Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat

Kontribusi Pemikiran Hadis Rashīd Ridhā Ilyas, Abustani
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol. 9 No. 3 (2007): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v9i3.37530

Abstract

This writing discusses the contribution of the laissez-faire of Rashīd Ridā’s ḥadīth, which includes the historicity of ḥadīth. According to him, the first ḥadīth writer was Khālid bin Mi’dān al-Himsī, a tabi’in in the 1st century A.H., not al-Zuhrī. The authority of ḥadīth, as a general rule in religion, is considered to be the Qur’an and mutawatir amaliyyah ḥadīth. The emphasized authenticity aspect of the ḥadīth in terms of sanad is to avoid excessive fanaticism in a madhhab. From the aspect of matan, he rejects ḥadīth containing strange elements, such as ḥadīth about signs of the Day of Judgment, Dajjal, the Mahdi of the end times, the descent of the Prophet Isa (Jesus), and others. He also uses contextual and interstitial interpretation, believing in understanding the ḥadīth along with its relevance to the social conditions of the Prophet Muhammad, returning its meaning to the Qur’an.
Korelasi Kitab Silsilah al-Aḥādīts al-Ṣaḥīḥah dan Silsilah al-Aḥādīts al-Dha’īfah wa al-Mawdhū’ah Karya Muḥammad Nāṣir Al-Dīn Al-Albānī Ilyas, Abustani
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol. 10 No. 3 (2008): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v10i3.40093

Abstract

This article studies about correlation of two books under the title Silsilah al-Ḥadīts al-Ṣaḥīḥah and Silsilah al-Ḥadīts al-Dha’īfah wa al-Mawdhū’ah, masterpieces of Muḥammad Nāṣir Al-Dīn Al-Albānī, by using comparative and content analysis methods. Two books represent collection of hadith which vary its qualities: sahih, hasan, daif, even maudhu’, without engagement with certain chapter or title. The difference among both lay in the methods used in mean region of hadith and philosophy affect numbers of hadith which are daif in quality.