FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is an open access and peer-reviewed journal that aims to offer an international academic platform for cross-border legal research encompassing specifically concerning human rights, policy, values of Islam. These may include but are not limited to various fields such as: ● humanity ● heritage law ● family law ● civil and political rights ● economic, social, and cultural rights ● solidarity rights ● philosophy of law ● private law ● international law ● civil law ● criminal law ● administrative law ● constitutional law ● adat law ● Intellectual Property Rights ● commercial court ● district court ● high court ● supreme court ● constitutional court ● industrial relations court ● administrative court ● fishery court ● military court ● taxation court ● court of human rights ● court of religion
Articles
655 Documents
Street Children Phenomenon in Makassar City : A Criminological Analysis
Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no1.1915
The presence of children who live on the streets has caused concern in various cities in Indonesia, especially Makassar, South Sulawesi. Lack of education, decent life, and government attention trigger street children to do unlawful acts, such as drugs and drinking. From a criminological perspective, the phenomenon of street children can be explained using the social learning theory. Social learning theory is a convergence between differential association theory with general behavioural principles, which in this theory explains that criminal behaviour can be obtained from environmental influences. There is a reciprocal interaction that directs a person’s behaviour. This study aims to determine the description of street children’s existence in the city of Makassar, analyse the factors that cause the phenomenon of street children, and determine the prevention of street children. The research method uses a type of qualitative research sourced from the various scientific literature. This study indicates that the phenomenon of street children is a warning signalling the need for social development and poverty eradication policies to improve the situation on the broader community and prevent more young people from becoming marginalised. Every child must be protected according to United Nations Children’s Fund and also has been regulated in Regional Regulation No. 2 of 2008 concerning the Development of Street Children, Homeless, Beggars and Buskers in Makassar City
Characteristics of Financial Technology as Financing Alternative Capitalization of Medium Small-Medium Enterprises (MSME)
Dwi Tatak Subagiyo
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no2.1933
Characteristics of Financial Technology as a Financial Institution that uses information technology to provide financial solutions by prioritizing compliance with the principles of prudence and risk management. The characteristics of Financial Technology institutions are getting a loan quickly; Makes Payment Easier; Make Loan Payments without Additional Fees. Peer to Peer Lending (P2P lending) system in providing financial services is done through information technology based. The financial services institution Peer to Peer Lending (P2P Lending) is a financial technology financial institution (Fintech). Financial Technology (Fintech) as a Literacy Source for Financing Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises; Financial Technology (Fintech) As a Facilitator in MSME Development; Financial Tecnology (Fintech) as a driver for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises to Increase National Financial Inclusion. The Role of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and the Indonesian Joint Funding Fintech Association (AFPI) As Regulations and Oversight of Financial Technology Institutions (Fintech) in Indonesia.
Social Sanction: Naked Parade and Vigilantism as Legal Violation Criminal Law Perspective and Human Rights
Kuswardani kuswardani;
Sunaryo Sunaryo
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no2.1934
Naked parade and vigilantism are social sanctions or informal sanctions imposed by the community for acts deemed contrary to the local community's norms. These sanctions include vigilante action, which breaks the law. This paper aims to explain social sanctions (naked parade) from a legal perspective, particularly studied from human rights and criminal law. The study uses a normative approach so that the data sources include legal documents, references, and journals relevant to the problem being studied. The data analysis using consists of human rights principles and criminal law. The study results show that naked parade and vigilante as social sanction contradict human rights principles (liberty, non-discrimination, dignity, humanity, and equity). This act is also a criminal act, considering that the criminal law functions to protect the legal rights of individuals, the community, and the state. There is no explicit formulation of naked parade in the Penal Code (KUHP) or regulations outside the Penal Code. It is necessary to formulate it explicitly as an act that can be punished.
Separatist Creditors Problems on Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Based on the Supreme Court’s Decree Number 30/KMA/SK/I/2020
Suwinto Johan
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no3.1956
Debt Payment Obligation postponement is an effort for creditors and debtors to settle the debts with a more efficient process. The creditor of a company consists of concurrent and separatist creditors. Based on the Supreme Court Decree Number 30/KMA/SK/I/2020 Book I on the Guidelines for the Settlement of Requests for Bankrupt and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, the creditors who can submit Postponement of Debt Payment Obligation (PKPU) are only concurrent creditors. The separatist creditors are not allowed to submit PKPU. This is different from the Bankruptcy and the Postponement of Debt Payment Law Number 37 of 2004. Based on Law Number 37 of 2004, Creditors who can submit Postponement of Debt Payment Obligation are creditors who estimate that the debtor cannot continue to pay debts that are due and can be billed, can request that the debtor be given a postponement of debt payment, to enable the debtor to submit a reconciliatory proposal which includes offering the payment of part or all of the debt to the creditor. However, based on the Supreme Court Decree, only the concurrent creditor can submit Debt Payment Obligation’s postponement. As a result of this Supreme Court Decree, the separatist creditors cannot apply for Debt Payment Obligation postponement. Separatist creditors can propose the postponement of debt payment obligations if the separatist creditor has turned into a concurrent creditor. Separatist creditors become concurrent creditors if the collateral provided value is insufficient for the company’s obligations so that the separatist creditors can propose to be part of the concurrent creditors. By becoming a concurrent creditor, the separatist creditors can submit to be part of the peace proposal and distribute the remaining company assets.
The Legal Reform of Venture Capital Financing Institutions As a Financing Alternative for Micro Small and Medium Enterprises
Tri Setiady
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no1.1969
So far, the role of venture capital has not been optimal, or it can be said that while it is not working. In practice, in Indonesia, venture capital companies carry out their business like banking. That until now, in general, venture capital companies practice more as credit providers as the usual practice of providing bank loans. All requirements and conditions requested for a business partner company (actually: a debtor) are like a bank in giving credit. Therefore a legal reform of venture capital financing institutions is needed to optimize financing for micro, small, and medium enterprises to realize national development.
Termination of Employment-Based on Efficiency in Indonesian Company
Kadek Agus Sudiarawan;
Putu Edgar Tanaya;
Kasandra Dyah Hapsari
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no1.2015
The different interest between employer and employee is potentially causing Industrial Dispute between them. Industrial Disputes is dominated by Termination of Employment (laid off) dispute; one of the reasons is company efficiency. Based on that matter, it needs to be studied regarding its legality, procedure, employees’ rights and the pattern of Industrial Dispute Settlement regarding laid off through company efficiency. Based on these problems, several conclusions can be drawn. Firstly, Termination of Employment must be based on a valid reason under the law. Secondly, Termination of Employment due to company’s efficiency can only be done on the condition that the company permanently closed. Thirdly, in the case of termination of employment for company efficiency, the company must pay attention to the employee’s rights in the form of compensation based on consideration of wages and the employee’s duration of work. Fourthly, the pattern of Industrial Dispute Resolution that can be adopted by the parties is bipartite, tripartite and Industrial Relation Court.
The Implementation of Well-Known Trademarks Doctrine in Indonesian Commercial and Supreme Court
Sujana Donandi S.;
Pandu Adi Cakranegara
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no2.2016
The implementation of well-known trademark in indonesia is still unsatisfying especially for foreign trademarks since many foreign trademarks that claimed themselves as well-known trademarks were not admitted for the trademarks were not yet registered or based on judges assessment, not fulfilling the criteria. This research aim is to analyse the implementation of well-known trademarks doctrine in Indonesian commercial and supreme court. The method used is normative-juridical with statute and case study approach. The result shows that the commercial and supreme court have used the criteria of well-known trademarks as stipulated in Law no. 20 Year 2016 and Permenkumham no. 67 Year 2016 as well as WIPO Joint Recommendation in identifying a well-known trademark. However, the implementation is inconsistent. it is inconsistent because in one case (STARCO case), court prior to the first to file principle while in other case (Alexander Mcqueen case), court admit the trademark as a well-known trademark though it is not registered yet. The second case is coherence with the well-known trademark doctrine which the idea to protect a high reputed trademark even it is not registered. Secondly, the emptiness of the detailed criteria has made the judgement on well-known trademarks becomes widely opened for interpretation. Thus, the next convention and regulation must set aside the first to file principle and prior to the criteria only in identifying a well-known trademark. Moreover, the criteria of minimum number of registration or application should be revised by requiring the trademark to be registered or applied in at least 6 out of 10 countries with the biggest population in the world so that it is proven that the trademark is exist among the most world population. In addition, the standard level of legal enforcement must entail minimum two verdicts so that the enforcement has obtained a re-confirmation.
The Role of Marine Security Agency (BAKAMLA) As Sea and Coast Guards in Indonesian Water Jurisdiction
Rika Kurniaty;
Herman Suryokumoro;
Setyo Widagdo
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no3.2017
The Indonesian geographical condition as an archipelagic state with abundant natural resources has put maritime security into its central issue. Several challenges are facing Indonesia’s maritime coordination. National maritime agencies are still overlapping and duplicating based on various laws and regulations. As part of the Indonesian vision to be a ‘global maritime fulcrum,’ Indonesia’s government established the Marine Security Agency (BAKAMLA). BAKAMLA aims to shift the law enforcement paradigm from a multi-agency multi-task to a single-agency multi-task. The establishment of BAKAMLA is expected to create law enforcement’s effectiveness and efficiency in Indonesia’s water jurisdiction. This study is a type of normative juridical research using a statute approach and case study approach. This study reveals that the emerging of BAKAMLA, based on Law Number 32 of 2014 concerning Marine, grants broad authority to the maritime security agency. BAKAMLA has the power to direct instant pursue, dismiss, inspect, arrest, carry, and deliver the ship to the related authorized agency for further legal proceedings. BAKAMLA also has the authority to integrated security and safety information systems. The presence of BAKAMLA does not necessarily disregard or eliminate other institutions in the same task, but as a guard to stimulate to synergize further the security and safety of Indonesia’s territorial waters under a single command unit.
Review of Syaria Economy Disputes in Religious Courts within the Perspective of Small Claims Court (SCC)
Anita Afriana;
Hazar Kusmayanti
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no2.2086
One of the absolute competencies of the Religious Court revolves around resolving sharia economy disputes. Quick, simple and inexpensive principles of the court must persist within Religious Court procedures, such as in sharia economy disputes relating to business disputes as regulated in Supreme Court Decree No. 14 of 2016 on Procedures in Sharia Economic Disputes. The solution in this way should be able to speed up commercial Shia dispute, but in fact, various obstacles were found. This article reviews the resolution of sharia economy disputes in Religious Court within the perspective of Small Claims Court implied through SC Decree No. 14 of 2016, along with the possible issues of Small Claims Court in Religious Court procedures. This research was conducted with a normative approach. Juridically SC Decree No. 14 of 2016 conforms with SC Decree No. 2 of 2015, now replaced with SC Decree No. 4 of 2019, permits parties to resolve certain nominal claims through a quicker dispute settlement procedure. Judges participate actively throughout the dispute resolution as Small Claims Court provides flexible interaction within formal courts. In practice, limitations such as the amount of sharia economy certified judges show that sharia economy cases are better resolved through standard procedure within the Civil Court. Other limitations, such as the insufficient electronic court (e-court) systems, limit dispute resolution capacity with further substantial limitations such as executorial clauses that are not yet regulated and can take more than 25 (twenty-five days).
Tort Claim under the Ship Time Charter: The Perspective of Indonesian Law
Kartika Paramita
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no3.2089
During a cargo carriage by sea under the time charter scheme, there can be a situation where the Ship-owner of the vessel does not have a contractual relationship with the cargo owner. This situation could happen when the charterer becomes the contractual carrier under the bill of lading instead of the Ship-owner. In that given scenario, if cargo damage occurs, the cargo owner can submit a tort claim against the Ship-owner. Indonesia never ratifies an international convention in the field of carriage of goods by sea. Suppose the given scenario happens without the incorporation of the Charter party or the provision of any international convention into the bill of lading, a tort claim will become a choice for the cargo owner to ask the Ship-owner's liability. It is the purpose of this article to analyze how Indonesian laws will examine a tort claim and how the Ship-owner will construe his defense in the field of carriage of goods by sea. The writing finds that Indonesia Commercial Code provides a legal basis for a cargo owner's tort claim against the Ship-owner. However, it needs further discussion to set the relationship status among the Ship-owner, the time-charterer/contractual carrier, and the cargo owner under Indonesian laws and regulations.