Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.409
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Al-'Adl Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah TAHKIM BILANCIA Mulawarman Law Review Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Amsir Law Jurnal (ALJ) JHCLS Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Jurnal Sultan : Riset Hukum Tata Negara Sighat : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah FAWAID: Sharia Economic Law Review Law Journal Bilancia : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum HUKUM EKONOMI ISLAM
Pikahulan, Rustam Magun
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : BILANCIA

 1 
DEKADENSI PEMILIHAN HAKIM AGUNG OLEH DPR RI Pikahulan, Rustam Magun
Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2020): BILANCIA
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/blc.v14i1.509

Abstract

Abstract: The Plato's conception of the rule of law states that good governance is based on good law. The organization also spreads to the world of Supreme Court justices, the election caused a decadence to the institutional status of the House of Representatives as a people's representative in the government whose implementation was not in line with the decision of the Constitutional Court. Based on the decision of the Constitutional Court No.27/PUU-XI/2013 explains that the House of Representatives no longer has the authority to conduct due diligence and suitability (elect) to prospective Supreme Judges proposed by the Judicial Commission. The House of Representatives can only approve or disapprove candidates for Supreme Court Justices that have been submitted by the Judicial Commission. In addition, the proportion of proposed Supreme Court Justices from the judicial commission to the House of Representatives (DPR) has changed, whereas previously the Judicial Commission had to propose 3 (three) of each vacancy for the Justices, now it is only one of each vacant for Supreme Court Judges. by the Supreme Court. The House of Representatives no longer has the authority to conduct due diligence and suitability (elect) to prospective Supreme Judges proposed by the Judicial Commission. The House of Representatives can only "approve" or "disagree" the Supreme Judge candidates nominated by the Judicial Commission.
Co-Authors Abdul Hafid Adriana, Sri Alvian, Muh. Andri Alvian, Muhammad Andri Anisa, Nur Ainun Dwi Octavia, Rahma Ersan, Handika Faiz, Abdul Karim Hajrah Hamuddin Hasim, Hasanuddin Hasniati Hasyim, Hasanuddin Husaema, Anna Iin Mutmainnah Kairuddin Karim Kurniati Madani, Mutiah Suci Misbahuddin Nasaruddin Umar Nasaruddin Umar, Nasaruddin Pangestu, Dian Reski Pradana, Syafa’at Anugrah Rahman, Aulia Audri Rasdiyanah Rasyid, St. Cheriah Reska, Nurul Alfita Sih Natalia Sukmi Silvi Sustrihazlinda Suarning, Suarning Sukri, Indah Fitriani Tuti Haryanti, Tuti Zainal Said