Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES WALISONGO Nadwa : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan At-Taqaddum Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism MAGHZA: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur´an dan Tafsir Riwayah : Jurnal Studi Hadis Contemporary Quran
Ahmad Musyafiq
Walisongo State Islamic University (UIN) Semarang
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Ideologi dalam Bahasa Mufasir: Analisis Marji’ al-Ḍamir pada Tafsir al-Kasysyāf Karya az-Zamakhsyari Nor Lutfi Fais; Musyafiq, Ahmad
Contemporary Quran Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga Islamic State University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/cq.v2i2.5693

Abstract

The methodology can be used in the interpretation of the Qur'an is ra’y, means ijtihad. In order to produce a correct methodologically interpretation, ra’y should be accompanied by certain requirements and methodological steps, such as knowing the rules of interpretation and linguistic sciences. Al-Kasysyaf is one of many interpretation books have been criticized by the strong ideological tendencies of its commentator. It can be seen in the interpretation of verses which have ideological content. Since Al-Zamakhsyari, the commentator, was also known by his expertise in language and literature, it raises a question, what if the verses contain ideology are not possible to be interpreted according to i’tizal when follows the rules of linguistic? This question is what the author intends to examine. This study aims to the implementation of the rule of marji‘ al-dlamir in verses mention the word man yasya’. After using both linguistic approach and theological approach to determine the direction of the interpretation produced by Al-Zamakhsyari, the study found that the rule of marji‘ al-dlamir is still applied thoroughly. However, the result of interpretation still has the nuance of i’tizal because of the takwil used by Al-Zamakhsyari.
URGENSI INTEGRASI ANTARA AHLI FIQH DAN AHLI HADIS DALAM MEMAHAMI SUNAH: Studi atas Pemikiran Syekh Muhammad al-Ghazali dalam Karyanya al-Sunah al-Nabawiyah baina Ahl al-Fiqh wa Ahl al-Hadis Hosen, Mat; Musyafiq, Ahmad
RIWAYAH Vol 5, No 2 (2019): Riwayah : Jurnal Studi Hadis
Publisher : ilmu hadis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/riwayah.v5i2.4551

Abstract

Selama ini kajian hadis lebih sering dilakukan secara terpisah oleh para ahli dengan latar belakang keilmuan yang berbeda. Perbedaan ini sering menimbulkan benturan baik dari segi metode maupun makna yang dihasilkan. Yang paling terkenal benturan terjadi antara ahli fiqih dan ahli hadis. Tulisan ini akan menganalisis elaborasi Muhammad Al-Ghazali terhadap hadis-hadis perspektif ahli hadis dan ahli fiqih. Melalui konten analisis ditemukan bahwa elaborasi yang dilakukan Ghazali dalam karyanya “al-Sunnah baina ahli al-Fiqih wa ahli al-Hadis” ada dua poin penting. Pertama, antara ahli fiqih dan ahli hadis ada perbedaan cukup mendasar dalam menganalisis sebuah hadis. Menurut Ghazali ahli fiqih lebih dominan kontekstual, sementara ahli hadis lebih dominan kepada tekstual. Kedua, dengan perbedaan di atas Ghazali berharap agar kedua belah pihak saling sapa dan bahu-membahu dalam menganalisa sebuah hadis. Meskipun pada uraiannya Ghazali menghendaki kedua belah pihak saling bekerja sama namun pada tataran operasionalnya Ghazali lebih condong pada kritik matan. Dalam hal ini tentu Ghazali cenderung terhadap metode ulama fiqih sebab ulama fiqih menurut Ghazali lebih proporsional dalam menentukan keshahihan hadis.
Resolusi Konflik Nabi Muhammad SAW pada Peletakan Hajar Aswad Darsini, Darsini; Musyafiq, Ahmad; Hilalinnisa, Khuriyatul; Mustaqim, Afif
AL-TAHRIR Vol 25 No 1 (2025): Islamic Studies
Publisher : IAIN Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/altahrir.v25i1.9869

Abstract

This article discusses the conflict resolution by Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) in the case of the placement of the Black Stone, an important event before his prophethood. Through the perspective of conflict resolution theory, this study aims to explore how Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) successfully resolved the dispute between the Quraysh tribes. This research is a literature study employing a qualitative analysis model to interpret the actions of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) in resolving the conflict over the placement of the Black Stone. The analysis indicates that Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) applied an approach reflecting the principles of effective conflict resolution, such as neutrality, a deep understanding of the conflicting parties, justice, and creativity in finding solutions. This study also reflects on the relevance of Prophet Muhammad's (PBUH) approach in contemporary conflict resolution. The theoretical implications of this study enrich conflict resolution scholarship by integrating Islamic perspectives into modern theoretical frameworks while affirming that Islamic teachings through the Quran and the exemplary practices of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) provide a holistic foundation for sustainable conflict resolution.
Partial and Comprehensive Understanding: An Analysis of the Interpretation of the Ḥadīṡ of Riddah Punishment Nabih Zaky Al-Fikri, M.; Musyafiq, Ahmad; Rochmawati, Nikmah
JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/quhas.v14i1.43095

Abstract

Ḥadīṡ regarding the punishment of riddah is often debated because partial understandings tend to cause misunderstandings, such as the view that Islam does not provide freedom of religion. A partial understanding of the ḥadīṡ of riddah punishment is often considered contrary to the values of Islamic justice and creates a negative perception of Islamic teachings in modern society. This study aims to analyze the difference between partial and comprehensive approaches in understanding the ḥadīṡ about riddah punishment. Using a qualitative method based on library research, this study examines primary and secondary literature through a descriptive-analytical approach. The study results show that the partial approach tends to ignore other related ḥadīṡ, socio-historical contexts, and maqāsid asy-syarī’ah principles, resulting in rigid interpretations. Instead, a comprehensive approach emphasizes the importance of understanding ḥadīṡ in the context of maqāsid asy-syarī’ah, such as maintaining societal stability and religious freedom. This study recommends using a comprehensive approach to understanding the ḥadīṡ considered controversial, so their interpretation is more relevant to the principles of justice and humanity in Islam, especially in the modern era that upholds the value of freedom.
Co-Authors Azhar, Fakhrijal Ali Darsini . . Hilalinnisa, Khuriyatul Hosen, Mat Mustaqim, Afif Nabih Zaky Al-Fikri, M. Nikmaturrahmah, Nikmaturrahmah Nor Lutfi Fais Nuri, Nafisatun Rochmawati, Nikmah