Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

PROSPEK PENGEMBANGAN EKONOMI SYARIAH DI MASYARAKAT BANJAR KALIMANTAN SELATAN Ahmadi Hasan
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol 14, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v14i2.1281

Abstract

Economic Development Prospects of Sharia in the Banjar Society in South Kalimantan. Currently Islamic economics, with a wide range of variants, is developing widely and dynamically. The development of Islamic finance has been extended to almost all parts of Indonesia, both in urban and rural areas. The Banjar tribe are a sub-ethnic group that inhabit the South Kalimantan area originating from the Malay coast. Islam is the foundation of culture and identity of the community of the Banjar. The presence of the Islamic economic concept in Banjar society is no longer unusual because Islamic values associated with it have become common place. The development of Islamic economics in Banjar society will continue to flourish if supported by government policy (top-down approach).DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v14i2.1281
Pengaruh Politik Hukum Kolonial Belanda Terhadap Perkembangan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Rezki Akbar Norrahman; Ahmadi Hasan; Jalaluddin Jalaluddin; Mariani Mariani
JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/jils.v7i1.9972

Abstract

Abstract: The influence of Dutch colonial legal politics on the development of Islamic economic law had a significant impact in the historical context of Indonesia. During the Dutch colonial period, the dominant legal system implemented was Western law, which was not in line with the principles of Sharia law. Dutch colonial legal politics had three aspects that influenced the development of Islamic economic law. First, the comprehensive adoption of Western law, including in the field of economic law. Second, unequal treatment towards local customary law and legal systems, including the existing Sharia economic system prior to the arrival of the Dutch. Third, restrictions on local legal autonomy and the use of colonial law that favored Dutch interests. However, Sharia economic law was not completely eradicated during the Dutch colonial era, and some Sharia financial practices and institutions managed to survive, albeit on a limited scale. The influence of Dutch colonialism also could not eliminate the awareness and need for Islamic economic law among the Muslim community in Indonesia. Abstrak: Pengaruh politik hukum kolonial Belanda terhadap pengembangan hukum ekonomi Syariah memiliki dampak yang signifikan dalam konteks sejarah Indonesia. Pada masa kolonial Belanda, sistem hukum yang diterapkan secara dominan adalah hukum barat yang tidak sejalan dengan prinsip-prinsip hukum Syariah. Politik hukum kolonial Belanda memiliki tiga aspek yang mempengaruhi pengembangan hukum ekonomi Syariah. Pertama diadopsi hukum barat secara menyeluruh, termasuk dalam bidang hukum ekonomi. Kedua perlakuan tidak setara terhadap hukum dan sistem hukum adat lokal, termasuk sistem ekonomi Syariah yang sudah ada sebelum kedatangan Belanda. Ketiga pembatasan terhadap otonomi hukum lokal dan penggunaan hukum kolonial yang lebih menguntungkan kepentingan Belanda Akan tetapi tidak sepenuhnya terhapusnya hukum ekonomi Syariah di masa kolonial Belanda dan beberapa praktik dan lembaga keuangan Syariah masih bertahan meskipun dalam skala yang terbatas. Pengaruh kolonial Belanda juga tidak dapat menghilangkan kesadaran dan kebutuhan akan hukum ekonomi Syariah di kalangan masyarakat Muslim Indonesia.
Peran Hukum Islam dalam Pembangunan Hukum Nasional di Indonesia Hasan Husaini; Mariani Mariani; Ahmadi Hasan; Jalaluddin Jalaluddin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1149

Abstract

The development of national law in Indonesia is a complex process involving various issues, interests, and expectations. Islamic law plays a crucial role in shaping the national legal system as one of the acknowledged sources of law. However, challenges in integrating Islamic law with national law encompass the diversity of interpretations, harmonization with constitutional principles, and practical obstacles in implementation. This study employs a literature review method with a normative approach. The literature review method is utilized to explore and analyze various documents and literature concerning the integration of Islamic law into the national legal system, enabling a more profound understanding of Islamic law and national law. The study's conclusion underscores the significant role of Islamic law in the development and formation of national law in Indonesia. Islamic law strongly influences the shaping of legal norms and values within the national legal system. Nevertheless, the integration of Islamic Law with National Law faces challenges and obstacles that must be overcome, including diverse interpretations, consensus among various parties, and a deep understanding of Islamic law within Indonesia's social context.
Konflik Bernuansa Religius Politik Dan Proses Integrasi Bangsa Pasca Pemilu Tahun 2019 di Kalimantan (Studi di Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan dan Kalimantan Tengah) Fauzi Aseri; Wahyuddin; Ahmadi Hasan; M.Ramadhan
Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Pascasarjana UIN ANTASARI Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/albanjari.v22i2.12404

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine (1) the conflict map with political and religious nuances after the 2019 election in Kalimantan society, (2) the process of national integration after the 2019 election in Kalimantan society, and (3.) the interaction of conflict with integration in Kalimantan society. The research uses a combined approach (quantitative-qualitative) with data mining techniques using questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and documentaries. Quantitative data analysis uses descriptive analysis of frequencies and percentages with the SPSS program, while qualitative data analysis uses data reduction, data display, and verification techniques. The results of the research are: (1) in the 2019 election there was a conflict with religious-political nuances among the people in South and Central Kalimantan; (2) the conflict is caused more by competition for legislative candidates, bringing in religious factors; (3) the involvement of religious figures contributes to the conflict and has a big influence; (4) the religious knowledge of the conflict followers is quite extensive; they have good religious behavior and practice and are devout in worship; (5) religious lecture media and religious print media also influence conflict conditions. The influence of social media (medsos) played a very big role in the occurrence of conflict in the 2019 Election; (6) the tendency of people's political choices towards parties that are not parties based on religion (religious parties), namely nationalist parties, is quite large; (7) religious factors are seen as not playing a strong enough role in realizing post-conflict integration; (8) respondents are not optimistic that religious harmony will be stronger after the 2019 election; (9) there is a significant relationship between conflict and integration in the 2019 elections in the people of South Kalimantan and Central Kalimantan; (10) there is a significant relationship between conflict sub-variables and conflict variables; (11) there is a relationship between the integration sub-variables and the integration variables. Key words: Conflict, Religious-Political, Integration, 2019 Election
Kajian Yuridis dan Syariah terhadap Fenomena Dispensasi Kawin di Pengadilan Agama Martapura Muhammad Rani; Akhmad Fauzi Aseri; Ahmadi Hasan
Journal of Scientific Interdisciplinary Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jsi1137

Abstract

Fenomena dispensasi kawin di Pengadilan Agama Martapura menjadi perbincangan hangat, mengingat semakin tingginya angka permohonan dispensasi kawin yang diajukan oleh pihak yang ingin menikah di bawah usia yang diatur oleh perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dispensasi kawin dari perspektif hukum positif dan syariah, serta implikasinya terhadap kehidupan sosial masyarakat. Secara yuridis, dispensasi kawin yang diajukan ke Pengadilan Agama harus memenuhi syarat-syarat yang telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Namun, terdapat ketegangan antara ketentuan hukum negara dan pandangan agama terkait batasan usia minimal untuk menikah. Dari sisi syariah, pernikahan di bawah usia yang ditetapkan dapat menimbulkan berbagai permasalahan baik dari segi kesehatan, psikologis, maupun sosial, meskipun dalam beberapa kondisi, dispensasi kawin dipandang sebagai solusi bagi individu yang berada dalam situasi darurat. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan studi kasus pada Pengadilan Agama Martapura, dengan menganalisis keputusan-keputusan yang dikeluarkan terkait dispensasi kawin. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun hukum negara memberikan ruang untuk dispensasi, namun nilai-nilai syariah tetap mengedepankan perlindungan terhadap hak-hak anak dan perempuan. Oleh karena itu, kebijakan pengadilan perlu memperhatikan aspek-aspek perlindungan tersebut dalam memutuskan setiap permohonan dispensasi kawin. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi dalam pengembangan hukum keluarga Islam, khususnya terkait dengan usia pernikahan dan dispensasi kawin di Indonesia.
Integrasi Keadilan Moral, Keadilan Hukum, dan Keadilan Sosial dalam Putusan Pengadilan Rasyid Rizani; Ahmadi Hasan; Masyithah Umar
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Islamic Law, Religious Court System, and Judicial Decisions in Indonesia
Publisher : Sharia Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v1i4.179

Abstract

Abstract This paper discusses the integration of moral justice, legal justice, and social justice in court decisions. The author begins by explaining the various theories of justice, both from Western and Islamic perspectives. The ideal court decision is one that balances these three principles of justice, but achieving this balance is not easy. Prioritizing legal certainty may neglect moral and social justice, while prioritizing moral and legal justice may neglect social justice. The author aims to describe and analyze how these three principles of justice can be integrated in court decisions for the benefit of the community. The paper includes a literature review, defining key terms such as integration, moral justice, legal justice, social justice, and court decisions. The author also discusses related writings on the concept of justice. The writing method used is library research supported by an empirical normative approach to a case. The paper addresses the difficulty of harmonizing the three principles of justice. Keywords: Integration, Justice, Moral, Decision, Court Abstrak Tulisan ini membahas tentang integrasi keadilan moral, keadilan hukum, dan keadilan sosial dalam putusan pengadilan. Penulis mengawalinya dengan menjelaskan berbagai teori keadilan, baik dari perspektif Barat maupun Islam. Putusan pengadilan yang ideal adalah putusan yang dapat menyeimbangkan ketiga prinsip keadilan tersebut, namun untuk mencapai keseimbangan tersebut tidaklah mudah. Mengutamakan kepastian hukum dapat mengabaikan keadilan moral dan sosial, sementara mengutamakan keadilan moral dan hukum dapat mengabaikan keadilan sosial. Penulis bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis bagaimana ketiga prinsip keadilan tersebut dapat diintegrasikan dalam putusan pengadilan untuk kepentingan masyarakat. Tulisan ini mencakup tinjauan pustaka, mendefinisikan istilah-istilah kunci seperti integrasi, keadilan moral, keadilan hukum, keadilan sosial, dan putusan pengadilan. Penulis juga membahas tulisan-tulisan terkait mengenai konsep keadilan. Metode penulisan yang digunakan adalah penelitian kepustakaan yang didukung oleh pendekatan normatif empiris terhadap suatu kasus. Tulisan ini membahas tentang sulitnya menyelaraskan ketiga prinsip keadilan tersebut. Kata Kunci: Integrasi, Keadilan, Moral, Putusan, Pengadilan
Analisa Pasal 412 Kuhp Baru Tentang Kohabitasi (Pendekatan Maqashid As-Syari’ah As-Syathibi Dan Teori Social Engineering Roscoe Pound) Gusti Muslihuddin Sa’adi; Ahmadi Hasan; Masyithah Umar
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Islamic Law, Religious Court System, and Judicial Decisions in Indonesia
Publisher : Sharia Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v1i4.187

Abstract

Abstract The phenomenon of cohabitation (kumpul kebo) has spreaded in the community, many couples live in the same house but do not have any marriage relations, especially among teenagers. This is very contrary to the norms that apply in society itself, the current shift in morality has triggered unrest among lawmakers, so that the cohabitation rule is included in Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP) article number 412. This research is a normative legal research, using qualitative literature research methods, the primary source used is Law No. 1 of 2023, and the sources include journals, books and scientific articles. This study aims to analyze article No. 412 of the new Criminal Code on cohabitation when viewed through the approach of Maqashid as-Shari'ah as-Syathibi and Roscoe Pound's social engineering theory. The results showed that article No. 412 on cohabitation in the new Criminal Code was in accordance with maqashid al-syariah hifz an-nasl, but was not included in dharuriyat, but included in the category of takmilat ad-dharuriyat, whose position was higher than al-hajiyat and at-tahsinaat. The prohibition of cohabitation is also an implementation of Roscoe Pound's legal theory of social engineering. The theory classifies the interests of society (public interest) precedence over private interests (private interest), so that cohabitation arrangements to maintain the morality and morals of the nation take precedence over individual freedom. Keywords: Cohabitation, Kumpul Kebo, Criminal Code, Maqashid as-Sharia, Roscoe Pound, Social Engineering Abstrak Fenomena kohabitasi (kumpul kebo) telah menjamur di masyarakat, banyak pasangan tinggal serumah namun tidak memiliki ikatan apapun, khususnya di kalangan remaja. Hal ini sangat bertentangan dengan norma yang berlaku di masyarakat sendiri, pergeseran moralitas yang terjadi saat ini memantik keresahan pembuat undang-undang, sehingga aturan kohabitasi dimasukkan ke dalam Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) pasal 412. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif kepustakaan, sumber primer yang digunakan adalah Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 2023, dan sumber skunder meliputi jurnal, buku dan artikel ilmiah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa pasal 412 KUHP baru tentang kohabitasi jika ditinjau melalui pendekatan Maqashid as-Syari’ah as-Syathibi dan teori social engineering Roscoe Pound. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pasal 412 tentang kohabitasi pada KUHP baru telah sesuai dengan maqashid al-syariah hifz an-nasl, namun tidak masuk ke dalam dharuriyat, tetapi masuk dalam katagori takmilat ad-dharuriyat, yang kedudukannya lebih tinggi dari al-hajiyat dan at-tahsinaat. Pelarangan kohabitasi juga merupakan implementasi dari teori hukum Roscoe Pound social engineering. Teori tesebut mengklasifikasikan kepentingan masyarakat (public interest) lebih didahulukan dari kepentingan pribadi (privat interest), sehingga pengaturan kohabitasi untuk menjaga moralitas dan akhlak bangsa lebih diutamakan dari pada kebebasan individual. Kata Kunci: Kohabitasi, Kumpul Kebo, KUHP Baru, Maqashid as-Syariah, Roscoe Pound, Social Engineering.
Tinjauan Teori Al-Mashlahah Al-Buthi Terhadap Hak Anak dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Perjanjian Internasional Achmad Shobirin Hasbulloh; Ahmadi Hasan; Masyithah Umar
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Islamic Law, Religious Court System, and Judicial Decisions in Indonesia
Publisher : Sharia Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v1i4.189

Abstract

Abstract This paper discusses children's rights in the perspective of Islamic law and international treaties and compares them using al-Buthi's al-mashlahah theory contained in his book entitled "Dlawābith al-Mashlahah fî al-Syarî'ah al-Islāmiyyah" with the aim of knowing which perspective is more accommodating to the benefit of children. This type of research is library research with a qualitative approach. According to al-Buthi, al-mashlahah becomes a proof if it is in line with maqashid al-syariah, does not contradict the Qur'an, does not contradict the Prophetic Hadith, does not contradict qiyas, and does not eliminate stronger benefits or commensurate benefits. Children's rights in the perspective of Islamic law include rights before birth and rights after birth. International treaties (Convention on the Rights of the Child) pay more attention to children's rights when they are born, so that many children's rights are forgotten. The provisions of Islamic Law regarding children's rights before and after birth are more in line with al-Buthi's al-mashlahah theory than the Convention on the Rights of the Child because they are in line with maqāshid al-syarî'ah. Children's rights should not only be in line with the child's benefit in the world, but must also be in line with the benefit for him in the hereafter. Islam has established the rights of children that benefit them in this world and in the hereafter. Keywords: Al-Buthi, Al-Mashlahah, Children's Rights, Islam, Convention Abstrak: Tulisan ini membahas hak anak dalam perspektif hukum Islam dan perjanjian internasional dan membandingkan antara keduanya menggunakan teori al-mashlahah al-Buthi yang termuat dalam kitab yang berjudul “Dlawābith al-Mashlahah fî al-Syarî’ah al-Islāmiyyah” dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui perspektif mana yang lebih mengakomodir kemaslahatan bagi anak. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kepustakaan dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Menurut al-Buthi, al-mashlahah menjadi hujjah jika selaras dengan maqashid al-syariah, tidak bertentangan dengan al-Quran, tidak bertentangan dengan hadis nabawi, tidak bertentangan dengan qiyas, dan tidak menghilangkan kemaslahatan yang lebih kuat atau kemaslahatan yang sepadan. Hak anak dalam perspektif hukum Islam meliputi hak sebelum dilahirkan dan hak sesudah dilahiran. Perjanjian internasional (Konvensi Hak Anak) lebih memperhatikan hak anak saat telah dilahirkan saja sehingga banyak sekali hak anak yang terlupakan. Ketetapan Hukum Islam mengenai hak anak sebelum dan sesudah dilahirkan lebih sesuai dengan teori al-mashlahah al-Buthi daripada Konvensi Hak Anak karena sejalan dengan maqāshid al-syarî’ah. Hak anak seyogyanya tidak hanya sejalan dengan kemaslahatan anak di dunia, melainkan juga harus selaras dengan kemaslahatan untuknya di akhirat. Islam telah menetapkan hak anak yang bermanfaat baginya di dunia dan di akhirat. Kata Kunci: Al-Buthi, Al-Mashlahah, Hak Anak, Islam, Konvensi
Perampasan Aset karena Kejahatan, Tak Bertuan dan Telantar Oleh Negara untuk Pembangunan dan Investasi dalam Perwujudan Walfare State Andhi Irawan; Ahmadi Hasan; Masyithah Umar
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Islamic Law, Religious Court System, and Judicial Decisions in Indonesia
Publisher : Sharia Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v1i4.194

Abstract

Abstract Asset forfeiture is a process in which the state takes control or ownership of assets that were obtained through criminal acts. It is based on court decisions that have legal force and is not dependent on punishing the perpetrators. The purpose of asset forfeiture is to recover state assets that were embezzled in cases of corruption, taxation, customs, economic crimes, and drug offenses. It also aims to recover state losses without requiring the punishment of the criminals. The proposed Asset Forfeiture Bill in Indonesia aims to provide a legal framework for cases involving large sums of money, such as corruption and drug crimes. The bill follows a non-conviction based approach, making it easier to confiscate assets derived from criminal acts. The teaching of law as a tool of social control is relevant in examining this bill and determining its commitment to justice. The current debt burden faced by the Indonesian government also adds urgency to finding solutions like asset forfeiture in order to ensure the welfare of every citizen. Keywords: Asset, seizure, investment, stranded Abstrak: Perampasan aset adalah proses di mana negara mengambil alih penguasaan atau kepemilikan aset yang diperoleh melalui tindak pidana. Proses ini didasarkan pada putusan pengadilan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap dan tidak tergantung pada penghukuman terhadap pelaku tindak pidana. Tujuan perampasan aset adalah untuk mengembalikan aset negara yang dikorupsi dalam kasus-kasus korupsi, perpajakan, bea cukai, kejahatan ekonomi, dan kejahatan narkoba. Perampasan aset juga bertujuan untuk mengembalikan kerugian negara tanpa harus menghukum para pelaku kejahatan. RUU Perampasan Aset yang diusulkan di Indonesia bertujuan untuk memberikan kerangka hukum untuk kasus-kasus yang melibatkan uang dalam jumlah besar, seperti korupsi dan kejahatan narkoba. RUU ini mengikuti pendekatan berbasis non-keyakinan, sehingga lebih mudah untuk menyita aset yang berasal dari tindak pidana. Ajaran hukum sebagai alat kontrol sosial sangat relevan dalam mengkaji RUU ini dan menentukan komitmennya terhadap keadilan. Beban utang yang dihadapi pemerintah Indonesia saat ini juga menambah urgensi untuk mencari solusi seperti perampasan aset untuk memastikan kesejahteraan setiap warga negara. Kata Kunci: Aset, perampasan, investasi, terlantar
Membangun Hukum Yang Adil Dalam Bingkai Moralitas Pancasila Noor Efendy; Ahmadi Hasan; Masyithah Umar
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Islamic Law, Religious Court System, and Judicial Decisions in Indonesia
Publisher : Sharia Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v1i4.195

Abstract

Abstract Pancasila is used in lawmaking or becomes a big step in making laws and regulations in accordance with the spirit of the Indonesian state which is humane, just, civilized and guarantees social justice for all Indonesian people. Therefore, an understanding of Pancasila justice needs to be done to provide a common perception of justice as the basis for the formation of good law. The research method used is normative research method in positive law with a focus on analyzing legal norms which are essentially prescriptive, specific provisions and tendencies in use. Using deductive logic analysis. The characteristics of justice based on Pancasila are the values of justice in the form of principles of justice, which fulfill certain principles or principles including the principle of justice based on faith in God Almighty. Promoting justice based on God's justice, the Pancasila principle of justice prioritizes human rights and humanizes humans as social beings whose justice must be protected, the Pancasila principle of justice upholds the values of solidarity and cohesiveness to create an atmosphere conducive to the nation, providing justice to Indonesian citizens, the Pancasila principle of justice adheres to the principle of deliberation for consensus through representation in order to create justice for citizens in expressing their respective opinions and the Pancasila principle of justice provides justice to all citizens without exception in accordance with applicable regulations. Keywords: Justice, Morality, Pancasila Abstrak: Pancasila digunakan dalam pembuatan undang-undang atau menjadi langkah besar dalam pembuatan peraturan perundang-undangan sesuai dengan semangat negara Indonesia yang manusiawi, adil, beradab dan menjamin keadilan sosial bagi seluruh rakyat Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, pemahaman tentang keadilan Pancasila perlu dilakukan untuk memberikan kesamaan persepsi tentang keadilan sebagai landasan terbentuknya hukum yang baik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif dalam hukum positif dengan fokus pada analisis norma hukum yang pada hakikatnya bersifat preskriptif, khusus ketentuan dan cenderungan digunakan. Menggunakan analisis logika deduktif. Ciri-ciri keadilan berdasarkan Pancasila adalah nilai-nilai keadilan yang berupa asas keadilan, yang memenuhi asas atau asas tertentu termasuk asas keadilan yang berdasarkan keimanan kepada Tuhan Yang Maha Esa. Mengedepankan keadilan berdasarkan keadilan Tuhan, Asas Keadilan Pancasila mengutamakan Hak Asasi Manusia dan memanusiakan manusia sebagai makhluk sosial yang keadilannya harus dilindungi, Asas Keadilan Pancasila menjunjung nilai nilai solidaritas dan kekompakan untuk menciptakan suasana yang kondusif bagi bangsa, memberikan keadilan kepada warga negara Indonesia, asas keadilan Pancasila menganut asas musyawarah untuk mufakat melalui perwakilan demi terciptanya keadilan bagi warga negara dalam mengemukakan pendapatnya masing-masing dan asas keadilan Pancasila memberikan keadilan kepada seluruh warga negara tanpa terkecuali sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku. Kata Kunci: Keadilan, Moralitas, Pancasila