Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.235
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Arbitrer ISLLAC : Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture Surya Abdimas Waskita: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan Karakter Wahana Dedikasi : Jurnal PkM Ilmu Kependidikan Jurnal bahasa, sastra, seni, dan pengajarannya Journal of Language, Literature, and Arts (JoLLA)
Novi Eka Susilowati
Universitas Negeri Malang
Arts Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Alleged case of blasphemy on podcast: Forensic linguistic analysis Novi Eka Susilowati; Sailal Arimi; Surahmat Surahmat; Fardan Mahmudatul Imamah
Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya Vol 51, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Sastra Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um015v51i22023p225

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the linguistic features that allegedly contained elements of blasphemy in Jenderal Dudung Abdurrachman's (JDA) speech. The analysis was carried out using a forensic linguistic perspective. This research data is in the form of JDA utterances delivered in a broadcast conducted with Deddy Corbuzier (DC). Based on a forensic linguistic analysis of the text of JDA's conversation with DC on Deddy Corbuzier's podcast, it can be concluded that JDA's linguistic evidence does not support blasphemy but a lack of knowledge in religion, especially in matters of faith. Due to the lack of knowledge of religion, JDA interprets religion and personifies God according to his understanding. In JDA's speech, there is also no intention to tarnish religion because the controversial JDA's speech cannot be interpreted partially but can be interpreted with other speeches. If it is related to other utterances, it can be concluded that there is no intention of JDA to tarnish religion. However, there are efforts by JDA to invite audiences to follow JDA's understanding and interpretation of religion.Dugaan kasus penodaan agama di podcast: Analisis linguistik forensikTujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis fitur kebahasaan yang diduga memuat unsur penodaan agama dalam tuturan Jenderal Dudung Abdurrachman (JDA). Analisis dilakukan dengan menggunakan perspektif linguistik forensik. Data penelitian ini berupa tuturan JDA yang disampaikan dalam siniar yang dilakukan bersama Deddy Corbuzier. Berdasarkan analisis linguistik forensik atas teks perbincangan JDA dengan DC di siniar DC, dapat disimpulkan bahwa tuturan JDA bukti-bukti kebahasaan tidak mendukung adanya penodaan agama, melainkan kurangnya pengetahuan dalam beragama, terutama dalam hal akidah. Akibat kurangnya pengetahuan dalam beragama tersebut, JDA menafsirkan agama dan mempersonifikasi Tuhan sesuai dengan pemahamannya. Dalam tuturan JDA juga tidak terdapat niat untuk menodai agama karena tuturan JDA yang kontroversial tersebut tidak dapat dimaknai secara parsial, melainkan dimaknai secara menyeluruh dengan tuturan-tuturan lain. Jika dikaitkan dengan tuturan yang lain, dapat disimpulkan bahwa tidak ada niat JDA untuk menodai agama. Meski demikian, terdapat upaya JDA untuk mengajak audiens agar mengikuti pemahaman dan penafsiran JDA tentang agama.
Hashtags as Digital Mobilisation: A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of #IndonesiaGelap Novi Eka Susilowati; Nadia Khumairo Ma'shumah; Arina Isti'anah
Jurnal Arbitrer Vol. 13 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ar.13.2.175-189.2026

Abstract

Protest discourse has become a fruitful source of data for critical studies, as reflected in the Indonesian socio-political landscape in early 2025. As social media plays an important role in disseminating information and shaping public discourse, narratives and hashtags related to the protests quickly gained widespread attention and became trending topics on social media. This study investigates how digital activism is represented through the #IndonesiaGelap “Dark Indonesia” hashtag on X. This study adopted a corpus-assisted discourse approach to analyse 16,103 posts through the analytical framework of Theo van Leeuwen’s Social Actor Theory. The quantitative and qualitative analyses demonstrate that Indonesian citizens use the hashtag to express their rejection, criticism, mobilisation, and solidarity by involving particular social actors. Therefore, netizens used proper names referring to political elites to represent the most dominant social actors, which serves as a discursive strategy to blame the worsening political situation in Indonesia. In addition, the corpus reveals that many users associated those events with previous presidential elections, which they perceived as being controlled by political dynasties, with the metaphor of “dark” reinforcing these negative evaluations. These findings indicate that hashtags functioned to construct the ideological distinction between “us”, represented by citizens, and “them”, represented by the Indonesian government, elites, and media. This study emphasises the function of hashtags in shaping online political dissent and democratic debate.
Co-Authors - Martutik Abdul Syukur Ibrahim Anang Santoso Arina Isti’anah Ariva Luciandika Ary Fawzi, Ary Astri Widyaruli Anggraeni Cicik Tri Jayanti Dewi Ariani Didin Widyartono Ersita Noor Mahliga Fardan Mahmudatul Imamah Fauziyyah Zahra Swandalia Ika Puput Oktavia Kumalasari Muhammad Hambali Muhammad Hambali Nadia Khumairo Ma'shumah Sailal Arimi Sumadi Suparno Suparno Suparno Suparno Surahmat Surahmat Surahmat Trisna Andarwulan