Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Inheritance Law in Egypt, Sudan, and Jordan: A Comparative Study of Systems and Implementation Kandriana, Muhammad; Sukardiawan, I Wayan; Rifaid, Muhammad; Arifin, Zainal; Wildan, Muhammad; Zuhrah
Al-Risalah VOLUME 25 NO 2, NOPEMBER (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.vi.57241

Abstract

Inheritance law in Islamic legal systems exhibits unique characteristics shaped by religious doctrine, state policies, and socio-cultural dynamics. This study conducts a comparative analysis of inheritance law in Egypt, Sudan, and Jordan, focusing on legal sources, regulatory implementation, and practical challenges. By employing a normative juridical approach with comparative legal analysis, this research systematically examines legislation, court rulings, and scholarly literature to highlight variations in the application of Islamic inheritance principles across these jurisdictions. The findings reveal that while all three countries base their inheritance systems on Islamic law, significant differences emerge due to political, social, and cultural influences. Egypt integrates Islamic inheritance law with national regulations, reflecting modernization efforts, whereas Sudan maintains a fiqh-based system strongly influenced by customary law. Jordan, meanwhile, codifies Islamic inheritance law within its legal framework, with the Sharia Court playing a central role in dispute resolution. The comparative approach of this study underscores the adaptability of Islamic inheritance law in different legal environments and highlights the need for harmonization between religious principles and contemporary legal reforms. The findings carry important implications for future legal reforms, suggesting that policymakers should consider contextual adaptations to enhance inclusivity and responsiveness to social changes. This study contributes to comparative legal scholarship by offering insights into the dynamic interplay between Islamic law and national legal systems, while proposing recommendations for progressive inheritance law reform in Muslim-majority countries.
Syarat Subjektif dan Objektif Perjanjian Jual Beli: Relevansi Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata dalam Praktik Modern Kandriana, Muhammad; Atika, Sri; Muslimin; Wildan, Muhammad; Hajairin
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v8i1.2476

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas relevansi Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dalam menilai keabsahan perjanjian jual beli pada praktik hukum modern, khususnya dalam konteks transaksi elektronik. Pasal 1320 menetapkan empat syarat sah perjanjian yang terdiri dari dua syarat subjektif, yaitu kesepakatan para pihak dan kecakapan hukum, serta dua syarat objektif, yaitu objek tertentu dan sebab yang halal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana syarat-syarat tersebut diterapkan dalam praktik jual beli kontemporer, termasuk transaksi daring yang sering kali menimbulkan sengketa hukum. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa banyak perjanjian jual beli modern, terutama di platform digital, kerap mengabaikan syarat subjektif berupa kesepakatan yang sah dan syarat objektif berupa kejelasan objek. Kondisi ini menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dan merugikan salah satu pihak. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menegaskan perlunya interpretasi adaptif terhadap Pasal 1320 serta penguatan regulasi pendukung agar mampu mengakomodasi dinamika transaksi modern secara adil dan legal.
EFEKTIVITAS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM: TELAAH DARI PERSPEKTIF FILSAFAT HUKUM Kandriana, Muhammad; Imamsyah, Mirham; Ridwan, Ridwan
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 8, No 2 (2025): May 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i2.3188

Abstract

Abstract: This article explores the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in law enforcement in Indonesia through the lens of legal philosophy. Using a normative juridical method and a qualitative approach, the study draws on literature reviews of legal regulations and contemporary academic sources. The findings indicate that while AI significantly improves efficiency and precision in judicial systems, it also introduces substantial challenges, especially in terms of substantive justice, legal accountability, and the protection of human rights. From a jurisprudential perspective, AI implementation should adhere to fundamental legal values such as justice, liberty, and moral responsibility. Therefore, value-based regulatory frameworks are necessary to ensure that the use of AI supports, rather than undermines, the foundational principles of law and human dignity. Keyword: artificial intelligence, law enforcement, legal philosophy. Abstrak: Artikel ini mengkaji bagaimana kecerdasan buatan (Artificial Intelligence/AI) berperan dalam proses penegakan hukum di Indonesia melalui pendekatan filsafat hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif berdasarkan studi literatur terhadap regulasi hukum dan referensi akademik terbaru. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun AI dapat meningkatkan efisiensi dan presisi dalam sistem hukum, kehadirannya juga menimbulkan tantangan serius, terutama dalam aspek keadilan substantif, pertanggungjawaban hukum, dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Dari sudut pandang filsafat hukum, pemanfaatan AI semestinya tunduk pada nilai-nilai dasar hukum seperti keadilan, kebebasan, dan tanggung jawab moral. Oleh karena itu, regulasi berbasis nilai menjadi urgensi untuk menjamin bahwa pemanfaatan teknologi ini tidak menyimpang dari prinsip-prinsip dasar hukum serta nilai-nilai kemanusiaan. Kata kunci: filsafat hukum, kecerdasan buatan, penegakan hukum.  
Legal Protection of Personal Data and Virtual Assets in the Metaverse: A Comparative Study of the United States, China, and South Korea Kandriana, Muhammad; Zuhrah , Zuhrah; Iksan , Iksan; Maulana, Rahmad; Yasir, Muhammad
Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Islamic Criminal Law Department, Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/legitimasi.v14i2.32699

Abstract

The development of the metaverse as a new digital interaction space has given rise to increasingly complex legal challenges regarding the protection of personal data and virtual assets. This situation demonstrates the regulatory gap between countries in responding to the dynamics of the global digital economy. This study examines the comparison of regulations on personal data protection and virtual asset protection in the United States, China, and South Korea, and identifies lessons that can be applied to the Indonesian legal system. Utilizing a normative legal research method through a comparative approach, this study examines primary and secondary legal sources, including laws, national policies, and digital legal doctrines, in each country. The results show that the United States applies a liberal sectoral regulatory model, China adopts a centralistic model based on state control, while South Korea develops a hybrid model that balances innovation and legal protection. The comparative analysis reveals gaps in institutional aspects, regulatory integration, and legal recognition of activities and assets in the metaverse. The results of the study indicate that Indonesia should adopt an adaptive legal framework that comprehensively integrates personal data and virtual asset protection as a guiding principle for ius constituendum in establishing a safe, equitable, and globally competitive metaverse governance.