Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Faishal, Achmad

Unknown Affiliation

Author-ID : 1877306

Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

1 2

Women's Participation in Mediation Houses in Banjarmasin City Zulaeha, Mulyani; Faishal, Achmad; Anwary, Ichsan; Suprapto, Suprapto; Saprudin, Saprudin; Tornado, Anang Shophan; Ilmy, Muhammad Azianoor; Mustika, Cindyva Thalia
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Oktober, Social Issues and Problems in Society
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.51206

Community service in the Compulsory Lecturer Service Program (PDWA) aims to develop the capacity of women in resolving disputes/conflicts and the strategic role of women's involvement in the Mediation House, so that equality of position is created between men and women to obtain opportunities/opportunities and participation in development, especially in facilitating the resolution of disputes and disputes in the community through mediation channels that prioritize deliberation and consensus with an approach that prioritizes peace. Through this service theme, it is hoped that it can inspire women to take a role in the Mediation House. The results of this service activity show that women also have the capacity and ability to become facilitators in resolving disputes in the community through mediation, because in principle women have good communication skills to facilitate the resolution of disputes/conflicts between the parties. Thus, women's participation in the mediation space can be an important investment for a better future in Banjarmasin City, which has a domino effect on increasing women's legal literacy and strengthening social networks (agents of change).

The Position of the Attorney General’s Office as the Single Prosecutor in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System Irwan, Muhammad; Suprapto, Suprapto; Zulaeha, Mulyani; Faishal, Achmad
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v5i1.130

This study aims to critically examine the institutional position of the Public Prosecutor’s Office as the sole prosecutorial authority (single prosecutor) within the Indonesian criminal justice system. The core legal issue addressed concerns the authority and functional role of the Prosecutor’s Office as the exclusive body responsible for prosecution, particularly as mandated in Article 1 of Law No. 11 of 2021, which amends Law No. 16 of 2004 on the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Employing a normative legal research method, this study focuses on the analysis of normative ambiguity, using both statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the single prosecutor concept normatively reinforces the centralization of prosecutorial powers in the hands of the Public Prosecutor's Office. Nonetheless, ambiguities persist regarding the interpretation of the limits of this authority, especially in its interactions with other law enforcement agencies and in the practical implementation of the dominus litis principle. Therefore, a comprehensive legal interpretation is imperative to prevent overlapping jurisdictions and to uphold the coherence and consistency of Indonesia’s criminal justice system.

The Position of the Attorney General’s Office as the Single Prosecutor in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System Irwan, Muhammad; Suprapto, Suprapto; Zulaeha, Mulyani; Faishal, Achmad
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v5i1.130

This study aims to critically examine the institutional position of the Public Prosecutor’s Office as the sole prosecutorial authority (single prosecutor) within the Indonesian criminal justice system. The core legal issue addressed concerns the authority and functional role of the Prosecutor’s Office as the exclusive body responsible for prosecution, particularly as mandated in Article 1 of Law No. 11 of 2021, which amends Law No. 16 of 2004 on the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Employing a normative legal research method, this study focuses on the analysis of normative ambiguity, using both statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the single prosecutor concept normatively reinforces the centralization of prosecutorial powers in the hands of the Public Prosecutor's Office. Nonetheless, ambiguities persist regarding the interpretation of the limits of this authority, especially in its interactions with other law enforcement agencies and in the practical implementation of the dominus litis principle. Therefore, a comprehensive legal interpretation is imperative to prevent overlapping jurisdictions and to uphold the coherence and consistency of Indonesia’s criminal justice system.

Title

Found 13 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 13 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 13 Documents
Search