Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Golden Ratio of Data in Summary

Responsibility of The Expedition Company to Sea Freight Service Users Who Experience Loss and Damage to Goods in The Port Area Siahaan, Richa Yohana Rusli; Anggusti, Martono; Haryono, Fadillah
Golden Ratio of Data in Summary Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): November - January
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grdis.v5i1.818

Abstract

Sea transportation is an important component in international trade, which plays an important role in the distribution of goods. However, there are losses greater than the losses caused by the transportation itself, such as shortages, damages, and loss of goods, which can arise during the process of unloading at the port carried out by the freight forwarding company by sea. This study aims to examine the limitation of responsibility in the legal relationship between freight forwarding companies, carriers, and sea transportation expedition companies in the context of sea transportation activities. Using a normative legal research methodology, this research relies on sources of legal materials, including laws and regulations and court decisions/rulings, using a legislative approach and a case approach. The results of this study show that, first, the limitations on the responsibility of the expedition party are regulated in Article 87 of the Commercial Code, as well as the limitations on the responsibility of the carrier regulated in Article 40 and Article 41 of Law Number 17 of 2008, and the responsibility of the sea freight expedition company in terms of providing facilities, licensing, supervision, and the implementation of order of sea transportation activities, as stipulated in Cassation Decision Number 2665 K/Pdt/2022 which corroborates the decision of the first judge in case Number 728/Pdt.G.2016/PN.Mdn, has been appropriate and fulfills the legal objectives that provide certainty, justice, and usefulness.
Legal Protection for Remote Working Workers: Comparison of Positive Law Between Indonesia and United States Gultom, Jeges Imanuelita; Mayca, Ofelica Ruth; Simarmata, Prayusti Sarah; Sihombing, Sherina Elizabeth; Anggusti, Martono
Golden Ratio of Data in Summary Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): November - January
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grdis.v5i1.830

Abstract

The development of increasingly diverse and time-spanning work arrangements: remote work systems need to be known and understood with certainty and legal protections for remote employees. Remote Working workers are prone to non-compliance with the following rights in the company's work cycle. The United States, one of the developed countries, has regulations to protect remote workers, and interpreting these regulations according to the situation in Indonesia can be helpful if they are implemented appropriately. This study aims to obtain reference materials regarding regulations that can be applied in Indonesia to ensure legal protection for remote workers. This research is comparative legal research using literature studies. In Indonesia, Remote Working worker regulations do not exist specifically, so they are still based on the Job Creation and Manpower Law. Meanwhile, in the United States, regulations for Remote Working workers have existed since 1990 until now. Despite the differences in legal systems between Indonesia and the United States, efforts are being made to coordinate appropriate regulations to develop government regulations in line with the increasing diversity of employment systems. Therefore, the government must clarify and follow up on determining legal protection for remote workers.
Comparison of Indonesian and Malaysian Laws on Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Business Competition Sitepu, Editama Joremia; Marbun, Putra Hasian; Nainggolan, Doni Fernando; Anggusti, Martono
Golden Ratio of Data in Summary Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): February - April
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grdis.v5i2.831

Abstract

Monopolistic practices and unfair competition are significant issues in the global economy. Indonesia and Malaysia have legal frameworks that aim to maintain fair competition and prohibit monopolistic practices. This article compares Indonesian and Malaysian laws prohibiting monopolistic practices and unfair business competition by examining the legal basis, supervision, enforcement mechanisms, and protection of consumers and businesses. Although both countries have similar objectives in protecting market competition, there are differences in the approach to law enforcement, merger and acquisition regulations, and philosophy in competition regulation. The results show that Indonesia focuses more on protecting consumers and small businesses, while Malaysia tends to pay more attention to overall market efficiency.