Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.096
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pembaharuan Hukum AL-HUKAMA´ Jurnal Ibn Abbas Unes Law Review Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan El-Ahli : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE) Qonun Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Jurnal At-Tabayyun Al-Hukama: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan
Faza, Amrar Mahfuzh
Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Mandailing Natal
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
An Examination of the Age Restriction of First-Time Voters in Indonesia's Elections From Maqashid Sharia Perspective Faza, Amrar Mahfuzh; Putra, Dedisyah; Mafaid, Ahmad; Rizki, Juni Wati Sri
Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Vol 11 No 2 (2024): Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan
Publisher : Hukum Keluarga Islam IAIN LANGSA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/qadha.v11i2.9286

Abstract

The age restrictions for first-time voters and the age requirements for electoral candidates in Indonesia have become topics of discussion and debate. One such debate revolves around the Constitutional Court's (MK) Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023, which allows individuals under 40 years of age to run for president (capres) or vice president (cawapres), as long as they have experience as a regional head. The Supreme Court has also ruled on the minimum age for governor and deputy governor candidates, setting it at 30 years old, as outlined in Decision Number 23 P/HUM/2024. This study aims to analyze the shift in the paradigm regarding age restrictions for first-time voters in the context of Maqashid Syariah. The research employs a normative legal method with a statute approach to examine the paradigm shift in the regulation of age restrictions for voting rights and explores the implications of this shift on electoral justice and the integrity of political leaders, analyzed through the Maqashid Syariah approach. The findings of this study conclude that age restrictions on voting rights need to be relaxed, as age is no longer a determinant of a citizen's maturity in thinking. In Islam, politics is intended to bring about public benefit in line with the objectives of shariah, as the principle states that the actions of a leader towards their people must be based on the common good. The age restrictions need to be re-evaluated, considering the principle that the original legal status of something is its nonexistence, meaning that the original legal basis for age restrictions on voting and candidacy does not exist. Another principle suggests that legal rulings (fatwas) can change due to changes in time, place, conditions, and objectives (intent). Therefore, it is necessary to re-evaluate the paradigm shift in the regulation of age restrictions for first-time voters to ensure fair elections and local elections for both candidates and voters.
Legal Status of a Wife Leaving Her Husband and Vice Versa in Contextual Fiqh Studies: A Pre-Divorce Analysis Haddad Ulum Harahap; Muhammad Fadhlan Is; Amrar Mahfuzh Faza; Muhamad Hasan Sebyar
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 12, No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v12i1.7158

Abstract

The issue of a wife leaving her husband or vice versa before an official divorce is a critical topic in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), raising legal, ethical, and social concerns. This study examines the legal status of such separations through the lens of various schools of thought (madhhab), analyzing spousal rights and obligations in pre-divorce contexts. Employing a qualitative method, it draws from primary Islamic legal sources, as well as contemporary statutory frameworks in Muslim-majority countries. Findings reveal that Islamic law distinguishes between justified and unjustified separation. A wife who separates without valid reason may be deemed nusyuz, which affects her right to nafaqah (maintenance), while a husband remains responsible for financial obligations until the divorce is finalized. Conversely, if separation is due to harm, negligence, or abuse, mechanisms such as fasakh (annulment) or khulu' (divorce initiated by the wife) may be pursued under Islamic principles. These doctrines aim to protect the rights of both parties and prevent injustice in marital relationships. From the perspective of civil law, legal separation is not explicitly codified, but courts may provide temporary arrangements through mediation and judicial orders. Customary law often manages informal separations through community mediation and traditional consensus. In Indonesia, religious courts (peradilan agama) handle pre-divorce separations as part of divorce proceedings, emphasizing mediation and evaluating interim living arrangements, financial duties, and child custody. Beyond legal analysis, the study highlights broader social consequences: women and children are often left vulnerable during informal separations, while unresolved conflicts can fragment social harmony
Fikih Jinayah dan Relevansinya Terhadap Hukum Keluarga Misra Netti; Amrar Mahfuzh Faza; Irma Romianto; Sumantri Adenin
QONUN: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-undangan Vol 10 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : FASYA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/qj.v10i1.12697

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menelaah keterkaitan antara fikih jinayah dan hukum keluarga serta perannya dalam memperkuat perlindungan keluarga dalam konteks sosial kontemporer. Fikih jinayah sebagai cabang hukum pidana Islam tidak hanya mengatur tindak kejahatan, tetapi juga berfungsi menjaga tatanan moral dan sosial masyarakat, termasuk institusi keluarga. Berbagai pelanggaran seperti zina, qadzaf, kekerasan dalam rumah tangga, dan penelantaran keluarga memiliki konsekuensi pidana yang berdampak langsung terhadap keharmonisan keluarga. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif berbasis studi kepustakaan dengan menelaah literatur klasik dan kontemporer terkait fikih jinayah dan hukum keluarga meninjauh pada sanksi ta'zir dalam Fikih Jinayah dengan pasal-pasal pelanggaran kewajiban suami-istri dalam UU Perkawinan/KHI, untuk menemukan bahwa penegakan hukum pidana Islam dalam keluarga berfungsi sebagai upaya preventif (preventive measure) terhadap kehancuran institusi keluarga, serta putusan hakim di Pengadilan Agama yang mengaitkan tindak pidana (KDRT) sebagai alasan kuat fasakh (pembatalan/putus) pernikahan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa fikih jinayah berperan penting dalam melindungi kehormatan, keturunan, dan keselamatan jiwa anggota keluarga melalui penerapan sanksi hudud, qishash, diyat, dan ta’zir. Pendekatan fikih jinayah modern juga menekankan prinsip restoratif yang berlandaskan maqashid syariah, yaitu perlindungan keluarga, pemulihan korban, dan penegakan keadilan. Dengan demikian, integrasi fikih jinayah dan hukum keluarga menjadi penting sebagai upaya memperkuat sistem hukum yang mampu menjaga stabilitas sosial, moral, dan keberlangsungan keluarga sebagai pilar utama masyarakat.
Co-Authors Affan, Lazuardi Maulana Ahmad Mafaid Dedisyah Putra Haddad Ulum Harahap Irma Romianto Juni Wati Sri Rizki Kasman Kasman Kohar, Kohar Misra Netti Muhamad Hasan Sebyar Muhammad Fadhlan Is Mukhlis Lubis Nasution, Edi Marjan Nasution, Liantha Adam Raja Ritonga Sumantri Adenin Sumper Mulia Harahap, Sumper Mulia Zainul Fuad