Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Psikologi Lingkungan: Pentingkah Untuk Dipelajari? Ayu Gigih Rizqia; Ai Siti Patimah; Arundati Shinta
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 20 No 2 (2024): JURNAL PSIKOLOGI
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Proklamasi 45

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT The more advanced a civilization, the more pollution threatens human life. This is because progress also produces goods that are increasingly difficult to decompose in nature. However, pollution occurs more because of human behavior than technology. Behavior that does not care about the environment will worsen environmental quality. Advanced technologies can actually also produce ways to neutralize pollution. Unfortunately, technological advances in presenting machines that neutralize pollution tend to be slower than the formation of behavior. Therefore, it is necessary to think about children up to students need to study environmental psychology. Keywords: Pollution, Environmental Psychology.
Hubungan Antara Sikap dan Perilaku Mengelola Sampah Pada Mahasiswa yang Tinggal di Rumah Pondok di Kabupaten Sleman Yogyakarta Kanza Gatand Viesyszico; Arundati Shinta; Amin Al Adib
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 21 No 1 (2025): JURNAL PSIKOLOGI
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Proklamasi 45

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30588/jpsi.v21i1.2172

Abstract

Students who have studied environmental science should be able to manage their waste properly. However, in reality, there are still many students who litter and do not manage their waste. This study aims to empirically prove the relationship between Attitude and Waste Management Behavior among boarding house students in Sleman Regency. The population in this study was students who studied environmental science and lived in boarding houses in Sleman Regency. The sample used was 100 students. The sampling technique used was Snowball Sampling. Data collection in this study used 2 scales, namely the Waste Management Behavior Scale and the Attitude Scale. This research is a type of quantitative research. Data analysis in this research is correlation test and regression test. The correlation coefficient of Attitude towards Waste Management Behavior is 0.116. The results of this study indicate that there is no positive relationship between attitudes and waste management behavior among dormitory students in Sleman Regency.
Hubungan Antara Kepedulian Terhadap Lingkungan dengan Perilaku Menyisakan Makanan pada Konsumen Angkringan X di Yogyakarta Sri Ayu; Arundati Shinta; Femmy Lekahena
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 22 No 1 (2026): JURNAL PSIKOLOGI
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Proklamasi 45

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30588/jpsi.v22i1.2292

Abstract

This research aims to determine the relationship between concern for the environment and the behavior of leaving food among angkringan consumers. There are two hypotheses proposed, namely: the first hypothesis is that there is a negative relationship between concern for the environment and food waste behavior. The second hypothesis is that there is a negative relationship between concern for the environment and the behavior of the amount of food waste produced. The research method used in this research is a quantitative method, with research subjects being 100 angkringan X consumers with the criteria for consumers who eat at angkringan, status (student or employee). Data collection was carried out by modifying the food waste behavior scale which has a reliability figure of 0.718 and a scale for the amount of waste produced. Meanwhile, the environmental concern scale has a reliability figure of 0.910. The data that has been analyzed shows that there is a negative relationship between concern for the environment and behavior of leaving food (r = -0.348, p = 0.000) and an effective contribution of 12.1%, the first hypothesis is accepted. Furthermore, the results show that there is a negative relationship between concern for the environment and the behavior of the amount of food waste produced (r = -0.300, p = 0.001) and an effective contribution of 9%, the second hypothesis is accepted.