Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

Pemenuhan Hak Lingkungan bagi Masyarakat Tani yang Terdampak Perubahan Iklim Sesuai SDG di Indonesia Muhammad Rafi Raditya; Davilla Prawidya Azaria
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.5.1.8234.786-799

Abstract

Perubahan iklim merupakan suatu fenomena yang tidak bisa dihindari pada saat ini, dan dengan adanya fenomena ini juga telah menimbulkan dampak yang sangat signifikan terhadap kehidupan manusia, salah satu golongan masyarakat yang merasakan dampak besar dari adanya perubahan iklim yaitu masyarakat tani. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan analisa terkait peran pemerintah Indonesia dalam memenuhi hak lingkungan bagi masyarakat tani yang terdampak oleh adanya perubahan iklim serta bagaimana relevansi setiap kebijakan yang diambil oleh pemerintah Indonesia dengan tujuan yang termuat di dalam Sustainable Development Goals 2030. Dan sebagai hasilnya, secara teoritis maka penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan suatu kontribusi pemikiran bagi pengembangan pengetahuan terkait hukum internasional dalam aspek lingkungan dengan mengidentifikasi dampak dari adanya perubahan iklim dan bagaimana hal ini dapat menyebabkan kerugian baik materil maupun imateril bagi masyarakat tani, ini termasuk juga bagaimana pemerintah Indonesia dapat menjadi aktor utama khususnya dalam hal pembuatan kebijakan serta rekomendasi peraturan tambahan baik berupa peraturan pemerintah maupun peraturan presiden yang berfokus pada Sustainable Development Goals 2030 serta penyelesaian masalah dalam sektor pertanian sehingga hak lingkungan bagi masyarakat tani yang terdampak perubahan iklim dapat terpenuhi secara maksimal.
Integrasi Perlindungan Padang Lamun sebagai Ekosistem Karbon Biru dalam Penguatan Mitigasi Iklim di Indonesia Nabilah Puspitarini; Davilla Prawidya Azaria
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Juni 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i3.2198

Abstract

Fenomena perubahan iklim yang ekstrem memerlukan mitigasi yang strategis salah satunya dengan optimalisasi ekosistem karbon biru. Lamun sebagai ekosistem karbon biru, dengan potensi penyerapan karbonnya yang besar masih dihadapkan pada perlindungan yang belum maksimal di tengah penurunan kualitas dan luasannya. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini akan menelaah perlindungan lamun di tingkat regulasi internasional dan penguatan perlindungannya di Indonesia sebagai wujud komitmen dalam menurunkan emisi karbon pada Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) dengan mengkomparasi negara lain sebagai praktik terbaik. Menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, penelitian ini akan meninjau melalui acuan kepustakaan berbahan hukum. Hasil temuan dari analisis peneliti menemukan bahwa perlindungan lamun di tingkat internasional memiliki regulasi yang masih lemah. Untuk praktik terbaik dari Fiji dan Filipina telah menerapkan model kebijakan Climate Framework Laws dengan undang-undang perubahan iklim sebagai induk hukumnya yang di dalamnya memuat legislasi iklim yang komprehensif, pengakuan terhadap karbon biru dan perlindungannya, serta kelembagaan yang khusus menangani perubahan iklim seperti National Ocean Policy Steering Committee dan Climate Change Commission sehingga dapat memperkuat tata kelola perubahan iklim. Pembelajaran dari Fiji dan Filipina dapat diterapkan di Indonesia atas absennya regulasi perubahan iklim di Indonesia saat ini. Model kebijakan tersebut memuat kelembagaan yang berfokus menangani isu perubahan iklim disertai perlindungan terhadap ekosistem karbon biru khususnya lamun untuk upaya mitigasi perubahan iklim.
United States' Refusal to the International Criminal Court's Investigation of Crimes Against Humanity Conducted by Israel in Palestine Muhamad Dafi Akbar; Davilla Prawidya Azaria
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/.v11i1.272

Abstract

This research examines the legal validity of the United States’ rejection of the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) investigation into alleged crimes against humanity committed in Palestine. The issue arises from the imposition of United States sanctions on ICC officials, despite the United States not being a State Party to the Rome Statute and its reliance on domestic legislation such as the American Servicemembers’ Protection Act of 2002. Using a normative juridical method, this study analyzes primary legal sources, including the Rome Statute, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and ICC jurisprudence, alongside relevant secondary materials. Particular attention is given to the Appeals Chamber decision of 15 December 2025, which rejected Israel’s objection under Article 18 of the Rome Statute and confirmed the Prosecutor’s authority to proceed with the investigation into the situation in Palestine. The findings indicate that the ICC lawfully exercises territorial jurisdiction based on Palestine’s 2015 accession and Article 12(2)(a) of the Rome Statute, and that obligations arising from jus cogens and erga omnes norms render unilateral countermeasures legally ineffective. Furthermore, the study argues that sanctions targeting ICC judges and prosecutors may constitute improper interference with the administration of justice under Article 70 of the Rome Statute. The study concludes that such sanctions undermine the independence of the ICC, weaken the universality of international criminal accountability, and risk politicizing the enforcement of core international crimes. 
Use for the Benefit of All? The Double-Edged Implications of Commercial Activities under the Outer Space Treaty Putra Hamonangan Ritonga; Davilla Prawidya Azaria
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: APRIL 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v20i1.4689

Abstract

The 1967 Outer Space Treaty was drafted in the Cold War era, when States were the primary actors in outer space activities. Consequently, Article I’s concept of “use” referred mainly to peaceful and scientific exploration by States. In the New Space Era, however, private actors such as SpaceX and Blue Origin have shifted space activities toward profit-driven commercialization. This development creates normative tension with the Treaty’s principle that outer space shall be used “for the benefit of all countries,” as commercial practices risk deepening inequality, enabling technological monopolies, and increasing environmental threats, particularly space debris. This research employs a normative juridical method through library-based analysis of international legal instruments, national regulations, and academic doctrines, complemented by comparison with other global commons regimes, notably the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The findings show that the current interpretation of “use” is inadequate for regulating multi-actor commercial activities. Therefore, an ius constituendum is required to redefine and limit “use” through fair benefit-sharing, proportional responsibility, and sustainable protection of the outer space environment, drawing inspiration from institutional models such as the International Seabed Authority.
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS VULNERABILITY TO CARBON TRADING MECHANISM: A LESSON LEARNED FOR INDONESIA Davilla Prawidya Azaria; Rianda Dirkareshza; Ali Imran Nasution
Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jbengkoelenjust.v13i2.30953

Abstract

Developed countries are strictly obligated to reduce carbon emissions due to their industrial activities, contributing to a major concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. This paper aims to provide a basic overview of carbon reduction provisions under Kyoto Protocol and climate change frameworksdevelopment through the years. Practically in developing countries, its provision requires funding and transferring technology schemes by developed countries. The carbon markets emerged from Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) as a so-called eco-friendly project which potentially turns into a new form of capitalism in developing countries along with a tendency to depend on funding and transferring technology itself. Indigenous people are targeted groups directly affected by CDM projects and often neglect their fundamental rights. State is obligated to provide a forum for indigenous people to participate in the level of socializing, consultation, and law-making process of CDM as its nature being the most vulnerable group. Keywords: Carbon trade; climate change; environmental rights; indigenous people
Pemanfaatan Lahan Sempit dengan Penanaman Hidroponik untuk Peningkatan Jumlah Ruang Terbuka Hijau di Jagakarsa Davilla Prawidya Azaria; Ali Imran Nasution; Anni Alvionita Simanjuntak; Gilang Abi Zaifa
Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Vol 8 No 2 (2023): November
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (DPPM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21067/jpm.v8i2.9217

Abstract

One of the major problems of urban people has been a need for more knowledge about utilizing narrow spaces around houses to increase green open spaces (Ruang Terbuka Hijau or RTH). People must be able to utilize limited land to the best of their abilities in order to benefit the community themselves. This community service activity aims to educate the community about optimizing limited and narrow land to increase the number of green open spaces using hydroponic methods in the Ciganjur area, Jagakarsa. The implementation method of this activity consists of three stages: preparation, execution, and implementation. The results showed, which involved 20 participants from the group of women involved in PKK and the community in general in Ciganjur, Jagakarsa, provide education and skills to the community regarding the utilization of narrow land with hydroponic methods to increase the number of green open spaces and improving the environment quality as well. Participants in the activity also acquire skills in applying hydroponic planting methods for using limited spaces.
Historical Pollution in the Polluter Pays Principle: Who Pays When the Polluter Is No Longer There? Davilla Prawidya Azaria; Anni Alvionita Simanjuntak
Veteran Law Review Vol 9 No 1 (2026): Mei 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/velrev.v9i1.14795

Abstract

The conventional Polluter Pays Principle encounters jurisdictional paralysis when confronted with historical pollution, particularly when responsible corporations escape liability through liquidation or strategic bankruptcy, leaving behind severely deteriorated environments as orphan sites. This normative legal research aims to formulate a policy reconstruction to bridge this intertemporal liability gap by analyzing successful environmental policy frameworks from various developing countries. Grounded in the protective function of state authority, governments possess an inherent responsibility and institutional capacity to proactively intervene in long-standing ecological crises. The analysis indicates that transferring remediation liability to the state can be effectively operationalized through adaptable instruments tested in the Global South, including state-led emergency restoration mechanisms, collective industry-funded environmental pools, and property-attached ecological obligations. In conclusion, the state must act as the primary executor of physical remediation upfront, subsequently utilizing its sovereign right to reclaim restoration costs from successor entities or parent companies to guarantee intergenerational ecological justice.