cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Deo Renaldi Saputra
Contact Email
admin@researchfrontiers.id
Phone
+6285709683865
Journal Mail Official
admin@scriptaintelektual.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Gunung Talang Timur Nomor 45, RT 005, RW 002, Desa Bendan Duwur Kecamatan Gajah Mungkur
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Published by CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31250696     DOI : 10.65310
Core Subject :
Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies is a peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality scholarly works in the fields of human interaction, social studies, and interdisciplinary social science research. The journal serves as an international platform for researchers, academics, educators, professionals, practitioners, and policymakers to disseminate original research articles, theoretical contributions, critical analyses, and interdisciplinary studies that enhance the understanding of social life and human relations across diverse contexts. Published four times a year (February, May, August, and November), Sapientia Diversalis promotes the exchange of ideas and empirical findings that address contemporary social issues, cultural dynamics, communication processes, and patterns of human interaction at local, national, and global levels. The journal welcomes contributions that demonstrate strong academic rigor, originality, methodological soundness, and relevance to current social challenges. Sapientia Diversalis adopts an open-access and no-fee publishing policy, ensuring that all published articles are freely accessible to readers worldwide without any financial barriers for authors or users. This policy reflects the journal’s commitment to academic inclusivity, equitable knowledge dissemination, and global scholarly collaboration. By embracing diverse theoretical perspectives and interdisciplinary approaches, Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies aims to foster critical dialogue, encourage innovative social research, and contribute meaningfully to the advancement of social science scholarship and the understanding of human interaction in an increasingly complex and interconnected world.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 50 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Patterns of Peer Social Support in Maintaining the Psychological Well-being of Students at MAN 1 Banyumas Arundaya Nara Tisna; Muh. Hanif
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/wyp5qw43

Abstract

Patterns of peer social support in maintaining the psychological well-being of students at MAN 1 Banyumas are examined in relation to adolescent vulnerability to academic pressure, social adjustment challenges, and personal problems that require continuous emotional buffering in school life. Adolescence represents a critical developmental stage in which peer relationships become central to daily coping and emotional regulation within the madrasah environment. A qualitative case study approach was employed, with data collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Findings show that peer social support operates through emotional assistance, academic collaboration, informational exchange, and companionship, enabling students to manage stress and interpersonal conflict more effectively. Peer networks also function as informal pathways that often precede formal counseling access, highlighting their structural importance in help-seeking behavior. Although positive peer relations strengthen psychological well-being and classroom climate, closed friendship groups may restrict broader social interaction and occasionally generate minor conflict. Overall, peer social support constitutes a key relational mechanism in sustaining students’ psychological well-being and fostering supportive school environments.
Regulatory Uncertainty as A Challenge to The Protection of Foreign Investors’ Legitimate Expectations from The Perspective of Indonesian Investment Law Arlansyah Harahap; Zulfikri Akramul Akbar; Duhita Driyah Suprapti; Sang Ayu Putu Rahayu
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/2z49an03

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between regulatory uncertainty and the protection of foreign investors’ legitimate expectations within the framework of Indonesian investment law. Employing a non empirical normative legal research design, the study integrates statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches to evaluate the extent to which Indonesian investment regulations provide legal certainty consistent with internationally recognized investment protection standards. The analysis focuses on Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment, Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation, and Government Regulation Number 5 of 2021 concerning Risk Based Business Licensing, complemented by international investment law doctrines and comparative jurisprudence. The findings indicate that Indonesian law implicitly accommodates the protection of legitimate expectations through principles of legal certainty and equal treatment, yet lacks explicit normative recognition. Regulatory inconsistency, overlapping governance structures, policy transitions, and implementation disparities create conditions that weaken investor reliance and regulatory predictability. The study further identifies a normative gap between domestic regulatory practice and international standards of Fair and Equitable Treatment. Strengthening investor protection requires regulatory harmonization, evidence based regulatory review, institutional coordination, and investment governance mechanisms capable of ensuring greater stability, transparency, and legal coherence.  
Derivative Actions As Legal Protection For Minority Investors In Public Companies In Indonesia Zulfikri Akramul Akbar; Arlansyah Harahap; Duhita Driyah Suprapti; Sang Ayu Putu Rahayu
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/vchg3q50

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of derivative actions as a legal protection mechanism for minority investors in Indonesian public companies. The research is motivated by the growing participation of retail investors in the capital market and the persistent limitations affecting shareholder access to derivative litigation under Indonesian company law. Employing a non empirical normative legal research design, the study analyzes statutory provisions, legal doctrines, and theoretical perspectives through statute and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials consist of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, Law Number 8 of 1995 concerning Capital Market, and Law Number 4 of 2023 concerning Financial Sector Development and Strengthening, complemented by scholarly literature and comparative legal sources. The findings demonstrate that the ten percent ownership threshold creates a structural incompatibility when applied to public companies characterized by dispersed share ownership and significant coordination barriers. The threshold transforms derivative actions into a procedurally inaccessible remedy for minority investors and weakens substantive access to justice. The study proposes a reconstructed framework based on threshold differentiation, leave of court mechanisms, regulatory derivative actions, and strengthened institutional involvement of the Financial Services Authority to achieve a more inclusive and effective system of investor protection.
Legal Analysis of Civil Servant Neutrality in General Elections Emilza Mumtaz; Berlianti Wahyu Nur Fatimah; Yahya Al Farisi; Titi Sari; Amelinda Cindy Laksintya; Arief Budiono
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/735fy090

Abstract

Civil servant neutrality constitutes a fundamental principle in ensuring the integrity and fairness of democratic elections, particularly within administrative systems vulnerable to political influence. In Indonesia, despite the existence of a comprehensive legal framework regulating neutrality, persistent violations indicate a gap between normative provisions and practical enforcement. This study aims to analyze the legal regulation of civil servant neutrality in general elections and examine the effectiveness of sanction enforcement mechanisms. The research employs a qualitative juridical-normative method, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches based on primary legal materials and relevant scholarly works. The findings reveal that neutrality is firmly established through a hierarchical legal structure, including constitutional provisions, statutory laws, and implementing regulations; however, its enforcement remains inconsistent due to institutional fragmentation, interpretative ambiguities, and socio-political pressures. The analysis further demonstrates that weak coordination among supervisory bodies and varying sanction applications undermine legal certainty and deterrence. Therefore, strengthening neutrality requires regulatory harmonization, institutional reform, and the development of a professional bureaucratic culture grounded in integrity and accountability.    
The Application of the General Principles of Good Governance to Administrative Disputes in Public Service Digitalization Policies Dila Nurul; Chandra Devaraihan Wahyudi; Yoyoh Yoyoh; Difky Maulana; Taufiq Alamsyah
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/ndfmc385

Abstract

This study examines the application of the General Principles of Good Governance in administrative disputes arising from public service digitalization policies in Indonesia. The research employs a non empirical normative legal method based on doctrinal legal inquiry and integrates statutory and conceptual approaches. The analysis focuses on the role of governance principles as normative standards for assessing the legality, accountability, transparency, and prudence of administrative decisions produced within digital public service systems. Primary legal materials include Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, Law Number 14 of 2008 concerning Public Information Disclosure, and Presidential Regulation Number 95 of 2018 concerning the Electronic Based Government System. The findings demonstrate that the General Principles of Good Governance remain applicable to electronic administrative decision making and function as essential safeguards against legal risks associated with algorithmic governance. The principle of prudence requires administrative authorities to maintain responsibility for decisions generated through digital systems, while the principle of openness supports transparency, auditability, and effective judicial scrutiny. The study concludes that administrative legality in the digital era depends not only on lawful outcomes but also on accountable and transparent decision making processes capable of ensuring effective legal protection and good governance.  
Aristotle’s Distributive Justice as the Basis for Evaluating Criteria for Low-Income Individuals Receiving Legal Aid Indra Purwanto
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/akts2664

Abstract

This study examines the philosophical and juridical foundations of legal aid eligibility criteria for low income individuals in Indonesia through the perspective of Aristotle’s distributive justice. The research employs a non empirical normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches. Primary legal materials include the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945, Law Number 16 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid, and Government Regulation Number 42 of 2013. The analysis reveals that the existing legal aid framework primarily relies on administrative indicators of poverty, particularly certificates of indigence and social assistance documentation. While these mechanisms provide procedural certainty, they do not adequately capture actual legal vulnerability, social exclusion, and barriers to accessing justice. Aristotle’s distributive justice demonstrates that the allocation of legal aid should be based on proportional need rather than formal administrative status alone. The study proposes a reconstructed eligibility model incorporating economic capacity, social vulnerability, legal access barriers, legal literacy, and structural disadvantage. Such a framework strengthens substantive justice, improves the accuracy of legal aid distribution, and enhances the realization of equal access to justice within Indonesia’s constitutional legal order.
The Legal Vacuum Regarding Constitutional Complaints Under Article 24C of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the Urgency of Expanding the Powers of the Constitutional Court Indra Purwanto
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/1j5e1790

Abstract

This study examines the constitutional implications of the absence of constitutional complaint mechanisms within the Indonesian constitutional framework and evaluates the urgency of expanding the authority of the Constitutional Court to strengthen constitutional rights protection. Employing a non empirical normative legal research design, the study analyzes statutory provisions, constitutional doctrines, and comparative constitutional literature through statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Secondary legal materials include constitutional provisions, national legislation, and scholarly works on constitutional adjudication and rights protection. The findings indicate that the current constitutional structure provides fragmented remedies that are insufficient to address direct violations of constitutional rights by public authorities. Comparative insights from established constitutional democracies demonstrate that constitutional complaint mechanisms significantly enhance access to constitutional justice, judicial accountability, and the effectiveness of rights enforcement. The study concludes that introducing constitutional complaint jurisdiction would strengthen constitutional supremacy and improve the coherence of constitutional remedies in Indonesia. The research highlights that institutional reform is necessary to bridge gaps in constitutional protection and to enhance the responsiveness of constitutional adjudication to contemporary governance challenges.
A Legal-Normative Analysis of Marriage Registration in Indonesia from the Perspectives of Islamic Law and Positive Law, and Its Implications for the Legal Protection of the Family Rosihah Rosihah; Abdul Raffi Ardiyanto; Fitria Adzuhri Mahyudin; Humaeroh Humaeroh
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/wb7qvy52

Abstract

This study examines the legal status, normative foundations, and legal implications of marriage registration in Indonesia through the perspectives of Islamic law and positive law. The research employs a non empirical legal method based on a normative juridical approach and doctrinal legal analysis. Primary legal materials consist of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975, and Law Number 16 of 2019, supported by scholarly literature on family law, legal pluralism, and sociolegal theory. The analysis explores the historical and regulatory development of marriage registration, the relationship between religious validity and state recognition, and the role of registration in securing legal protection for family members. The findings indicate that marriage registration functions as a legal mechanism that bridges Islamic legal principles and state legal authority within Indonesia’s plural legal system. Although classical Islamic jurisprudence does not generally classify registration as a substantive requirement of marriage validity, contemporary legal developments justify its necessity through the objectives of Islamic law and the demands of legal certainty. Registration strengthens the protection of rights relating to spouses, children, inheritance, maintenance, and access to judicial remedies. The study concludes that marriage registration constitutes an essential instrument for legal recognition, family welfare, and substantive justice in contemporary Indonesia.
The Effectiveness of Administrative Remedies as a Prerequisite for Filing a Lawsuit in the Administrative Court (PTUN) Rafli Ramdani; Rihan Rizky; Gia Anggiani; Jasmine Az-zahra; Zakiyah Zakiyah; Taufiq Alamsyah
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/fga6kf24

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of administrative remedies as a prerequisite for filing lawsuits in the State Administrative Court (PTUN), as regulated under Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court as amended by Law Number 9 of 2004 and Law Number 51 of 2009, as well as Supreme Court Regulation Number 6 of 2018. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by primary and secondary legal materials. The findings indicate that normatively, administrative remedies aim to promote efficiency in dispute resolution, provide opportunities for internal correction, and reduce the caseload of the PTUN, while also functioning as a prerequisite (voorvraag) for litigation. However, in practice, their effectiveness remains limited as they are often treated as procedural formalities, influenced by limited independence, weak transparency and accountability, and low public legal awareness. Comparative analysis with civil law and common law systems shows the need to balance legal certainty and substantive justice. Strengthening regulations, institutions, and legal awareness is essential to enhance their effectiveness as legal protection.  
Dynamic Governance in Population Services Under the “Dukcapil in the Village” Program in Batu Bara Regency Muhammad Azhari Ihsan; Jona Bungaran Basuki Sinaga; Lilis Sholihah
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/118c2h77

Abstract

Population administration services play a crucial role in ensuring legal identity, social inclusion, and access to public services. This study examines the implementation of dynamic governance in population administration services through the Dukcapil in the Village Program in Batu Bara Regency. The research employed a qualitative approach within a post positivist paradigm. Data were collected through in depth interviews, observation, and document analysis involving officials of the Population and Civil Registration Office, village service personnel, and community members. Data analysis was conducted using ATLAS.ti based on the dynamic governance framework developed by Neo and Chen. The findings indicate that governance capabilities have contributed to improving service accessibility and administrative responsiveness through service decentralization and technology utilization. Institutional culture has supported transparency, professionalism, and citizen oriented service values, although public trust and community participation remain uneven across villages. Organizational change has encouraged workforce adaptation, digital transformation, and service innovation, yet several constraints persist, including limited human resources, infrastructure disparities, and low levels of digital literacy. The study concludes that sustainable population service improvement requires the integration of adaptive governance capacity, strong institutional values, and continuous organizational transformation to ensure inclusive, responsive, and citizen centered public services.

Page 2 of 5 | Total Record : 50

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): : August: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): :February: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studie