Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.434
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurisprudentie YUSTISI Jurnal Ilmiah Ahwal Syakhshiyyah (JAS) Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam Proceeding International Seminar of Islamic Studies Al-MIKRAJ: Jurnal studi Islam dan Humaniora QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies Asian Journal of Law and Humanity Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
Mhd Yadi Harahap
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 43 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 43 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Hudud Adultery and Sexual Crimes: A Comparison of Qanun Jinayat and the National Criminal Code Danang Dermawan; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1314

Abstract

The regulation of the crime of adultery in Indonesian law shows that there is a fundamental difference between Qanun Aceh Number 6 of 2014 concerning the Jinayat Law and Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. These differences are not only related to the formulation of delicacies, but also reflect the difference in legal paradigm between Islamic criminal law which emphasizes the protection of public morals and national criminal law which is oriented towards the protection of private rights and human rights. This condition raises juridical problems related to consistency, legal certainty, and limits of state authority in regulating the sexual behavior of citizens. This study aims to analyze and compare the conception of adultery, the nature of delicacy, the mechanism of proof, and the orientation of punishment in Qanun Jinayat and the National Criminal Code. This study uses normative legal research methods with legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials are obtained through literature studies of laws and regulations, Islamic legal sources, and relevant legal literature, then analyzed qualitatively and prescriptively. The results of the discussion show that Qanun Jinayat views adultery as a hudud jarimah with theological and social dimensions, so that it can be processed without complaints and applies very strict evidentiary standards as a form of prudence. The National Criminal Code places adultery as an absolute complaint with a modern evidentiary system, which emphasizes the orientation to the protection of family privacy and honor. This study concludes that the difference in the regulation of adultery reflects the plurality of Indonesian criminal law and demands the harmonization of criminal law policies to be in harmony with religious values, human rights, and the principles of the modern state of law.
The Penal System in Islamic Law: The Concepts of Jarimah, Uqubat, and Taʿzir Arifin Siahaan; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1315

Abstract

The penal system in Islamic law is an integral part of the sharia which aims to maintain social order, uphold justice, and protect human dignity. The concept of jarimah as a criminal act in Islamic law is not only understood as a violation of legal norms, but also as a violation of divine provisions derived from the Qur'an and Sunnah. Criminality in Islam is manifested through uqubat which is classified into hudud, qishash-diyat, and taʿzir, each of which has different characteristics, purposes, and legal basis. This research aims to analyze conceptually and normatively the penal system in Islamic law by focusing on the definition of jarimah, forms of uqubat, and the principles of criminal law that underlie it. The research method used is normative legal research with a conceptual, philosophical, and normative-shari'a approach, through the study of the Qur'an, Sunnah, the opinions of the jurists, and Islamic criminal law literature. The results of the discussion show that the penal system in Islamic law is built on the principles of justice, certainty, and benefit, which is reflected in the strict standard of proof of hudud, the proportional nature of qishash-diyat, and the flexibility of taʿzir in responding to social dynamics. The difference in the views of scholars in interpreting the postulates of criminalization confirms that Islamic criminal law has an adaptive character without losing its normative legitimacy. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that the penal system in Islamic law is a comprehensive legal system and oriented towards substantive justice, crime prevention, and protection of maqāṣid al-syarī'ah.
Qisas in the Crime of Murder: A Comparison of Islamic Criminal Law and the Criminal Code Kamaluddin Pane; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1316

Abstract

The crime of murder is the most serious crime because it directly deprives people of the right to life, thus demanding a penal system that not only provides legal certainty, but also substantive justice. Islamic criminal law through the concepts of qisās and diyat offers a model of punishment that balances retributive justice, humanity, and welfare, by giving a central role to the victim's family. Meanwhile, the Indonesian Criminal Code, both in its old form and through Law No. 1 of 2023, places murder as a crime against the state with a penal approach that is increasingly shifting towards corrective and rehabilitative, especially through the provision of the conditional death penalty. This study aims to analyze and compare the concept of qisās in Islamic criminal law with the regulation of the crime of murder in the Indonesian Criminal Code in order to find common points and fundamental differences in the paradigm of justice adhered to. The research method used is normative legal research with legislative, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches, through literature studies on sources of Islamic law and positive law. The results of the discussion showed that Islamic criminal law emphasizes commensurate justice and the right to forgiveness of victims as a mechanism of social control, while the Criminal Code emphasizes the dominance of the state in criminalization with limited space for the role of the victim. In conclusion, this comparison shows that the values of justice in qisās have conceptual relevance to enrich the development of a national criminal law that is more just, humane, and responsive to the interests of victims without neglecting the principle of the rule of law.
Jarimah Qadzaf and Uqubatnya, Comparison Between Qonun No. 4 of 2014 concerning Jinayat and the Criminal Code Saifuddin AW; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1317

Abstract

The phenomenon of accusations of adultery without real evidence and defamation raises serious problems in the moral, social, and legal order of society. In the perspective of Islamic law, this act is known as jarimah qadzaf, which not only damages the reputation of the individual but also interferes with social integrity and the principle of justice. The application of qadzaf in Indonesia shows that there is a fundamental difference between national law and the sharia qanun that applies in Aceh, thus creating challenges in legal harmonization. This study aims to analyze the concept of jarimah qadzaf and its uqubat, as well as compare its application between Qanun Aceh No. 4 of 2014 concerning Jinayat and the Criminal Code (KUHP). The research method used is normative research with a comparative law approach, based on the study of legal documents in the form of the Qur'an, Hadith, Qanun, and the Criminal Code, as well as relevant secondary legal literature. The analysis is carried out qualitatively to understand the substantive, philosophical, and procedural aspects of the existing regulations. The results of the study showed that Qanun Aceh placed qadzaf as a hudud crime with the sanction of eighty lashes, focusing on the protection of individual honor and preventive effects. While the Criminal Code places the accusation of adultery as a defamation complaint with imprisonment or fines, it emphasizes procedural certainty rather than moral and spiritual aspects. This difference reflects the different legal philosophies between the sharia approach and national positive law, but both have the goals of protecting the community and enforcing justice. In conclusion, a deep understanding of qadzaf and its comparison with the Criminal Code is important to integrate moral principles, ethics, and legal procedures, as well as ensure fair protection of individuals and social interests.
Settlement of Child Criminal Cases of Terrorism Criminals through Restorative Justice (Al-Isti'adah) in Islamic Criminal Law Muhammad Firman Akhsani; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1318

Abstract

The case of a child perpetrator of a terrorism crime raises complex problems related to law enforcement and child protection. The social, psychological, and moral impact of acts of terrorism on victims and societies requires an approach that is not only repressive, but also educational and restorative. Islamic criminal law offers the principles of justice and rehabilitation through the concept of al-isti'adah, which emphasizes the restoration of wrongs, moral construction, and the restoration of social harmony. This study aims to analyze the settlement of child cases of terrorism perpetrators through al-isti'adah-based restorative justice in Islamic criminal law. The research also assesses the relevance of Islamic legal principles with national laws and regulations related to child protection and the eradication of terrorism crimes. The research method used is normative, with a literature study and document analysis approach. Data sources include the Quran, Hadith, Indonesian laws and regulations, ulema fatwas, legal literature, and relevant previous research. The analysis was carried out qualitatively using content analysis techniques, mapping norms, restorative justice principles, and the application of al-isti'adah in the context of children of perpetrators of terrorism crimes. The results of the study show that the al-isti'adah-based restorative justice approach allows the restoration of relationships between perpetrators, victims, and society, as well as providing moral and spiritual education for children. The involvement of families, communities, and law enforcement is a key factor in the success of rehabilitation. The integration of Islamic legal principles with the Child Protection Law and the Terrorism Eradication Law has resulted in a humane, proportionate, and effective law enforcement mechanism in preventing recidivism. In conclusion, the al-isti'adah-based restorative justice model provides comprehensive solutions for the resolution of child cases of terrorism perpetrators, prioritizing social recovery, moral education, and the reintegration of children into society.
Riddah (apostasy) efforts in performing interfaith marriages Afriansyah; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1319

Abstract

The phenomenon of riddah or apostasy in the context of interfaith marriage in Indonesia poses significant legal and social complexity. A person's actions to leave religion to marry a follower of another religion raises questions related to the legality of marriage, the status of children, and social implications. Indonesia as a legal country upholds freedom of religion, but Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage requires religious conformity for couples, so the practice of riddah presents a tension between individual rights and religious norms. This study aims to analyze the efforts of riddah in interfaith marriage normatively, assess the legal, social, and moral consequences, and evaluate the harmonization between national law and fiqh principles. The research focus includes an analysis of the legal status of marriage, children's rights, and social implications for individuals and society. This research also provides normative guidance for law officials, religious leaders, and the community in handling cases of interfaith marriage that trigger riddah. The method used is normative with a descriptive qualitative approach. The analysis was carried out through the study of Islamic legal doctrines, laws and regulations, fatwas of the Indonesian Ulema Council, as well as legal and social literature related to interfaith marriage and apostasy. This approach allows the identification of legal dualism between the absolute norms of Islamic law and positive legal procedures, while assessing the social and moral implications of the phenomenon. The results of the analysis show that riddah for the sake of interfaith marriage causes legal uncertainty and potential for social conflict. Islamic law emphasizes the validity of faith as a valid condition for marriage, while national law requires religious suitability. The normative approach emphasizes the importance of harmonization between positive law, fiqh, and social norms to create legal certainty, moral protection, and social stability. The integration of norms is the main instrument in managing conflicts, guaranteeing individual rights, and maintaining justice in a pluralistic society.
Sirqah In The Concept Of Islamic Criminal Law: Theft That Is Not Restricted (Hudud Sanctions) Suhardiman; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1320

Abstract

Theft is one of the criminal acts that receives special attention in Islamic criminal law. This act is categorized as sirqah and has hudud sanctions if it meets certain requirements, such as the minimum amount of property, legal evidence, and the condition of the perpetrator who is mature and sane in his mind. The phenomenon of theft that does not meet hudud requirements creates complexity in law enforcement, because it still harms the victim but cannot be subject to a fixed punishment. This study highlights the relevance of the ta'zir mechanism as a flexible and humanistic alternative sanction, as well as the role of Islamic legal norms in balancing legal certainty, social justice, and rehabilitation of perpetrators. This study aims to analyze the concept of sirqah in Islamic criminal law, evaluate the application of hudud and ta'zir sanctions, and examine the relevance of Islamic legal norms in the context of unrestricted theft. The normative approach is used by examining primary legal sources such as the Qur'an, Hadith, and fiqh books, as well as secondary literature in the form of journals, books, and academic documents. The analysis was carried out qualitative-descriptive to understand the legal mechanism, the principles of maqashid al-shari'ah, and the flexibility of ta'zir sanctions. The results of the study show that non-hudud theft is still regulated through ta'zir sanctions that are adjusted to the intention, condition of the perpetrator, and social impact. Islamic legal norms emphasize the protection of victims' rights, the certainty of court procedures, and the rehabilitative effect for perpetrators. Ta'zir is an adaptive instrument to uphold justice, educate the community, and prevent the repetition of criminal acts. This approach shows that Islamic criminal law is not only repressive, but also humanistic, preventive, and restorative. The conclusion of this study confirms that Islamic criminal law is able to balance legal certainty, social justice, and rehabilitation goals in dealing with non-hudud theft. The normative and procedural application of ta'zir ensures the protection of victims' rights while providing educational and moral opportunities for perpetrators, so that the law remains relevant and adaptive to modern socio-economic dynamics.
Extra-Judicial Killing in the Perspective of Islamic Criminal Law Said Reza Pahlevi; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1321

Abstract

Extra-judicial killing or extrajudicial killings outside legal procedures has become a phenomenon that causes controversy in the realm of law, ethics, and human rights because these actions are carried out without a legitimate judicial mechanism. This practice raises a dilemma between the interests of public security and the protection of individual rights. This study aims to analyze the legitimacy, social and moral impact, and comparison of Islamic criminal law norms with contemporary practices related to extra-judicial killing. The research uses a normative or normative juridical approach by analyzing primary sources in the form of the Qur'an, Hadith, classical fiqh, and the principles of maqashid al-sharia, as well as secondary sources in the form of academic literature, journals, and national regulations related to the taking of life and law enforcement. The analysis was carried out descriptively-analytically and comparatively to assess the suitability of empirical practices with sharia norms. The results of the study show that Islamic criminal law places human life as a fundamental right that can only be taken through formal procedures such as qisas and diyat with court supervision, so that unilateral actions by the authorities have no legal legitimacy and give rise to moral and spiritual responsibilities. The social impact of this practice includes psychological trauma of victims and families, public distrust of the authorities, social instability, and the potential for the emergence of a culture of violence. A comparison of Islamic legal norms with contemporary practices highlights the tension between public security and the principle of justice, where sharia norms emphasize accountability, transparency, and protection of individual rights. In conclusion, fair and ethical legal procedures in accordance with the principles of maqashid al-sharia are important instruments to prevent extra-judicial killings, maintain social stability, and strengthen the legitimacy and morality of law enforcement officials.
Comparative Review of Jarimah Khalwat and Ikhtilath: An Analysis of Uqubat in Qanun No. 4 of 2014 and the Indonesian Criminal Code Muniruddin Ritonga; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1322

Abstract

The regulation of jarimah khalwat and ikhtilath is part of Islamic criminal law efforts in maintaining the morality and honor of the community. Both acts are seen as acts that pave the way to more serious moral violations that require preventive legal arrangements. The existence of Qanun No. 4 of 2014 concerning Jinayat in Aceh presents a model of formalization of Islamic criminal law in the plural Indonesian national legal system, while the Criminal Code regulates morality in general without explicitly recognizing the concepts of khalwat and ikhtilath. This study aims to analyze comparatively the regulation and uqubat jarimah khalwat and ikhtilath in Qanun Jinayat and compare it with the regulation of morality in the Indonesian Criminal Code. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach, using primary legal materials in the form of Qanun No. 4 of 2014 concerning Jinayat and the Criminal Code, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of Islamic criminal law literature and national criminal law. The results of the discussion show that Islamic criminal law places khalwat and ikhtilath as jarimah ta'zir which is oriented towards the prevention and moral protection of the community, while Qanun Jinayat formulates both acts expressly with proportional and flexible uqubat. The Criminal Code has a different approach by emphasizing concrete consequences and the protection of individual freedoms. This paradigm difference reflects the pluralism of criminal law in Indonesia and emphasizes that Qanun Jinayat functions as a lex specialis that lives in the social and religious context of the Acehnese people, so harmonization with the Criminal Code needs to be carried out through the recognition of regional specificity and a dialogue of fair values.
The Dualism of the Arrangement of Jarimah Khamar and Maisir: A Comparison of Uqubat and Witnesses between Qanun Jinayat Aceh and the Criminal Code in 2023 Romel Tarigan; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1323

Abstract

The dualism of the regulation of jarimah khamar and maisir in Indonesia is a consequence of the recognition of legal pluralism in the national legal system. Qanun Jinayat Aceh as a criminal law based on Islamic sharia coexists with the 2023 Criminal Code as a national criminal law. These fundamental philosophical and normative differences cause differences in the formulation of delik, the type of uqubat, as well as the system of proof and witnesses, which has the potential to give rise to legal uncertainty and differences in legal treatment of legal subjects. This study aims to analyze and compare the arrangement of jarimah khamar and maisir between the Qanun Jinayat Aceh and the 2023 Criminal Code, focusing on the difference in uqubat and witness provisions. This study also aims to examine the normative implications of the regulatory dualism in the context of the national criminal law system. The research method used is normative legal research with legislative, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches. Legal materials consist of primary legal materials in the form of related laws and regulations, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of literature, scientific journals, and the doctrine of criminal law and fiqh jinayah. The analysis is carried out qualitatively through systematic and teleological interpretation. The results of the discussion show that Qanun Jinayat Aceh views khamar and maisir as jarimah that threaten the moral and religious order of society, so that uqubat is formulated in the form of ta'zir sanctions that are symbolic and preventive, with a proof system influenced by the principles of fiqh jinayah. The 2023 Criminal Code regulates similar acts within the framework of modern criminal law that focuses on public order and legal certainty, with criminal sanctions of imprisonment and fines as well as a national evidentiary system. This study concludes that the dualism of regulation reflects the challenge of harmonizing national criminal law in a pluralistic legal state, so that legal policies are needed that are able to bridge religious values, legal certainty, and human rights protection proportionately.
Co-Authors Afriansyah Anggi Egi Anggraini Anna Muwaffika Arifin Siahaan Bukti Padang Danang Dermawan Faisal Khalid Fery Dianta Ginting Fitri Hafsah Hafsah Hafsah Kamaluddin Pane M. Fajri Syahroni Siregar Mashuri Siregar Hall Muhammad Firman Akhsani Muhammad Saputra Muhammad Sya’ban Siregar Muniruddin Ritonga Nandani Zahara Mahfuzah Nurasiah Pratitis, Sugih Ayu Prayogi Prayogi Rachma Syarina Aatifa Rizki Fadilah Romel Tarigan Said Reza Pahlevi Saifuddin AW Suhardiman Sukiati Tata Cendekia Putra Sinaga Taufik Tengku Rizki Rahman Utary Maharany Barus Wahda Hilwani Damanik Wiranto Yoyok Adi Syahputra Zamakhsyari bin Hasballah Thaib