cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Hendri Yanova
Contact Email
yanovahendrii@gmail.com
Phone
+6282255839986
Journal Mail Official
jphi@bdproject.co.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Hasan Basri Komp. Polsek Banjarmasin Utara Jalur 3 Blok i, Banjarmasin, Kalimantan Selatan 70125
Location
Kota banjarmasin,
Kalimantan selatan
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI)
Published by Scholar Center
ISSN : 28084896     EISSN : 27467406     DOI : https://doi.org/10.51749
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) (E-ISSN: 2746-7406 P-ISSN: 2808-4896) is a Double Blind Review Scientific Journal first launched in 2020 by Scholar Center under the administration of PT. Borneo Development Project in collaboration with Law office of SAP. JPHI publishes three times a year on February, June and October, provides with open access publication to support the exchange of global knowledge. The submission shall follow the blind peer-reviewed policy which aims to publish new work of the highest caliber across the full range of legal scholarship, which includes but not limited to works in the Philosophy of Law, Theory of Law, Sociology of Law, Socio-Legal Studies, International Law, Environmental Law, Criminal Law, Private Law, Islamic Law, Agrarian Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Business Law, Constitutional Law, Human Rights Law, Civil Procedure Law and Customary Law. All papers submitted to this journal can be written either in English or Indonesian.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 79 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Penerapan Hukum Terhadap Penyebar Video Porno Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pornografi Gusti Heliana Safitri; Hendy Indra Pratama
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Edisi Juni 2021
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v2i2.37

Abstract

This study aims to determine the qualifications of the crime of distributing pornographic videos in the view of criminal law and to determine the application of material criminal law to the crime of spreading pornographic videos. This research method uses a normative juridical approach, secondary data from library research techniques. Then it was analyzed qualitatively and then presented descriptively. The results of the research conducted by the author that the act of pornography is a crime that is private in nature so that law enforcement against pornography eradication there are many difficulties. One of the inhibiting factors for eradicating pornography is the lack of cooperation from the community and various parties in reporting this crime. The application of criminal law has a tendency to be influenced by the structure of society, which is an obstacle that allows the application of criminal law to be carried out and can provide obstacles that lead to the application of criminal law cannot be carried out or cannot be maximized. The elements of a pornographic crime consist of a subjective element, namely an error, which means that the act was intentionally or with its consent, and an objective element, namely an act (to be) which means an object or model that contains pornographic content. (2) The crime of pornography is carried out based on the Criminal Procedure Code unless otherwise stipulated in Law Number 44 of 2008.
Kewajiban Penyidik Dalam Memanggil Dan Memeriksa Saksi A De Charge Mochammad Zulfi Yasin Ramadhan
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Edisi Juni 2021
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v2i2.38

Abstract

Investigators also have an obligation to serve the interests of the the suspect, when they ask to be presented with a witness who according to their version can help to break the elements or discharge them from the suspicion, this kind of witness is known as A De Charge (Exoneration Witness). The problem arises how to assess and screen and summon an a de charge witnesses. Investigators must have a clear and complete ground for implementing this provision. Based on that issue, the problem formulations in this study are as follows: (1) What are the criteria for a de charge witnesses who can be examined by investigators? (2) What are the sanctions for investigators when refusing to call and examine a de charge witnesses? The research method used in this paper is a normative research method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results show that the neglect of the a de charge witness examination has made the norms governing the examination of a de charge witnesses becomes less crucial, which should receive serious attention in investigations for the realization of a criminal justice that upholds the principle of fair trial.  
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Atas Upaya Pihak Ketiga Untuk Meletakan Sita Sahal Afhami
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Edisi Juni 2021
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v2i2.39

Abstract

Banking institutions as a financial institution operate and collect fundsfrom the public in the form of deposits and distribute them to the public in the form of credit or other forms, of course, are closely related to the risks that occur. The main risk in providing credit is bad credit. Given this risk, banks in providing credit are not only based on binding credit agreements, but often also require accessor agreements in the form of material guarantees. The material agreement that is often required in the granting of credit in large amounts is the binding of mortgage rights on land and or buildings. However, in fact, even though the mortgage has been installed at the time of bad credit, there is often resistance from the debtor or the owner of the guarantee and even a third party that the debtor has planned so that a confiscation can be placed on an object that has been encumbered with a mortgage in order to hinder or stop the execution. The problems that we raise are how legal protection is and how efforts can be made if there is resistance or attempts to place confiscations on mortgage objects to interfere with the auction. The type of legal research used is doctrinal research, with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. From the research, it was found that the provisions of Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights and other provisions have provided legal protection to mortgage holders for efforts to place confiscations, in addition creditors holding mortgages can also intervene or file resistance claims in case between the owner of the collateral and a third party requesting the placement of the confiscation.
Analisis Yuridis Dihapusnya Ketentuan Pasal 26 Ayat (4) Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Dalam Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Akhmad Munawar; Muhammad Aini; Dedi Sugiyanto; Miftah Ulumudin Tsani
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Edisi Oktober 2021
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v2i3.40

Abstract

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 28 H paragraph (1) states that everyone has the right to live in physical and spiritual prosperity, to have a place to live, and to have a good and healthy living environment and have the right to obtain health services. After the enactment of the Employment Creation Law on October 5, 2020, the impact of changes to several provisions stipulated in the PPLH Law, including the part that was deleted was Article 26 paragraph (4) of the PPLH Law which reads "The community as referred to in paragraph (1) may file an objection to The AMDAL document” is also not accompanied by an explanation so that it can lead to confusion in what kind of society rejects the document, with the abolition of the provisions of Article 26 paragraph (4) of the PPLH Law, resulting in the community no longer having the right to file an objection to the environmental impact analysis document. alias Amdal on a project because their rights have been removed in the Job Creation Act. The formulation of the first problem in this study is how the legal consequences of the abolition of the provisions of Article 26 Paragraph (4) of Law no. 32 of 2009 concerning the Protection and Management of the Environment on the participation of the community in the supervision of a good and healthy environment. Furthermore, the formulation of the second problem is how the provisions in Article 26 paragraph (4) of Law no. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management from the perspective of Human Rights in Article 28 Letter H Paragraph (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study uses a type of juridical-normative research because the problem will be analyzed by reviewing the laws and regulations relating to the abolition of the provisions of Article 26 paragraph (4) of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management in Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation.
Reformasi Sistem Pengawasan Terhadap Jaksa Penuntut Umum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Arif Ronaldi
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Edisi Februari 2023
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v4i1.41

Abstract

Kejaksaan merupakan suatu institusi dalam SPPT yang memiliki fungsi penyidikan, pembuatan surat dakwaan, penuntutan, dan penahanan yang semua itu berlandaskan pada hakikat dasarnya berupa kebenaran, kepastian, dan ketertiban. Upaya menciptakan lembaga Kejaksaan yang menjamin kehidupan masyarakat berkeadilan dalam menyelenggarakan penegakkan hukum diranah sistem peradilan pidana tersebut, tentunya terlebih dahulu menegaskan kedudukan pengawasannya. Sepanjang eksistensi pengawasan dimaksud menyimpan berbagai polemik, selama itu pula akan menjadi retorika. Yang menjadi permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana prinsip dan pedoman yang semestinya dalam pengawasan terhadap Jaksa penuntut umum dalam menjalankan profesinya di ranah Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu? Jenis penelitian ini adalah jenis  penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif, sifat preskriptif ini mempelajari tujuan hukum, nilai-nilai keadilan, validitas aturan hukum, konsep- konsep hukum dan norma-norma hukum. Hasil penelitian yaitu Jaksa sebagai penuntut umum dalam sistem peradilan pidana terpadu diawasi dalam fungsi, tugas, dan wewenangnya menegakkan hukum sebagai Jaksa yang mempunyai profesionalitas, integritas pribadi yang baik dan bekerja efisien. Adapun PNS di Kejaksaan selain Jaksa dapat tetap berada dibawah pengawasan KASN.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Secara Non Litigasi Melalui Mediasi Oleh Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Libas Pada Perkara Perdata Di Kabupaten Ngawi Aljuna Andyspahlawan
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Edisi Oktober 2021
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v2i3.42

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study is to analyze the resolution and obstacles faced in non-litigation settlement of default in breach of contract through mediation by the Libas Legal Aid Institute in Ngawi. The method used in this study is socio-legal research. The data is obtained by interviews and documentation using qualitative analysis through collecting and presenting the result. It is shown from one of the cases resolved in Karanganyar District is that each party and Libas Legal Aid went through several stages, namely mutual understanding, first mediation meeting, separate meeting, second mediation, final decision making, and conclusion. While Libas Legal Aid faced several challenges including the lack of understanding between the parties, the long process, the difficulties of negotiation, and the lack of knowledge from the mediator. These challenges can be resolved if the mediator has good faith to resolve the dispute, has broad insight and knowledge of the issue, and can convince both parties that a dispute will be resolved together and the mediator must disclose all forms of possible conflict of interests and must be able to minimize the occurrence of the further issue.   Keywords: Default, Mediation, Legal Aid.     Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini ialah untuk mengetahui penyelesaian dan kendala yang dihadapi dalam penyelesaian sengketa wanprestasi secara non litigasi melalui mediasi oleh Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Libas pada perkara perdata di Kabupaten Ngawi. Metodologi penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian hukum empiris. Guna memperoleh data digunakan metode wawancara dan dokumentasi yang berkaitan dengan penelitian. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan menganalisis data yang telah terkumpul lalu menyajikannya dan terakhir adalah menarik kesimpulan dari hasil tersebut. Hasil penelitian dan pembahasan akan didapat alur penyelesaian sengketa wanprestasi secara non litigasi melalui mediasi di Kecamatan Karanganyar Kabupaten Ngawi yakni masing-masing anak dari “SM”, “SK” dan LBH Libas melalui beberapa tahapan yaitu pemahaman, pertemuan mediasi pertama, pertemuan terpisah, pertemuan mediasi kedua, pembuatan keputusan akhir dan penutupan. Kendala-kendala yang dihadapi oleh LBH Libas antara lain kurangnya pemahaman para pihak pada pokok perkara, prosesnya berlangsung lama, para pihak dirasa sulit untuk bernegosiasi, berkomitmen dan terbuka serta kurangnya pengetahuan mediator dalam penguasaan permasalahan. Kendala-kendala tersebut dapat teratasi dengan mudah bila seorang mediator mempunyai itikad baik untuk menyelesaikan sengketa tersebut, mempunyai wawasan dan pengetahuan yang luas, dapat meyakinkan kedua belah pihak bilamana suatu sengketa akan dapat terselesaikan secara bersama-sama dan mediatorpun harus mengungkapkan segala bentuk kemungkinan terjadinya benturan kepentingan serta harus dapat meminimalisir terjadinya konflik.             Kata Kunci: Wanprestasi, Mediasi, Lembaga Bantuan Hukum.
Implementasi Diversi Oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak : (Studi Kasus Di Kejaksaan Negeri Karanganyar Tahun 2020) Awan Ashari; Herwin Sulistyowati
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Edisi Oktober 2021
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v2i3.43

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find the procedures for implementing diversion against child crime by the public prosecutor and to find the factors that hindered the public prosecutor during the implementation of diversion. This study uses the empirical legal method. The results of this study are 9 out of 17 cases were successfully diverted during January-December 2020 by the Public Prosecutor at the Karanganyar District Attorney. In diverting the case, the Public Prosecutor at the Karanganyar District Attorney's Office experienced 3 (three) obstacles, among others, (1) there is no consent or agreement between the victim and the perpetrator for diversion; (2) the short and limited period for seeking diversion; and (3) the crime is grossly high to divert.
Problematika Terhadap Batas Waktu Perlindungan Saksi Oleh Lpsk Dalam Perkara Pidana Muhammad Ghazali Rahman
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Edisi Oktober 2021
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v2i3.46

Abstract

This study aims to determine the time limit of protection provided by LPSK clearly to witnesses who are undergoing the examination process and also to find out whether LPSK has provided protection in accordance with what is currently in effect. The type of research used is normative legal research, namely research to obtain legal materials by analyzing and collecting legal materials related to the issues discussed. (1) The protection efforts that will be given to witnesses regarding a limit on when the protection starts and ends of witness protection byLPSK must be optimized so that witnesses who give their statements in order to seek a truth are deemed necessary to clearly pay attention to the time limit for witness protection. (2) Law No. 31 of 2014 on LPSK, especially regarding the time limit for protection, is still considered not maximal and is considered not sufficient to guarantee the witness's sense of trust in LPSK. Weaknesses like this become an obstacle if the witness wants to give information without knowing the time limit for the protection clearly. Of course, there needs to be a complete and more perfect arrangement, presumably the right to witness protection needs to be accommodated in principles, general provisions, types of punishment and other substances.
Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Berasaskan Keadilan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Iwan Riswandie
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Edisi Oktober 2021
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v2i2.48

Abstract

Ease of execution is based on protection for creditors to be able to guarantee repayment of debtor obligations at the risk of default or bad credit with the existence of a Fiduciary Certificate, of course, the creditor's position is protected in an execution activity in the event of a breach of promise (default) from the debtor in the main agreement or additional agreements. who use the fiduciary guarantee institution instrument. This decision from the Constitutional Court in a legal perspective that there is legal protection by carrying out the principle of balance from the parties carrying out a legal act is that within a framework of creditors and debtors, they must receive equal and balanced treatment in accordance with the rights and obligations as wellas the risks in the resulting situation so that justice which is the main purpose of the law itself can run well. This paper examines the implications of this decision in the principle of justice in the framework of the balance of protection between debtors and creditors. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. At the conclusion of this paper, the Constitutional Court's decision which provides conditions regarding the execution of fiduciary guarantees based on the Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate will certainly result in unfavorable conditions for creditors if problems occur in the future. it is necessary to apply in order to ensure the direction of protection in the event of a breach of contract/default, in the future to ensure legal certainty and maximum protection for the parties in a more balanced manner, the revision of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law needs to be put forward
Kajian Hukum Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Yang Melakukan Pencemaran Lingkungan Khairunnisa Fahriati; Nurul Listiyani; Iwan Riswandie
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Edisi Oktober 2021
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v2i3.49

Abstract

Environmental pollution can occur due to activities carried out by corporations. The increasing number of development activities has an impact on the environment, pollution and environmental damage. The impact of environmental pollution is very  dangerous for the lives of living things and the comfort of the environment in the future. The state of Indonesia has prepared a regulation in an effort to protect the environment as in law number 32 of 2009 conceming prorection and management of the environment. With the issuance of law number 11 of 2020 concerning job creation using the omnibus law model, the main theme of this law is to create jobs and investment. To make it easier to achieve this goal, a simplification of a permit was carried out. Therefore, law number 32 of 2009 conceming prorection and management was also affected by to permits and several articles that were changed, replaced, and abolished. This research was conducted to find out how the legal regulation of environmental pollution in law number 11 of 2020 concerning job creation and how the form of corporate responsibility as perpetrators of environmental pollution according to law number 11 of 2020 concerning job creation. The mothod used in this study is normative. The source of the legal material used is primary secondary legal material. The results of this study discuss the simplification of licensing and revisions to a number of articles in law number 32 of 2009 concerning environmental protection and management due to the issuance of law number 11 of 2020 concerning job creation and shifting criminal sanctions into administrative sanctions in the job creation act is one the weaknesses in environmental law enforcement against corporations that are perpetrators of pollution environment.  

Page 3 of 8 | Total Record : 79

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2020 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Edisi October 2025 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Edisi Juni 2025 Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Edisi Oktober 2024 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Edisi Juni 2024 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Edisi Februari 2024 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023): Edisi Oktober 2023 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Edisi Juni 2023 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Edisi Februari 2023 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): Edisi Oktober 2022 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): Edisi Juni 2022 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Edisi Februari 2022 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Edisi Oktober 2021 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Edisi Juni 2021 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Edisi Februari 2021 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Edisi Oktober 2020 More Issue