Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
5.134
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ISTORIA JUPIIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Pattingalloang : Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan dan Penelitian Kesejarahan Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya AGASTYA: JURNAL SEJARAH DAN PEMBELAJARANNYA Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya Yupa: Historical Studies Journal PEMBELAJAR: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Keguruan, dan Pembelajaran Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Indonesia Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science Socius (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial) (Edisi Elektronik) Ghancaran: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Tamumatra : Jurnal Seni Pertunjukan Jurnal Integrasi dan Harmoni Inovatif Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Historiography HISTORIA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah
Dewa Agung Gede Agung
Universitas Negeri Malang
Religion Arts Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 42 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya

 1 
PERISTIWA 1 OKTOBER 1965 SEBAGAI PUNCAK PERGOLAKAN POLITIK DI TAHUN 1950-AN Agung, Dewa Agung Gede
Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya Vol 3, No 2 (2010): Desember
Publisher : Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (17.515 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: Main assumption that PKI ( IndonesianCommunis Party ) as single factor behind the October 1st, 1965 tragedy becoming formal law decision nowadays in Indonesia. Tracing this tragedy need an understanding into politics structure applied from year 1950 until 1965 in Indonesia. Learning history are based on continuity and chronological so it has applied on this tragedy. This tragedy popular with G30S/PKI and relevant with historical event such as Liberal Democracy Periods (1950 – 1957) and Guided Democracy Periods (1957 – 1965). G30S/PKI are accumulate tragedy caused by political interest on that period
PEMAHAMAN AWAL TERHADAP ANATOMI TEORI SOSIAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF STRUKTURAL FUNGSIONAL DAN STRUKTURAL KONFLIK Dewa Agung Gede Agung
Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya Vol 9, No 2 (2015): Desember
Publisher : Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (626.862 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/sb.v9i2.4998

Abstract

Abstrak. teori struktural fungsional dan teori struktural konflik adalah dua diantara berbagai teori sosiologi yang ada. Dua teori tersebut dipandang masih relevan dalam melihat suatu realitas sosial dan peristiwa historis. Namun demikian, tidak ada ilmu yang abadi setelah diketemukan bukti-bukti terbaru. Inilah yang dikenal dengan istilah “anomali” Kuhn, bahkan Popper mengajukan “falsifikasi” untuk mengatasi kemacetan epistemologis. Begitu juga dengan kedua aliran tersebut, bahwa selalu ada kritik dalam rangka penyempurnaan, bahkan menolak teori yang ada sebelumnya karena dianggap tidak sesuai dengan perkembangan keilmuan atau dianggap kurang kritis dalam melihat masalah-masalah sosial. Tulisan ini mencoba melakukan anatomi teori pada teori struktural fungsional Talcott Parson dengan Robert King Merton, dan struktural konflik Karl Marx dengan Ralf Dahrendorf.Kata-kata kunci: anatomi teori, teori struktural fungsional, teori struktural konflikAbstract. Theories of structural functionalism and structural conflict are two of the existed sociological theories. Both theories are seemed to be relevant to look at a social reality and the historical event. However, there is no immortal science after the newest fact is found. This is well known as Kuhn’s anomaly. Even, Popper argues the term of falsification to cope the epistemological gap. Both two school of thoughts gain some criticisms in completing or in refusing the previous theory. This is caused by the previous theories which are not fit with the development of science or which are claimed uncritically to look at the social problems. This article tries to organize both theories of structural functionalism between Talcott Parson and Robert King Merton; and of structural conflict between Karl Marx and Ralf Dahrendorf.Keywords: anatomy of theory, theory of structural functionalism, theory of structural conflict
Co-Authors Aditya Nugroho Widiadi Agik Nur Efendi Agustiyanto, Achmad Ahmad Almarisi ahmad muthohar Ahmad Sholehuddin Suryanullah Aji Saputra, Mochammad Ronaldy Almarisi, Ahmad Anam, Muhammad Khoirul Annisa Amalia Ari Sapto Astutik, Winda Tri Blasius Suprapta, Blasius Budiarti, Isnaini Daya Negri Wijaya Dewi E, Elizabeth Dwi Wahyu Ningtyas Dya Fatkhiyatur Rohimah Eka Dian Susanti Ella Jayahuda Prasety Endang Sri Andayani Hafida, Melina Nur Hafida, Mellina Nur Handayani, Dian Ratna Hilmi Novan Eldyansyah Ima Offiana Imaduddin, Muhammad Faaiz Alim Indah Wahyu Puji Utami, Indah Wahyu Joko Sayono Khakim, Moch Nurfahrul Lukmanul Kusmaharti, Ratih Mahardika, Moch. Dimas Galuh Maulidah, Alvin Mellina Nur Hafida Muhammad Khoirul Anam Nafi'ah, Ulfatun Ramadani Tri Arianti Ramadhan, Rommy Naufal Reza Hudiyanto Ridhoi, Ronald Rozaq, Mokhamad Amirul Safira Putri Andriani Santi, Dwijayati Ari Novia Satrio Wibowo Shinta Ayu Mutiara Sari Subekti, Arif SULISTIA, SULISTIA Tedy Susanto