Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

Strategi Konvergensi Media TV Assunnah Cirebon dalam Optimalisasi Dakwah Digital Arief Amarudin; Rokibullah Rokibullah; Dono Darsono; AS Haris Sumadiria
Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): JURNAL LOCUS: Penelitian dan Pengabdian
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/locus.v5i3.5934

Abstract

The transformation of broadcasting media in the digital era requires local Islamic propagation institutions to adapt to media convergence so that dakwah messages remain relevant and reach audiences across generations. This study aims to analyze the media convergence strategy applied by TV Assunnah Cirebon in optimizing digital dakwah, covering the transition pattern from conventional broadcasting to digital platforms, content production and distribution strategies, as well as the challenges and opportunities accompanying the transformation process. The research uses a qualitative descriptive approach with a case study method, conducted through exploratory field research. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with TV Assunnah Cirebon managers, direct observation at the production studio and editing room, and documentation of digital content on various platforms, then analyzed using data triangulation techniques. The results show that TV Assunnah Cirebon applies a convergence strategy consisting of four main dimensions. First, the transition from satellite broadcasting to digital platforms as a strategic decision in response to the Analog Switch-Off (ASO) policy and high operational costs. Second, multiplatform integration through YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Telegram, and WhatsApp with content differentiation according to audience characteristics. Third, the implementation of the one content, multiple outputs production model accompanied by audio-visual quality standardization and distinctive Islamic visual branding. Fourth, strategic collaboration with dakwah networks such as Rodja TV, Ahsan TV, and ARTISI to expand reach. This study also identifies several challenges, including limited human resources, technical infrastructure, shadow banning, content reporting, and dynamics of digital regulation. These findings contribute to the literature on media convergence and dakwah communication, while also serving as a practical reference for other local dakwah institutions in designing adaptive and sustainable digital dakwah strategies.
Analisis Dilema Diskusi di Era Digital, Ruang Publik atau Arena Konflik: (Analisis Habermas dalam Kasus Amsal Sitepu Pada Platform X) Siti Patimah; Irfan Haniful Qoyyim; Feggy Nurdiansyah; Dono Darsono
AN-NASHIHA Journal of Broadcasting and Islamic Communication Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): April : Jurnal AN-Nashiha Journal of Broadcasting and Islamic Communcation Stud
Publisher : Institut Pesantren Sunan Drajat Lamongan, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55352/an-nashiha.v6i1.2916

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the phenomenon of digital discourse on platform X in the Amsal Sitepu case through the lens of Jürgen Habermas's Public Sphere theory. The criminalization of videographer Amsal Sitepu triggered massive debates that blurred the boundaries between rational-critical dialogue and emotional conflict arenas in cyberspace. Using a descriptive qualitative method and a critical discourse analysis approach, this study explores how platform X functions as a contemporary public sphere. The results show that although digital platforms are often trapped in opinion fragmentation, particularism, and affective conflict, the Amsal Sitepu case proves the existence of emancipatory potential through the "communicative power" of civil society. Organized public opinion pressure on social media proved capable of demanding institutional accountability and correcting the dominance of administrative power. This study concludes that social media can become an effective public sphere if the established discourse is able to transform from mere sentiment into logical and measured arguments.
Against COVID-19 Pandemic: Bibliometric Assessment of World Scholars' International Publications related to COVID-19 Dono Darsono; Jajang A Rohmana; Busro Busro
Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): June 2020 - Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia
Publisher : Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25008/jkiski.v5i1.356

Abstract

This article focuses on sharing information and knowledge in the form of scholars’ academic communication about the COVID-19 epidemic in international publications. The data was collected from search results in the Scopus database from December 2019 to March 2020. Through the bibliometric assessment method, the survey shows that there are 1475 publications on COVID-19. There are 1104 publications (75%) that can be accessed. Although COVID-19 has started about four months since the first case in Hubei China (11/17/20), scholars are making a research program and publish their findings in order to share information and knowledge in dealing with the pandemic. The sharing information is theoretically a form of world scholarly academic communication activities. Therefore, open access publications can help scholars to easily communicate and share information about their findings. This then affects the number of publications and citations with the capacity of research institutions, sponsors, and countries. This article recommends as broad as possible to provide open access in the midst of disaster situations in order to handle COVID-19 pandemic faster and easier.
Komunikasi Wartawan dalam Reportase konflik Agama Enjang Muhaemin; Dono Darsono
Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu komunikasi Vol. 5 No. 2. December (2021): Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/cjik.v5i2.15026

Abstract

This study aims to explore the meaning and motives of journalists in reporting on religious conflicts and explore journalists' views on the root causes and solutions of religious disputes. This study uses a qualitative approach; the considerations are expected to produce descriptive data, both written, oral, and the behavior of journalists in reporting. The results show that journalists generally interpret religious conflicts as enjoyable, meaningful, and sensitive events. The motives of journalists to report on religious conflicts are more in the interest of documenting newsworthy events, placing problems in a balanced way, and straightening out information confusion in the community. The causes of conflict occur due to differences in perspectives, misunderstandings, intolerance, excessive fanaticism, weak legal umbrella, government indecision, immature religious understanding, the inability of religious leaders to suppress mass emotions, and the presence of certain interested parties. The conflict solution that must be carried out is the existence of a clear and firm legal settlement umbrella and the importance of dialogue in policy formulation..
Rezim Kebenaran dan Kuasa Negara: Analisis Wacana Kritis atas Kontroversi Kuota Haji Khalid Basalamah Ikmal Maulana Akbar; Dzulfikar Adirais; Dono Darsono
AN-NASHIHA Journal of Broadcasting and Islamic Communication Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): April : Jurnal AN-Nashiha Journal of Broadcasting and Islamic Communcation Stud
Publisher : Institut Pesantren Sunan Drajat Lamongan, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55352/an-nashiha.v6i1.3292

Abstract

This article analyzes the 2024 Hajj quota controversy involving Khalid Basalamah through the lens of Michel Foucault's theory of truth regimes. Using a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approach, this study demonstrates how the state, bureaucracy, and digital media collectively produce "social truths" that do not always align with legal facts. Key findings demonstrate three discursive mechanisms at work: procedural normalization by the state bureaucracy, the production of social stigma through digital media framing, and the struggle for moral legitimacy in the public sphere. This case demonstrates that the Hajj pilgrimage has become a political-administrative arena where power operates subtly but effectively to shape public perception.
BIMBINGAN BUDAYA KERJA DALAM PENGUATAN KESEHATAN MENTAL KARYAWAN STUDI KASUS DI CV. BINTANG MANDIRI BANDUNG Esa Firnanda; Dindin Solahudin; Dono Darsono
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 03 (2026): Volume 11 No. 03, September 2026 Processed
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i03.64558

Abstract

Work culture is an important aspect in creating an organizational environment that not only supports the achievement of organizational goals but also promotes employees’ mental health. This study was motivated by the phenomenon observed at CV. Bintang Mandiri Bandung, where employees demonstrate strong loyalty, harmonious working relationships, and relatively positive psychological conditions despite high operational demands. This study aims to describe the process through which work culture is formed through social interaction, analyze how employees interpret work culture in relation to the strengthening of mental health, and examine its implications for Islamic Guidance and Counseling. This study employed a qualitative approach using a case study method. Data were collected through participant observation, in-depth interviews with 14 purposively selected informants, and documentation. Data were analyzed through organization, reduction, presentation, and interpretation processes, supported by source and technique triangulation. The analysis employed George Herbert Mead’s Symbolic Interaction Theory, Edgar H. Schein’s Organizational Culture Theory, the concept of Workplace Mental Health, and the perspective of Islamic Guidance and Counseling. The findings indicate that work culture is formed through continuous social interactions between leaders and employees through role modeling, open communication, briefings, evaluations, positive behavioral habituation, spiritual activities, and interpersonal relationships. These processes foster shared meanings that develop into organizational values, practices, and collective identity. Employees perceive work culture as a source of psychological safety, social support, psychological well-being, psychological resilience, a sense of belonging, and meaningful work, reinforced by spiritual practices. From the perspective of Islamic Guidance and Counseling, work culture performs developmental, preventive, preservative, and curative functions through guidance processes that occur naturally within organizational life. This study contributes a conceptual framework demonstrating that work culture can function as a guidance ecosystem integrating organizational culture, mental health, and Islamic values, resulting in the S.H.O.L.E.H. Work Culture Guidance Model as a development of Islamic Guidance and Counseling in the workplace setting.