Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.728
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Media Iuris Fairness and Justice: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum DAS SEIN: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum dan Humaniora Yuridika Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Al-'Aqdu: Journal of Islamic Economics Law Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Lex Scientia Law Review
Serfiyani, Cita Yustisia
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Media Iuris

 1 
In the Nick of Time: The Legitimacy of Imposing Deadlines on Appeal and Counter-Appeal Memoranda in Civil Procedure Serfiyani, Cita Yustisia; Wibisono, Angelica Milano Aryani; Wibisono, Jeniffer Avrillya; Taniady, Vicko
Media Iuris Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v9i1.77372

Abstract

The modernization of Indonesia’s civil justice system through the e-Court platform has generated a significant normative conflict by imposing a strict seven-day deadline for submitting appeal and counter-appeal memoranda under Supreme Court Decision Letter No. 363/KMA/SK/XII/2022. This regulation conflicts with several higher legal instruments—including the Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR), RBg, Law No. 20 of 1947, and Constitutional Court Decision No. 22/PUU-XX/2022—which confirm that such submissions are optional and are not subject to fixed time limits. This research offers a comprehensive analysis of the normative inconsistency by employing a legal research method grounded in procedural justice theory. Using statutory and conceptual approaches, it assesses whether the decision letter rests on a valid legal basis and whether it comports with the principles of fair civil procedure. The findings indicate that the decision letter imposes a formal requirement that exceeds the Suipreme Court’s legal authority, creates a conflict of norms, and undermines litigants’ procedural rights. The study therefore recommends that the Supreme Court undertake a judicial review to resolve the inconsistency and restore legal certainty in Indonesia’s civil justice system.
Co-Authors Abhisek Kumar Amin, Izat Rolibi Putra Ardhiwinda Kusumaputra Ari Purwadi Ari Purwadi BUDI HERMONO Cahyono, Yoshua Chandra, Joshua Giorgio Citi Rahmati Serfiyani Dyah Ochtarina Susanti Fendi Setyawan Hariyani, Iswi -- Hulwanullah, Hikam Iswi Hariyani L Budi Kagramanto Masda Agatha Sari Masnun, Ali Mieke Yustia Ayu Ratna Sari, Mieke Yustia Ayu Prameswari, Septiana Pratista, Farida Prima Sari, Mieke Yustia Ayu Ratna Serfiyani, Citi Rahmati Sulistiyowati, Eny Taniady, Vicko Tharifah Arsari, Devina Wibisono, Angelica Milano Aryani Wibisono, Jeniffer Avrillya Yatini Yudisetyo, Zerry Akbar