Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Kualifikasi Alasan-Alasan Tertentu Menurut Pasal 3 Angka 15 Perubahan Kode Etik Notaris Anak Agung Titah Ratihtiari; I Nyoman Bagiastra
Acta Comitas Vol 6 No 03 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2021.v06.i03.p12

Abstract The purpose of this study is to find out what is included in the qualifications of certain reasons in Article 3 point 15 of the Amandment to the Notary Code of Ethics which states that “Notaries are obliged to carry out the position of a Notary in their office, except for certain reasons that carried out to the outside of the office to create the legal certainty.” The research using normative legal research methods. The results of this study indicate that the meaning of certain reasons in Article 3 point 15 is a condition that is permissible and doesn’t violate the provisions of Notary public Law or Amandments to the Notary Code of Ethics. Things that can be classified as qualifying of the certain reasons are related to the making of a relaas deed which is generally made outside the office and if the client is in a bad condition and not possible to leave the house or hospital to come to the Notary’s office. Furthermore, the violation of the provisions of Article 3 point 15 doesn’t necessarily affect the authenticity of the authentic deed. Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui apa saja yang termasuk ke dalam kualifikasi alasan-alasan tertentu dalam Pasal 3 angka 15 Perubahan Kode Etik Notaris yang menyatakan bahwa “Notaris wajib menjalankan jabatan Notaris di kantornya, kecuali alasan-alasan tertentu yang dilakukan tidak dalam kantor Notaris sehingga terciptanya kepastian hukum.” Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa arti dari alasan-alasan tertentu pada Pasal 3 angka 15 KEN-P merupakan keadaan yang dibolehkan serta tidak melanggar peraturan UUJN ataupun KEN. Hal yang dapat digolongkan dalam kualifikasi alasan-alasan tertentu yaitu berkaitan dengan dibuatnya akta relaas yang pada umumnya memang dibuat di luar kantor serta apabila klien atau penghadap Notaris sedang sakit yang kemudian tak dimungkinkan untuk keluar rumah ataupun rumah sakit demi datang ke kantor Notaris. Selanjutnya pelanggaran Pasal 3 angka 15 KEN-P belum tentu mempengaruhi otentisitas akta.

Pengaturan Organ Komisaris Dalam Perseroan Terbatas Perseorangan Menurut Perspektif Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Yanuar Agung Sudjateruna; Gde Made Swardhana
Acta Comitas Vol 6 No 03 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2021.v06.i03.p2

Abstract The purpose of this study is to examine the unregulated Organs of Commissioners in Individual Limited Liability Companies in the Job Creation Act, and to examine the organs authorized to take over the duties and responsibilities of the organs of Commissioners in Individual Limited Liability Companies according to the Job Creation Act. This research is classified as a normative juridical research that uses 3 types of approaches, including the statutory approach, legal interpretation and analysis of legal concepts. The results of the study indicate that the existence of a Commissioner in a Limited Liability Company is not regulated in the work copyright law to avoid a conflict of authority between the Commissioner and the Director who is also the sole shareholder. It is impossible for the supervisory process to be carried out by the Commissioner against the board of directors as well as the sole shareholder who has absolute power. Meanwhile, those who are then authorized to take over the duties and responsibilities of the organs of the Commissioner in an Individual Limited Liability Company are the shareholders, because there is only one personal figure in Individual Limited Liability Companies, namely the Sole Shareholders, who concurrently serves as Director. The organs of Commissioners in a private company must be regulated and still exist, although in the process of implementation its function is only as a complement, but the void of norms can be avoided. Further regulation is needed to create legal harmonization in order to ensure legal certainty. Abstrak Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji tidak diaturnya Organ Komisaris dalam Perseroan Terbatas Perseorangan dalam Undang-undang Cipta Kerja, dan mengkaji organ yang berwenang untuk mengambil alih tugas dan tanggungjawab organ Komisaris dalam Perseroan Terbatas Perseorangan menurut Undang-undang Cipta Kerja. Penelitian ini tergolong jenis penelitian yuridis normatif yang menggunakan 3 jenis pendekatan, antara lain pendekatan perundang-undangan, penafsiran hukum dan analisa konsep hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak diaturnya keberadaan Komisaris dalam Perseroan Terbatas Perseorangan di dalam undang-undang cipta kerja adalah untuk menghindari konflik kewenangan antara Komisaris terhadap Direktur yang sekaligus pemegang saham tunggal. Mustahil proses pengawasan dapat dilakukan oleh Komisaris terhadap direksi sekaligus pemegang saham tunggal yang memiliki kekuasaan mutlak Sedangkan yang kemudian berwenang untuk mengambil alih tugas dan tanggungjawab daripada organ Komisaris dalam Perseroan Terbatas Perseorangan adalah Pemegang saham, karena hanya ada satu sosok personal dalam PT Perseorangan yaitu Pemegang Saham Tunggal, yang dirangkapkan jabatannya sekaligus sebagai Direktur. Organ Komisaris dalam PT Perseorangan wajib diatur dan tetap ada, walaupun dalam proses pelaksanaannya fungsinya hanya sebagai pelengkap, tetapi kekosongan norma dapat dihindari. Perlu pengaturan lebih lanjut untuk menciptakan harmonisasi hukum demi menjamin kepastian hukum.

Kedudukan Perjanjian Perkawinan Yang Dibuat Setelah Perkawinan Dilangsungkan Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Ida Bagus Adhitya Prayoga D.; Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan
Acta Comitas Vol 7 No 01 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2022.v07.i01.p09

The purpose of this paper is to determine the arrangement of the marriage agreement before the decision of the constitutional court number 69/PUU-XII/2015 and the position of the marriage agreement made after the marriage took place against a third party. The method used in this research is the normative method and the type of approach used is the law and conceptual. Marriage agreements are more about property and there is no clear understanding of this. Marriage is regulated in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and the marriage agreement is regulated in Article 29 of Law Number 1 of 1974 which discusses the time of making a marriage agreement. Prior to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, prospective husband and wife who will make a marriage agreement must comply with Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, namely Article 29 paragraph (1) which discusses the time of making of the marriage contract. marriage agreement. In the Decision of the Constitutional Court number 69/PUU-XII/2015 which allows the marriage contract to be made after marriage, it will have an impact on third parties related to debt. Marriage agreements relate to third parties starting from the registration of the agreement.

Akibat Hukum Keterlambatan Pendaftaran Akta Berita Acara Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Kepada Menteri Hukum dan HAM Made Yoga Pramana Sugitha; I Nyoman Suyatna
Acta Comitas Vol 7 No 01 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2022.v07.i01.p05

This study aims to identify and analyze the legal consequences of the deed of minutes of the general meeting of shareholders being late being registered with the Minister of Law and Human Rights and to identify and analyze efforts to delay the registration of the minutes of the general meeting of shareholders to the Minister of Law and Human Rights. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study explain that the legal consequences for the deed of the minutes of the general meeting of shareholders in this case related to changes to the articles of association of a Limited Liability Company are late in submitting an application for approval and notification of amendments to the articles of association to the Minister of Law and Human Rights. cannot be registered due to a delay so that the General Meeting of Shareholders becomes invalid and must be repeated. As well as efforts that can be made so that the Limited Liability Company obtains approval from the Minister of Law and Human Rights is the responsibility of the company by making a new deed, namely the deed of confirmation or deed of reaffirmation of the previous deed and the holding of the mechanism of the general meeting of shareholders again so that the deed of confirmation or a deed of reaffirmation can be made.

Penerapan Asas Equality Before The Law Dalam Pembuatan Akta Keterangan Waris Bagi Etnis Tionghoa di Indonesia Nathasya Fransiska Nancy Kussoy; I Made Dedy Priyanto
Acta Comitas Vol 7 No 01 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2022.v07.i01.p10

The writing of this article is to find out the application of the principle of equality before the law in according to the Regulation Of The Minister Of State For Agrarian/Head Of The National Land Agency number 3 of 1997 concerning The Implementation Of Government Regulation number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration Article 111 paragraph 1 letter (c) especially with regard to distribution community groups related to the processing of inheritance certificates after the enactment of Law number 40 of 2008 concerning the Elimintation of Racial and Ethnic Discrimination. To answer this, the author uses a normative legal research, namely a research method that places positive legal norms as the object of study, in order to support this research, form the results of study that the distribution of community groups related to the management of inheritance certificates does not apply the principle of equality before the law because in the processing of the certificate of inheritance has different requirements for Indonesian citizens (native) and Indonesian citizens of Chinese descent, for native Indonesian citizens, the processing of an inheritance certificate can be done through the local urban village office and does not require a fee, while the citizens Indonesians of Chinese descent can make arrangements through a Notary which obviously requires a fee.

Cyber Notary di Era Globalisasi 4.0: Suatu Kebutuhan Ataukah Ancaman Ngurah Justia Dharmadyawan R; Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan
Acta Comitas Vol 7 No 01 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2022.v07.i01.p01

This study aims to acknowledge and to analyze the capacity and the juridical power of the concept of cyber notary, in terms of Notary Public to carry out their duties, functions and authorities as Public Officials in the era of globalization 4.0. Furthermore, aims to perceive the opportunities that cyber notary can be applied into Indonesian’s legal system. This study uses normative legal research with the statue approach and conceptual approach, with primary and secondary legal materials. The result of this study indicates that UUJN-P (The Law on The Position of Notary Public) has presented the concept of cyber noatary, but it’s implementation still needs the necessary update of the laws and regulations, specifically that relates to the process of making the electronic-based deeds. For Notary to apply the concept of cyber notary in carrying out their duties, functions, and authorities not limited to participate the development of technology in this era of globalization.

Penggelapan terhadap Uang Titipan oleh Notaris dalam Pembuatan Perjanjian Kerjasama Melyana .
Acta Comitas Vol 7 No 01 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2022.v07.i01.p06

This article aims to examine the responsibility of the Notary who embezzled money deposited by the appearer in the District Court Decision No. 29/PID.B/2020/PN PWK. In this article, author uses normative research method. The Notary who receives the deposited money has violated Article 52 Paragraph (1) of the UUJN, because the Notary is indirectly a party to the deposit agreement. This resulted in based on Article 52 Paragraph (3) UUJN, the authentic deed was degraded its evidentiary strength into an underhand deed and the Notary could be sued to reimburse fees, interest and losses. In addition, Court Decision No. 29/PID.B/2020/PN.Pwk made a mistake in passing the verdict, where the Notary should have been punished based on Article 374 of the Criminal Code regarding embezzlement by weighting. Given that, the Notary has received the money because he holds the position of a Notary who is highly trusted and is considered a neutral party by the appearers. Besides, based on Article 13 jo. Article 374 KUHP, the Notary who commits embezzlement can be given office sanctions ranging from a written warning to dishonorable discharge.

Kepastian Hukum Pendirian Perseroan Perseorangan Tanpa Akta Notariil Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Farhad Lubbena; I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari
Acta Comitas Vol 7 No 01 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2022.v07.i01.p11

The purpose of this study is to examine the legal certainty of an individual company which does not use a notarial deed in its establishment. This study uses a descriptive legal research method. The law approach and legal concept analysis are the approaches used in this research. The collection of legal materials in this journal uses a literature study. The description technique is a method of analyzing legal materials used in this journal referring to the relevant laws and regulations, the collected literature related to the problems of this journal. The results of this study indicate that in the process of establishing a limited liability company there are quite significant differences, namely in Law Number 40 of 2007 with Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation. The process of forming a PT generally must be made in the form of a notarial deed. It is different from the process of establishing a sole proprietorship which is regulated in Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, where the establishment process is carried out by completing a statement of establishment which does not have to be written down in the form of a notarial deed. The function of a notarial deed at the establishment of a PT is to protect third parties or the public against misuse of the establishment of a PT and provide a protection for the interests of other PT.

Kepailitan Sebagai Alasan Pemberhentian Notaris Di Indonesia I Nyoman Ganang Bayu Weda; Made Gde Subha Karma Resen
Acta Comitas Vol 7 No 01 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2022.v07.i01.p02

The objective on this paper is to finding legal position of a notary who is declared bankrupt and the bankruptcy which is used about a reason that dishonorable dismissal of notary from his position. In this researched, authors used a normative methods research. The study indicated that : 1. Having a position as a legal subject of a person, not as a legal entity, this is because what is stated as a legal subject is a legal entity and a person, while notaries are not legal entities, but only represent legal subjects of people 2. Referring to the principle of lex specialist derograt legi generalis, Bankruptcy in the Notary law and bankruptcy law respects the position of the bankrupt party, However bankruptcy in this UUJN can involve the position as a Notary if this bankruptcy is the result of a mistake made by someone in his position as a Notary.

Hak Ingkar Notaris Pengganti Atas Akta Otentik Yang Dibuatnya Amanda Runisari; Putu Edgar Tanaya
Acta Comitas Vol 7 No 01 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2022.v07.i01.p07

This study aims to determine the form of accountability of the substitute notary who has ended his term of office and the extent of his right of refusal. This research uses normative legal research. The responsibility of the Substitute Notary is related to the obligation to keep the secrecy of his office. This applies even after the end of his term, but does not apply for life due to the expiration of a lawsuit. The right of refusal of the Substitute Notary can occur when he is a witness in a matter and is related to the confidentiality of the department to be kept. The right to refusal does not simply happen when he or she is a witness to something. The right of refusal may be exercised when the Substitute Notary complies with the siding call and submits an application to the judge examining the matter. Only then will the judge decide to reject or grant the application

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
-

Editorial Address
-

Location
Kota denpasar,

Bali

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name -

Contact Email -

Phone -

Journal Mail Official -

Editorial Address -

Location Kota denpasar, Bali INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
-

Editorial Address
-

Location
Kota denpasar,

Bali

INDONESIA