Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Media Hukum

Dinamika dan Problematika Politik Hukum Lembaga Penyelesai Sengketa Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Indonesia Nasrullah, Nasrullah; Lailam, Tanto
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 24, No 1 (2017): June
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The success of free and fair local elections is not only measured by the voting process, but also determined on how the settlement of the disputes follows it. In connection with that, the institutional dispute settlement of local elections in Indonesia has experienced ups and downs that have not been interminable. The issuance of the Act Number 10 of 2016 which mandates the establishment of special judicial body for settlement of regional head election disputes still leaves a ‘homework’ of the shape or design of that special judicial institution, its authorities and procedural law that must be established ahead of national simultaneous elections in 2027. This paper is the result of a normative research with statute, analytical, and case approaches regarding the background of the existence of special judicial body which is needed to be established to resolve regional head election disputes in Indonesia as an antithesis on the weaknesses and problems ofinstitutional settlement of regional head election disputes that been there for years, namely: Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. In order to provide an overview as well as an alternative institutional model of special court for regional head election disputes settlement to be formed onward.
PENAFSIRAN KONSTITUSI DALAM PENGUJIAN KONSTITUSIONALITAS UNDANG- UNDANG TERHADAP UNDANG- UNDANG DASAR 1945 Lailam, Tanto
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 21, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study is about interpretation of constitution, this study is based on the extent authority of the Constitutional Court on the  interpretation of  the constitution,  including various verdicts that are considered as controversial.The result of the study shows that Constitution 1945 giving authority of the constitution  interpretation of the Constitutional Court to evaluate the conflict of  legal norm, this could be meant that the Constitutional Court is “the guardian of  the constitution and the sole interpreting of constitution” and as the legitimate interpreter of  the constitution.  Some  interesting  in implementing  the  interpretation of  the constitution as a  standard  toevaluate  the conflict of  legal norm, consists of: First, essentially,  that the  interpretation of  the constitution  is one of the ways to elaborate understandings contained in constitution text. Second, related to the independence and the  freedom of judge in using an interpretation method which  is not  regulated by positive  law, therefore the judge is  free to use those interpretation methods which are appropriate with the conviction of the Justice. Justice  in  using  the  interpretation method  doesn’t  only  have  function  as  funnel of  the  act,  but  also  has functioned as the funnel of justice since a judge is required the value of the law and the sense of justice which exists in the society (substantial justice). Refer to  the theory of living constitution, therefore Constitution 1945 should be  understood  as  a  constitution which has  textual  and  contextual  dimention  Third,  the  restriction  in using the interpretation method, the constitutional judge couldn’t only focused into the originalism interpretation method which  only  based  to  original  intent  /  the  formulation  of  Constitution  1945  or  using  the  other interpretations  (non  originalist) which oppositely  those  interpretation  the 1945  Constitution doesn’t work according to system and/ or contended with  the main idea underlying the constitution itself entirely  related to the  purpo  se  that would  like  to be  realized.  Fourth,  the  use of  interpretation method  should  be  able  to  be accounted to  the publics, therefore the validity could be examined  in certain cases. This is very essential to dosince Constitutional Court has an extent interpretation authority so that it could keep justice of Constitutional Court  to avoid it from misuse of authority  in interpreting of 1945 Constitution.
Implikasi Pengujian Undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mewujudkan Maqashid Syari’ah Nur Wijayanti, Septi; Lailam, Tanto
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 25, No 2, December 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2018.0115.202-216

Abstract

This research is about the implications of constitutional review by Constitutional Court in realizing maqashid sharia backgrounded by the ambiguity of whether or not to use the maqashid syariah as a benchmark in constitutional review. The research is to observe the use of maqashid syariah as a benchmark and the implications of the legal system in Indonesia. The method used is normative legal research focusing on several decisions of Constitutional Court. The results of the study show that the Constitutional Court accommodates maqashid sharia. Based on the analysis of Constitutional Court Verdict Number 2-3/ PUU-V/2007, Verdict Number 12/PUU-V/2007, Verdict Number 68/PUU-XII/2014, Verdict Number 85/PUU-XI/2013 show that in constitutional review, the Constitutional Court uses the maqashid syariah as a benchmarks (in the framework of  Pancasila) in line with the idealization of Baldatun Thayyibatun wa Rabbun Ghafur meant to maqashid syariah focusing on maintaining the benefit of religion/din, maintaining the benefit of the soul/nafs, maintaining the benefit of reason/aql, maintaining the benefit of descendants/nasl, and maintaining the benefit of wealth/mal) has been accommodated and applied in constitutional review. The implication is that maqashid sharia becomes one of benchmarks in constitutional review and the Constitutional Court can intepret the contextualization of maqashid sharia in various cases.
Implikasi Pengujian Undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mewujudkan Maqashid Syari’ah Nur Wijayanti, Septi; Lailam, Tanto
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 25, No 2, December 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2018.0115.202-216

Abstract

This research is about the implications of constitutional review by Constitutional Court in realizing maqashid sharia backgrounded by the ambiguity of whether or not to use the maqashid syariah as a benchmark in constitutional review. The research is to observe the use of maqashid syariah as a benchmark and the implications of the legal system in Indonesia. The method used is normative legal research focusing on several decisions of Constitutional Court. The results of the study show that the Constitutional Court accommodates maqashid sharia. Based on the analysis of Constitutional Court Verdict Number 2-3/ PUU-V/2007, Verdict Number 12/PUU-V/2007, Verdict Number 68/PUU-XII/2014, Verdict Number 85/PUU-XI/2013 show that in constitutional review, the Constitutional Court uses the maqashid syariah as a benchmarks (in the framework of  Pancasila) in line with the idealization of Baldatun Thayyibatun wa Rabbun Ghafur meant to maqashid syariah focusing on maintaining the benefit of religion/din, maintaining the benefit of the soul/nafs, maintaining the benefit of reason/aql, maintaining the benefit of descendants/nasl, and maintaining the benefit of wealth/mal) has been accommodated and applied in constitutional review. The implication is that maqashid sharia becomes one of benchmarks in constitutional review and the Constitutional Court can intepret the contextualization of maqashid sharia in various cases.