Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : DE JURE

Kontruksi Hukum Kebijakan Pembiayaan Infrastruktur Milik Negara Melalui Skema Non-APBN Untuk Mewujudkan Ketahanan Ekonomi Nasional Karsayuda, M. Rifqinizamy; Fadli, Moh; Kusumaningrum, Adi; Nurjannah, Nurjannah
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 13, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v13i2.14533

Abstract

Abstract:Indonesia needs a huge investment in infrastructure. Of the total funding needs for strategic infrastructure from year 2019 to 2024, it is projected that the country is only able to provide less than half. Hence, Indonesia needs to seek another source to finance its infrastructure. This research aims to review and provide input to the government on the construction of state-owned infrastructure financing policies to realize national economic resilience. Through legal construction methods using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a multidisciplinary approach. The results of this study show that the right state-owned infrastructure financing model to realize national economic resilience is with the Non-APBN scheme, which is a cooperation between the government and all stakeholders. The infrastructure development is supported by the VfM (Value for Money) method, with a new financing scheme in the form of participation of the entire community through the issuance of securities by the sharia-based government. The development of infrastructure with the Non-State Budget scheme will maintain the country's financial stability and reduce the burden of dependence on foreign debt.Keywords: Infrastructure, Financing, Non-APBNAbstrak:Indonesia membutuhkan investasi Infrastuktur yang sangat besar. Dari total pendanaan ivestasi strategis infrastruktur untuk kurun waktu 2019 sampai dengan. 2024, pemerintah hanya mampu menyediakan pendanaan kurang dari separuhnya saja. Pemerintah perlu mencari alternatif sumber pendanaan lain guna mendanai kebutuhan infrastrukturnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan memberikan masukan kepada pemerintah terhadap konstruksi kebijakan pembiayaan infrastruktur milik negara untuk mewujudkan ketahanan ekonomi nasional. Melalui metode konstruksi hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan multidisipliner. Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa model pembiayaan infrastruktur milik negara yang tepat untuk mewujudkan ketahanan ekonomi nasional adalah dengan skema Non-APBN, yang merupakan kerjasama antara pemerintah dan seluruh stakeholders. Pembangunan  infrastruktur tersebut didukung dengan metode VfM (Value for Money), dengan skema pembiayaan baru berupa partisipasi seluruh masyarakat melalui penerbitan surat berharga oleh pemerintah yang berbasis syariah. Penerpan pembanguan infrastruktur dengan skema Non-APBN akan menjaga stabilitas keuangan negara dan mengurangi beban ketergantungan terhadap hutang luar negeri.Kata Kunci: Infrastruktur, Pembiayaan, Non-APBN
Cancellation of Marriage Due to Apostasy in Islamic Law and Human Rights: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia and Malaysia Sholehudin, Miftahus; Fadli, Moh; Sulistyarini, Rachmi; Djumikasih, Djumikasih
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 17, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Shariah Faculty UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v17i1.31465

Abstract

The issue of apostasy, especially the annulment of marriage on the grounds of apostasy, is a highly intricate and contentious issue at the intersection of Islamic law and human rights. This article seeks to undertake a critical comparative analysis of the legal frameworks, jurisprudence, and practical applications surrounding this issue within Indonesia and Malaysia—two prominent Muslim-majority countries. Through in-depth insight into the relevant laws and court cases with scholarly literature reviews, this paper examines the different approaches taken by these countries and the deeply entrenched challenges in resolving the principles of Islamic legal doctrine with the main tenets of international human rights. This examination requires treading the line carefully, as religious traditions and individual freedoms clash. An inclusive and balanced dialogue can be done to further the protection of human rights and respect the rich tapestry of religious and cultural perspectives. Indeed, the proper application of Islamic law can be viewed as a fundamental human right since the freedom to practice one’s faith is part and parcel of the core tenets of international human rights standards. It is in a holistic approach—one that respects both Islamic legal principles and universal human rights—that apparent tensions can be resolved and fair treatment can be ensured for everyone. Moreover, the Islamic jurisprudents take the invalidation of marriage by way of apostasy as unanimous since it is a permissible action in case of a defect or some damage in the marriage. However, clear and specific regulations are urgently needed with a view to legal certainty and unity within the community.