Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

Persepsi Pengunjung tentang Keberadaan Corner di Perpustakaan Universitas Negeri Padang Bellini, Melani Putri; Nabila, Jeihan
YASIN Vol 5 No 3 (2025): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/yasin.v5i3.5591

Abstract

The utilization of corner services in college libraries, which remains minimal, indicates a gap between the availability of facilities and users' understanding of their functions. This study aims to describe the perceptions of visitors and librarians regarding the presence of corner services at the Information and Library Center of Universitas Negeri Padang by examining three main aspects: cognitive, affective, and conative. This research employs a descriptive qualitative approach with methods of observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Informants were purposively selected, consisting of librarians and active visitors. Data collection was conducted over two months with the researcher’s direct presence at the location, and data were analyzed through data reduction techniques, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results show that, cognitively, visitors' understanding of the corner's functions varies, and librarians have not actively engaged in the management of these services. Affective responses indicate interest in the design and themes of the corner; however, a lack of information and guidance has led to dissatisfaction. Conatively, only a portion of visitors actively utilizes the facilities and participates in literacy activities. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that the effectiveness of corner services heavily relies on understanding, librarian involvement, and appropriate promotional strategies to optimally meet users' information needs.
Measuring Publication Efficiency in Humanities Journals: An AI-Based Analysis of Diamond Open Access Models and SINTA Rankings Saputra, Andi; Nelisa, Malta; Nabila, Jeihan
Khizanah al-Hikmah : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, dan Kearsipan Vol 13 No 2 (2025): December (Article in Press)
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Perpustakaan UIN Alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/v13i2a7

Abstract

This study examines the influence of open access models, particularly Diamond Open Access (OA), and SINTA rankings on the submission-to-publication duration of accredited humanities journals in Indonesia. It also addresses a notable gap in existing literature regarding publication waiting times within the Indonesian humanities context. Employing a quantitative ex post facto design, the study analyzes a sample of 100 SINTA-accredited humanities journals that published articles in 2024. Submission-to-publication durations (calculated as the number of days between submission and final publication) were extracted using an AI-assisted metadata retrieval tool (Gemini). A total of 2,489 eligible articles were identified. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA to determine the effects of the independent variables. The findings show that the median submission-to-publication time for Indonesian humanities journals is 125.67 days, with substantial variability ranging from 0 to 991 days. The Diamond OA model does not significantly affect publication duration (Sig. > 0.05), indicating that author-fee-free access does not inherently lengthen editorial processes. Conversely, SINTA rankings show a significant effect (Sig. < 0.05), with journals in higher SINTA tiers tending to have longer publication timelines. This study provides timely empirical evidence regarding factors that shape publication efficiency in Indonesia’s humanities journals—an area previously underexplored. The methodological use of AI for metadata extraction also represents an important contribution. These findings offer practical insights for authors selecting suitable publication venues and for journal publishers seeking to enhance the efficiency of their editorial workflows.