Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.003
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal NOTARIUS LAW REFORM Jurnal Hukum Progresif Diponegoro Law Journal IJTIHAD Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan Badamai Law Journal Halu Oleo Law Review SOEPRA Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Jurnal Ius Constituendum Administrative Law & Governance Journal JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Jurnal CREPIDO: Jurnal Mengenai Dasar-Dasar Pemikiran Hukum Filsafat dan Ilmu Hukum
Lumbanraja, Anggita Doramia
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro
Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 32 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
URGENSI PERAN AKTIF HAKIM PADA PERADILAN TINDAK PIDANA INFORMASI ELEKTRONIK Lumbanraja, Anggita Doramia
CREPIDO Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Crepido July 2019
Publisher : Bagian Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum & Hukum dan Masyarakat Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/crepido.1.1.1-12

Abstract

Dewasa ini, kasus Tindak Pidana Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE) meningkat sangat tajam sejak tahun 2018, beberapa tahun setelah kita memasuki Era Post-Truth. Dengan keterbatasan peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada, hakim harus berperan aktif dalam mencari kebenaran materiil dalam kasus tindak pidana ini. Artikel ini membahas mengenai sejauh mana pentingnya peran aktif hakim dalam proses peradilan Tindak Pidana ITE khususnya pada Tindak Pidana Informasi Elektronik. KUHAP yang berlaku saat ini tidak cukup mengakomodir kebutuhan hukum formil, terutama pada ketentuan pembuktian. Oleh karena itu hakim secara aktif melakukan terobosan hukum yakni menghadirkan bukti elektronik sebagai alat pembuktian meskipun tidak diatur di dalam KUHAP. Hakim harus berperan aktif tidak hanya melakukan penerapan hukum namun harus mampu melakukan penemuan hukum.
PERKEMBANGAN FIKTIF NEGATIF DAN TINDAKAN FAKTUAL BERSIFAT OMISI DI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Putrijanti, Aju; Habibi, Dani; Lumbanraja, Anggita Doramia
Badamai Law Journal Vol 11, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Program Magister Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/damai.v11i1.25391

Abstract

This research focus on the development of fictitious negative and factual act omission after Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2024 issued. The principle lex posteriori derogat legi priori was implemented against Article Number 3 of Law Number 5 of 1986 of Administrative Court. It was caused by the stipulation of Article Number 53 of Law Number 30 of 2014 of Government Administration, stated that the Administrative Court has authority to examine fictitious positive application, but then it was eliminated by Law Number 11 of 2020 of Job Creation. This elimination caused legal gap and legal uncertainty about the mechanism to get government decree and access to justice. People tried to used mechanism of factual act omission lawsuit, to get justice, because, first, there is no certain regulation which gives authority to Administrative Court to examine fictitious positive application, second, to give justice and legal certainty. The aims of this research are to get to know the development of fictitious negative and factual act omission lawsuit and the regulation refer to fictitious negative and factual act omission lawsuit as access to justice. This research used a doctrinal method and statute approach, conceptual approach and comparative approach to analysis and answer the legal problems. Research results shows fictitious negative lawsuit mechanism can be used to get access to justice, because, there is no cancellation of this regulation, and to give legal certainty and justice to whomsoever might needed. Government should make a new regulation according to Administrative Court system, which resolve the legal problems and legal certainty, and to fulfilled   access to justice.  
Co-Authors Achmad Busro Aju Putrijanti Arviana Yuliasari, Arviana ary yunanto Astari, Redita Bambang Eko Turisno Candra, Bananda Janu Damarsari, Bening Permata Dedy Permono, Kurniawan Dian Trisusilowaty Dwi Budi Santoso Fajriati, Rafika Ariana Fifiana Wisnaeni Guswaninginchia, Anviresta Habibi, Dani Handias Gita Harun Natadiarta, Ignatius Indriana Dwi Mutiara Sari Irmawati, Wiwi Kadek Cahya Susila Wibawa Khasanah, Dian Ratu Ayu Uswatun Koni, Justriany Lita Tyesta ALW Nasution, Angelica Vanessa Audrey Ngadino Ngadino, Ngadino Noho, Muhammad Dzikirullah H. Nurdjanah, Lina Paramita Prananingtyas Putri, Trisa Mardeta Rajab, Rezeki Aldila Rani Tiyas Budiyanti Ratna M.S, Edith Ridiyan, Weny Sa'adah, Nabitatus Safitri, Fina Ayu Setyowati, Ro’fah Simangunsong, Helena Lamtiur Suteki Suteki Suteki, Suteki Widhi Handoko, Widhi Yadev, Marconery Yusriyadi Yusriyadi Zen, Kiki Latifa