Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

Pertanggung Jawaban Yaman Terhadap Serangan Intensif Pasukan Houthi di Laut Merah Yaman Ayu Syaputri Lubis; Mirsa Astuti
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Juli - Agustus 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2212

Abstract

Yaman, sebuah negara di Semenanjung Arab, telah menarik perhatian dunia dalam beberapa tahun terakhir karena konflik yang berkepanjangan di seluruh wilayahnya. Salah satu konflik terbesar adalah pertempuran antara pasukan pemerintah Yaman yang didukung oleh koalisi militer pimpinan Arab Saudi dan pasukan pemberontak Houthi yang didukung oleh Iran. Konflik di Yaman bermula dari pergolakan politik dan perubahan rezim yang dimulai pada tahun 2011, mirip dengan gelombang revolusi Arab di wilayah tersebut. Namun, situasi cepat berubah menjadi pertempuran antara pasukan pemerintah yang didukung oleh negara-negara Arab dan pasukan pemberontak Houthi yang menguasai wilayah utara Yaman, termasuk ibu kota Sana'a. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif, yang juga dikenal sebagai metode penelitian hukum positif, metode penelitian hukum doktrinal, atau metode penelitian hukum murni. Metode penelitian normatif ini mempelajari hukum yang tertulis (hukum yang tertulis dalam buku) atau tradisi yang telah ada di masyarakat. Penelitian normatif ini menggunakan sebagian besar data sekunder, yang mencakup materi hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier.Yaman harus meningkatkan kekuatan militernya, memperkuat keamanan perbatasan, dan bekerja sama dengan negara-negara tetangganya. dalam hal ini Upaya mediasi regional yang dilakukan oleh negara-negara tetangga Yaman bertujuan untuk meningkatkan stabilitas regional dan mencapai solusi yang adil bagi semua pihak yang terlibat.Serangan ini berdampak pada bidang keamanan, politik, ekonomi, dan kemanusiaan, dan ini berdampak pada perkembangan regional secara keseluruhan. Konflik di Yaman memiliki konsekuensi yang signifikan bagi wilayah itu dan dunia secara keseluruhan. Dengan meningkatkan ketegangan antara Yaman dan negara-negara tetangga seperti Arab Saudi dan Uni Emirat Arab, konflik ini mengancam keamanan dan stabilitas regional. Eskalasi konflik juga dapat mengancam keamanan lintas negara dan jalur perdagangan maritim strategis di sekitar Laut Merah. Dalam mengevaluasi tanggung jawab Yaman terhadap serangan intensif pasukan Houthi di Laut Merah, penting untuk mempertimbangkan relevansi hukum internasional, termasuk Konvensi Jenewa 1949 dan Protokol Tambahan I dan II, yang mengatur perlindungan terhadap warga sipil dan personel medis selama konflik bersenjata.
Intervensi Prinsip Responsibility To Protect Terhadap Masyarakat Sipil dalam Situasi Perang Israel – Palestina Tahun 2023 Renzi Zian Azmi Falevi; Mirsa Astuti
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Juli - Agustus 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2371

Abstract

One of the longest and most complex conflicts in the world is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The security situation in the region remains extremely fragile despite peace efforts. In 2023, another escalation of violence occurred, killing civilians. The principle of the responsibility to protect (R2P) is important to discuss in this situation. This study uses normative legal scholarship-also known as positive legal scholarship, doctrinal, or purely as a methodology-to conduct this research. The main focus of the research is written law and legal traditions held by the community. Primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials are included in the secondary data sources, which are an essential component of this methodology.In 2005, the United Nations (UN) established the global Responsibility to Protect (R2P) standard. This concept says that states have the primary responsibility to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing, crimes against humanity and other human rights violations. This concept is based on existing international rules, such as Articles 1 and 2 of the UN Charter. Violations of R2P principles in the 2023 Israeli-Palestinian conflict have significant legal, security and moral consequences. Such violations are considered war crimes and crimes against humanity for which international tribunals are legally accountable. Security-wise, a prolonged conflict could lead to significant regional instability and refugees. Morally, these violations constitute a human tragedy.
Analysis Of Citizenship Rights And Mixed Marriages Between Rohingya Refugees And Indonesian Citizens (WNI) Mirsa Astuti; Rizka Syafriana; Ramlan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.5993

Abstract

Indonesia has come under fire at home and abroad for its rejection of Rohingya refugees, making it irresponsible to accept refugees in its territory. There is no clear legal umbrella in Indonesian law for marriage between Indonesian citizens and refugees. This can be seen from the fact that Article 57 of the Marriage Law only regulates marriage between Indonesian citizens and foreigners who have citizenship status, there will also be discussed in this study regarding the mixed marriage status of Rohingya refugees and the legal status of children born from mixed marriages, This research method uses a qualitative approach carried out by collecting data both in initial observations and during the research, Solving the Rohingya problem regarding the legal status of children born from mixed marriage can only be done if all parties have a strong commitment to side with the values of morality and humanity by taking concrete steps in resolving the root of the problem, so that the clarity of the status of mixed marriage can be known.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF DIPLOMA RETENTION AGREEMENT AS A CONDITION OF WORKING IN THE COMPANY Sulistiani; Astuti, Mirsa; Pohan, Masitah
International Journal of Cultural and Social Science Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): International Journal of Cultural and Social Science
Publisher : Pena Cendekia Insani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53806/ijcss.v7i1.1290

Abstract

The practice of companies withholding diplomas as a condition of employment is an employment law issue that reflects the unequal position between employers and workers and the weak protection of workers' rights. Although this practice is not explicitly regulated in employment law, it has the potential to go against the principles of freedom of contract, fair employment relations, and human rights. This study aims to analyze the form of legal protection for workers, and the government's responsibility in preventing and combating this practice. Through normative legal research, it was concluded that the detention of diplomas could violate the constitutional rights of workers, potentially making the agreement invalid. Legal protection can be provided in a preventive and repressive manner, based on national law and international human rights instruments. The government's responsibility is strengthened through supervision, mediation, and the issuance of the Circular Letter of the Minister of Manpower No. M/5/HK.04.00/V/2025. Nevertheless, stronger laws and regulations are needed to ensure legal certainty and the effectiveness of legal protection for employees
ANALYSIS OF LAND OWNERSHIP RESTRICTIONS FOR FOREIGNERS ACCORDING TO INDONESIAN LAW AND THAILAND LAW Athaya, Syarifah Khaira; Astuti, Mirsa
International Journal of Cultural and Social Science Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): International Journal of Cultural and Social Science
Publisher : Pena Cendekia Insani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53806/ijcss.v7i1.1317

Abstract

Land is a strategic resource closely linked to state sovereignty, public welfare, and economic stability. In the context of globalization and increasing foreign investment, Southeast Asian countries face the challenge of opening their property markets without undermining national interests. This study aims to analyze restrictions on foreign land ownership under Indonesian and Thai law and to compare the legal approaches of both countries. This research applies a normative legal method using statutory and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that Indonesia allows limited foreign access through use rights and condominium ownership, whereas Thailand maintains a stricter prohibition on direct land ownership by foreigners, allowing only narrow exceptions. Both countries seek to protect national land sovereignty but differ in their level of openness to foreign property investment.