Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Legal Analysis of Savings and Loan Cooperatives with Money Laundering with the Origin of Fraud Together and Continues in Decision No. 2113 K / Pid.Sus/2023 Sitompul, Ariman
International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML)
Publisher : International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59712/iaml.v5i1.158

Abstract

Money laundering is a complex organized crime with a growing modus operandi and threatens the stability of the national financial system, particularly involving non-bank financial institutions such as poorly regulated savings and loan cooperatives. This study analyzed the Supreme Court Decision No. 2113 K/PID.SUS/2023 uses normative juridical methods with statute and case study approaches to assess the criminal responsibility of individuals and corporations in money laundering originating from continuing fraud, and identify the effectiveness of preventive legal mechanisms through supervision of savings and loan cooperatives in the context of criminal law enforcement. The results showed that the criminal liability of the perpetrator has met the theory of Identification and Strict Liability with evidence of systematic transactions, but the application of criminal sanctions by the panel of judges is still not in accordance with the maximum provisions of Article 7 of law no. 8 of 2010 and Article 121 of Law No. 1 year 2023. The Supervisory Mechanism of savings and loan cooperatives shows structural weaknesses in the implementation of Know Your Customer and Customer Due Diligence principles, as well as the absence of a mandatory and standardized Suspicious Transaction Reporting System. The study concluded that a comprehensive regulatory reform, strengthening the capacity of law enforcement officers, and strengthening surveillance systems are needed to improve the effectiveness of combating money laundering in the cooperative sector
Legal Analysis Of Death Certificate Determination Through The District Court In The Perspective Of Population Administration (Decision Study No. 407 / Pdt.P / 2025 / PN Bks) Sitompul, Ariman
Legalpreneur Journal Volume 4, No. 1 October 2025
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lpj.v4i1.7928

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal basis and consideration of judges in determining the application for the issuance of death certificates through the Bekasi District Court in Decision No. 407/Pdt.P / 2025 / PN Bks. This application was submitted by Sri Haryati as the wife of the late Bambang Sarwono Hadi who died in 1995 but was never registered with the Department of Population and Civil Registration (Disdukcapil). Because of the delay in reporting, the applicant must take the path of court determination in accordance with the provisions of Article 44 of Law Number 24 of 2013 concerning Population Administration and the Circular Letter of the Directorate General of Dukcapil number 472.12/932/DUKCAPIL of 2018. The research method used is normative juridical approach, by examining the legislation and analyzing the legal facts in the decision. The results showed that the judge took into account the formal and material aspects of the application by confirming the citizen's right to a document of residence. This ruling affirms the role of the court as a corrective instrument against the negligence of the population administration that has not been reported for a long time.
The Role Of The Prosecutor's Office And The BPK In The Process Of Returning State Losses Between Dominus Litis And Justice Sitompul, Ariman
Legalpreneur Journal Volume 4, No. 2 April 2026
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lpj.v4i2.8645

Abstract

This study examines the role of the prosecutor's office and the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) in the process of returning state losses due to corruption, especially in relation to the dominus litis principle and the dimension of Justice. The method used is juridical normative approach to legislation and conceptual through the study of literature (library research). The results showed that the relationship of authority between the prosecutor's office and the BPK is complementary but has not been coordinated systematically, resulting in normative gaps that weaken the effectiveness of state asset recovery. The dominus litis principle that gives prosecutorial authority to prosecutors is in practice limited by the principle of functional differentiation that separates investigation and prosecution. The restorative justice approach and the establishment of an Asset Recovery Agency is a positive institutional breakthrough, but requires strengthening interagency coordination regulations so that the goal of returning state losses can be optimally achieved. This study concludes the need for special regulations that regulate formal coordination between the prosecutor's office and the BPK as the foundation for fair and measurable recovery of State losses.