cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
I Gusti Ngurah Santika
Contact Email
ngurahsantika88@gmail.com
Phone
+6285237832582
Journal Mail Official
jomlas26@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Pandu, No.48
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies
Published by CV Tirta Pustaka Press
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31238416     DOI : 10.60153
Core Subject :
Journal of Multidiscipline Law Studies (JOMLAS) is dedicated to advancing and disseminating high-quality multidisciplinary legal scholarship. The journal serves as an international forum for academics, researchers, legal practitioners, and policymakers to publish scholarly works and exchange critical ideas on contemporary legal issues within national, regional, and global contexts. JOMLAS emphasizes the integration of legal studies with perspectives from other disciplines in order to deepen the understanding of law as a dynamic social, political, economic, cultural, and technological phenomenon. Scope The scope of JOMLAS encompasses, but is not limited to, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary studies that connect law with the following fields: Law and Social Sciences Law and Economics Law and Sociology Law and Political Science Law and Humanities Law and Education Law and Public Administration Law and Land and Property Studies Law and Technology (including digital law, cyber law, and artificial intelligence) Law and Environmental Studies and Sustainable Development Law, Culture, and Society Law and Health Studies Law and Public Policy Comparative Law and International Law Legal Reform and Governance JOMLAS welcomes original research articles, theoretical and conceptual papers, empirical studies, case analyses, and policy-oriented research that make a substantial contribution to the development of multidisciplinary legal knowledge and practice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 17 Documents
 1   2 
Civil Law in Practice Between Theory and Reality I Gede Sujana; Anjelia Pendi Jola; Alexandrio Ngindi Ate; Patrisia Rambu Sedu
Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies
Publisher : CV. Tirta Pustaka Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60153/jomlas.3i2.254

Abstract

Civil law is traditionally understood as a systematic and codified legal framework designed to ensure legal certainty, predictability, and coherence in regulating private legal relations. However, the practical application of civil law often reveals a significant gap between theoretical ideals and real-world implementation. This article aims to critically analyze the tension between civil law theory and its practice, focusing on how normative principles operate within judicial interpretation and social realities. This study employs a normative juridical research method with a qualitative and critical analytical approach. The analysis is based on secondary legal materials, including civil codes, judicial decisions, scholarly journal articles, and authoritative legal literature. Doctrinal, philosophical, and comparative approaches are used to examine the extent to which civil law theory aligns with or diverges from its practical application. The findings indicate that civil law in practice is not merely a mechanical application of codified norms. Instead, it is shaped by judicial discretion, interpretative flexibility, socio-economic change, and evolving societal values. The pursuit of legal certainty frequently encounters the demand for substantive justice, compelling judges to adopt purposive and contextual interpretations. Moreover, technological developments and globalization further challenge the adequacy of traditional civil law concepts. This article concludes that the gap between civil law theory and practice is structural rather than incidental. Bridging this gap requires reconceptualizing civil law theory to acknowledge interpretation, context, and justice as integral elements of legal practice. Such an approach allows civil law to remain normatively coherent while responsive to contemporary legal challenges.
Customary Law of the Dani Tribe in Regulating Social Life in Papua Yonas Wenda; Debora Hubi; Elisabet Tabuni
Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies
Publisher : CV. Tirta Pustaka Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60153/jomlas.3i2.255

Abstract

This study examines the role of customary law of the Dani Tribe in regulating social life within indigenous communities in Papua. As one of the major indigenous groups in the Baliem Valley, the Dani Tribe maintains a strong customary legal system that functions as a living law governing social behavior, dispute resolution, kinship relations, and communal order. The research aims to analyze how Dani customary law operates in practice and how it contributes to social cohesion amid the coexistence of state law and indigenous legal systems. This research employs a qualitative socio-legal approach, utilizing primary data collected through in-depth interviews and participant observation, as well as secondary data obtained from academic literature, legal documents, and previous studies. Data were analyzed using descriptive qualitative and thematic analysis to identify patterns in the implementation and function of customary law within the Dani community. The findings reveal that Dani customary law is an unwritten, flexible, and community-based legal system enforced through social consensus and the authority of customary leaders. It plays a central role in resolving disputes through restorative justice mechanisms that emphasize reconciliation, compensation, and the restoration of social harmony. Additionally, customary law regulates kinship and marriage practices, reinforcing collective responsibility and inter-clan solidarity. Despite constitutional recognition of customary law in Indonesia, challenges remain in its integration with formal legal institutions, particularly in relation to land rights and development policies.
Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91PUU XIX2021Terhadap Mekanisme Pengawasan Presiden Di Indonesia Rizal Timbul; Agus Haryanto; Maria Anjani
Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies
Publisher : CV. Tirta Pustaka Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60153/jomlas.3i2.256

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 91/PUU-XIX/2021 terhadap mekanisme pengawasan Presiden di Indonesia, dengan menekankan gap antara idealisme konstitusional dan realitas praktik pemerintahan. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasari oleh peran strategis MK sebagai lembaga pengawas konstitusi yang memiliki kewenangan final dalam menguji undang-undang dan menegakkan prinsip checks and balances terhadap eksekutif. Meskipun secara normatif putusan MK menegaskan bahwa Presiden harus tunduk pada batasan konstitusional, implementasi putusan dalam praktik menunjukkan adanya kendala terkait kepentingan pragmatis pemerintah, interpretasi fleksibel eksekutif, dan dinamika politik-administratif. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, yang menggabungkan analisis dokumen hukum, putusan MK, undang-undang terkait, literatur hukum akademik, dan publikasi resmi terkait implementasi kebijakan. Data dianalisis menggunakan studi konten (content analysis) secara deskriptif-analitis, serta dilakukan triangulasi sumber untuk memastikan validitas dan reliabilitas temuan. Pendekatan kritis digunakan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas pengawasan Presiden melalui putusan MK serta menyoroti faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan gap antara teori dan praktik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan MK secara yuridis menegaskan prinsip supremasi konstitusi dan checks and balances, namun realitas implementasinya sering terhambat oleh kepentingan pragmatis pemerintah dan karakter putusan yang bersifat inkonstitusional bersyarat. Gap ini menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme pengawasan Presiden melalui MK belum sepenuhnya efektif, meskipun secara teori memiliki dasar hukum yang kuat. Fenomena ini juga menegaskan perlunya kesadaran politik dan budaya hukum birokrasi yang kuat untuk menegakkan akuntabilitas eksekutif secara nyata. Kesimpulan penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XIX/2021 memiliki peran penting dalam pengawasan Presiden, namun efektivitasnya bergantung pada kepatuhan eksekutif, implementasi birokrasi, dan komitmen politik terhadap supremasi konstitusi.
Legal Challenges and Reforms in Dutch Labor Law Insights from Rotterdam Maarten Bakker; Jan de Vries; Tom de Boer
Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies
Publisher : CV. Tirta Pustaka Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60153/jomlas.3i2.257

Abstract

This study examines the legal challenges and reforms in Dutch labor law, with a particular focus on Rotterdam, a major urban and economic center. It critically analyzes recent legislative changes, especially the Balanced Labour Market Act, which aims to improve employment security and reduce disparities between temporary and permanent contracts. The research highlights persistent issues affecting non-standard, gig, and migrant workers, including gaps in social protection, legal classification, and collective representation. Using a qualitative approach that combines doctrinal analysis, case studies, and examination of labor market practices, the study identifies both the successes and limitations of current reforms. Findings indicate that while legislative measures have enhanced worker security and fairness for certain groups, significant vulnerabilities remain for platform-based and flexible workers. The study concludes that labor law must adopt adaptive, inclusive, and evidence-based strategies to respond effectively to technological, economic, and social transformations in Rotterdam’s labor market. Recommendations include clarifying employment definitions, extending protections to non-standard workers, strengthening migrant labor safeguards, and developing innovative models of collective representation. The insights from Rotterdam provide broader implications for understanding the interaction between labor law, employment practices, and social justice in modern urban economies.
Pancasila sebagai Grundnorm dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Analisis Filosofis dan Yuridis I Gusti Ngurah Santika; Ni Putu Ika Putri Sujianti; Adrianus Ahas; I Gede Agus Juliawan
Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies
Publisher : CV. Tirta Pustaka Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60153/jomlas.3i2.258

Abstract

Pancasila memiliki kedudukan fundamental sebagai dasar negara sekaligus norma dasar (grundnorm) dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Secara normatif, Pancasila berfungsi sebagai sumber nilai yang menjiwai pembentukan, penafsiran, dan penegakan hukum nasional. Namun, dalam praktik ketatanegaraan, nilai-nilai Pancasila sering kali mengalami reduksi makna dan belum terinternalisasi secara substantif dalam hukum positif Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara kritis kedudukan Pancasila sebagai grundnorm dalam sistem hukum Indonesia serta implikasinya terhadap pembentukan dan penegakan hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan filosofis, konseptual, dan perundang-undangan. Bahan hukum yang digunakan meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, serta literatur ilmiah yang relevan dengan Pancasila, filsafat hukum, dan negara hukum Indonesia. Analisis dilakukan secara kualitatif dengan penalaran deduktif dan interpretatif untuk menilai konsistensi antara kedudukan normatif Pancasila dan realitas praktik hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya kesenjangan antara pengakuan normatif Pancasila sebagai norma dasar dan implementasinya dalam sistem hukum. Pembentukan hukum masih didominasi pendekatan legal-formal dan kepentingan politik praktis, sementara penegakan hukum cenderung bersifat positivistik dan kurang berorientasi pada keadilan substantif. Penelitian ini menegaskan, bahwa penguatan Pancasila sebagai paradigma hukum merupakan prasyarat penting bagi terwujudnya sistem hukum nasional yang berkeadilan, humanis, dan berorientasi pada kesejahteraan sosial. 
Penegakan Hukum Pidana terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia I Wayan Kandia; Rosa Delima Darniati Bulu; Mariam Manilang; Matius Saingo
Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies
Publisher : CV. Tirta Pustaka Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60153/jomlas.3i2.259

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penegakan hukum pidana terhadap tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia, serta mengevaluasi efektivitas hukum, lembaga penegak hukum, dan faktor sosial-budaya yang mempengaruhi pelaksanaannya. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif-analitis, melibatkan studi literatur, analisis putusan pengadilan, serta data sekunder dari laporan lembaga terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun kerangka hukum antikorupsi di Indonesia telah memadai dan didukung oleh keberadaan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) sebagai lembaga independen, implementasinya masih menghadapi berbagai kendala. Kendala tersebut meliputi inkonsistensi putusan pengadilan, koordinasi antar lembaga penegak hukum yang belum optimal, keterbatasan kapasitas sumber daya manusia, serta budaya hukum dan intervensi politik yang memengaruhi efektivitas penegakan hukum. Selain itu, hukuman pidana yang diterapkan belum sepenuhnya menciptakan efek jera karena kurangnya rehabilitasi sosial dan edukasi hukum bagi pelaku korupsi. Penelitian ini juga menekankan pentingnya keterlibatan masyarakat dalam pengawasan serta penguatan mekanisme transparansi dan pelaporan. Kesimpulannya, penegakan hukum pidana korupsi di Indonesia memerlukan pendekatan holistik yang mengintegrasikan aspek hukum normatif, kelembagaan, profesionalisme aparat, transformasi budaya hukum, dan partisipasi publik. Implementasi pendekatan multidimensional ini diharapkan dapat meningkatkan efektivitas pemberantasan korupsi, memperkuat supremasi hukum, serta membangun kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap sistem peradilan.
Teori Hukum sebagai Instrumen Analisis Normatif dan Sosiologis Benny Simanjuntak; Samuel Sinaga; Togar Manullang; Martua Pasaribu
Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies
Publisher : CV. Tirta Pustaka Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60153/jomlas.3i2.260

Abstract

Teori hukum memiliki peran fundamental dalam membentuk cara pandang terhadap hukum, baik sebagai sistem norma maupun sebagai instrumen sosial yang berfungsi mengatur dan menata kehidupan masyarakat. Namun, perkembangan masyarakat modern yang ditandai oleh kompleksitas sosial, pluralitas nilai, dan ketimpangan struktural menuntut pembacaan ulang terhadap teori-teori hukum klasik yang selama ini mendominasi wacana hukum. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara kritis perkembangan teori hukum kontemporer dengan menyoroti ketegangan antara kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan sebagai tujuan utama hukum, serta merumuskan kerangka pemahaman teoritis yang lebih integratif dan kontekstual. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif-kritis dengan pendekatan konseptual dan filosofis yang dipadukan dengan perspektif hukum kritis. Data penelitian diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap karya-karya teori hukum klasik dan kontemporer, serta artikel jurnal ilmiah nasional dan internasional yang relevan dan mutakhir. Analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif-deskriptif dan kritis untuk mengkaji karakteristik, keterbatasan, serta implikasi praktis dari berbagai aliran teori hukum dalam konteks penegakan hukum modern. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dominasi positivisme hukum, meskipun berkontribusi terhadap kepastian dan stabilitas sistem hukum, memiliki keterbatasan dalam menjawab tuntutan keadilan substantif dan kemanfaatan hukum. Pendekatan normatif yang terlalu formalistik cenderung mengabaikan konteks sosial dan pengalaman kelompok masyarakat yang beragam, sehingga berpotensi mereproduksi ketidakadilan struktural. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa teori penemuan hukum dan pendekatan hukum kritis memiliki peran strategis dalam menjembatani ketegangan antara norma dan realitas sosial melalui interpretasi hukum yang kontekstual dan reflektif. Sebagai simpulan, artikel ini menegaskan pengembangan teori hukum ke depan perlu diarahkan pada pendekatan integratif yang memadukan dimensi normatif, filosofis, dan sosial-kritis.
Social Work Penalties For Perpetrators Of Minor Crimes In The Development Of Indonesian Criminal Law Nani Widya Sari; Guntarto Widodo; Oksidelfa Yanto; Fariz Rifqi Hasbi; Rifka Zuwanda
Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies
Publisher : CV. Tirta Pustaka Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60153/hnr8pz42

Abstract

This study examines the legal regulation and implementation of community service punishment for minor offenses within the framework of Indonesian criminal law reform, as well as their application to minor offenders. The method used is normative juridical research, which emphasizes the study of rules and legislation related to community service penalties. The study reveals that the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023 introduces community service punishment as an alternative sanction for minor offenses, reflecting a shift from imprisonment-oriented sentencing toward rehabilitative and restorative justice policies. The analysis demonstrates that community service punishment constitutes a more proportional and rehabilitative sanction for minor crimes compared to short-term imprisonment or monetary fines, aiming to improve offender behavior and restore social relationships. Effective implementation requires institutional readiness, inter-agency coordination among law enforcement bodies, and adequate supervisory mechanisms within the criminal justice system to ensure community service effectively functions as a substitute for imprisonment.
Children’s Rights vis-à-vis the Media: A Study of the Laws of the Republican Era in Afghanistan A. Basir Mesbah; Sayeed Sulaiman Sadat; Sayed Mohammad Firozi; Ali Juma Hamdard
Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies
Publisher : CV. Tirta Pustaka Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60153/9nvmw833

Abstract

The right of children to access information and media messages is considered one of the important manifestations of children’s rights, and alongside it, their protection and safeguarding against the media is of great importance. After the adoption of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1989, national-level laws aimed at protecting children against traditional and new media were developed. Afghanistan, during the two decades of the republican system (2001–2021), in light of the Constitution (2004), enacted the Law on Protection of the Child and the Mass Media Law, which directly or indirectly referred to the rights of this social group in relation to the media. This study employs a comparative legal analysis to examine how Afghanistan’s Republican-era laws protected children’s rights in relation to the media and to evaluate their conformity with the Convention on the Rights of the Child amid limited prior scholarship on Afghan child-media legal protections, has examined and compared the extracted legal codes of these laws with the articles of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.The findings reveal that Afghanistan’s Republican-era legal framework formally aligned with international child rights standards and the Social Responsibility Theory of the press, although significant gaps remained in the practical enforcement of media protections for children. According to our research, the most important axes addressed in the laws of this country were identified as: “the right to freedom of expression,” “the necessity of protecting dignity, reputation, and psychological and moral well-being,” “cultural development,” “the right of access to information,” “protection against immoral content and pornography,” “control of gambling in the online space,” and “prevention of sexual abuse in the dissemination and reception of messages.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Platform Digital Terhadap Kerugian Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Marketplace Ni Made Trisna Dewi; Sang Ayu Made Ary Kusumawardhani
Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies
Publisher : CV. Tirta Pustaka Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60153/tk7y5e49

Abstract

Perkembangan marketplace sebagai bagian dari ekosistem perdagangan digital menimbulkan persoalan hukum terkait batas tanggung jawab platform terhadap kerugian konsumen, sementara pengaturan hukum di Indonesia belum mengatur secara komprehensif mengenai pertanggungjawaban platform digital dalam transaksi elektronik. Penelitian Ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konstruksi tanggung jawab hukum platform marketplace berdasarkan prinsip liability based on fault dan strict liability, serta mengevaluasi efektivitas perlindungan hukum konsumen dalam transaksi digital di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa platform marketplace tidak lagi hanya berfungsi sebagai perantara, tetapi juga memiliki tanggung jawab hukum atas kegagalan sistem, lemahnya pengawasan penjual, dan tidak terpenuhinya keamanan transaksi konsumen. Tanggung jawab tersebut dapat didasarkan pada prinsip liability based on fault maupun strict liability, tergantung pada konstruksi hubungan hukum yang terjadi. Selain itu, perlindungan konsumen dalam transaksi marketplace di Indonesia masih menghadapi tantangan, seperti lemahnya pengawasan, ketidakseimbangan posisi para pihak, serta keterbatasan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan regulasi dan peningkatan akuntabilitas platform digital guna menjamin kepastian hukum dan perlindungan yang optimal bagi konsumen. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan regulasi mengenai tanggung jawab platform digital serta peningkatan mekanisme perlindungan konsumen guna menciptakan kepastian hukum dalam transaksi marketplace di Indonesial.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 17

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Law Studies