Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

MEKANISME PENYELESAIAN PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK JURNALISTIK PADA DEWAN PERS DI KOTA SERANG Sigit Surahman; Fuqoha Fuqoha
LONTAR: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): Lontar : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Serang Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (305.539 KB) | DOI: 10.30656/lontar.v5i2.491

Abstract

Journalism is an activity of gathering news and reporting events. Delivery of news or information in general often also called the press. To protect journalistic activities and freedom of the press, the press council established by law. Press Council as an independent agency to establish guidelines which must be done by any reporter or journalist in writing or delivered the news. Journalistic ethics is a guideline to behave in journalistic activity compiled by journalists, press organizations to be ethical or moral grounding in journalistic activities. The purpose of this study, to find a model settlement of violations of journalistic ethics in the press council. This research method using descriptive analytical research model with normative juridical approach. Collecting data using literature study by collecting data and legal regulations. Besides the interviews to the parties concerned to complete the data. Press Council in resolving violations of journalistic ethics, to maintain the freedom of the press with a mechanism that provides power to the press council to decide a case arising from journalistic activities completed by the press council. Settlement due to journalistic activities outside the press council will shut down and eliminate the freedom of the press as mandated by law. The right model is the removal of press offenses perspective that may affect national press by giving power and authority to the press council to resolve matters arising from journalistic activities.
Presidential Prerogative Powers in the Judicial Sphere: A Review of Legal Politics in Applying the Separation of Powers Fuqoha Fuqoha; Hasuri Hasuri; Rivani Arif Rezeki; Silfi Barten
Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (on Process)
Publisher : Universitas Serang Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30656/ajudikasi.v10i1.12398

Abstract

The President’s authority in the judicial sphere serves as a constitutional link between the executive and judicial branches in Indonesia. Article 14 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia grants the President the powers to grant pardons, rehabilitation, amnesty, and to abolish sentences. This arrangement demonstrates that Indonesia’s separation of powers is defined by division and delegation, rather than by absolute separation. This study examines the legal policy regulating the President’s prerogative powers in the judicial sphere and investigates the implementation of the trias politica in relation to the rule of law, judicial independence, and constraints on authority. The research utilizes a qualitative, normative legal methodology, including literature review and legislative analysis. The findings show that, while the Constitution distributes power among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, the President retains constitutionally mandated authority within the judicial domain. Judicial independence is preserved, ensuring autonomy in judicial functions. The President must exercise prerogative powers in the judicial sphere in accordance with constitutional principles and with consideration of input from the legislative and judicial branches. Legal policy may influence judicial power if the boundaries of authority within the separation of powers are not clearly defined.