Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Eksistensi dan Karakteristik Putusan Bersyarat Mahkamah Konstitusi Faiz Rahman; Dian Agung Wicaksono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (482.55 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1326

Abstract

The result of this legal research show the existence of conditionally constitutional and conditionally unconstitutional decision in reviewing laws from 2003 to 2015, although that model of decision is not regulated in the positive law.  There are 5 characteristics of conditionally constitutional decision, those are (1)  Court  gives interpretation or certain requirements in order to remain constitutional provisions tested throughout implemented according to the specified requirements of the Constitutional Court; (2) based on the rejected verdict; (3) a conditionally constitutional clause can be found only on the consideration of the Court, or can be found on the judgment and injunction; (4) conditionally constitutional decision require re-judicial review if the norm is not in line with the interpretation of the Constitutional Court; (5) encouraging legislative review. Regarding the conditionally unconstitutional decision, there are 4 characteristics, those are (1) the verdict certainly include a conditionally unconstitutional clause; (2) a conditionally verdict can be the meaning or interpretation of a norm, or give the terms of the norm is unconstitutional; (3) based on the granted verdict either partially or completely; (4) does not substantially different from the conditionally constitutional clause.
Pemetaan Pola Permohonan dan Putusan dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang dengan Substansi Hukum Islam Dian Agung Wicaksono; Faiz Rahman; Khotibul Umam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (489.523 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1832

Abstract

The existence of Islamic law substance in national law, specifically in an Act, has been indirectly placed the Constitutional Court in the position that also has a role in determining the development of Islamic law in the national law system. It can be seen in the context of judicial review of Act that has Islamic law substance or that explicitly regulates Islamic law. This research specifically answers: (a) how is the justification of the inclusion of Islamic law in Indonesian national law? (b) how are the pattern of judicial review petitions and court decisions of Acts related to Islamic law? This research is normative-juridical research, which analyses secondary data such as laws and regulations, Constitutional Court decisions, and articles related to the inclusion of Islamic law in the national law. The results show that the justification of the accommodation of Islamic law in the national law system is related to the construction of state and religion relationship. It indicates that Indonesia is not a religious state, but it is a state that has a divine principle. Furthermore, based on the analysis of judicial review decisions from 2003 to 2019, the pattern of petitions and court decisions of judicial reviews of laws related to Islamic law substance shows at least three main petitions, namely: (a) questioning state intervention in the implementation of Islamic law; (b) questioning the administration of the implementation of Islamic law; (c) petitions for the inclusion of Islamic law in the positive law.
Justifikasi Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Karena Efisiensi Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Dan Relevansinya Dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 19/PUU-IX/2011 Dian Agung Wicaksono; Enny Nurbaningsih
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (429.902 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1827

Abstract

This conceptual article aims to analyze about the justification and legal aspect of employment termination because of efficiency phenomenon in covid-19 pandemic period. Article 164 paragraph 4 Manpower Act and Constitutional Court Decision Number 19/PUU-IX/2011 already stipulated that employment termination because of efficiency must be followed by company closure. But, covid-19 pandemic situation was forcing the employers to do employment termination because of efficiency without a company closure. The conclusion of this article is the employers did the termination without the company closure based on consideration that, it would prevent more damage than did it with the closure. The company closure would bring result all of workers, including the employers, loss their jobs. The employment termination because of efficiency, but without company closure could be preserved the operational of company and maintain the other workers’ jobs. This efficiency reason is not actually prohibited in Article 153 paragraph 1 Manpower Act and in ILO’s Convention and Recommendation 1982. However, this termination could not use Article 164 paragraph 4 Manpower Act and Constitutional Court Decision Number 19/PUU-IX/2011 as the legal basis. The compensation formulation model of the termination could use the formulation of termination without worker’s fault as stipulated by Manpower Act. In addition, the institutions of industrial relaton dispute resolution must supervise the termination process, in order the process would be staged fairly, coincide with the principles of legal termination, and the workers’s compensastion would be fulfilled by the employers.
Revitalisasi Sumber Daya Manusia Polri Untuk Sinergitas Kinerja Dalam Integrated Criminal Justice System Wicaksono, Dian Agung
Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia Vol. 16, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

human resources, integrated criminal justice system, police education
Influencing or Intervention? Impact of Constitutional Court Decisions on the Supreme Court in Indonesia Dian Agung Wicaksono; Faiz Rahman
Constitutional Review Vol 8, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/consrev823

Abstract

The third amendment of Indonesia’s 1945 Constitution, conducted in 2001, had significant implications for the nation’s judiciary. It transformed the judiciary from a single to a dual structure. Consequently, there are two apexes of the judiciary: the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. Furthermore, the establishment of the Constitutional Court divided judicial review authority between the two apex courts. The Constitutional Court can review laws against the Constitution, while the Supreme Court has the power to review whether regulations, made under laws, contradict such laws. Although the Indonesian Constitution provides explicit delineations over the absolute competence of judicial review, the division of judicial review has often triggered tension between the two courts. The Constitution allows the Supreme Court to have additional authorities granted by laws. On the other hand, the Constitutional Court has the power to review any law against the Constitution, including laws related to the Supreme Court. This article seeks to answer the important question of whether the Constitutional Court could influence or intervene in the Supreme Court through judicial review. The authors argue that the duality of judicial review authority unintentionally causes an imbalance in the functional relationship between the two apexes of the judiciary. The main reason is that the Constitutional Court can influence or intervene in the Supreme Court through constitutional review authority. The authors examine two essential aspects of this: (1) the functional implications of duality of judicial review authority; and (2) the implementation of the Constitutional Court’s authority in reviewing laws, especially those closely related to the Supreme Court’s authorities. Various cases are examined to illustrate how the Constitutional Court could directly or indirectly influence the Supreme Courts’ authorities. The Constitutional Court, however, often seems to ‘play safe’ to maintain the judiciary’s imbalanced relationship caused by the dualism of judicial review authority.
PENGELOLAAN ARSIP KELEMBAGAAN PANWAS KABUPATEN MANGGARAI DALAM MENDUKUNG PELAKSANAAN FUNGSI DEMOKRASI: Array Dian Agung Wicaksono; Daisyta Mega Sari
Jurnal Kearsipan Vol 11 No 1 (2016): -
Publisher : Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pemerintah menetapkan Kabupaten Manggarai sebagai satu dari 205 daerah yang masuk dalam tahapan pertama menuju penyelenggaraan Pilkada serentak pada tahun 2020 mendatang. Penyelenggaraan Pilkada tersebut dilaksanakan pada tahun 2015. Panwas selaku organ yang menjalankan fungsi pengawasan di Kabupaten Manggarai sayangnya belum optimal karena pengaruh beberapa faktor, seperti kompleksitas Pilkada, tingginya potensi sengketa/konflik, keterlambatan pelantikan komisioner Panwas, serta diperparah dengan kurangnya manajemen internal kelembagaan itu sendiri. Lebih lanjut, realisasi fungsi pengawasan ini masih sebatas pada konteks represif, sementara pada konteks preventif masih belum terlaksana dengan baik. Hal ini tak lain karena tidak adanya arsip kerja kelembagaan Panwas terdahulu yang sebenarnya dapat dijadikan sebagai modal perbaikan kerja lembaga ke depan, serta dapat ditindaklanjuti dengan analisis pemetaansengketa/konflik Pilkada di Kabupaten Manggarai.
QUO VADIS PENGATURAN DESA SEBAGAI PENERIMA TUGAS PEMBANTUAN (STUDI KASUS KALURAHAN DALAM MELAKSANAKAN URUSAN KEISTIMEWAAN DI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA) Wicaksono, Dian Agung; Mulyani, Cora Kristin
Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Vol 12, No 1 (2023): Tinjauan Yuridis Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Desa
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v12i1.1116

Abstract

Keberlakuan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa memberikan implikasi yang signifikan terhadap kedudukan desa dalam sistem ketatanegaraan di Indonesia. Akan tetapi terdapat beberapa diskursus yang muncul salah satunya berkaitan dengan pengaturan distribusi urusan pemerintahan. Pencermatan terhadap topik tersebut semakin menunjukkan urgensinya ketika melihat praktik yang terjadi di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta di mana desa (dalam konteks keistimewaan DIY disebut Kalurahan) dimungkinkan untuk menerima distribusi urusan pemerintahan berupa urusan keistimewaan. Tulisan ini menjawab rumusan masalah sebagai berikut: (a) Bagaimana pengaturan mengenai Desa sebagai penerima tugas pembantuan dalam hukum positif di Indonesia? (b) Bagaimana pengaturan Kalurahan sebagai penerima tugas pembantuan berupa urusan keistimewaan di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta? Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menganalisis data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan yang relevan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat ketidakharmonisan dalam konstruksi pengaturan desa sebagai penerima tugas pembantuan dan pemberian penugasan kepada Kalurahan di DIY didasari pada pemaknaan yang diperluas dari ketentuan dalam Perdais 1/2018, yang kemudian dijadikan dasar dalam Pergub 13/2022 untuk memberikan penugasan berupa urusan keistimewaan kepada Kalurahan.
QUO VADIS PENDIRIAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MENGUJI UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KEGAMANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MELAKSANAKAN KEWENANGAN MENGATUR Wicaksono, Dian Agung
Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Vol 11, No 1 (2022): April 2022
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (590.433 KB) | DOI: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i1.846

Abstract

Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 perihal pengujian formil UU Cipta Kerja (UU CK) menimbulkan diskursus dalam ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Hal ini semakin problematik dengan terbitnya Instruksi Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 68/2021 yang menimbulkan kebingungan bagi Pemerintah Daerah dalam melaksanakan kewenangan mengatur terkait pelaksanaan UU CK. Tanpa bermaksud membuat hegemoni kebenaran atas tafsir terhadap Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, penelitian ini bermaksud untuk memberikan alternatif tafsir atas pertimbangan hukum dan amar putusan yang dituangkan dalam Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, dengan berfokus pada permasalahan: (a) Bagaimana alternatif penafsiran atas pertimbangan hukum dan amar Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 perihal pengujian formil UU CK? (b) Bagaimana konsistensi pendirian MK dalam menguji UU CK? (c) Bagaimana implikasi normatif keberadaan Inmendagri 68/2021 terhadap kewenangan mengatur Pemerintah Daerah dalam melaksanakan UU CK? Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, dengan menganalisis data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan putusan MK yang terkait dengan pengujian UU CK. Hasil dari penelitian ini memberikan alternatif penafsiran atas pertimbangan hukum dan amar Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 adalah UU CK seharusnya dibaca tetap memiliki daya laku (validity) dan daya ikat (efficacy) secara bersyarat dan hanya berlaku bagi hal-hal yang bersifat strategis namun tidak berdampak luas, sehingga tidak ada alasan untuk tidak melaksanakan UU CK sepanjang syaratnya dipenuhi.
Mencari Jejak Konsep Judicial Restraint Dalam Praktik Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia Wicaksono, Dian Agung; Tonralipu, Andi Sandi Antonius Tabusassa
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The decision on judicial review of Laws by the Constitutional Court was allegedly not fully obeyed by the parties affected by the decision. One form of disobedience tothe judicial review decision by the Constitutional Courtwas shown by the Supreme Court concerning the decision related to the opening of the opportunity to submit a Peninjauan Kembali more than once, which was responded by the Supreme Court with internalregulations which emphasized that Peninjauan Kembali could only be done once.From the phenomenon, this research tries to trace the concept of judicial restraint in the practice of judicial power in Indonesia, as well as measuring the implementation and justification of the concept of judicial restraint in the practice of judicialpower in Indonesia. This is normative legal research that uses secondary data. The results indicate that the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court are expected to have the awareness to apply judicial restraint in the exercise of judicial review authority.
Dynamics of Granting Legal Standing to the Indigenous Community in Constitutional Review of Law: Dinamika Pemberian Kedudukan Hukum Pemohon bagi Masyarakat Hukum Adat dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Wicaksono, Dian Agung
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2037

Abstract

The research on the existence of Indigenous Community (IC) is interesting to discuss heretofore. Previous studies have discussed the relationship between IC and Constitutional Court (CC) authority in judicial review of the Law (JR). Still, no research has comprehensively mapped the dynamics of granting the Litigants' legal standing to IC in JR since the establishment of CC. This research aims to obtain a portrait of the dynamics and basis of CC for granting legal standing to IC as a Litigant in JR and providing a basic proposal for determining IC’s legal standing as a Litigant in JR. This normative legal research analyzes secondary data by comprehensively mapping decisions on JR with IC as Petitioner since CC was established in 2003 to 2019. The study's results indicate several patterns of legal considerations and the basis of legal considerations for the CC in granting legal standing to IC as Litigants in JR.