Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.886
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal 'ADALAH JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN FISIKA AL BIRUNI Momentum: Physics Education Journal Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Journal of Natural Science and Integration JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching IBLAM Law Review Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities Tanjungpura Legal Review
Nawas, Abu
Unknown Affiliation
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Physics Social Sciences

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
A Comparative Study of Legal Systems in the Regulation of Business Activities in Indonesia and Common Law Countries Gunawan, Gunawan; Habeahan, Rasman; Nawas, Abu; Chotib, Muhammad; Rizki Aji Putra, Gilang
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 9 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v9i5.50254

Abstract

Economic globalization has intensified cross-border business relations, requiring a comprehensive understanding of the differences among legal systems governing business activities. Differences in legal systems, particularly between the civil law and common law systems, have a significant impact on contract formation, dispute resolution, and the protection of business actors’ interests. Indonesia, as a country that adopts the civil law system, has distinct characteristics in business regulation compared to common law countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States. This article aims to analyze the comparative legal aspects of business law between Indonesia and common law countries, with a focus on sources of law, contract law, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The research method employed is normative legal research using a comparative law approach. The findings indicate that differences in legal systems have direct implications for legal certainty, contractual flexibility, and business strategies adopted by business actors.
Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills through IMOREAR: An AR-Based Renewable Energy Module Aviyanti, Lina; Fratiwi, Nuzulira Janeusse; Salam, Abdul; Fitriani, Silmi; Khairunnisah, Khairunnisah; Nawas, Abu
Journal of Natural Science and Integration Vol 9, No 1 (2026): Journal of Natural Science and Integration
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/jnsi.v9i1.39209

Abstract

Critical thinking skills are essential competencies in renewable energy learning, requiring evidence-based analysis, evaluation, and informed decision-making. This study aimed to enhance students’ critical thinking skills through an Interactive E-Module on Renewable Energy Using Augmented Reality (IMOREAR). The study employed a pre-experimental one-group pretest–posttest design involving 30 high school students (12 male and 18 female students aged 15–16 years) in Garut, West Java. The intervention was conducted over four meetings using project-based learning supported by AR-based visualization and renewable energy prototyping activities. The research instrument consisted of 15 contextual multiple-choice items developed based on domain-specific critical thinking indicators. Data was analyzed using Rasch modeling to estimate students’ ability measures in logits. The results indicated a significant improvement (p < 0.001), with the average logit score increasing from -1.20 to 0.46 and an effect size of 1.64 (large). These findings suggest that IMOREAR enhances students’ critical thinking skills, underscoring its value in fostering 21st-century skills. Keywords: augmented reality, renewable energy, critical thinking skills, project-based learning, Rasch analysis
Evaluating the Implementation of Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021 on Environmental Protection and Management: A Study of AMDAL Compliance in Sand Mining Sholihatunnisa, Nanda; Nawas, Abu; Nasir, Muh
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v10i1.50856

Abstract

Poorly managed sand mining activities can lead to environmental degradation, including land degradation, water pollution, and ecosystem disruption. Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021 mandates the preparation of Environmental Impact Assessments (AMDAL) as part of environmental protection and management. This study aims to examine the implementation of this regulation, particularly the AMDAL requirement in sand mining activities in Pancanegara Village, Pabuaran District, Serang Regency. It also analyzes the positive and negative impacts of such activities on the local community. This research employs an empirical juridical method, combining a statutory and field approach. Data were collected through literature review and field research and analyzed qualitatively. The findings reveal that the implementation of the AMDAL requirement under Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021 has not been optimal. Contributing factors include limited supervision by authorities, low awareness among business actors, and administrative challenges in the licensing process. While sand mining contributes to local economic development, it also results in environmental damage, pollution, and social changes within the community. Keywords: Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021, AMDAL, sand mining, environmental protection, law enforcement.
A Juridical Analysis of Rehabilitation Policy as an Alternative to Criminal Punishment for Narcotics Abusers from a Restorative Justice Perspective Kurniawan, Syaiful; Nawas, Abu; Nasir, Muh
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v10i1.50861

Abstract

Rehabilitation policy as an alternative to criminal punishment for narcotics abusers has a strong juridical foundation and is aligned with the principles of restorative justice. However, its effective implementation requires regulatory harmonization, capacity building of law enforcement officers, and adequate rehabilitation facilities. This study aims to analyze the juridical framework of rehabilitation policies for narcotics abusers from a restorative justice perspective. The main issues addressed are: (1) how medical rehabilitation for drug addicts is implemented in legal practice, and (2) what obstacles hinder its implementation and law enforcement efforts. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal materials consist of primary sources, including laws and regulations on narcotics and rehabilitation, and secondary sources such as literature, journals, and legal documents. Data were analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method. The findings indicate that rehabilitation policies are legally recognized as a form of protection for narcotics abusers, who are essentially victims. Nevertheless, challenges persist, including punitive-oriented perspectives among law enforcement, limited rehabilitation facilities, and suboptimal inter-agency coordination. A restorative justice approach offers a more humane resolution by emphasizing recovery, social reintegration, and the reduction of the negative impacts of imprisonment. Keywords: Rehabilitation, Narcotics Abusers, Alternative Sentencing, Restorative Justice.
Enhancing Enforcement Strategies Against Illegal Fishing: A Socio-Legal Analysis of Water Police Operations in Jakarta Waters under Law No. 45 of 2009 Muharom, Muharom; Nasir, Muh; Nawas, Abu
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v10i1.50862

Abstract

Illegal fishing remains a persistent challenge in Indonesia, undermining economic sustainability, marine ecosystems, and maritime security. Despite the enactment of Law No. 45 of 2009 on Fisheries, enforcement effectiveness particularly at the operational level remains uneven. This study addresses this gap by examining the strategies employed by the Water and Air Police Directorate (Ditpolair) of Korpolairud Baharkam Polri in combating illegal fishing in the waters of DKI Jakarta. Using a normative-empirical (socio-legal) approach, this research integrates statutory analysis with field data obtained through interviews and observations. The study evaluates enforcement practices, including maritime patrols, vessel monitoring, licensing inspections, and inter-agency coordination. The findings reveal that while current strategies have contributed to suppressing illegal fishing activities, their effectiveness is constrained by structural and operational limitations, including inadequate patrol assets, jurisdictional complexity, and increasingly adaptive criminal networks. This study argues that enforcement remains predominantly reactive and insufficiently supported by integrated surveillance systems and institutional synergy. Strengthening technological capacity, enhancing inter-agency collaboration, and adopting intelligence-led enforcement are critical to improving outcomes. This research contributes to the discourse on fisheries law enforcement by offering a practical and policy-oriented framework to optimize anti-illegal fishing strategies in high-risk maritime zones. Keywords: Illegal Fishing, Law Enforcement Strategy, Water Police, Fisheries Law, Indonesia.
Unlawful Act Claims in Land Auction Disputes: A Juridical Analysis of Court Decision No. 29/Pdt.G/2025/PN Kwg Gunawan, Gunawan; Nawas, Abu; Nasir, Muh
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v10i1.50863

Abstract

Disputes arising from land auctions frequently involve claims of unlawful acts (perbuatan melawan hukum), particularly where alleged violations of legal rights occur during the auction process. However, not all contested auctions meet the legal threshold for liability under Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code. This study addresses this issue by examining the juridical basis of unlawful act claims and the judicial reasoning applied in Court Decision No. 29/Pdt.G/2025/PN Kwg. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Legal materials, including primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, are analyzed qualitatively to assess the legal standards governing land auction disputes. The findings demonstrate that unlawful act claims in land auction disputes require the fulfillment of key elements: an unlawful act, fault, damage, and causality. The court, in the examined decision, emphasized both procedural and substantive legality, including the validity of the auction object, the authority of auction officials, and the protection of affected parties. The ruling highlights that compliance with established legal procedures serves as a critical benchmark in determining the absence of unlawful conduct. This study contributes to clarifying the limits of civil liability in auction-related disputes and underscores the importance of legal certainty in auction practices. Keywords: Unlawful Act, Land Auction Dispute, Juridical Analysis, Court Decision, Civil Liability.
Consumer Legal Protection Against Non-Conformity of Goods in Online Transactions on Shopee Platform Based on Law Number 8 of 1999 David Caniago, Ribet; Nasir, Muh; Nawas, Abu
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v10i1.50895

Abstract

The rapid development of information and communication technology has significantly increased electronic commerce transactions through marketplace platforms, one of which is Shopee. However, in practice, issues frequently arise regarding the non-conformity of goods received by consumers with the descriptions, specifications, quality, or images displayed by sellers on the platform. This condition leads to consumer losses and highlights the need for adequate legal protection. This study aims to analyze the forms of legal protection available to consumers in cases of non-conforming goods in online transactions on Shopee, based on Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, as well as to examine the responsibilities of business actors for consumer losses. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data sources are obtained through library research, including primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results indicate that Law Number 8 of 1999 provides comprehensive legal protection for consumers, particularly through the regulation of consumer rights to obtain goods in accordance with the promised value and condition, as stipulated in Article 4, and the obligation of business actors to provide accurate, clear, and honest information as stipulated in Article 7. In cases of non-conformity, consumers are entitled to file complaints, request returns, replacements, or refunds through mechanisms provided by Shopee, as well as through dispute resolution procedures under applicable laws. Therefore, the Consumer Protection Law serves as a strong legal foundation in ensuring legal certainty, justice, and protection for consumers in online buying and selling transactions. Keywords: Consumer Protection; Non-Conformity of Goods; Online Transactions; Shopee; Law Number 8 of 1999
Diversion Policy for Child Victims of Drug Abuse in Indonesia: A Normative Juridical Analysis Saputro, Djoko Aprianto; Nasir, Muh; Nawas, Abu
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v10i1.50896

Abstract

Children represent the future generation and must be granted special legal protection, particularly when they come into conflict with the law. In cases of drug abuse, children often occupy a complex position, not only as perpetrators of criminal acts but also as victims of social environment influences, family conditions, peer pressure, and exploitation by other parties. This study examines whether the mechanism for implementing diversion for children involved in narcotics offenses is in accordance with the objectives of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics in Indonesia. Furthermore, it analyzes Indonesia’s criminal law policy regarding the application of diversion in addressing juvenile drug-related offenses. This research employs a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach, focusing on statutory regulations and legal principles relevant to juvenile justice and drug abuse cases. The findings indicate that children involved in drug abuse should primarily undergo rehabilitation as a form of guidance and recovery rather than be subjected to punitive sanctions. Imposing criminal penalties on children is considered disproportionate, as child drug users are essentially victims of illicit drug trafficking, especially given their vulnerable age. Judicial considerations in deciding such cases include juridical aspects such as the prosecutor’s indictment, criminal charges, witness testimonies, the defendant’s statements, and evidence presented in court, as well as non-juridical aspects, including aggravating and mitigating circumstances. Therefore, diversion policies play a crucial role in ensuring that the best interests of the child are upheld, emphasizing restorative justice and rehabilitation over punishment in handling juvenile narcotics cases. Keywords: Diversion Policy; Child Victims; Drug Abuse; Juvenile Justice System; Rehabilitation
Efektivitas Tindakan Preventif Dan Persuasive Babinkantibmas Dalam Penanggulangan Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Di Kecamatan Pakuhaji Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Kepolisian Tarsin, Tarsin; Nawas, Abu; Habeahan, Rasman; Indrayanto, Indrayanto
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v9i3.50742

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis efektivitas tindakan preventif dan persuasif Bhabinkamtibmas dalam penanggulangan penyalahgunaan narkotika di Kecamatan Pakuhaji, Kabupaten Tangerang, serta mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor penghambatnya. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris dengan metode penelitian kualitatif deskriptif eksploratif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara mendalam, Focus Group Discussion (FGD), observasi partisipatif, dan studi dokumentasi terhadap Bhabinkamtibmas, tokoh masyarakat, aparat pemerintah, dan pemangku kepentingan terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tindakan preventif dan persuasif Bhabinkamtibmas di Kecamatan Pakuhaji efektif dalam membangun ketahanan sosial terhadap bahaya narkotika. Efektivitas tersebut tercermin dari tiga indikator utama: pertama, meningkatnya kepercayaan masyarakat yang ditandai dengan partisipasi aktif warga melaporkan aktivitas mencurigakan; kedua, keberhasilan pendekatan personal persuasif dalam mendorong korban penyalahguna narkotika menjalani rehabilitasi sesuai amanat Pasal 54 dan 55 Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009; ketiga, efektivitas peran mediasi dalam mencegah eskalasi konflik horizontal dan tindakan main hakim sendiri. Ditinjau dari perspektif hukum kepolisian, tindakan tersebut telah sesuai dengan kewenangan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, khususnya Pasal 13, Pasal 14 ayat (1) huruf g, dan Pasal 15 ayat (2) huruf c tentang diskresi kepolisian. Namun, optimalisasi tugas Bhabinkamtibmas menghadapi hambatan internal (keterbatasan personel dan beban administrasi) serta hambatan eksternal (kultur masyarakat tertutup, modus operandi jaringan narkoba yang canggih, dan masalah sosial-ekonomi). Hambatan tersebut membentuk lingkaran setan yang saling menguatkan. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pemenuhan rasio personel ideal, reformasi sistem administrasi berbasis teknologi, penguatan forum kemitraan polisi-masyarakat, serta program pemberdayaan ekonomi bagi warga rentan.   Kata Kunci: Efektivitas Hukum, Tindakan Preventif, Tindakan Persuasif, Bhabinkamtibmas, Penanggulangan Narkotika, Community Policing, Kecamatan Pakuhaji.
Analisis Yuridis Konflik Kewenangan Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Dengan Badan Narkotika Nasional Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Narkotika di Indonesia Ficry, Achmad; Nawas, Abu; Habeahan, Rasman; Indrayanto, Indrayanto
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v9i3.50743

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis dualisme kewenangan penyidikan tindak pidana narkotika antara Kepolisian Republik Indonesia (Polri) dan Badan Narkotika Nasional (BNN) serta implikasi yuridisnya terhadap efektivitas penegakan hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif yang diperkaya dengan data empiris melalui wawancara mendalam dengan aparat penegak hukum di Polres Tangerang Selatan dan BNN Provinsi Banten, serta kajian putusan pengadilan dan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dualisme kewenangan bersumber pada konstruksi hukum yang tidak harmonis antara Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Polri yang memberikan kewenangan umum penyidikan kepada Polri, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika yang memberikan kewenangan khusus kepada BNN. Kedua undang-undang tidak mengatur mekanisme koordinasi, hierarki, atau prioritas kewenangan secara tegas, sehingga menciptakan konflik norma horizontal dan tumpang tindih kewenangan. Perbedaan mendasar juga ditemukan dalam batas waktu penangkapan (1×24 jam untuk Polri versus 3×24 jam untuk BNN), yang semakin memperparah ketidakpastian hukum. Implikasi yuridis dualisme ini mencakup ketidakpastian hukum (rechtssicherheit) karena tidak jelasnya lembaga yang berwenang, ketidakadilan (gerechtigkeit) akibat perbedaan prosedural yang berpotensi melanggar prinsip persamaan di hadapan hukum, serta inefisiensi (zweckmäßigkeit) berupa duplikasi sumber daya dan pemborosan anggaran. Penelitian ini menawarkan model harmonisasi kewenangan, yaitu model koordinasi fungsional yang diperkuat dengan mekanisme penugasan bersama sebagai transisi menuju model subsidiaritas. Rekomendasi jangka pendek meliputi pembentukan peraturan bersama antara Kapolri dan Kepala BNN serta forum koordinasi rutin, sedangkan rekomendasi jangka panjang mencakup revisi Undang-Undang Narkotika dengan mengadopsi pendekatan subsidiaritas dan harmonisasi batas waktu penangkapan.  Kata Kunci: Dualisme Kewenangan, Penyidikan Narkotika, Polri, BNN
Co-Authors Aditya, Raldy Avianti, Grace Bofiola Marpaung , Budi Chotib, Muhammad Danuwijaya, Ari Arifin David Caniago, Ribet E. Suhendi Febriyanti, Tanti Ficry, Achmad Fitriani, Silmi Fransisca, Meilyn Fratiwi, Nuzulira Janeusse Gani, Amalia Weka Gunawan Gunawan Habeahan, Rasman Heni Rusnayati Indrayanto, Indrayanto Ismawatati, Sri Khairunnisah Khairunnisah Kurniawan, Syaiful Lasemin, Lasemin Lina Aviyanti Muharom Muharom Muhindar, Agus Muhlisin Muhlisin Muki, Beata Graceshela nasir, muh Nurdini Nurdini, Nurdini Ribie, Salma Rizki Aji Putra, Gilang Saputro, Djoko Aprianto Sholihatunnisa, Nanda Tarsin, Tarsin Yudi, Gede