Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2021 - 2026

4.566

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Wacana Hukum DE JURE Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Hukum Islam Jurnal Cita Hukum Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM UIR LAW REVIEW Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Selat Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Law Review Jurnal Yudisial PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Pagaruyuang Law Journal Borneo Law Review Journal LEGAL BRIEF Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy ARSY : Jurnal Aplikasi Riset kepada Masyarakat JHCLS Indonesian Community Journal Yuridika Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan SASI Lex Scientia Law Review

Suparto Suparto

Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Riau

Author-ID : 2396556

Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 54 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Title

Perbandingan Model Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia Dengan Komisi Yudisial Perancis Suparto, Suparto
UIR Law Review Vol 3 No 01 (2019): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

The standing of the Judiciary Commitee, thus structurally it wascreated on the same level with the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court.Even so, the nature of the Judiciary Committee is an auxiliary to the judiciary bodies.Even if the function of the Judiciary Committee is related with Judiciary power, yet it is not the actor of the Judiciary power, but an institution to uphold the code of ethics. Aside from that, the Judiciary Committee is not involved in the organization, human resources, administration, and financial matters of the judges. This is different with the similar committees in the Europe, i.e. France. The France Council for Judiciary has the authority in the technical field as well as the policy making in the judiciary bodies. The judciary committees of the France and Europe in general has the authority in the management of the organization, budgeting, and administration of the courts, including on promotion, rotation, recruitment, and the giving of a sanction to the judges. The Supreme Court itself focuses on the trial conduct, and does not handles the administration and the organization of the court.

Pengujian UU No. 27 Tahun 2009 Dan UU No. 17 Tahun 2014 Tentang MPR, DPR, DPD & DPRD (MD3) Sebagai Upaya DPD Untuk Mengembalikan Kewenangan Konstitusionalnya Suparto Suparto
UIR Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Dalam UU No. 27 Tahun 2009 Tentang MPR, DPR, DPD & DPRD (MD3) banyak kewenangan DPD yang tereduksi, sehingga DPD melakukan pengujian UU tersebut ke Mahkamah Konstitusi. Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui putusan No. 92/PUU-X/2012 mengembalikan kewenangan DPD sebagaimana yang diatur oleh UUD 1945. Namun demikian walaupun sudah ada putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 92/PUU-X/2012 akan tetapi dalam UU No. 17 Tahun 2014 Tentang MD3 yang merupakan pengganti dari UU No. 27 Tahun 2009, DPR kembali melanggarnya dengan mengabaikan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut sehingga DPD akhirnya kembali mengajukan judicial review. Kemudian Mahkamah Konstitusi mengeluarkan putusan No. 79/PUU-XII/2014 yang mengembalikan lagi kewenanangan DPD, tetapi DPR tetap mengabaikannya dengan tidak mengakomodirnya dalam Tata Tertib (Tatib). Oleh karena itu kedepan DPR dan Presiden sebagai institusi negara yang mempunyai kewenangan untuk membentuk UU agar mematuhi dan menjalankan keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, karena bagaimanapun putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi itu adalah sama derajatnya dengan Undang-Undang. Kata kunci : Judicial Review, Kewenangan, DPD

Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Pemilu Serentak Terhadap Pencalonan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Pada Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2019 Ellydar Chaidir; Suparto Suparto
UIR Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Proyeksi pengaturan pencalonan pasangan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden pada pemilu tahun 2019 (pemilu serentak) berdasarkan pengalaman dan undang-undang yang pernah digunakan dalam pilpres secara langsung ada beberapa alternatif yaitu ; 1). Semua partai politik yang lulus verifikasi dan ditetapkan sebagai peserta pemilu legislatif berhak mengusulkan pasangan calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden artinya tanpa adanya ambang batas pencalonan (presidential threshold) 2). Memberlakukan ambang batas pencalonan (presidential threshold) dengan beberapa varian yaitu Pasangan calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden diusulkan oleh partai politik atau gabungan partai politik yang memperoleh ; a). Sekurang-kurangnya 20% kursi di DPR atau 25% suara sah nasional. b). Sekurang-kurangnya 15% kursi di DPR atau 20% suara sah nasional c). Sekurang-kurangnya 3% kursi di DPR atau 5% suara sah nasional. d). Memperoleh kursi di DPR atau presidential threshold sama dengan parliamentary threshold. Kata kunci: Pemilihan Umum, Presidential Threshold, Parliamentary Threshold ABSTRACT Regulation on President and Vice President candidacy in the general elections of 2019 (simultaneous elections) has several alternatives; 1). All the political parties that pass the verification procedures and have rights to enter legislative are is entitled to propose candidates for President and Vice President, which means without any presidential threshold 2). Impose presidential threshold with some variants namely Candidate Pair of President and Vice President shall be nominated by a political party or coalition of political parties that gain; a). At least 20% of the seats in the House of Representatives or 25% of the valid votes nationwide. b). At least 15% of the seats in the House of Representatives or 20% of the valid votes nationwide c). At least 3% of the seats in the House of Representatives or 5% of the valid votes nationwide. d). Gain seats in the House of Representatives or presidential threshold is equal with parliamentary threshold. Keywords: General Election, Presidential Threshold, Parliamentary Threshold

Perlunya Pengawasan Terhadap Kode Etik Dan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Rangka Menjaga Martabat Dan Kehormatannya: The Need For Supervision On Constitutional Court Judges’ Code Of Ethics & Behavior In Order To Uphold Their Dignity And Honor Ellydar Chaidir; Suparto Suparto
UIR Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

In the beginning, the external supervision on Constitutional Court Judges’ ethics and behavior was conducted by Judicial Commission. That was in accordance with the stipulation in Law No. 22 of 2004 and Law No. 4 of 2004. Yet the activity of supervision itself has yet to be conducted, due to Constitutional Court Ruling No. 005/PUU-IV/2006, which stated that Constitutional Court Judges are not subject to Judicial Commission’s supervision. Hence, the supervision was conducted internally by Constitutional Court itself. After the issuance of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (“PERPU”) No. 1 of 2013 on Second Amendment to Law No. 24 of 2003 (Law No. 4 of 2014), the authority of external supervision was once again being held by Judicial Commission. But with Constitutional Court Ruling No. 1-2/PUU-XII/2014, the PERPU was once again being canceled. Hence, the supervision on the judges is conducted internally via the Board of Ethics of the Constitutional Court. In the future, Constitutional Court Judges must be supervised by external body, but without violating their independency as judges. Yet, since Constitutional Court as the interpreter of Constitution once interpret the scope of “judges” in article 24B (1) of 1945 Constitution are limited to the Judge and Supreme Court Justice (Not including Constitutional Court Judge), to be able to conduct an external supervision to them, a revision on article 24B (1) of 1945 Constitution needs to be conducted.

Perbandingan Model Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia Dengan Komisi Yudisial Perancis Suparto Suparto
UIR Law Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Interpreting The State's Right to Control In the provisions of Article 33 Paragraph (3), The Constitution of 1945 Republic of Indonesia Suparto Suparto
UIR Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2020.vol4(2).6889

Article 33 paragraph (3) of The Constitution Republic of Indonesia in 1945 stipulates that "Earth, water and natural resources contained therein controlled by the State and used for the people's welfare". Understanding of the earth (which is called land) according to the provisions of Article 1 paragraph (4) of Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Basic Agrarian Issues is the surface of the earth and the body of the earth underneath it and which is under water. The meaning of the provisions of Article 33 paragraph (3) in The Constitution of 1945 is that the State as the highest power organization of all people (the nation) acts as the Governing Body. The right to control the State or be controlled by the State in this article does not mean "owned", but in the sense of giving authority to the State as the highest power organization of the Indonesian nation. The Constitutional Court elaborated State's Right to Control becomes 5 (five) authorities whose purpose is as much as possible for the prosperity of the people, including: (1). Formulate policy (beleid), (2). Make arrangements (regelendaad), (3). Carry out management (bestuurdaad), (4). Carry out management (beheerdaad), and (5). Supervise (toeichthoudensdaad). The earth, water and natural resources contained in the earth are the main points of people's prosperity, therefore they must be controlled by the State and used for the greatest prosperity of the people.

Problematika Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Dan Wakil Kepala Daerah Secara Langsung Atau Tidak Langsung Dalam Prespektif Demokrasi Ibnususilo, Efendi
UIR Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2024.vol8(2).19473

The election of regional heads and deputy regional heads is one of the things that has sparked attention lately, because the 2024 general elections will soon be held even though the implementation does not coincide with the election of the President and Vice President and the election of legislative members. Nevertheless, there are still many people who compare the election of regional heads and deputy regional heads directly or indirectly considering that the performance results of the regional heads and deputy regional heads have not seen the expected results. In fact, both direct and indirect elections have their own advantages and disadvantages so there is no need to debate because basically both elections are democratic elections

Co-Authors A Admiral Adinda, Fadhel Arjuna Admiral , Admiral Admiral Admiral Ardiansyah Ardiansyah ARDIANSYAH ARDIANSYAH Chatarina Umbul Wahyuni David Hardiago Dedy Gusniawan Deni Jaya Saputra Despan Heryansyah Efendi Ibnu Susilo Efendi Ibnususilo Ellydar Chaidir Ellydar Chaidir, Ellydar Esanov, Azamat Esirgapovich Faishal Taufiqurrahman Halimah Abdul Manaf Heni Pujiastuti Hyeonsoo, Kim M. Rafi Monika Melina Muhammad Faizal Pahlevi Namazovna, Sultanova Dilshoda Naurah Dwirengganis Riata Putri Normurotovna, Zamira Esanova Pahmi Amri Puti Mayang Seruni Riauan, Muhd Ar. Imam Santos, Jose Gama Susilo, Efendi Ibnu Syafrinaldi, Rani Fadhila Umi Muslikhah Wira Atma Hajri, Wira Atma Zainal

Title Search

Found 7 Documents Search Journal : UIR LAW REVIEW

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search
Journal : UIR LAW REVIEW