Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

The Role of Political Communicators in Increasing Voter Participation in Pekanbaru City 2024 Jupendri; Nurrahmi; Saidul Amin
INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : FAKULTAS DAKWAH UIN SALATIGA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/inject.v11i1.6098

Abstract

This study to look how political communicators actually help raise voter turnout in the 2024 Pekanbaru regional election. Even tho direct elections already running for long time and info access is quite ok, the turnout still stuck low at 45.87%. Using qualitative approach inside a constructivist view, this research explore the roles of mayor candidates, political parties, the Election Commission KPU, and also voters in the whole communication process. The findings show that candidate pairs shape their messages and personal branding based on what they think community need, then share it through media they feel is more effective. Political parties give support by pushing the candidate image through community programs. KPU do outreach and voter education that try to suit voter characteristics. Voter turnout is influenced by various factors, including candidate personality, competence, vision and mission, program proposals, party support, past credibility, money politics, and the accessibility of polling stations. In general, turnout increases when political messages are delivered through appropriate media and supported by effective outreach from the Election Commission (KPU). These findings become a base for making better political communication strategy so public participation in regional elections can increase.
Intizar ke Jihad: Paradigma Islam Protes dalam Pemikiran Ali Syari’ati Saifullah, Saifullah; Amin, Saidul; Kasmuri, Kasmuri; Jasman, Febrina Alya; Anggraini, Putri
Manthiq : Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam Vol 10, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Pascasarjana UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mtq.v10i1.10842

Abstract

Abstract: This study analyzes the paradigm of protest Islam in the thought of Ali Syari’ati through the conceptual transformation from intizar to jihad. It aims to explain how Syari’ati reconstructs the meaning of intizar (awaiting) from a passive eschatological attitude into a historical consciousness that critically engages with social injustice. Within this framework, intizar is not understood as a fatalistic stance, but rather as a theological and ethical foundation for committed struggle. Furthermore, this research demonstrates that jihad in Syari’ati’s perspective is not merely physical warfare, but an intellectual, moral, and social struggle to uphold tawhid and to liberate the oppressed (mustadh‘afin) from structures of domination. Islam is thus conceived as a revolutionary force that stands for justice and rejects the religious legitimation of political tyranny and economic inequality. In this context, the role of the enlightened intellectual (raushanfikr) becomes central as an agent of social transformation who awakens the collective consciousness of the community. Using a qualitative library-based approach, this study affirms that the integration of intizar and jihad forms an ideological framework of Islam that is active, critical, and transformative. This paradigm positions faith as a liberating energy that demands concrete engagement in social struggle, so that true awaiting gains meaning only when embodied in action aimed at realizing justice and historical change.Keywords: Ali Syari’ati, intizar, jihad, protest Islam, social transformation. Abstrak: Penelitian ini menganalisis paradigma Islam protes dalam pemikiran Ali Syari’ati melalui transformasi konseptual dari intizar menuju jihad. Penelitian ini bertujuan menjelaskan bagaimana Syari‘ati merekonstruksi makna intizar (penantian) dari sikap eskatologis yang pasif menjadi kesadaran historis yang kritis terhadap ketidakadilan sosial. Dalam kerangka tersebut, intizar tidak dimaknai sebagai sikap fatalistik, melainkan sebagai fondasi teologis dan etis bagi komitmen perjuangan.Lebih lanjut, penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa jihad dalam perspektif Syari‘ati bukan sekadar perang fisik, tetapi perjuangan intelektual, moral, dan sosial untuk menegakkan tauhid serta membebaskan kaum tertindas (mustadh‘afin) dari struktur penindasan. Islam dipahami sebagai kekuatan revolusioner yang berpihak kepada keadilan dan menolak legitimasi religius atas tirani politik maupun ketimpangan ekonomi. Dalam konteks ini, peran intelektual tercerahkan (raushanfikr) menjadi sentral sebagai agen transformasi sosial yang membangkitkan kesadaran kolektif umat.Dengan pendekatan kualitatif berbasis studi kepustakaan, penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa integrasi intizar dan jihad membentuk kerangka ideologis Islam yang aktif, kritis, dan transformatif. Paradigma ini menempatkan iman sebagai energi pembebasan yang menuntut keterlibatan nyata dalam perjuangan sosial, sehingga penantian sejati hanya bermakna ketika diwujudkan dalam aksi untuk menghadirkan keadilan dan perubahan historis.Kata kunci: Ali Syari‘ati, intizar, jihad, Islam protes, transformasi sosial.
Divergent Paths to Moderation: Muhammadiyah, Nahdlatul Ulama, and the Construction of Wasatiyyah in Contemporary Indonesia Saidul Amin; Fakhri, Abrar; Rahim, Adibah Binti Abdul; Fuad, Evans; Hardivizon, Hardivizon
Jurnal Studi Islam dan Kemuhammadiyahan (JASIKA) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jasika.v6i1.242

Abstract

Despite extensive scholarship on Islamic moderation in Indonesia, existing studies have not systematically explained why debates about wasatiyyah persist among actors who share fundamental moderate commitments. This study examines how Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) Indonesia's two largest Islamic organizations construct competing visions of wasatiyyah through Islam Berkemajuan (Progressive Islam) and Islam Nusantara (Archipelagic Islam). Drawing on Gallie's essentially contested concepts, Bourdieu's field theory, and social movement framing theory, the study employs a qualitative comparative case study based on document analysis of official organizational sources from 2015 to 2024. The analysis across four challenges digital radicalism, transnational Islamic movements, state religious moderation policy, and internal diversity reveals that while both organizations share commitments to the Indonesian nation-state, Pancasila, and the rejection of violence, they articulate moderation through systematically different framings, state-positioning strategies, and institutional mechanisms shaped by distinct capital configurations. Muhammadiyah maintains critical distance from state power, emphasizing education-based responses, while NU pursues strategic partnership and mobilization-based approaches. The study demonstrates that wasatiyyah functions as an essentially contested concept whose meaning is constituted through ongoing organizational contestation. These findings contribute to debates on Islamic moderation by showing that the resilience of Indonesian Islam lies in its internal plurality rather than definitional uniformity, with implications for comparative studies in other Muslim-majority contexts