functions and is applied in society, taking into account the social, cultural and economic contexts that influence it. Results: The analysis of the judges' reasoning in Wilfrida Soik's case (HC-42KB-7-04/2014) by the Kota Bharu High Court highlights the importance of a holistic approach to law enforcement. The court emphasized substantive justice by integrating written law with the human condition, particularly the mental state of the accused. This decision reflects the influence of the diplomatic relations between Indonesia and Malaysia, respect for sovereignty, and international conventions. Psychologically, the defendant's mental state was disturbed, showcasing the justice system's attention to individual well-being. Sociologically, the judgment underscored the interplay of social and cultural factors, promoting rehabilitation alongside punishment. This multidimensional approach reinforces fairness and social justice in legal decisions. Applications of this study: The results of this research may inspire judicial institutions to make decisions based on considerations of inconsistency of evidence; lack of murderous intent; humanitarian consideration; criminal policy; and parole consideration. This is because many factors must be considered when making a decision, especially in the case of a death row. Novelty/Originality of this study: The analysis of Wilfrida Soik's case underscores a holistic approach to law enforcement, emphasizing substantive justice, mental health, and sociocultural factors. This novel research reveals how these considerations led to the decision to spare the accused from the death penalty, highlighting fairness and social justice. Keywords: Judicial considerations, Indonesian migrant workers, death penalty.   ABSTRAK  Tujuan penelitian: Makalah ini bertujuan untuk memberikan analisis mendalam tentang pertimbangan hakim dalam perkara nomor HC-42KB-7-04/2014 di Pengadilan Tinggi Kota Bharu, Malaysia. Makalah ini secara khusus bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi aspek filosofis, historis, psikologis, dan sosiologis yang memengaruhi keputusan untuk membebaskan seorang pekerja migran Indonesia dari dakwaan hukuman mati. Pertimbangan hakim Malaysia dipandu oleh hukum yang berlaku, fakta-fakta kasus, prinsip-prinsip keadilan, preseden hukum; pertimbangan sosial dan proses hukum yang wajar. Metodologi: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian sosio-hukum dengan pendekatan hukum komparatif yang mengkaji bagaimana hukum berfungsi dan diterapkan dalam masyarakat, dengan mempertimbangkan konteks sosial, budaya, dan ekonomi yang memengaruhinya. Hasil: Analisis penalaran hakim dalam perkara Wilfrida Soik (HC-42KB-7-04/2014) oleh Pengadilan Tinggi Kota Bharu menyoroti pentingnya pendekatan holistik terhadap penegakan hukum. Pengadilan menekankan keadilan substantif dengan memadukan hukum tertulis dengan kondisi manusia, khususnya kondisi mental terdakwa. Putusan ini mencerminkan pengaruh hubungan diplomatik antara Indonesia dan Malaysia, penghormatan terhadap kedaulatan, dan konvensi internasional. Secara psikologis, kondisi mental terdakwa terganggu, yang menunjukkan perhatian sistem peradilan terhadap kesejahteraan individu. Secara sosiologis, putusan tersebut menggarisbawahi interaksi faktor sosial dan budaya, yang mendorong rehabilitasi di samping hukuman. Pendekatan multidimensi ini memperkuat keadilan dan keadilan sosial dalam keputusan hukum.   Aplikasi penelitian ini: Hasil penelitian ini dapat menginspirasi lembaga peradilan untuk membuat keputusan berdasarkan pertimbangan ketidakkonsistenan bukti; kurangnya niat membunuh; pertimbangan kemanusiaan; kebijakan kriminal; dan pertimbangan pembebasan bersyarat. Hal ini karena banyak faktor yang harus dipertimbangkan saat membuat keputusan, terutama dalam kasus hukuman mati.   Kebaruan/Keaslian penelitian ini: Analisis kasus Wilfrida Soik menggarisbawahi pendekatan holistik terhadap penegakan hukum, yang menekankan keadilan substantif, kesehatan mental, dan faktor sosial budaya. Penelitian baru ini mengungkap bagaimana pertimbangan-pertimbangan tersebut berujung pada keputusan untuk membebaskan terdakwa dari hukuman mati, dengan menonjolkan keadilan dan keadilan sosial.  Kata kunci: Pertimbangan hukum, pekerja migran Indonesia, hukuman mati.
The Construction of Customary Judge's Decision on Plantation Conflict Resolution from the Perspective of Huma Betang Philosophy: A Case Study in Seruyan Regency, Central Kalimantan: - Achmadi, Achmadi; Armadiansyah, Armadiansyah; Sanawiah, Sanawiah; Wahdini, Muhammad; Ogli, Turdialiev Mukhammad Ali Polatjon
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.6970

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This study examines the construction of the decision of the Basara Hai Customary Peace Assembly No. B./01/T.9.DKA.-KTG/IV/2024 which has implications for the decision of the Palangka Raya District Court Number 55/Pid.B/2024/PN Plk to resolve the plantation conflict that occurred in Seruyan Regency, Central Kalimantan Province, Indonesia which had the potential to provide a lighter sentence for the defendant. Methodology: The study utilized a mixed research method consisting of doctrinal (normative) and non-doctrinal (socio-legal) research methods. Both methods were used to analyze legislative products or court decisions at the macro-analysis level empirical realities. They aimed to study and solve problems that were conceptualized at the micro-analysis level as symbolic realities. This study used the sociological and anthropological juridical approach methods that aimed to observe written laws and the law in practice. Results: The findings of this study showed that the construction of customary judges' decisions upholds the values ​​of belom bahadat (customs of life regarding politeness/ethics/high morals of the Dayak indigenous community). These values ​​must be applied in all philosophical, sociological, and legal aspects. The decision of the customary judge also has implications for the construction of the Palangka Raya Court Decision No. 55/Pid.B/2024/PN that aims to provide legal justice and certainty for the disputing parties. Applications of this study: This study offers findings from the construction of customary judges in upholding customary law based on the values ​​of belom bahadat which have implications for the Palangka Raya Court Decision No. 55/Pid.B/2024/PN in providing justice for defendants who have undergone customary trials and the defendant's obedience to applicable customary laws as an effort to resolve conflicts. Novelty/Originality of this study: The doctrine of customary law in the form of a customary judge's decision from the Huma Betang perspective is used by state judicial institutions as the basis in providing recommendations or legal considerations for law enforcement in providing justice and legal certainty for the disputing parties. Keywords: Decision construction, Customary Judge, Philosophy, Huma Betang.   ABSTRAK  Tujuan penelitian: Penelitian ini mengkaji konstruksi putusan Majelis Perdamaian Adat Basara Hai Nomor B./01/T.9.DKA.-KTG/IV/2024 yang berimplikasi pada putusan Pengadilan Negeri Palangka Raya Nomor 55/Pid.B/2024/PN Plk untuk menyelesaikan konflik perkebunan yang terjadi di Kabupaten Seruyan, Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia yang berpotensi memberikan hukuman yang lebih ringan bagi terdakwa. Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian campuran yang terdiri dari metode penelitian doktrinal (normatif) dan non-doktrinal (sosio-legal). Kedua metode tersebut digunakan untuk menganalisis produk perundang-undangan atau putusan pengadilan pada level analisis makro realitas empiris. Tujuannya adalah untuk mengkaji dan memecahkan permasalahan yang dikonseptualisasikan pada level analisis mikro sebagai realitas simbolik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis sosiologis dan antropologis yang bertujuan untuk mengamati hukum tertulis dan hukum dalam praktik. Hasil: Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa konstruksi putusan hakim adat menjunjung tinggi nilai-nilai belom bahadat (adat istiadat kehidupan mengenai kesopanan/etika/moral yang tinggi dari masyarakat adat Dayak). Nilai-nilai tersebut harus diterapkan dalam segala aspek filosofis, sosiologis, dan hukum. Putusan hakim adat tersebut juga berimplikasi pada konstruksi Putusan Pengadilan Palangka Raya Nomor 55/Pid.B/2024/PN yang bertujuan untuk memberikan keadilan dan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak yang bersengketa. Aplikasi penelitian ini: Penelitian ini menawarkan temuan dari konstruksi hakim adat dalam menegakkan hukum adat berdasarkan nilai-nilai belom bahadat yang berimplikasi pada Putusan Pengadilan Palangka Raya Nomor 55/Pid.B/2024/PN dalam memberikan keadilan bagi terdakwa yang telah menjalani persidangan adat dan ketaatan terdakwa terhadap hukum adat yang berlaku sebagai upaya penyelesaian konflik. Kebaruan/Keaslian penelitian ini: Doktrin hukum adat berupa putusan hakim adat dari perspektif Huma Betang digunakan oleh lembaga peradilan negara sebagai dasar dalam memberikan rekomendasi atau pertimbangan hukum bagi penegak hukum dalam memberikan keadilan dan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak yang bersengketa. Kata Kunci: Konstruksi putusan, Hakim Adat, Filsafat, Huma Betang.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8

 1 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): Vol. 15, No. 1, June 2025 Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024 Vol. 14, No. 1, June 2024 Vol. 13, No. 2, December 2023 Vol. 13, No. 1, June 2023 Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022 Vol. 12, No. 1, June 2022