Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : KHAIRUN LAW JOURNAL

Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pejabat Lelang dalam Hubungan Kedudukan dan Fungsinya Gultom, Ambi; Malik, Faissal; Syafari, Tri
Khairun Law Journal Vol 3, No 1 (2019): Volume 3 Issue 1, September 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v3i1.2956

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap Pejabat Lelang dalam kedudukan dan fungsinya. Penulis menganalisis suatu pelaksanaan lelang yang berujung pada penetapan tersangka, penangkapan, dan penahanan serta disidangkan dalam perkara pidana terhadap Pejabat Lelang Sdr. UAM sebagaimana tercantum dalam perkara pidana pada Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 15/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Dps jo Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1250K/Pid/2016. Disamping menganalisis perkara pidana dimaksud, penulis juga melakukan kajian terhadap bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap Pejabat Lelang dalam kedudukan dan fungsinya dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ternate Nomor : 177/Pid.B/2018/PN.Tte Dalam Tindak Pidana Pengeroyokan Pada Prespektif Asas Legalitas. Anwar, M. Afdal Hi; Malik, Faissal; Alauddin, Rusdin
Khairun Law Journal Volume 3 Issue 2, March 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v3i2.2896

Abstract

Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Ternate Nomor : 177/ Pid.B/2018/PN.Tte, yang amar putusannya tidak mencantumkan perintah supaya terdakwa ditahan adalah putusan yang hanya didasarkan pada “kebiasaan hakim” dan dasar pertimbangan hakim tersebut tidak memiliki kekuatan  hukum yang mengikat untuk dieksekusi oleh Jaksa selaku eksekotor sebagimana ketentuan Pasal 30 ayat (1) huruf b UU. No 16/2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Akibat hukum dalam Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Ternate Nomor : 177/ Pid.B/2018/PN.Tte, yang amar putusannya tidak mencantumkan perintah supaya terdakwa ditahan merupakan putusan yang lemah dan berakibat fatal secara hukum sehingga putusan tersebut dinyatakan batal demi hukum sebagaimana ketentuan hukum yang diatur dalam Pasal 197 Ayat (1)Huruf a-ldan ayat (2) KUHAP serta Putusan tersebut juga telah menyimpangi prinsip-prinsip pokok dalam asas legalitas. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah  teori asas legalitas, teori tentang putusan dan teori Pemidanaan, yaitu Teori Absolut/Retribusi,  Tujuan/Relatif dan teori Gabungan
Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Denda Sebagai Upaya Menekan Tingkat Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas di Kota Ternate Sudarsono, M. Agus F; Malik, Faissal; Anshar, Anshar
Khairun Law Journal Volume 4 Issue 1, September 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v4i1.3036

Abstract

The legal basis regulating traffic is Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 22 of 2009 concerning "Road Traffic and Transportation" (hereinafter written UULAJ). Traffic procedures are regulated in Article 105 to Article 126 UULAJ. However, the current high number of traffic violations is one of the causes of the high number of traffic accidents that occur. With the increasing need for transportation for the community, there are also more vehicles in the traffic lane so that it cannot be denied that it will cause violations to be committed, especially by motorized vehicle drivers which results in quite difficult and complicated problems. Fines are a type of crime that is generally imposed on all violations. The fact is currently happening in Kota Ternate, although the ticket fines already exist, the number of traffic violations is always there and tends to increase. One of the causes is the low number of fines imposed by the District Court Judges of Ternate on traffic offenders so that traffic offenders feel that they are able to pay the sanctions given and the supervision of traffic officers is not proportional to the size of the area being supervised so that it causes unevenness and weakness. supervision of offendersSanctions; Criminal Fines; Traffic violations
Syarat Subjektif dan Objektif Sahnya Perjanjian dalam Kaitannya dengan Perjanjian Kerja Suwarti, Suwarti; Malik, Faissal
Khairun Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (2018): Volume 2 Issue 1, September 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v2i1.1884

Abstract

The Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 Year 2003 regarding Manpower explicitly stipulates that an employment agreement is made on the basis of: (i) an agreement between the two parties, (ii) the ability or ability to perform legal actions, (iii) the existence of the promised work, and ( iv) the work promised is not contrary to public order, decency, and applicable laws and regulations. Based on these provisions, which include subjective conditions for the validity of the work agreement are: (i) agreement between the two parties, (ii) the ability or ability to do the agreement is not contrary to public order, decency, and applicable laws and regulations. The legal implications for the work agreement can be canceled, while the work agreement that does not meet the objective objectives of the validity of the employment agreement is that the employment agreement is null and voidThe Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 Year 2003 regarding Manpower explicitly stipulates that an employment agreement is made on the basis of: (i) an agreement between the two parties, (ii) the ability or ability to perform legal actions, (iii) the existence of the promised work, and ( iv) the work promised is not contrary to public order, decency, and applicable laws and regulations. Based on these provisions, which include subjective conditions for the validity of the work agreement are: (i) agreement between the two parties, (ii) the ability or ability to do the agreement is not contrary to public order, decency, and applicable laws and regulations. The legal implications for the work agreement can be canceled, while the work agreement that does not meet the objective objectives of the validity of the employment agreement is that the employment agreement is null and void
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PADA TINGKATAN PENGADILAN YANG BERBEDA (STUDI PUTUSAN PERKARA TIPIKOR DANA DESA TUGUIS KABUPATEN HALMAHERA UTARA TAHUN 2022) Sulani, Jitro; Malik, Faissal; Anshar, Anshar
Khairun Law Journal Volume 7 Issue 2, March 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v7i2.7609

Abstract

This article discusses legal considerations in court decisions on corruption of village funds at two different court levels based on Decision Number 5/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN Tte at the first level and Decision Number 6/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PT Tte at the appeal level. The legal issue lies in the difference in judges' legal considerations related to the application of Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law. This research uses normative legal research with secondary data sourced from primary and secondary legal materials. In the data collection process, data collection techniques are used by means of literature studies which are then processed and analyzed qualitatively. The panel of judges who examined and tried the case of corruption of village funds based on the Corruption Court Decision at the North Maluku High Court Number 6/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PT Tte after examining based on legal facts had a different view from the panel of judges at the previous level. The judge at the high court level after examining the case file and based on the legal facts in the trial at the first level concluded that what was proven was not the primary charge of Article 2 paragraph (1) but the secondary charge of Article 3 with all legal considerations. However, in relation to the punishment imposed by the judge at the higher level, there is no difference with the form of punishment imposed by the judge at the first level. Both the imposition of imprisonment, fines and additional punishment in the form of payment of restitution.