Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

Hermeneutika Hadis Muhammad Syahrur dan Kedudukan Nabi dalam Hukum Islam Sa'adah, Hitna Bis; Masruhan, Masruhan
el Buhuth: Borneo Journal of Islamic Studies el Buhuth: Borneo Journal of Islamic Studies, 8(2), December 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (Center for Research and Community Services), Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/el-buhuth.v8i2.10723

Abstract

This article discusses Muhammad Syahrur's hermeneutical approach in understanding hadith and its implications for the position of the Prophet Muhammad in the Islamic legal system. Syahrur, as a contemporary Syrian thinker, offers a rational and contextual approach to religious texts, including hadith, which have been positioned as the main source of law after the Qur'an. In his hermeneutical framework, Syahrur distinguishes between “nusus” (text) and “fahm” (understanding), and emphasizes the importance of contextual reading of hadith by considering the times and social realities. He views that the authority of the Prophet as the bearer of revelation is limited in a particular historical context, so that not all actions of the Prophet are automatically binding as the basis of universal law. This view raises a critical discourse on the authority of hadith in the construction of Islamic law and opens a wider space for ijtihad for Muslims today. The article also examines the responses to Shahrur's ideas, both from supporters of Islamic thought reform and from those who maintain the traditional approach. In doing so, it seeks to contribute to the contemporary discourse on the methodology of understanding hadith and the role of the Prophet in the modern Islamic legal system.
Antara Teks dan Realitas : Analisis Hadist Pernikahan Beda Agama dalam Konteks Pluralisme di Indonesia Ulinnuha Abdurrahman; Masruhan Masruhan; Nurlailatul Musyafaah
Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal Vol. 8 No. 5 (2026): RESLAJ: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/reslaj.v8i5.10563

Abstract

Marriage is a crucial social and religious institution in Indonesia's plural society, where Islamic Sharia strongly emphasizes the importance of shared faith (aqidah) between spouses. Normatively, the Qur’an and hadiths provide strict limitations on the practice of interfaith marriage due to concerns about serious problems in aspects of worship, child education, and the integrity of the family's faith. In the context of Indonesian positive law, although Law No. 1 of 1974 states that the validity of marriage depends on respective religious laws, there was briefly a legal loophole allowing the registration of interfaith marriages, which was subsequently affirmed closed by the Supreme Court. This article examines this issue through Normative Legal Research using a philological approach to the Prophet’s hadiths such as the story of Sayyidah Zainab and the athar (narration) from Ibn Umar and linking it to the context of pluralism and positive law in Indonesia. The analysis shows that the provision in the hadith about the marriage of Sayyidah Zainab and Abu al-‘Ash was abrogated (mansukh) after the revelation of the verses Al-Baqarah 221 and Al-Ma’idah 5, and the athar of Ibn Umar affirms the prohibition of marrying women of the People of the Book, reflecting a spirit of caution in safeguarding family faith. The results of this study affirm that both Islamic Sharia and state law especially through SEMA No. 2 of 2023 are aligned in rejecting interfaith marriage. Thus, pluralism in Indonesia is interpreted as affirming peaceful coexistence without sacrificing one's religious identity, making interfaith marriage a theological, legal, and socio-cultural problem that must be avoided.
Epistemologi Hermeneutika Hadis Kontemporer: Dialektika Otoritas Teks dan Kontekstualisasi dalam Pemikiran Khaled M. Abou El-Fadl dan Yusuf al-Qaradawi Nur Annisa Istifarin; Masruhan Masruhan
Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal Vol. 8 No. 7 (2026): RESLAJ: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/reslaj.v8i7.12432

Abstract

The development of contemporary hadith studies has demonstrated a paradigmatic shift from textual approaches toward more contextual and hermeneutical perspectives. In this regard, Khaled M. Abou El-Fadl and Yusuf al-Qaradawi represent two influential scholars who offer distinct epistemological models for understanding hadith. This study aims to analyze and compare the epistemology of hadith hermeneutics developed by both scholars, particularly concerning the relationship between textual authority and contextualization. Employing a qualitative method through library research and comparative analysis, this study examines the primary works of the two figures. The findings reveal that Khaled M. Abou El-Fadl advances a negotiative hermeneutics that views meaning as the product of interaction among the author, the text, and the reader, thereby preventing authoritarian interpretations. In contrast, Yusuf al-Qaradawi develops a hadith interpretation framework grounded in maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, asbāb al-wurūd, and the distinction between legislative (tashrī‘iyyah) and non-legislative (ghayr tashrī‘iyyah) Sunnah to maintain the relevance of hadith across changing social contexts. The study finds that the primary difference between the two scholars lies in their respective conceptions of textual authority and the scope of contextualization, although both seek to ensure the continued relevance of hadith in modern Muslim societies. This research contributes to contemporary hadith hermeneutics by providing a comparative mapping of critical and maqāṣid-oriented interpretive models within hadith studies.
Navigating Tradition and Modernity: A Diachronic Analysis of the Methodological Rupture in Tafsīr al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr Habib Abdillah; Abdulaziz Saad Alqahtani; Masruhan, Masruhan; Abideen Opeyemi Yekeen
Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): JUNE
Publisher : Department of Qur'an dan Hadith Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/mutawatir.2025.15.1.188-214

Abstract

Contrary to its reputation as a unified magnum opus, Tafsīr al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr is marked by a sharp methodological rupture spanning four decades. By dismantling the prevailing synchronic readings, this study exposes the diachronic evolution of Ibn ‘Āshūr’s exegetical paradigm. Using a qualitative method, a historical approach, and maqāṣidī tafsīr analysis, this study reveals a significant shift from the tradition-based approach (tafsīr bi al-ma’thūr) to a more contextual, reflective, and goal-oriented approach to sharī‘ah (maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah). This methodological shift not only reflects Ibn ‘Āshūr’s intellectual response to the complexities of the times but also confirms the role of his tafsīr as an important work in the development of contemporary tafsīr methodologies that are adaptive, humanistic, and oriented towards problem-solving. The findings of this study confirm that Tafsīr al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr is not only a significant work of modern exegesis but also an important foundation in the formation of a tafsīr paradigm that addresses the challenges of modernity without abandoning the roots of classical scientific authority. 
The Role of Digital Tools in Qur'anic Research and Tafsir: Improving Methodology and Interpretation Thon Thowi Hamdi; Masruhan Masruhan
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 12, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v12i1.9895

Abstract

The transformation of higher education, particularly in Islamic studies, necessitates innovation in learning and research. This study explores the role of digital tools in Qur'anic and Tafsir research, analyzing their impact on efficiency, accuracy, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation, involving rectors, faculty leaders, lecturers, students, and IT teams. Findings show that successful digital integration requires strong academic literacy and technology-based methodologies. Tools like corpus analysis software, AI-driven text comparison, and digital manuscripts enhance precision in analyzing Qur'anic texts, reducing processing time and enabling deeper cross-referencing. Compared to traditional methods, digital tools improve accuracy in identifying linguistic patterns and historical interpretations. Additionally, technology fosters interdisciplinary dialogue, connecting Qur'anic studies with linguistics, history, and artificial intelligence. This study underscores the importance of bridging tradition and technology, advocating for structured frameworks to optimize digital tools in Qur'an and Tafsir research. By embracing technological advancements, Islamic studies can remain relevant, innovative, and better equipped to address contemporary academic and societal challenges.