Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.572
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Media Hukum Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Melayunesia Law Varia Justicia Jurnal Yuridis Community Development Journal Indonesia Berdaya Jurnal Jarlit Borobudur Law and Society Journal Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues Prosiding Seminar Nasional Unimus Contrarius
Deslaely Putranti
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Perlindungan Hukum atas Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional dan Eksistensi Masyarakat Hukum Adat Kampung Pitu Isdiyanto, Ilham Yuli; Putranti, Deslaely
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 15, No 2 (2021): July Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Research and Development Agency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2021.V15.231-256

Abstract

Masyarakat Kampung Pitu masih memegang tradisi dan budaya asal usulnya hingga sekarang, bahkan jumlah Kepala Keluarga yang tidak boleh lebih dari 7 (tujuh) juga masih bertahan hingga sekarang. Sebagai masyarakat tradisional yang khas, masyarakat Kampung Pitu memiliki berbagai macam bentuk Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional (EBT) yang disisi lain hal ini perlu mendapatkan perhatian serius oleh pemerintah. Regulasi di Indonesia mengatur perlindungan EBT melalui UU No. 28/2014 tentang Hak Cipta, sehingga dapat menjadi perlindungan EBT masyarakat Kampung Pitu agar tetap lestari. Penelitian ini menjadi sangat penting karena tidak banyak masyarakat tradisional yang mempertahankan hak asal-usulnya di wilayah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif dan pengumpulan data baik primer maupun sekunder yang diperoleh secara daring serta analisa deskriptif-kualitatif. Hasilnya, masyarakat Kampung Pitu dapat dikategorikan sebagai Masyarakat Hukum Adat yang memiliki hak identitas dan tradisional atas asal-usulnya sehingga harus dilindungi dalam pelestariannya. Walaupun tidak ada regulasi ataupun penetapan dari tingkat Pusat sampai Daerah terkait Kampung Pitu, namun Kampung Pitu sudah ditetapkan sebagai Warisan Budaya Takbenda sehingga menjadi dasar perlindungan.
Perlindungan Indikasi Geografis oleh Masyarakat Perlindungan Indikasi Geografis Pasca Sertifikasi di Yogyakarta Putranti, Deslaely; Indriyani, Dewi Analis
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 15, No 3 (2021): November Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Research and Development Agency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2021.V15.395-414

Abstract

Indikasi Geografis (IG) pada produk selama ini diklaim sebagai produk premium yang dapat meningkatkan pendapatan jika digunakan dan dilindungi dengan baik. Namun, tidak semua produk IG yang terdaftar mengalami kenaikan harga secara signifikan pasca sertifikasi seperti Salak Pondoh Sleman dan IG Batik Tulis Nitik Yogyakarta. Metode pengumpulan data penelitian ini dilakukan melalui wawancara secara virtual, observasi dan studi dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa setelah sertifikasi IG, MPIG Salak Pondoh Sleman sampai saat ini belum menunjukkan peningkatan, khususnya pada nilai tambah dari hasil produksi salak. Faktor yang sangat mempengaruhi adalah kurangnya pemahaman terkait Indikasi Geografis, baik pedagang maupun konsumen. Masyarakat belum mampu membedakan antara salak yang sudah tersertifikasi IG maupun tidak tersertifikasi. Ketidakjelasan fungsi dan tumpang tindih antara MPIG dan asosiasi sebagai “managing group” pada IG Salak Pondoh Sleman membuat pengelolaan IG Salak Pondoh Sleman tidak maksimal. Sebaliknya, MPIG Batik Tulis Nitik Yogyakarta justru mengalami peningkatan hasil produksi hingga lebih dari 50%. Saat pandemi, MPIG Batik Tulis Nitik Yogyakarta tetap produktif karena kekompakan dan komunikasi yang baik antara MPIG Batik Tulis Nitik Yogyakarta dengan para stakeholder serta penanaman edukasi pentingnya IG dan kecintaan terhadap seni khas daerah tersebut.
Tax Conflicts Policy in Thrifting between Trade Law and Tax Law Ibnususilo, Efendi; Taufiqurrahman, Faishal; Deslaely Putranti
Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jsderi.v4i1.223

Abstract

The rapid expansion of thrifting practices in Indonesia has generated complex legal challenges, particularly at the intersection of trade law and tax law. This condition gives rise to a policy conflict in which thrifting activities, although prohibited under trade regulations, continue to generate economic transactions that may fall within the scope of taxation. This study adopts a normative juridical approach to examine the nature of this conflict and to assess potential regulatory responses. The analysis demonstrates that imposing taxation on economic activities derived from prohibited imports creates legal ambiguity and risks undermining the enforcement of trade law by implicitly legitimizing unlawful practices. Accordingly, the principle of legality within the tax system must be upheld by ensuring that taxation aligns with the normative framework governing trade. This study proposes a regulatory harmonization model that integrates trade, taxation, and customs policies through the reconstruction of legal norms, the strengthening of cross sectoral supervision, and the clarification of legal boundaries concerning taxable activities. Such harmonization is necessary to establish legal certainty, prevent regulatory loopholes, and ensure that fiscal policy operates consistently with national legal and economic objectives.
The Impact of Asset Recovery Regulations on Corruption Cases in Indonesian: A Leap Forward? Shalihah, Fithriatus; Bakhshillo Kamolovich Khojaev; Fitrat Umirov; Mohammad Ishaque Husain; Deslaely Putranti
Contrarius Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v2i3.297

Abstract

The central problem lies in the structural limitations of the asset recovery regime under the Anti-Corruption Law, which requires a criminal conviction for confiscation. This restriction has hindered full recovery of state losses, particularly in cases involving hidden or transferred assets and transnational challenges. The research aims to assess the paradigmatic nature of Indonesia’s asset forfeiture reform by analysing its conceptual transformation, constitutional legitimacy, and systemic coherence. This research employs a normative juridical method, relying on statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The research reveals that, first, the shift from conviction-based forfeiture to non-conviction-based (NCB) forfeiture reflects an emerging transformation from offender-oriented justice toward asset-oriented justice. However, in Indonesia, this transformation remains transitional and has not yet restructured the philosophical and institutional foundations of asset recovery. Second, the comparative analysis demonstrates that the United Kingdom has successfully institutionalised civil recovery mechanisms within a strong framework of judicial oversight and proportionality, supported by human rights safeguards, thereby illustrating that effectiveness and constitutional protection are not mutually exclusive. Finally, Indonesia’s reform, while normatively progressive, still depends on harmonisation with constitutional guarantees and requires clearer standards of proof, differentiated procedural safeguards, and stronger institutional coordination to ensure systemic coherence and prevent abuse of power. The research recommends adopting a hybrid-restorative constitutional model of asset forfeiture. Such a model should provide limited autonomy for non-conviction-based confiscation, integrate early asset tracking and freezing mechanisms, apply differentiated standards of proof, and embed strict constitutional safeguards through effective judicial review and proportionality principles.
Co-Authors Alda Kartika Yudha Aska, Ghoniyun Nisa Uskhulil Bakhshillo Kamolovich Khojaev Chrisna Bagus Edhita Praja Difaul Husna Efendi Ibnususilo Eko Prabowo, Husni Faishal Taufiqurrahman Farah Farida Tantiani, Farah Farida Fauzan Muhammadi Fithriatus Shalihah Fitrat Umirov Hidayah, Laelatul Ibdal, Ibdal Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto Imaduddin, Zhorif Agung Indriyani, Dewi Analis Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny Marwa, Muhammad Habibi Miftakhul Mohammad Ishaque Husain Nohan Arum Romadlona Prasojo, Bintang Rahmawan, Jihad Reza Ajeng Febiani Salsabila, Unik Hanifah Sapto Adi Setya Nugraha, Bima Subrata, Arsyad Cahya Sudarmini Sudarmini, Sudarmini Syaidina Akasyah Totok Eka Suharto