Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

PEMAKNAAN INTERTEKSTUAL PADA HADIS TENTANG LARANGAN GHULUW Amin Iskandar; Komarudin Soleh
Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan al-Hadis Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): December
Publisher : UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/diyaafkar.v11i02.15243

Abstract

This article aims to discuss the Hadith regarding the prohibition of ghuluw with an intertextual approach, namely an approach to understanding texts by finding meaningful relationships between two or more texts. This research is library research. The method used in this research is a qualitative approach. The results of this research conclude that the hadith regarding the prohibition of ghuluw is an original hadith, its existence can be traced in famous hadith books, and has authentic quality. Through intertextual interpretation, it can be concluded that the Hadith regarding the prohibition of ghuluw is meaningful and at the same time functions as bayan at-ta'kid (reinforcement) for the verses in the Koran regarding the prohibition of excesses in religion and the verses regarding the recommendation to be moderate. This meaning is also strengthened by the Prophet's correction of the excessive attitudes carried out by several companions mentioned in other hadiths.  Artikel ini bertujuan untuk membahas Hadis tentang larangan ghuluw dengan pendekatan intertekstual, yaitu suatu pendekatan dalam memahami teks dengan cara menemukan hubungan-hubungan bermakna diantara dua teks atau lebih. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan. Adapun metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Hadis tentang larangan ghuluw merupakan Hadis yang orisinil, keberadaannya dapat ditelusuri di dalam kitab-kitab Hadis yang masyhur, serta memiliki kualitas yang shahih. Melalui pemaknaan intertekstual dapat disimpulkan bahwa Hadis tentang larangan ghuluw semakna dan sekaligus berfungsi sebagai bayan at-ta’kid (penguat) terhadap ayat-ayat di dalam Al-Qur’an tentang larangan bersikap berlebih-lebihan dalam beragama dan ayat tentang anjuran untuk bersikap moderat. Pemaknaan ini diperkuat pula dengan koreksi Nabi atas sikap berlebihan yang dilakukan oleh beberapa sahabat yang disebutkan di dalam Hadis-Hadis yang lain.  
Living Hadith on Qur’anic Learning and Teaching: Reception, Pedagogical Actualization, and Institutionalization at Rumah Tahfizh Qur’an At-Taqwa Cirebon Amin Iskandar; Hartati; Ahmad Ubaydi Hasbillah; Abdel Nasser Abdelgalil Mohammed Mousa
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v11i1.56103

Abstract

This study examines the reception, pedagogical actualization, and institutionalization of the hadith on Qur’anic learning and teaching at Rumah Tahfizh Qur’an At-Taqwa Cirebon. Employing a qualitative case study with a living hadith perspective and Berger and Luckmann’s social construction framework, the study draws on direct observation, semi structured interviews with two institutional leaders, five teachers, fourteen students, and three parents, as well as institutional documents. The findings reveal that hadith reception is actor based: institutional leaders, teachers, students, and parents appropriate the prophetic teaching according to their respective social and educational positions, yet their interpretations converge around a shared Qur’anic orientation. These received meanings are externalized through recurring pedagogical practices of Qur’anic learning and subsequently objectified in learning standards, teacher criteria, evaluation mechanisms, parental communication, and institutional governance. The analysis further shows that institutionalization is not a static process, but an ongoing negotiation between the religious values of worship, sincerity, adab, and devotion to the Qur’an and contemporary demands for teacher professionalism, learning achievement, service quality, parental expectations, and institutional sustainability. Theoretically, the study demonstrates that living hadith can be understood as an interconnected movement from actor reception to pedagogical actualization and institutionalization, through which prophetic values acquire social and organizational durability in contemporary Qur’anic education. This finding extends living hadith scholarship by showing how received hadith meanings become embedded in both pedagogical practices and institutional structures.
DARI ATRIBUSI STRUKTURAL KE VERIFIKASI KORELATIF: Reinterpretasi Harald Motzki atas Common Link dalam Rekonstruksi Historis Hadis Amin Iskandar
Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan al-Hadis Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): December
Publisher : UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/nge5aa56

Abstract

The historicity of hadith in modern scholarship partly depends on the extent to which isnād structures can be used to reconstruct the origins and transmission of a report. This article examines Harald Motzki’s reinterpretation of G. H. A. Juynboll’s common link theory and its implications for the epistemic status of isnād, particularly the common link, single strand, and diving strand. The study employs a qualitative literature review using content and comparative analysis of Juynboll’s and Motzki’s works together with relevant secondary studies. The analysis proceeds through identification, categorization, comparison, and interpretive synthesis of isnād structures and isnād-matn relationships. The findings show that Motzki does not discard the evidentiary value of the common link, but separates a transmitter’s structural position from his historical function. A common link is not automatically an originator or fabricator; it may function as a transmitter-collector whose historical role must be tested through correlations among isnād routes, matn variants, sources, and transmission patterns. Consequently, single strands and diving strands cannot be treated as automatic evidence of authenticity or fabrication, but as investigative indicators requiring further verification. This article conceptualizes the shift as a movement from a structural attribution model to a correlative verification model: from structure directly producing attribution to structure generating a hypothesis that must be tested through correlated evidence. The study concludes that isnād remains relevant as historical evidence, but its conclusions are probabilistic, critical, and open to revision. Historisitas hadis dalam studi modern salah satunya ditentukan oleh sejauh mana struktur isnād dapat digunakan untuk merekonstruksi asal-usul dan proses transmisi suatu riwayat. Artikel ini mengkaji reinterpretasi Harald Motzki terhadap teori common link G. H. A. Juynboll dan implikasinya terhadap status epistemologis isnād, khususnya common link, single strand, dan diving strand. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif berbasis tinjauan pustaka dengan analisis isi dan analisis komparatif terhadap karya Juynboll, Motzki, serta studi terkait. Analisis dilakukan melalui identifikasi, kategorisasi, perbandingan, dan sintesis interpretatif terhadap struktur isnād dan relasi isnād-matan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Motzki tidak meniadakan nilai common link, tetapi memisahkan posisi struktural periwayat dari fungsi historisnya. Common link tidak otomatis merupakan originator atau fabricator, melainkan dapat berfungsi sebagai transmitter-collector yang statusnya harus diuji melalui korelasi antara jalur isnād, varian matan, sumber, dan pola transmisi. Konsekuensinya, single strand dan diving strand tidak dapat diperlakukan sebagai bukti otomatis autentisitas ataupun fabrikasi, tetapi sebagai indikator investigasi yang memerlukan verifikasi lebih lanjut. Penelitian ini merumuskan pergeseran dari model atribusi struktural menuju model verifikasi korelatif, yaitu dari struktur yang langsung menghasilkan atribusi menuju struktur yang membentuk hipotesis untuk diuji secara korelatif. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa isnād tetap relevan sebagai bukti sejarah, tetapi kesimpulannya bersifat probabilistik, kritis, dan terbuka terhadap revisi.  
HADIS MAUDHU’ DAN HOAKS DIGITAL: REKONTEKSTUALISASI KRITIK SANAD MATAN SEBAGAI ETIKA TABAYYUN Amin Iskandar
Taqrib : Journal of Islamic Studies and Education Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Taqrib : Journal of Islamic Studies and Education
Publisher : CV. Doki Course and Training

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61994/taqrib.v1i2.2410

Abstract

The digital circulation of hadith has generated new challenges concerning authenticity, attribution, source credibility, and responsibility in the transmission of religious information. This study aims to analyze the relationship between fabricated hadith and digital religious hoaxes, identify continuities and transformations in patterns of fabrication and information transmission, and formulate a digital tabayyun model based on the principles of sanad and matan criticism. This study employs a qualitative library research approach. Its main sources are classical works of ‘ulum al-hadith, particularly Mahmud al-Tahhan’s Taysir Mustalah al-Hadith and Nur al-Din ‘Itr’s Manhaj al-Naqd fi ‘Ulum al-Hadith, while secondary sources consist of journal articles published between 2017 and 2022 on hadith digitization, social media, religious hoaxes, Islamic communication ethics, and tabayyun. The data are analyzed through content analysis and conceptual-contextual analysis. The findings demonstrate that fabricated hadith and digital hoaxes are conceptually distinct but intersect in problems of false attribution, source manipulation, messenger credibility, message distortion, and transmission responsibility. Their relationship is best understood through continuity and transformation: continuity appears in the manipulation of authority and persuasive information, while transformation occurs in media, transmission patterns, speed, scale, and structures of digital authority. The study formulates five stages of digital verification: taḥqīq al-maṣdar, taḥqīq al-nāqil, taḥqīq al-naṣṣ, taḥqīq al-ma‘nā, and taḥqīq al-athar. The last stage constitutes an ethical extension for digital communication rather than a classical criterion of hadith authenticity. The study concludes that this model can strengthen digital hadith literacy without equating digital communication with the technical system of hadith transmission.