Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.288
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Toleransi: Media Ilmiah komunikasi Umat Beragama An-Nida' Jurnal Pengabdian UntukMu NegeRI Majalah Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Pemikiran Keagamaan Tajdid JURNAL AL-AQIDAH Kafa’ah: Journal of Gender Studies Jurnal Studi Islam dan Kemuhammadiyahan (JASIKA) El-Maqra' : Tafsir, Hadis dan Teologi Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu al-Quran dan Tafsir Al-Qudwah: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hadis
Saidul Amin
Fakultas Ushuluddin Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Divergent Paths to Moderation: Muhammadiyah, Nahdlatul Ulama, and the Construction of Wasatiyyah in Contemporary Indonesia Saidul Amin; Fakhri, Abrar; Rahim, Adibah Binti Abdul; Fuad, Evans; Hardivizon, Hardivizon
Jurnal Studi Islam dan Kemuhammadiyahan (JASIKA) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jasika.v6i1.242

Abstract

Despite extensive scholarship on Islamic moderation in Indonesia, existing studies have not systematically explained why debates about wasatiyyah persist among actors who share fundamental moderate commitments. This study examines how Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) Indonesia's two largest Islamic organizations construct competing visions of wasatiyyah through Islam Berkemajuan (Progressive Islam) and Islam Nusantara (Archipelagic Islam). Drawing on Gallie's essentially contested concepts, Bourdieu's field theory, and social movement framing theory, the study employs a qualitative comparative case study based on document analysis of official organizational sources from 2015 to 2024. The analysis across four challenges digital radicalism, transnational Islamic movements, state religious moderation policy, and internal diversity reveals that while both organizations share commitments to the Indonesian nation-state, Pancasila, and the rejection of violence, they articulate moderation through systematically different framings, state-positioning strategies, and institutional mechanisms shaped by distinct capital configurations. Muhammadiyah maintains critical distance from state power, emphasizing education-based responses, while NU pursues strategic partnership and mobilization-based approaches. The study demonstrates that wasatiyyah functions as an essentially contested concept whose meaning is constituted through ongoing organizational contestation. These findings contribute to debates on Islamic moderation by showing that the resilience of Indonesian Islam lies in its internal plurality rather than definitional uniformity, with implications for comparative studies in other Muslim-majority contexts
SIKAP IBNU KATSIR TERHADAP NARASI ISRAILIYAT: STUDI KASUS KISAH NABI ILYAS AS DAN RELEVANSINYA DALAM TAFSIR AL-QURAN AL-AZIM Syabil, Zafran; Akbar, Ali; M, Afrizal; Hakim, Lukmanul; Amin, Saidul
EL-MAQRA' Vol 6 No 2 (2026): November (In Progress)
Publisher : IAIN KENDARI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31332/elmaqra.v6i2.14807

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji riwayat Israiliyyat dalam kisah Nabi Ilyas pada Tafsir al-Qur’an al-‘Aẓīm karya Ibn Katsir dengan fokus pada sumber transmisi dan respons epistemik mufasir. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan library research. Data dianalisis melalui identifikasi narasi, penelusuran sumber dan atribusi riwayat, serta analisis terhadap cara Ibn Katsir menyampaikan dan merespons setiap riwayat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya lima narasi Israiliyyat yang berkaitan dengan identifikasi Ilyas dengan Idris, silsilah Ilyas, identitas Ba‘l, pengangkatan Ilyas dengan kendaraan dari api, dan penahanan hujan selama tiga tahun. Riwayat-riwayat tersebut dinisbahkan kepada Qatadah, Muhammad ibn Ishaq, Ibn Mas‘ud, al-Dhahhak, Wahb ibn Munabbih, dan Ahl al-Kitab. Empat riwayat ditransmisikan tanpa afirmasi atau validasi eksplisit terhadap substansinya, sedangkan riwayat pengangkatan Ilyas memperoleh tawaqquf eksplisit melalui ungkapan wallāhu a‘lamu bi ṣiḥḥatihi yang menunjukkan penangguhan penilaian terhadap validitasnya. Dengan demikian, respons Ibn Katsir terhadap Israiliyyat dalam kisah Nabi Ilyas tidak bersifat biner antara penerimaan dan penolakan, tetapi menunjukkan diferensiasi epistemik melalui atribusi, transmisi, dan penanda ketidakpastian. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa keberadaan suatu riwayat dalam tafsir tidak secara otomatis menunjukkan penerimaan mufasir terhadap kebenaran substansinya.
Co-Authors Afrizal M Afrizal Nur Afrizal Nur Ali Akbar Doni Winarso, Doni Evans Fuad Fakhri, Abrar Fatmah Taufik Hidayat Hardivizon Hardivizon Hendri sayuti Jani Arni Khairiah Khairiah Lukmanul Hakim Lukmanul Hakim Mizan Asnawi Nanda Riswanda Pohan Pohan , Nanda Riswanda Putra, Aldomi Putra, Masyhuri Rahim, Adibah Binti Abdul Rahman, Syahrul Rini Maharini Santoso Setiawati, Poppy Silva Khayrani Siti Khoiriah Hasibuan Syabil, Zafran