Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Perbandingan Kedudukan Hukum Laporan Akuntan Publik Dalam Jasa Investigasi Terhadap Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Dan Malaysia Harsono, Budi; Sujono; Sudarto
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 2 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i2.4427

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis dan membandingkan kedudukan hukum laporan akuntan publik dalam jasa investigasi sebagai bagian dari pembuktian tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia dan Malaysia. Fokus utama berada pada (i) jalur penerimaan (admissibility) laporan investigatif dalam sistem pembuktian, (ii) bobot pembuktian (weight) laporan melalui mekanisme pengujian di persidangan, serta (iii) desain kelembagaan yang memengaruhi penggunaan laporan tersebut, khususnya pada pembuktian unsur kerugian keuangan negara. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan hukum, melalui studi kepustakaan atas peraturan, doktrin, dan sumber hukum relevan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa di Indonesia laporan jasa investigasi akuntan publik tidak berdiri sebagai alat bukti mandiri, melainkan harus dikonstruksikan ke dalam kategori alat bukti KUHAP, terutama sebagai keterangan ahli dan/atau surat, sehingga kekuatan pembuktiannya bersifat derivatif dan sangat bergantung pada strategi pembuktian serta penilaian hakim. Di sisi lain, pada konteks pembuktian kerugian negara, terjadi tarik-menarik normatif-institusional antara ruang yang diberikan Penjelasan Pasal 32 UU Tipikor dengan kecenderungan penguncian otoritas pemeriksaan melalui Penjelasan Pasal 603 KUHP (berlaku 2 Januari 2026), yang berdampak pada kepastian hukum penggunaan laporan investigatif pihak non-negara. Sebaliknya, Malaysia memberikan pengakuan lebih eksplisit terhadap expert evidence melalui Evidence Act 1950 serta menormalisasi keterujian bukti ahli melalui kombinasi laporan dan testimoni, diperkuat oleh etika profesi dan pedoman prosedural penyusunan expert report. Temuan ini mengindikasikan perlunya penguatan kerangka pembuktian di Indonesia agar pemanfaatan laporan investigasi akuntan publik lebih akuntabel dan konsisten, tanpa mengurangi prinsip fair trial dan tata kelola pembuktian kerugian negara
The Impact of Auditor Selection on Financial Statement Quality: Evidence from Listed Companies in Indonesia Dewi, Sari; Wati, Lidia; Karjantoro, Handoko; Harsono, Budi
Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting Vol. 6 No. 5 (2025): Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (November - De
Publisher : Dinasti Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/dijefa.v6i5.5403

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of auditor selection on the quality of financial statements by considering factors such as auditor independence, competence, and reputation as key determinants of transparency and accountability in financial reporting. Using a quantitative approach with descriptive and causal-comparative methods, the study analyzes secondary data from companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The sample was selected through purposive sampling based on criteria such as completeness of financial reports and the presence of audited statements. The results reveal that auditor selection whether from Big Four or non-Big Four firms does not significantly affect the quality of financial statements. Instead, total accruals show a significant negative effect, indicating that internal financial practices play a more substantial role than auditor type in determining financial reporting quality. Despite this, prior literature emphasizes that auditor quality, industry specialization, and experience still contribute indirectly by strengthening oversight. Therefore, future research should explore additional variables such as auditor tenure, audit committee effectiveness, and corporate governance as mediators or moderators. Expanding the sample and observation period, as well as applying multi-dimensional measures of financial statement quality, such as earnings persistence and conservatism, can improve the robustness and generalizability of findings.
Audit Opinion, Big4, Auditor Narcissism and CEO Narcissism: Drivers of Reporting Timeliness Septiany, Sheila; Jurnali, Teddy; Egnes, E; Suparman, Meiliana; Harsono, Budi
Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset) Vol 17, No 1 (2025): JURNAL ASET (AKUNTANSI RISET) JANUARI-JUNI 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/jaset.v17i1.78465

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the influence of audit opinion, Big4, auditor narcissism and CEO narcissism on timeliness. A sample of 138 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2018 to 2022 was analyzed using annual financial reports. The study employed statistical analysis with the Stata application to measure the effects of these variables on timeliness, calculated as the number of days between the fiscal year-end and the audit report date. The findings reveal that audit opinion and auditor narcissism have a significant negative effect on timeliness, indicating their role in accelerating audit report completion. Conversely, Big4 firms and CEO narcissism do not significantly impact timeliness, suggesting a more nuanced relationship between leadership traits and audit timing. These results highlight how varying characteristics influence the punctuality of financial reporting, a crucial factor in stakeholder decision-making. The study contributes to agency theory, signaling, and the upper echelons perspective by offering insights into how personality traits and audit practices affect financial reporting timeliness. Practically, it provides guidance for companies to enhance reporting processes by understanding the traits that drive efficiency. The novelty lies in exploring the under-researched influence of CEO narcissism and auditor narcissism on audit timeliness, particularly in the context of public companies in Indonesia, thus enriching the literature and expanding practical applications in the audit field.